&w=3840&q=100)
Google case: Indian-origin US judge questions future of search amid AI rise
Indian origin US judge Amit Mehta -- who is overseeing a major trial about Google's dominance in online search -- has questioned the US Department of Justice (DOJ) on how much space there might be for new search engines to develop, especially as artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more widespread.
The trial is focused on whether Google, owned by Alphabet, holds a monopoly over internet search and what measures should be taken to encourage more competition. If the DOJ's proposals are approved, it could provide a boost to AI companies that are already challenging Google's position as the main tool people use to find information online.
During closing arguments in Washington on Friday, Judge Mehta asked DOJ lawyer David Dahlquist if AI should be seen as simply another way to access search results or as a form of competing technology on its own. He asked, "Do you think someone is going to come off the sidelines and build a new general search engine in light of what we are seeing?"
Dahlquist responded that search will not disappear and explained that the DOJ's proposed solutions aim to stop Google from blocking AI-based rivals. He added that OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, is still several years away from being able to handle 80 per cent of user queries using its own search technology.
Google's response to competition concerns
Google's lawyer, John Schmidtlein, said that while generative AI is changing how search works, Google has taken steps to ease worries about AI competition. He pointed out that Google no longer has exclusive deals with wireless carriers and smartphone makers like Samsung. This change lets these companies pre-load rival search engines and AI apps on new devices.
However, the DOJ and a group of states want Google to take bigger steps. They are pushing for Google to sell its Chrome browser, share its search data, and stop paying billions of dollars to Apple and others to be the default search engine on new gadgets.
David Dahlquist explained that these remedies are designed to open up the market for online search engines and advertising. He said Google's behaviour has 'fundamentally broken' competition in these areas.
Google argues that the DOJ's demands are too extreme and go beyond what the law allows. The company believes these measures would unfairly force Google to hand over its technology to competitors.
Google case: Trial timeline
The trial over the proposed remedies began in April. Judge Mehta has indicated he plans to make a decision by August.
If Google is ordered to sell Chrome, Nick Turley, OpenAI's head of product for ChatGPT, said OpenAI would be interested in buying it. Turley also mentioned that having access to Google's search data would help OpenAI improve the accuracy and relevance of its AI responses to user questions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Higher steel tariffs to dent exports as companies look at other markets
Representative image (Picture credit: AP) NEW DELHI: Doubling of import duty on steel and aluminium by the Trump administration will dent export demand, with companies having to scout for alternative markets. Several US importers have gone slow on fresh orders as costs went up significantly after the imposition of 25 per cent duty, although India was not seen to be worse off, given that the same duty applies to all countries. But if Trump decides to move ahead with his threat, several American firms will have to slow down production as such duties are seen to be unviable and unsustainable. This will also reduce demand for inputs. "The economic impact will be significant. US steel prices are already high, at around $984 per metric tonne - far above European prices at $690 and Chinese prices at $392. The doubling of tariffs is expected to push US prices to about $1,180, squeezing US domestic industries such as automotive, construction, and manufacturing that depend on steel and aluminium as key inputs. These sectors may face hundreds of dollars in additional material costs per tonne, driving up prices, reducing competitiveness, and risking job losses or inflationary pressures," said trade research body GTRI. Fieo chief S C Ralhan said the increase in tariffs would have a significant bearing on India's steel exports, especially in semi-finished and finished categories like stainless steel pipes, structural steel components, and automotive steel parts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo These products are part of India's growing engineering exports, and higher duties could erode our price competitiveness in the US market. EEPC India president Pankaj Chadha said, "It's unfortunate that while bilateral trade talks are going on between India and the US, such unilateral tariff increases have be done. It only makes the work of negotiators more complicated." Last fiscal, India exported steel and finished products of $6.2 billion to the US and about $0.9 billion of aluminium and its products. The US is among the top destinations for Indian exporters, who have been increasing market share through high-quality production and competitive pricing, Fieo said. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Mint
40 minutes ago
- Mint
Silicon Valley VCs navigate uncertain AI future
