logo
The 12 Worst Chain Restaurant Recalls And Outbreaks In History

The 12 Worst Chain Restaurant Recalls And Outbreaks In History

Yahoo22-05-2025

News reports of product recalls and food poisoning outbreaks have become so commonplace in the 21st century, it's enough to make anyone a little paranoid. For chain restaurants, troubles surrounding these unsavory topics have been decades in the making. Sometimes, the lack of food safety regulations were the reason why hordes of restaurant goers wound up getting seriously ill after visiting a local chain. In other instances, a shoddily made plastic toy thrown into a fast food kid's meal bag could result in a humongous recall — or even the death of a child.
These scenarios affect fast-casual sit-down chains and fast-food joints alike. What these businesses have in common is that they operate on a very large scale, and that involves trusting a whole lot of food growers, product distributors, and other commercial manufacturers. When the level of demand is that high, the chances of something going wrong increase as well.
In the U.S., federal organizations like the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are tasked with making sure that businesses aren't selling contaminated foods or faulty goods. The recalls and outbreaks we'll look at here demonstrate times when those systems failed, and people's wellbeing hung in the balance.
Read more: 15 Frozen Onion Rings, Ranked From Worst To Best
One of the most legendary fast food burgers was embroiled in disaster in fall 2024. Slivered yellow onions used on McDonald's Quarter Pounder burgers were behind an outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 that infected at least 104 people in 14 states. A total of 34 people were hospitalized. Four people who ate the contaminated onions developed hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), a condition that damages blood vessels and can cause kidney failure. An older individual in Colorado died.
On October 22, 2024, Taylor Farms, the company that supplied McDonald's with the onions, recalled 17,995 cases. McDonald's stopped putting onions on Quarter Pounders in the states that had been affected by the E. coli outbreak. Some locations stopped selling Quarter Pounders altogether. Meanwhile, Taylor Farms warned its other food service customers not to use the onions on any of their menu items. Taylor Farms' raw yellow onions were only distributed to food service retailers and were not available to the general public in grocery stores.
Taylor Farms provided more onions to McDonald's than any other restaurant, but other chains were also affected. Burger King, KFC, and Pizza Hut removed onions from select locations in response to the Taylor Farms recall. CNN reported that the E. coli outbreak led to a 10% drop in McDonald's visits nationwide and a 33% drop in Colorado. The fast food giant has invested $100 million in advertising in an effort to regain the public's trust.
Since 1958, IHOP has lured in customers who are looking for a tasty, comforting American meal. In late 2023, customers got something from IHOP they didn't order ... salmonella poisoning. In October 2023, three IHOP customers who dined at the Bellevue, Washington location came down with the same strain of salmonellosis. When inspectors from Public Health Seattle King County (PHSKC) visited the Bellevue IHOP in January 2024, they weren't able to determine where the salmonella bacteria had come from.
In February 2024, another IHOP customer became sick after dining at the Bellevue restaurant and PHSKC returned to take environmental samples. One of the samples tested positive for Salmonella Thompson, the same salmonella strain identified in the ill individuals. The Bellevue IHOP was temporarily closed multiple times so that deep cleaning could be performed. PHSKC identified 32 people who were infected with Salmonella Thompson between October 2023 and August 2024 — 22 of them had eaten at the same IHOP.
Health inspectors linked the IHOP outbreak to Gills Onions that had been recalled nationwide in October 2023 due to being contaminated by Salmonella Thompson. The recall accounted for 716,997 pounds of diced onions. Although the Bellevue IHOP discarded these onions, the bacteria was still present on multiple surfaces in the restaurant. The CDC has since declared the outbreak over and as of May 2025, the Bellevue IHOP is open.
Milkshakes are definitely a cheat day favorite, but nobody who indulges in one deserves to die. Sadly, that was the ill-gotten fate of three people who drank milkshakes from a Frugals restaurant in Tacoma, Washington. The regional budget-friendly chain is known for its old-timey, diner-style appearance and the retro fare to match. Burgers, fries and milkshakes are Frugals specialties ... well, not so much the milkshake part anymore. Frugals' milkshake-making legacy is forever tainted by the deadly listeria outbreak that stemmed from the Tacoma location in summer 2023.
Six people were hospitalized after contracting listeriosis — a serious foodborne illness associated with frozen and perishable foods — after consuming milkshakes from the Tacoma Frugals. Upon learning this, officials from the Washington State Department of Health set out to investigate what was going on behind the counter. What they found was two ice cream machines that were not properly cleaned, creating an environment in which listeria monocytogenes could thrive. Milkshake samples collected from the machines tested positive for the same strain of listeria that had sickened the hospitalized individuals.
Since the listeria outbreak was the result of negligence at the Frugals location, a product recall wasn't necessary, however, the Frugals in Tacoma stopped using the unsanitary milkshake machines on August 8, 2023. The six individuals who fell ill were between the ages of 40 and 70. All had underlying conditions that made them more vulnerable to the dangers of listeriosis, but only half survived.
