
Rashid to approach HC over travel cost to Parl
Rashid, who represents the Baramulla constituency was issued a bill of ₹874816( ₹1.45 lakh per day) for travel and security expenses for the six days when he attended Parliament in March when he was given similar parole. The parole this time is for 12 days.
'How can we pay over ₹1 lakh per day for travel from Tihar jail to the Parliament. My father wants to do his constitutional duty by attending Parliament and taking part in the discussions. He (Engineer Rashid) has ailing parents who are on daily medicine. It is not feasible and is unaffordable. We will approach the high court seeking relief. Also he is just an accused and not a convict,' Rashid's son Abrar said.
'The fee imposed is unjustified. When they take prisoners for trial or medical checkup, they do not send such bills,' he added.
On March 25 , a special NIA court allowed Engineer Rashid, accused in a terror case, to attend Parliament on the condition that he would bear travel expenses, return to jail in the evening and not have access to cell phones or speak to the press. The amount was not specified by the court. In February and March when he attended Parliament proceedings, a Delhi police team escorted him from the jail to the Parliament and handed him to the CISF personnel inside the house. The CISF is incharge of Parliament security. After the day's proceedings, he was taken back by the police team to jail 3 inside Tihar where he is lodged.
Rashid, an Independent MP and President of the Awami Ittehad Party (AIP), has been in jail since August 9, 2018 after being arrested by NIA. The National Investigation Agency(NIA) has in the past objected to Rashid's plea for bail, because he is facing very serious charges under the provisions of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. The agency has also said that Rashid was involved in the activities of various terrorist and secessionist groups, including the Jammu & Kashmir Liberation Front, Hizb-ul-Mujahideen, Lashkar-e- Taiba, in waging war against the Government of India
Inam un Nabi, spokesperson of Rashid's AIP party, said that the family arranged the money through crowd funding in February and March. 'The courts have in the past granted him interim bail to campaign. It was even extended then. No such fee was imposed. There is a discussion related to Operation Sindoor scheduled in Parliament. Baramulla, which the MP represents, includes the LOC region which was the most affected. If such a high fee is imposed in the name of travel conveyance and security, how can he take part in the Parliament proceedings?'
HT reached out to the Tihar authorities but did not get a comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
20 minutes ago
- First Post
Op Sindoor Debate LIVE Updates: Rajnath to open debate, Rahul key Opposition speaker; NDA meeting underway
Op Sindoor Debate LIVE Updates: The Lok Sabha on Monday (July 28) is holding a special discussion on Operation Sindoor, India's military response to the recent Pahalgam terror attack, during the Monsoon Session of Parliament. Defence minister Rajnath Singh is set to open the debate whereas, Rahul Gandhi is key Opposition speaker. read more Ahead of the crucial debate on Operation Sindoor, Union Minister Kiren Rijiju urged the Congress and Opposition parties to refrain from making any statements in Parliament that could harm India's national interest or appear to favour Pakistan. "Everyone must ensure the dignity and spirit of the Indian Army is upheld. The country's enemies should not be emboldened by foul language used by opposition leaders," Rijiju said. Sources say both Houses are expected to witness uproar over the Bihar SIR row, while the Lok Sabha will function in the afternoon for the Operation Sindoor debate. Both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha resumed proceedings on Monday, with the Lower House seeing protests from Opposition members before the Operation Sindoor discussion began. The Lok Sabha on Monday(July 28) is holding a special discussion on Operation Sindoor, India's military response to the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, as part of the ongoing Monsoon Session of Parliament. Union Minister Kiren Rijiju emphasised that the Business Advisory Committee has scheduled the debate, following requests from the Opposition, including the Congress, which had earlier written to the government seeking a discussion on the operation. While several issues were on the Opposition's agenda, it was agreed that Operation Sindoor would be taken up first. What to expect from the debate


New Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Stage set for fiery debate on Operation Sindoor
LIVE LIVE Parliment monsoon session LIVE updates| Stage set for fiery debate on Operation Sindoor The first week of the session was disrupted by frequent adjournments and the unexpected resignation of Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar.


New Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
'Why do you assume that they came from Pakistan': Chidambaram's remark on Pahalgam attackers stirs row
A political row has erupted ahead of the high-stakes parliamentary debate on 'Operation Sindoor', India's military response to the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam. The controversy was sparked by remarks from former finance minister and senior Congress leader P. Chidambaram, who, in an interview with The Quint, questioned the narrative that the attackers came from Pakistan. 'There is no evidence so far that the killers were Pakistani,' Chidambaram said, suggesting that "homegrown terrorists" could have been involved. He also slammed the government's handling of the investigation, asking why the attackers had not yet been apprehended or identified. His comments triggered a sharp backlash from the BJP, with the party accusing Congress of undermining national security. 'Once again, the Congress rushes to give a clean chit to Pakistan, this time after the Pahalgam terror attack,' BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya posted on X, sharing a clip from the interview. He further added, 'When it comes to national security, there should be no ambiguity. But with the Congress, there never is – they always bend over backwards to protect the enemy.'