logo
Insights from Liberty's 2024 claims statistics: a closer look at health trends and financial protection

Insights from Liberty's 2024 claims statistics: a closer look at health trends and financial protection

IOL News28-05-2025

Liberty has announced a substantial increase in claims payouts for 2024, totalling R7.35 billion, with insights into health trends and the importance of risk protection for policyholders.
Image: IOL
Liberty has revealed its claims payouts for 2024, showing a significant increase in benefits paid to policyholders and their families. The majority of claims came from the insurer's flagship retail cover, Lifestyle Protector, which paid out a total of R7.35 billion to 28,889 individuals and beneficiaries. On average, each claimant or their family received R260,000 over the year.
According to Liberty, its Corporate Benefits also made substantial payments, with R2.6 billion going to 11,198 individuals. Claims from Liberty's funeral and credit life products, some of which are sold via Standard Bank, contributed a further R1.99 billion to the total payout.
The insurer's annual Claim Statistics offer insights into health trends, economic challenges, underinsurance, and industry shifts, highlighting the tangible value of Liberty's risk protection products.
'Our personal risk claim payouts show an increase of 11.8% from 2023. This demonstrates our range of risk protection benefits and the true value delivered by insurance and corporate benefits in a time when South Africans are overburdened by life's challenges. The payouts provide those affected and their families with financial resources to navigate adversity with confidence in their most vulnerable moments. This assistance goes a long way towards protecting what matters most,' says Mark Barberini, head of comprehensive life solutions at Liberty.
Across Liberty's Lifestyle Protector range, it said there was notable growth in claims across all major categories. Life Protection payouts increased by 9.5% to R5.5 billion, Lifestyle Protection surged by 20.4% to R1.2 billion, while lump-sum Income Protection claims climbed by 18.5% to R507 million. Monthly income protection claims rose by 11.6% to R267.3 million. Although life claims made up the bulk of payments, the increase in claims under Lifestyle Protection benefits suggests that people are surviving longer with critical illnesses.
Early detection and quicker access to treatment have played a role in this trend, reinforcing the need for living benefits and frequent preventative medical screenings. 'Insights like these point to a need for more comprehensive lifestyle protection cover, as death and unexpected medical diagnoses are not the only risks that can have a significant effect on your family and lifestyle. Unexpected life events, such as retrenchment, can also have a serious impact,' says Andrew Methmann, Liberty's chief specialist for Risk Pricing.
As anticipated, the group says most claims came from older clients, with the average age at claim being 60 for women and 64 for men. However, 25% of male claimants were under 55, while 35% of female claimants were younger than 55.'With 2.2% of claims coming from individuals under the age of 35, it is evident that death, disability, and critical illness can affect anyone, regardless of age, and happen unexpectedly. It is important to encourage younger people to take out cover while they are still young and also in better health, potentially making their risk cover cheaper,' Methmann says.
According to the group, in 2024, men accounted for 64.8% of overall claims, while women made up 35.2%. Liberty's client base is nearly evenly split between genders, yet a larger proportion of male clients are older, making them more likely to claim. Cancer remained the leading cause of claims, accounting for 31.2% overall, followed by cardiovascular disorders (22.3%), respiratory disorders (5.8%), musculoskeletal disorders (5.5%), and nervous system disorders (5.3%). Among women, cancer caused 37.2% of claims compared to 27.9% for men.
'The higher prevalence of cancer among women can be attributed to the high incidence of breast cancer among South African women. Notably, 46.9% of cancer-related claims submitted by women were for this specific form of the disease. For men, the most common cancer was prostate cancer, accounting for 31.9% of male cancer claims,' says Liberty's chief medical officer, Dr Reinhardt Erasmus.
Musculoskeletal disorders were the primary cause of income protection claims, making up 22.7%, followed by cancer at 16% and retrenchment at 9.9%. Chief specialist for Liberty's lifestyle protector cover, Kresantha Pillay, notes that while retrenchment claims declined in 2024, the importance of income protection remains critical.
'In 2024, most retrenchment claims occurred in the 35 to 44 age band, with 38.6% of claimants being female and 16.8% male. Overall, 64.4% of retrenchment claims were from women, whilst 35.6% were from men. This reveals a stark contrast in retrenchment claim trends, showing that in 2024, women filed nearly twice as many retrenchment claims as men. This signals a troubling imbalance in job security and underscores the critical need for income protection among women, highlighting the urgency for them to explore tailored financial solutions and safeguards,' says Pillay.
Gauteng recorded the highest number of retrenchment claims at 47.5%, followed by the Western Cape at 28.7% and KwaZulu-Natal at 14.9%. Serious mental disorder claims made up 2.8% of all retail claims, with 51.1% of these being life protection claims. Tragically, suicide accounted for the majority of these. Liberty paid out over R1.3 billion in funeral claims, assisting 80,345 families in honouring their loved ones, the group says.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mango airline sale: SAA to receive nominal fee as new owners emerge
Mango airline sale: SAA to receive nominal fee as new owners emerge