The questionably-named Oriental Chicken Salad from Applebee's was at the center of a public health investigation in July 2014, when it was discovered that customers were leaving the restaurant with food poisoning. Officials from the Minnesota Department of Health began looking into 15 confirmed cases involving a strain of E. coli O111 that was uncommon in the U.S. Through interviews, they learned that 12 of the 14 individuals had dined at a nearby Applebee's. Nine Minnesota Applebee's locations and one Wisconsin location were named during the interviews. Many interviewees also stated that they had ordered the Oriental Chicken Salad.
Investigators determined that green whole head cabbage used in Applebee's Oriental Chicken Salad was the likely source of contamination. This prompted Applebee's to temporarily remove it and other cabbage-containing items from the menu. The Minnesota Department of Health believed that the cabbage was tainted prior to entering the restaurants and narrowed its traceback search to a handful of regional cabbage suppliers, including Jack's Produce.
Four of the individuals infected with E. coli required hospitalization. The FDA performed testing at some of the regional farms that may have played a role in the E. coli outbreak, but no recalls for cabbage were ever initiated. In August 2014, the first lawsuit against Applebee's in regard to the contaminated cabbage was filed.
Between June and July 2013, Olive Garden and Red Lobster were implicated in a food poisoning outbreak that made hundreds of people sick. This time, the usual suspects -- salmonella, E. coli, and listeria -- weren't to blame. The culprit was cyclospora, a one-celled parasite that infects the intestinal lining. Health authorities investigating a rise in cyclosporiasis cases in Iowa and Nebraska traced the outbreak's origin to salad mix served at Olive Garden and Red Lobster restaurants in both states. The contaminated mix was grown by Taylor Farms de Mexico.
Taylor Farms CEO, Bruce Taylor stated that in June 2013 alone, its Mexican facility produced 48 million salad servings, but the farm's state-of-the-art water-testing equipment hadn't detected any signs of cyclospora. The mix was sold in thousands of restaurants in the Midwest and Eastern U.S. By August 2013, cyclosporiasis had sickened 418 people across 16 states. It was unclear whether the origin of all the reported illnesses were the same.
Salad mix at Olive Garden and Red Lobster wasn't recalled because state health officials assessed that the contaminated batches were no longer in the food supply. The FDA investigated Taylor Farms' Mexico facility and found that the hand-washing system for the growers was a potential source for cross-contamination. As 2013 drew to a close, over 60 lawsuits had been filed against Darden Corporation, which owns Olive Garden and Red Lobster, and Taylor Farms de Mexico due to the outbreak.
While Taco Bell locations on the East Coast weathered an outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 in November and December 2006, Taco John's was experiencing a near-identical catastrophe in the Upper Midwest. The statistics of Taco John's E. coli outbreak were concerning: 81 reported illnesses and 26 hospitalizations. In the face of federal lawsuits filed by E. coli victims and waning trust in the Taco John's brand, the company's CEO, Paul Fisherkeller stated that Taco John's insurer was willing to pay the medical bills of those who were sickened from eating at the restaurant.
Public health officials analyzing the Taco John's outbreak pointed to shredded iceberg lettuce as the problem ingredient — just like Taco Bell. On December 14, 2006, the CDC announced a public health alert for the E. coli outbreak linked to Taco John's restaurants in Minnesota and Iowa. One day later, an environmental investigation of two growing regions in California that had supplied Taco John's lettuce were set into motion.
One of the growing regions that investigators visited was Buttonwillow in California's Central Valley. Multiple environmental samples taken from Buttonwillow were a genetic match to the strain present at Taco John's. Investigators pointed to a complex water pipe system the Buttonwillow growers shared with a nearby dairy farm that lacked manure water backflow protection, which may have caused cross-contamination between the clean and waste water supplies.
Taco Bell had a serious problem in late 2006 — several of its restaurants were serving E. coli-laced food. A total of 43 cases of E. coli O157:H7 were reported across New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. A majority of the customers who fell ill were under the age of 23. An 11-year-old boy who sustained kidney damage was one of nine people who were hospitalized. Testing of various produce items in affected locations led Taco Bell to pull green onions from all of its U.S. restaurants, despite evidence that green onions were the cause of the E. coli outbreak being less than concrete.
By December 12, 2006, the number of E. coli cases associated with Taco Bell rose to 71. The CDC, FDA, and USDA worked together to gain insight on which ingredient introduced E. coli into the restaurants. Further testing of green onions were negative for E. coli O157:H7, leading investigators to rule out onions as the contamination's cause. Instead, their analysis pointed toward shredded lettuce as a probable source.
At the time of the recall, shredded lettuce was an ingredient in 70% of Taco Bell's menu items. To minimize the outbreak, Taco Bell periodically closed 90 locations in order to thoroughly sanitize the environment and replace existing food supplies. Taco Bell tried to keep the name of its lettuce supplier under wraps, but firing Ready Pac Produce was pretty telling.
What happened at Chi-Chi's in 2003 was an outright tragedy. That November, Chi-Chi's decades-long reputation as a popular Mexican-American chain had to reckon with a devastating outbreak of hepatitis A that left around 600 people sick and three dead. Officials from the CDC and Pennsylvania Department of Health traced the virus' origin to green onions grown in Mexico. Chi-Chi's executives publicly lamented that testing nor produce-cleaning methods to ward off hepatitis A simply didn't exist. They weren't off-base. Public health authorities confirmed that the outbreak was not caused by wrongdoing on Chi-Chi's part.