For Silicon Valley venture capitalists, the world has split into two camps: those with deep enough pockets to invest in artificial intelligence behemoths, and everyone else waiting to see where the AI revolution leads. The generative AI frenzy unleashed by ChatGPT in 2022 has propelled a handful of venture-backed companies to eye-watering valuations. You may be interested in Leading the pack is OpenAI, which raised $40 billion in its latest funding round at a $300 billion valuation -- unprecedented largesse in Silicon Valley's history. Other AI giants are following suit. Anthropic now commands a $61.5 billion valuation, while Elon Musk's xAI is reportedly in talks to raise $20 billion at a $120 billion price tag. The stakes have grown so high that even major venture capital firms -- the same ones that helped birth the internet revolution -- can no longer compete. Mostly, only the deepest pockets remain in the game: big tech companies, Japan's SoftBank, and Middle Eastern investment funds betting big on a post-fossil fuel future. "There's a really clear split between the haves and the have-nots," says Emily Zheng, senior analyst at PitchBook, told AFP at the Web Summit in Vancouver. "Even though the top-line figures are very high, it's not necessarily representative of venture overall, because there's just a few elite startups and a lot of them happen to be AI." Given Silicon Valley's confidence that AI represents an era-defining shift, venture capitalists face a crucial challenge: finding viable opportunities in an excruciatingly expensive market that is rife with disruption. Simon Wu of Cathay Innovation sees clear customer demand for AI improvements, even if most spending flows to the biggest players. "AI across the board, if you're selling a product that makes you more efficient, that's flying off the shelves," Wu explained. "People will find money to spend on OpenAI" and the big players. The real challenge, according to Andy McLoughlin, managing partner at San Francisco-based Uncork Capital, is determining "where the opportunities are against the mega platforms." "If you're OpenAI or Anthropic, the amount that you can do is huge. So where are the places that those companies cannot play?" Finding that answer isn't easy. In an industry where large language models behind ChatGPT, Claude and Google's Gemini seem to have limitless potential, everything moves at breakneck speed. AI giants including Google, Microsoft, and Amazon are releasing tools and products at a furious pace. ChatGPT and its rivals now handle search, translation, and coding all within one chatbot -- raising doubts among investors about what new ideas could possibly survive the competition. Generative AI has also democratized software development, allowing non-professionals to code new applications from simple prompts. This completely disrupts traditional startup organization models. "Every day I think, what am I going to wake up to today in terms of something that has changed or (was) announced geopolitically or within our world as tech investors," reflected Christine Tsai, founding partner and CEO at 500 Global. In Silicon Valley parlance, companies are struggling to find a "moat" -- that unique feature or breakthrough like Microsoft Windows in the 1990s or Google Search in the 2000s that's so successful it takes competitors years to catch up, if ever. When it comes to business software, AI is "shaking up the topology of what makes sense and what's investable," noted Brett Gibson, managing partner at Initialized Capital. The risks seem particularly acute given that generative AI's economics remain unproven. Even the biggest players see a very uncertain path to profitability given the massive sums involved. The huge valuations for OpenAI and others are causing "a lot of squinting of the eyes, with people wondering 'is this really going to replace labor costs'" at the levels needed to justify the investments, Wu observed. Despite AI's importance, "I think everyone's starting to see how this might fall short of the magical" even if its early days, he added. Still, only the rare contrarians believe generative AI isn't here to stay. In five years, "we won't be talking about AI the same way we're talking about it now, the same way we don't talk about mobile or cloud," predicted McLoughlin. "It'll become a fabric of how everything gets built." But who will be building remains an open question.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Indian call centre agents accused of leaking customer data in $400 million Coinbase hack
In May, cryptocurrency giant Coinbase revealed a major data breach that affected more than 69,000 customers – its biggest security failure to date. The breach, which could cost the company up to $400 million, happened after hackers bribed customer service workers in India to leak sensitive data, according to a report in Fortune. The hackers targeted employees of TaskUs, a US-based company that provides customer service support to major tech firms. TaskUs has a large presence in India, and its agents have handled support for Coinbase since 2017. In January, TaskUs laid off over 200 Indian staff working for Coinbase – just weeks after the data theft was discovered. TaskUs salaries in India are not high – often between $500 and $700 a month. Due to low salaries, some workers in India were persuaded to hand over confidential customer records in exchange for bribes. Coinbase confirmed it had cut ties with the individuals and other overseas agents involved. 'Obviously that's the weakest point in the chain, because there is an economic reason for them to accept the bribe,' Sergio Garcia, founder of the crypto investigations company Tracelon, told Fortune. The stolen information wasn't enough to access Coinbase's crypto vaults directly. Instead, criminals used it to impersonate Coinbase staff and trick customers into giving up their crypto assets. These social engineering scams led to real financial losses, though Coinbase hasn't revealed how many customers lost funds. The company says it is reimbursing affected users. A class action lawsuit has been filed in New York, accusing TaskUs of negligence. The company insists the claims are baseless and says it's strengthening its security measures. TaskUs believes two agents were part of a broader scheme involving attacks on multiple service providers linked to Coinbase. The hackers are believed to be part of a loosely connected group known as 'the Comm' or 'Community' -- young, English-speaking cybercriminals who coordinate through Telegram and Discord. Unlike traditional hacking groups from Russia or North Korea, the Comm includes thrill-seeking teenagers and young adults who often compete for attention and success online. According to a hacker who spoke with Fortune under the alias 'puffy party,' different members of the group handled different parts of the operation: bribing agents, collecting data, and carrying out scams.