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Mango airline sale: SAA to receive nominal fee as new owners emerge

State-owned Mango appears to be a step closer to the skies again, four years after the low-cost airline was grounded in July 2021. Image: File The sale of grounded state-owned low-cost airline Mango is being finalised and its current owners, SA Airways (SA), are likely to receive a nominal fee of about R1 000. Business rescue practitioner Sipho Sono this week said there was no reason why SAA should not sign the sale of shares agreement because the sale was approved even though the matter had to go to court to force the decision. 'That decision has already been taken. We don't know why its taken SAA long to comment on the sale of shares agreement but at least now there is some movement,' he explained. Sono said SAA appointed lawyers advising the national carrier to review and conclude the agreement. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'So it looks like we are moving in the right direction. The value that goes to SAA is nominal, they are not getting anything. Their shares will be sold at next to nothing, let's say a R1,000,' he added. Sono expressed confidence that the rest is more the language of the agreement and nothing of substance will change. Mango's new owners are expected to lease aircraft, according to Sono. 'The investor will be buying the intellectual property, the brand, which is Mango, and the loyal customer base, which previously had a good experience with Mango. The planes and so forth would be leased independently so there are no planes to be sold,' he said. Sono said Mango has to be sold and it has to be privatised as it may no longer be owned by SAA. 'It will be sold to a private investor whose details we have not officially released. We will only do so once all the relevant agreements have been signed,' he further stated. Sono said the investor has also reviewed the agreement and once it is signed the investor will be announced but timelines for the restart of Mango have not been finalised. 'We are busy with trying to conclude a transaction that will then allow the investor to finalise its own business plan. The timelines and the dates will be announced in the future,' he said. At the start of the business rescue process, there were 55,000 unflown customers, which is about R180 million in value. Sono said some of the customers have been refunded by their banks, where if a passenger bought a ticket with their credit card they are allowed to claim back from the bank within 30 days or so. In addition, there are a number of customers who may have opted for bank refunds and some of them may have been refunded by Mango's pervious travel partners. Sono said customers are no different from other creditors but they have been prioritised to receive the full value of their unflown tickets. 'Customers are getting good value, assuming we finalise the transaction and Mango restarts soon enough,' he said. However, if the sale is not concluded, customers will be treated the same way as other creditors and will be paid a dividend, which is a fraction of what they paid for their tickets.

How to maximise your tax-free savings account for long-term wealth
How to maximise your tax-free savings account for long-term wealth