Even so, the chain was saddled with one of the biggest hepatitis A outbreaks ever. In light of the outbreak, which was centered around mild salsa served at the Chi-Chi's location in Pennsylvania's Beaver Valley Mall, three green onion suppliers connected to Chi-Chi's had their shipments stopped at the border for FDA-led inspection. The outbreak's timing couldn't have been worse. On October 6, 2003, Chi-Chi's filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
The ordeal motivated the Pennsylvania Department of Health to urge anyone who had dined at the Chi-Chi's inside the Beaver Valley Mall in late October to early November to receive an Immune globulin (Ig) shot to prevent hepatitis A infection. Approximately 9,300 people associated with the outbreak primarily or secondarily received the Ig shot in November 2003. In December 2005, a broke and beaten-down Chi-Chi's settled a class action lawsuit among nearly 5,000 claimants for $800,000.
The free toys inside fast food kid's meals have caused problems over the years. For Burger King, some toys have been a source of mortal danger. In March 2001, the chain announced the recall of 400,000 "Rattling, Paddling Riverboat" toddler toys that were plonked into Kid's Meal bags between January 15 and February 13 of that year. As it turned out, the wheels on the paddling riverboat were rattling so much that they came unscrewed from the toy and make their way into innocent children's throats.
Choking hazards have long been a source of concern on the retail market, and Burger King was well-versed in these dangers before the 2001 recall. A year prior, Burger King included a Pokemon ball toy in its Kid's Meals that suffocated a toddler and killed an infant. Burger King execs claimed to have learned from the fatal incident, but its shoddy riverboat rattle wasn't matching up to executives' lip service. Ten parents issued complaints about the riverboat's faulty wheels but no injuries were reported. Burger King was quick to blame a manufacturing defect on Sassy, the toys' manufacturer.
The biggest takeaway from this recall was the need for fast food chains to disperse toys that are safe for children of all ages. By recalling the dangerous riverboats, Burger King put itself on the right side of harm reduction. It was a positive step from an industry that hasn't always held consumer safety in the highest regard.
The recall and outbreak that befell Burger King in August 1997 was one of the worst fast food recalls in history. Burger King's beef supplier Hudson Foods recalled 25 million pounds of beef due to E. coli contamination, creating a lose-lose situation for the Nebraska-based manufacturing plant and its biggest customer. Immediately after the recall announcement, around 700 Burger Kings throughout the U.S. were relegated to serving chicken, fish, ham, and BLT sandwiches for roughly two business days until a new beef merchant could be secured.
The change in suppliers turned out to be permanent. Burger King severed ties with Hudson Foods in the midst of the recall. Former Hudson Foods employees claimed the break-up was fueled by Hudson Foods cutting corners in order to fulfill Burger King's large product demand. A July 1997 E. coli outbreak in Colorado unrelated to Burger King's restaurants was what prompted the nationwide recall and ultimately closed the plant down. Shortly after the recall, Hudson Foods was merged with competitor Tyson Foods.
Burger King may have been short of beef for a while but it was spared the pain of causing innocent consumers to get sick. Hudson Foods former director of quality control, Michael Gregory, faced criminal charges for allegedly lying to the UDSA about the details of the E. coli contamination which resulted in 15 reported illnesses in Colorado. Gregory and Hudson Foods were acquitted of the charges.
1993 sparked a turning point with how chain restaurants handled food recalls and illness outbreaks. The Washington Department of Health (WDOH) began examining a cluster of illnesses associated with children who had been hospitalized with HUS, a potentially fatal kidney infection brought on by E. coli infection. It didn't take long for WDOH officials to realize that the sick children had eaten Jack in the Box hamburgers adulterated by E. coli O157:H7 bacteria.
Suspicion then turned to Jack in the Box's burger supplier Vons' Companies of California. Fecal contamination at Vons' slaughterhouse was believed to have tainted the meat the company shipped to Jack in the Box. The chain did not obligate Vons to test the meat for pathogens prior to shipment. In turn, Jack in the Box cooked the ground beef to 140 degrees — 15 degrees below the recently revised federal standard. Undercooking the bacteria-laden beef made over 700 people ill and resulted in the deaths of four children.
Jack in the Box's deadly outbreak fast-tracked the federal government's zero fecal tolerance mandate for beef carcasses. It also led to E. coli O157:H7 being officially declared as an adulterant to any food product. These initiatives incentivized meat manufacturers to employ more sanitary practices and preventive measures to keep these kinds of outbreaks at bay.
McDonald's was a trendsetter in all the wrong ways when it launched the first major recall of a kid's meal toy in 1982. The chain's oversight of safety regulations was put on blast when its Happy Meal promotion of Playmobil toys was putting children under the age of 3 in danger of choking. The plastic figurines contained small pieces that could be removed and easily swallowed by toddler-aged children, and were not up to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commision (CSPC) standards, resulting in the recall of 10 million units.
Thankfully, no reports of injury were reported in conjunction with the toys' release. Customers were given the option to return the Playmobil toys in exchange for a box of McDonld's cookies, a soft serve cone, or a refund. This early recall would prove to be a challenging lesson for McDonald's to learn, Over the years, several other Happy Meal toys would be recalled due to the choking hazards they presented.
Read the original article on Mashed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Aurora exhibit explores impact of 9/11 terror attacks: ‘It's really powerful'
Aurora exhibit explores impact of 9/11 terror attacks: ‘It's really powerful'

