Industry leaders call for urgent overhaul of power plant rules: 'These regulations ... threaten the reliability of the power grid'
North Carolina utility Duke Energy is the largest among 10 power companies that recently signed a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency urging the rollback of environmental rules.
The companies argued that regulations under the former government expanding federal oversight of coal ash disposal exceeded the EPA's authority and placed an undue burden on operations. They also opposed rules requiring carbon-capture technology at existing coal-fired and new gas-fired plants, saying the tech is not ready and would be too costly.
"These regulations, individually and collectively, threaten the reliability of the power grid, jeopardize national security, are a drag on economic growth, increase inflation, and hinder the expansion of electric power generation," the group wrote, per WRAL News.
Environmental advocates strongly oppose the proposal. As reported by WRAL News, they warn that rolling back safeguards would leave communities, especially those near coal ash sites, exposed to greater health risks.
Coal ash is the waste left behind when coal is burned. It contains harmful heavy metals, including arsenic and mercury, and is now classified as carcinogenic. For years, it was used as a cheap fill material in construction. Today, 72 documented sites across North Carolina hold at least 8.85 million tons of coal ash.
Although the EPA does not classify coal ash as hazardous waste, it acknowledges that improper handling poses serious health risks. Weakening federal rules could make it easier for utilities to delay cleanup and continue relying on coal and gas for power.
Even if national rules are rolled back, North Carolina's cleanup is protected under a 2020 consent order. Duke Energy must excavate 80 million tons of ash from six major sites, a process already underway.
Duke previously pleaded guilty to criminal negligence and was hit with $102 million in fines for a 2014 coal ash spill into the Dan River. The company has also faced additional enforcement under the Clean Air Act.
Current EPA rules require coal plants to retire by 2032 or install systems that cut air pollution by 90%. Industry leaders say those options are currently unrealistic.
Do you worry about air pollution in and around your home?
Yes — always
Yes — often
Yes — sometimes
No — never
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Environmental groups are urging the EPA to defend the current rules in court. They say weakening protections would reverse progress and put more people at risk.
What happens next carries real urgency. Whether the EPA holds firm may decide how long coal ash continues to shape communities across the country.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
HazardPros Announces Public Awareness Campaign for Death and Decomposition Cleanup Services in Seattle
SEATTLE, Aug. 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- HazardPros, a Washington-based biohazard remediation and hoarding cleanup company, has launched a public awareness campaign to inform residents and businesses about its specialized death cleanup and decomposition cleanup services. The effort aims to ensure that property owners know where to turn for professional assistance following traumatic or hazardous events. HazardPros: Biohazard & hoarding cleanup in Seattle. The Seattle team is trained and equipped to provide comprehensive biohazard cleanup that meets or exceeds industry standards. HazardPros technicians handle sensitive situations with discretion, compassion, and strict adherence to health and safety regulations, including OSHA and EPA guidelines. Available services include trauma scene cleanup, crime scene cleanup, hoarding cleanup, unattended death cleanup, odor removal, hazardous waste removal, and blood cleanup. 'Our priority is to respond quickly, handle every situation with care, and restore each property to a safe and sanitary condition,' said Michael Gossett of HazardPros. 'By raising awareness, we want people to know that help is available any time of day or night.' HazardPros operates 24/7, providing emergency response for residential, commercial, and public properties throughout Seattle and surrounding communities. The company uses advanced cleaning agents, proven remediation methods, and specialized equipment to eliminate biohazards, remove odors, and return affected spaces to safe use. In addition to death cleanup and decomposition cleanup, HazardPros offers support for hoarded property remediation, infectious disease decontamination, and complex hazardous waste situations. The team provides clear communication, detailed estimates, and insurance documentation to help clients navigate what is often a stressful and overwhelming process. With this awareness campaign, HazardPros aims to connect with community members, property managers, and business owners to ensure they are informed about professional cleanup options. By combining industry-standard practices with a compassionate approach, HazardPros continues to be a trusted resource for restoring safety and peace of mind in the Seattle area. About HazardPros HazardPros is a Washington-based biohazard remediation company specializing in death cleanup, decomposition cleanup, and other hazardous waste removal services. Serving Seattle and surrounding communities, HazardPros provides 24/7 emergency response, compassionate service, and compliance with all health and safety regulations. Media Contact: Michael Gossett Email: [email protected] Website: A photo accompanying this announcement is available at
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Duke Energy looking to combine utility companies in the Carolinas
CHARLOTTE, N.C. (WNCN) — Duke Energy is looking to merge its two subsidiaries in the Carolinas, a move the company says will make it more efficient and lead to reductions in energy costs for customers. The Charlotte-based energy company currently owns Duke Energy Progress — which covers most of the eastern and central parts of North Carolina and South Carolina, including the Triangle — and Duke Energy Carolinas, which services much of the western areas of both states. Since the merger of Duke Energy and Progress Energy in 2012, the two have been run by their parent company as two separate utilities. On Thursday, Duke Energy announced it has formally asked regulators at both the state and federal levels for permission to combine operations with a target merger date of Jan. 1, 2027. 'Although legally considered a merger, the proposed combination is more in line with reorganizing two corporate divisions into one,' the company said in a release. 'This strategic reorganization will create a single utility, streamlining operations and significantly reducing costs for customers.' According to Duke Energy's estimates, the move will save customers over $1 billion in energy costs between the start of 2027 through 2038. 'Combining our two utilities reduces customers costs, simplifies operations, supports economic growth and promotes regulatory efficiencies, all of which create value for customers in both states,' Kodwo Ghartey-Tagoe, Duke Energy Carolinas' executive vice president and CEO, said in the same release. 'There will be no immediate changes to retail customer rates or services. We look forward to sharing more details with our customers on how rates will evolve over time if the combination is approved by regulators.' Duke Energy is one of the largest energy providers in the Southeast and Midwest, serving over 8.6 million customers across six states. In addition to electricity, the company also serves 1.7 natural gas customers across five states. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's EPA chief offers an utterly absurd defense of carbon dioxide
Harmful pollutants have an ally in Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin, who on Wednesday delivered yet another impassioned diatribe in defense of toxic emissions. I previously wrote about Zeldin's bizarre defense of cancer-causing 'forever chemicals,' and his absurd claim that they have been unfairly maligned. And on Wednesday, Donald Trump's EPA chief doubled back on his literally toxic musings in a rant on Fox Business in which he said that carbon dioxide — a greenhouse gas widely known to be present in fuel emissions that are the driving forces of climate change — has merely gotten a bad rap from past Democratic administrations. He said this in defense of his push to rescind and ignore studies from the Obama administration that warned of the impact that carbon dioxide emissions have on climate change. 'They'll say that carbon dioxide endangers public health, that carbon dioxide is a pollutant, and they'll never talk about anything that is good or important about it,' Zeldin said. That's simply not true, as you can tell from this elementary video released by the EPA during the Obama administration explaining that some greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, are necessary for sustaining a healthy environment but that — crucially — humans burning fossil fuels that create carbon dioxide are driving climate change and its resultant environmental catastrophes. Zeldin went on to falsely suggest there's no scientific evidence showing carbon dioxide emissions contribute to negative public health outcomes — another demonstrable falsehood, one that is even contradicted by the department he now leads. In times like this, it's helpful to remember that Trump essentially vowed during his 2024 presidential bid to give Big Oil executives — key culprits behind the world's climate woes — whatever they wanted politically in exchange for their financial support. I imagine performances like Zeldin's on Wednesday are what he had in mind: shamelessly willful climate ignorance from the administration in service of a pro-pollution agenda. This article was originally published on