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

How to maximise your tax-free savings account for long-term wealth

Discover how to effectively utilise your Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA) to reduce your tax burden and enhance your long-term financial strategy. Image: Freepik Many South Africans are looking to reduce their tax burden and improve overall tax efficiency, and one of the most effective tools available is the Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA). With an annual contribution limit of R36,000 and no tax on interest, dividends, or capital gains, the TFSA offers significant long-term benefits – although it's important to ensure that you align your TFSA with your broader investment strategy. Here's how to get the most from your tax-free savings. Use your tax-free allowance wisely: The TFSA has become a key component of long-term financial planning because all income and growth earned within the structure, including interest, dividends, and capital gains, are tax-free. Note, however, that contributions are made with after-tax income, and no tax deduction is available on contributions such as in the case of retirement fund contributions. While it, therefore, makes sense to first maximise your retirement fund contributions, the TFSA remains an exceptional long-term investment vehicle. Think long-term from the start: The tax benefit in the early years of a TFSA is fairly small, with the compounding tax savings only becoming meaningful after about a decade. With this in mind, a TFSA is best suited to long-term investing and is not ideal for an emergency fund. It can, however, be used to supplement retirement savings or to meet other long-term goals, such as funding a child's tertiary education. Structure your contributions to suit your cash flow: Legislation permits annual TFSA contributions of up to R36,000 with a lifetime limit of R500,000, with most providers allowing flexible contribution options for investors depending on their personal circumstances. For instance, if your income is variable, you can set up a modest debit order and top it up when additional income becomes available, thereby allowing you to consistently build wealth without placing strain on your budget. Understand the implications of withdrawals: While it is possible to withdraw from your TFSA at any time, it's important to understand the consequences because withdrawals can reduce your lifetime contribution capacity. For example, if you've contributed R300,000 towards your TFSA and withdraw R50,000, you may only contribute another R200,000 in the future, regardless of whether you replace the R50,000 later. Importantly, withdrawals not only reduce your tax-free limit but can also interrupt the compounding growth within the investment. Match your investment to your time horizon: When selecting the underlying investment for your TFSA, consider how long you intend to stay invested. If you're investing for your child's education 15 to 20 years from now, or to supplement retirement income, your investment horizon may be long enough to justify growth assets. Having said that, it's important to balance return expectations with your risk tolerance. Also, remember that individuals under 65 already enjoy a tax exemption of R23,800 per year on interest earned (R34,500 if over 65), so using your TFSA to invest in low-yielding interest-bearing assets might not be the most efficient use of your tax-free allowance. Choose an efficient investment platform: There are numerous TFSA providers in South Africa, ranging from banks to investment platforms. While fixed-term accounts and money market funds are available, those with a long investment horizon should consider a more aggressive unit trust portfolio to harness better growth over time. Ideally, select a platform that provides consolidated reporting across your retirement and discretionary investments, so that your TFSA integrates seamlessly into your overall strategy. Avoid over-contributions and penalties: It's important to ensure that you stay within your R36,000 annual limit, as any contributions above this will attract a penalty tax of 40% from Sars, regardless of your personal income tax bracket. If you have more than one TFSA, be sure to track contributions carefully to avoid exceeding the threshold and incurring avoidable penalties. Stay compliant with Sars: Even though no tax is payable within a TFSA, you are still required to disclose the investment on your tax return. Your provider will issue a tax certificate, and it's important to include all TFSA-related information when filing with Sars. Maintaining transparency ensures compliance and helps avoid any administrative issues. A TFSA can be a powerful tool for building long-term wealth, provided it is used strategically, managed consistently, and integrated into your broader financial plan. * Odendaal is an associate financial planner at Crue Invest. PERSONAL FINANCE

Court orders wife to adjust her lavish lifestyle amid divorce proceedings
Court orders wife to adjust her lavish lifestyle amid divorce proceedings

IOL News

time4 hours ago

  • IOL News

Court orders wife to adjust her lavish lifestyle amid divorce proceedings

The Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, told a divorcing woman to tighten her belt as she made financial demands from her husband pending their divorce Image: File An elderly woman who is in the process of divorcing her husband was advised by the court to tighten her belt as she can no longer live the lavish life she is used to since she and her husband had parted ways. The woman turned to the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, in a bid for her husband to increase the monthly maintenance he is paying her, pending their divorce. Apart from the nearly R54,000 a month she is demanding from him, she also insisted that he pay all her other expenses, such as her gym membership and furnishing her new home. The husband said his company mostly paid for her luxuries in the past, but the now cash-strapped company had been sold, and the money had dried up. He suggested that the wife curb her expenses and tone down her lavish spending, which the court agreed with. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The applicant (wife) and the respondent (husband) were married to each other in community of property in 2012, but the wife instituted divorce proceedings last year. Both are in their late 60s. The wife asked for an order forcing her husband to pay her R53,800 per month, and that, additionally, he should continue to pay all her direct expenses. These included R6,800 a month for the domestic worker, the wife's medical aid premiums, her car's premiums and maintenance, as well as her gym membership. Apart from this, she wants him to pay for the monthly lease of a townhouse selected by her, as well as a one-off contribution towards appliances and related household items to furnish her home in the sum of R193,000. Finally, she wants R1 million from him towards her legal costs in the divorce proceedings. The respondent contends that he does not have the means to pay the exorbitant amounts claimed from him by the applicant, who, according to the respondent, is living beyond her means. The applicant, so the respondent contends, is insisting on a lifestyle that was sustained by his company, which in recent times had fallen on hard times, making it necessary for them, as a family, to tighten the proverbial belt. The respondent tendered a cash payment of R28,700 per month, to include the applicant's Audi A3 instalment and its maintenance limited to R4,000 per month. He also agrees to pay for the domestic worker as well as to pay the R1,500 a month towards her gym membership. The claim by the applicant for payment of R193,000 for household accessories is also rejected by the respondent, who made it clear he also cannot afford to pay for her monthly rental.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store