Chicago Tribune

time10 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Aurora exhibit explores impact of 9/11 terror attacks: ‘It's really powerful'

An exhibit focusing on the impact of the attacks on the United States on Sept. 11, 2001, is running now through Sept. 13 at the Aurora Regional Fire Museum in downtown Aurora. The exhibit called 'America United: The Days After 9/11' was created by the Children's Museum of Oak Lawn which, according to Brian Failing, executive director of the Aurora Regional Fire Museum, 'reached out to us and offered to share the exhibit.' The display features pieces from two metal beams recovered from the World Trade Center site in New York City that was attacked on Sept. 11, 2001. While the exhibit includes a timeline of the day's events, its focus is on what came after: the emotions, resilience and acts of unity that followed, according to a press release about the display. Two interactive tables prompt visitors to the exhibit to reflect on themes of compassion, community and what it means to be American, the release stated. Failing said the new exhibit is one of the most powerful the museum has ever featured. 'It puts a different spin, a different dimension on 9/11, something that really is meaningful to all of our visitors whether they were impacted by it or are too young to remember it,' Failing said. 'There's something about seeing the beams and having a conversation about that day.' The pieces of the beams themselves are not overly large, Failing said, 'but the weight is substantial.' A special welcoming ceremony was held at 2 p.m. on Monday where members of the Aurora fire and police departments escorted the exhibit to the museum, where it was received by the Aurora Fire Department Honor Guard. 'It's just so impactful seeing it and how something that we know is from the World Trade Center and seeing how it's twisted – words can't even describe it,' he said. 'It's really powerful. It really shows how important physical artifacts are to museums and just showing and remembering,' he said on Tuesday. 'For me, when this happened, I was in fourth grade and was maybe 9 years old. Yesterday I stood looking at it with my daughter who is just 3 years old and I was just thinking – I was in fourth grade and remembering where I was. It's amazing how objects can just evoke those memories.' Jim Levicki, public safety media manager and information officer for the Aurora Police Department, said the exhibit, though small, is 'awe inspiring when you see it.' 'It's pretty cool to see a piece of history,' he said. 'When I was there Monday, I turned to one of the firemen and asked, 'Were you working on 9/11?' and he said he was a high school senior. I was a police officer then and was on duty that day and this, to me, is a reminder there are people out there who don't even know what this was. It was like me reading about Pearl Harbor. 'It's important that people never forget the things that happened that day and the impact they had on the country moving forward,' Levicki added. 'Everybody just had a moment of pause when they saw it and realized what exactly it was.' As the weeks go by, Failing said he hopes that visitors will experience 'the power of artifacts and having this direct piece from history.' 'We always say, 'We will never forget,' but this is also about all the things the exhibit can convey and the stories it can tell and the conversations that can be had,' he said. The Aurora Regional Fire Museum is at 53 N. Broadway in Aurora and is open from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. Tuesday through Saturday. For more information on the exhibit, go to

‘No One Can Offer Any Hope'
‘No One Can Offer Any Hope'

Atlantic

time12 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

‘No One Can Offer Any Hope'

Every month or so I get a desperate message from a 25-year-old Afghan refugee in Pakistan. Another came just last week. I've written about Saman in the past. Because my intent today is to write about her place in the moral universe of Elon Musk and Vice President J. D. Vance, I'll compress her story to its basic details: During the Afghan War, Saman and her husband, Farhad (they requested pseudonyms for their own safety), served in the Afghan special forces alongside American troops. When Kabul fell in 2021, they were left behind and had to go into hiding from the Taliban before fleeing to Pakistan. There the couple and their two small children have languished for three years, burning through their limited cash, avoiding the Pakistani police and Taliban agents, seldom leaving their rented rooms—doomed if they're forced to return to Afghanistan—and all the while waiting for their applications to be processed by the United States' refugee program. No other country will provide a harbor to these loyal allies of America, who risked everything for the war effort. Our country has a unique obligation to do so. They had reached the last stage of a very long road and were on the verge of receiving U.S. visas when Donald Trump came back into office and made ending the refugee program one of his first orders of business. Now Saman and her family have no prospect of escaping the trap they're in. 'The stress and anxiety have become overwhelming,' Saman wrote to me last week. 'Every day I worry about the future of my children—what will become of them? Recently, I've developed a new health issue as well. At times, my fingers suddenly become tight and stiff—almost paralyzed—and I can't move them at all. My husband massages them with great effort until they gradually return to normal. This is a frightening and painful experience … Please, in this difficult time, I humbly ask for your help and guidance. What can I do to find a way out of these hardships?' I've brought the plight of Saman and her family to members of Congress, American activist groups, foreign diplomats, and readers of this magazine. No one can offer any hope. The family's fate is in the hands of Trump and his administration. George Packer: 'What about six years of friendship and fighting together?' And, after all, their story is just one small part of the suffering caused by this regime. A full accounting would be impossible to compile, but it already includes an estimated several hundred thousand people dead or dying of AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria because of the elimination of the U.S. Agency for International Development, as well as the starvation of refugee children in Sudan, migrants deported to a Salvadoran Gulag, and victims of domestic violence who have lost their shelter in Maine. In the wide world of the regime's staggering and gratuitous cruelty, the pain in Saman's fingers might seem too trivial to mention. But hers is the suffering that keeps arriving in my phone, the ongoing story that seems to be my unavoidable job to hear and tell. And sometimes one small drama can illuminate a large evil. Since reading Saman's latest text, I can't stop thinking about the people who are doing this to her and her family—especially about Musk and Vance. As for Trump, I find it difficult to hold him morally responsible for anything. He's a creature of appetite and instinct who hunts and feeds in a dark sub-ethical realm. You don't hold a shark morally responsible for mauling a swimmer. You just try to keep the shark at bay—which the American people failed to do. Musk and Vance function at a higher evolutionary level than Trump. They have ideas to justify the human suffering they cause. They even have moral ideas. Musk's moral idea goes by the name longtermism, which he has called 'a close match to my philosophy.' This reductio ad absurdum of utilitarianism seeks to do the greatest good for the greatest number of human beings who will ever live. By this reasoning, the fate of the hundreds of billions of as-yet-unborn people who will inhabit the planet before the sun burns it up several billion years from now is more urgent than whether a few million people die of preventable diseases this year. If killing the American aid programs that helped keep those people alive allows the U.S. government to become lean and efficient enough to fund Musk's grand project of interplanetary travel, thereby enabling human beings to live on Mars when Earth becomes uninhabitable in some distant era, then the good of humanity requires feeding those aid programs, including ones that support refugee resettlement, into the woodchipper. Refugees—except for white South Africans —aren't important enough to matter to longtermism. Its view of humanity is far too large to notice Saman, Farhad, and their children, or to understand why America might have a moral obligation to give this family a safe home. Longtermism is a philosophy with a special appeal for smart and extremely rich sociopaths. It can justify almost any amount of hubris, spending, and suffering. Sam Bankman-Fried, the cryptocurrency mogul who is serving a 25-year sentence for fraud, conspiracy, and money laundering, was a longtermist. It isn't clear that Musk, during his manic and possibly drug-addled months of power in the Trump administration, applied moral reasoning when hacking at the federal government. His erratic behavior and that of his troops in the Department of Government Efficiency seemed driven more by destructive euphoria than by philosophy. But in February, on Joe Rogan's show, Musk used the loftiest terms to explain why the cries of pain caused by his cuts should be ignored: 'We've got civilizational suicidal empathy going on. And it's like, I believe in empathy. Like, I think you should care about other people, but you need to have empathy for civilization as a whole and not commit to a civilizational suicide. The fundamental weakness of Western civilization is empathy.' Here is another category of the long view, with an entire civilization in place of the planet's future inhabitants. Musk's sphere of empathy is galactic. In its cold immensity, the ordinary human impulse to want to relieve the pain of a living person with a name and a face disappears. Vance once called himself 'a proud member of both tribes' of the MAGA coalition—techno-futurists like Musk and right-wing populists like Steve Bannon. But when Vance invokes a moral code, it's the opposite of Musk's. The scope of its commitment is as narrow and specific as an Appalachian graveyard—the cemetery in eastern Kentucky where five generations of Vances are buried and where, he told the Republican National Convention last summer, he hopes that he, his wife, and their children will eventually lie. Such a place is 'the source of America's greatness,' Vance said, because 'people will not fight for abstractions, but they will fight for their home.' Politically, this is called blood-and-soil nationalism. Religiously, Vance traces his moral code to the Catholic doctrine of ordo amoris, the proper order of love: first your family, he told Sean Hannity of Fox News, then your neighbor, your community, your nation, and finally—a distant last—the rest of humanity. But Vance's theology is as bad as his political theory. Generations of Americans fought and died for the idea of freedom in the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, World War II, and other conflicts. And Christian doctrine does not say to keep out refugees because they're not your kin. Jesus said the opposite: To refuse the stranger was to refuse him. Vance likes to cite Augustine and Aquinas, but the latter was clear about what ordo amoris does not mean: 'In certain cases, one ought, for instance, to succor a stranger, in extreme necessity, rather than one's own father, if he is not in such urgent need.' From the March 2022 issue: The betrayal It's a monstrous perversion of both patriotism and faith to justify hurting a young family who, after all they've suffered, still show courage and loyalty to Vance's country. Starting from opposite moral positions, Musk and Vance are equally indifferent to the ordeal of Saman and her family. When empathy is stretched to the cosmic vanishing point or else compressed to the width of a grave, it ceases to be empathy. Perhaps these two elites even take pleasure in the squeals of bleeding-heart humanitarians on behalf of refugees, starving children, international students, poor Americans in ill health, and other unfortunates. And that may be a core value of these philosophies: They require so much inventing of perverse principles to reach a cruel end that the pain of others begins to seem like the first priority rather than the inadvertent result. Think of the range of people who have been drawn to MAGA. It's hard to see what political ideology Elon Musk, J. D. Vance, Glenn Greenwald, Glenn Loury, Nick Fuentes, Bari Weiss, Lil Wayne, Joe Rogan, Bill Ackman, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, and Kanye West have in common. The magnetic pull is essentially negative. They all fear and loathe something more than Trump—whether it's wokeness, Palestinians, Jews, Harvard, trans people, The New York Times, or the Democratic Party—and manage to overlook everything else, including the fate of American democracy, and Saman and her family. But overlooking everything else is nihilism. Even if most Americans haven't abandoned their private sense of empathy, many don't seem terribly bothered by the rancidness of their leaders. I confess that this indifference astonishes me. It might be the ugliest effect of Trump's return—the rapid normalization of spectacular corruption, the desensitization to lawless power, the acceptance of moral collapse. Eventually it will coarsen us all.

Wayne Dawson talks about when he'll return to FOX 8
Wayne Dawson talks about when he'll return to FOX 8

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Wayne Dawson talks about when he'll return to FOX 8

CLEVELAND (WJW) – Longtime FOX 8 News in the Morning anchor Wayne Dawson is sharing a powerful message of resilience. He was declared cancer-free just weeks ago, after undergoing extensive treatment for oral cancer. Bear spotted in Trumbull County backyard The veteran broadcaster was diagnosed with oral cancer in May 2024. After a grueling year of treatment and recovery, doctors declared him in remission on May 21. 'I'm in remission and that's a blessing,' Dawson said. 'There's no sign of cancer in my body.' While the news is uplifting, Dawson acknowledged the physical toll of treatment remains. 'Still feeling the effects of chemo and radiation,' he said. 'My taste is not 100%.' One of the most visible reminders of his battle is dental: 'They pulled my teeth out to get the cancer out,' Dawson explained. 'They have to put my teeth back in.' Doctors won't be able to do that until six months after radiation, which puts his dental reconstruction timeline in late August or early September. 'And I'll admit there are some days that I'm feeling pretty good and other days I wake up and I don't really like what I see in the mirror,' he said. Despite the challenges, Dawson is focused on healing and returning to the anchor desk. 'Then after that I'm going to work very hard to get back on the news at FOX 8 News in the Morning,' he said. He's also using his platform to speak directly to others facing cancer. 'I know what you're going through. I know what you've been through,' Dawson said. 'Don't give up, don't give in.' Ground beef sold nationwide possibly contaminated with E. Coli His mantra throughout the journey has been to stay positive, a message he's extending to those still fighting. 'When you're going through this fight you have to stay positive,' he said. 'I had shirts that said 'Fight Like Wayne.' I want you to fight better than me.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store