logo
ICE Accessing Medicaid Data Raises Privacy, Health Concerns

ICE Accessing Medicaid Data Raises Privacy, Health Concerns

Newsweek5 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will begin giving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) access to personal Medicaid records, a decision that has ignited outrage from experts who warn that the move is illegal.
Why It Matters
The decision to allow ICE access to Medicaid data marks a significant shift in how health information is used in immigration enforcement. It's the latest development in the Trump administration's hard-line immigration agenda and has sparked concerns among experts about its potential to violate medical privacy laws and deter vulnerable populations from seeking care.
The agreement is the latest in a series of actions that have aligned the Health Department with the Trump administration's immigration enforcement efforts. On July 10, the department expanded its interpretation of a law that restricts most immigrants from accessing federal public benefits.
Federal agents standing outside an immigration court at the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building in New York on July 17.
Federal agents standing outside an immigration court at the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building in New York on July 17.
Yuki Iwamura/AP
What To Know
The Trump administration's policy change allows ICE to use data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS)—including medical diagnoses, treatment history, home addresses and ethnicity—to locate and detain undocumented immigrants.
Critics say the unprecedented use of sensitive health records for immigration enforcement marks a dangerous breach of both legal precedent and ethical norms.
In response, the California Pan-Ethnic Health Network (CPEHN), a medical justice coalition, called the action cruel.
Kiran Savage-Sangwan, CPEHN's executive director, said the policy could have devastating ripple effects on public health.
"Health advocates are shocked and outraged by this deeply cruel and blatantly illegal action that threatens health care for millions," Savage-Sangwan said in a statement shared with Newsweek.
"The Trump Administration aims to weaponize records of patients who accessed treatment for cancer, heart attacks, or their children's broken arms to not only accelerate its mass deportation agenda, but to further spread fear in communities already terrorized by ICE," she said.
"For generations, federal law has guaranteed emergency medical care to anyone in need because as a nation we believe deeply that saving lives transcends politics," she added.
The agreement, first reported on Thursday by the Associated Press, was signed on Monday.
"ICE will use the CMS data to allow ICE to receive identity and location information on aliens identified by ICE," the agreement said, according to AP.
"President Trump consistently promised to protect Medicaid for eligible beneficiaries," Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said.
"To keep that promise after Joe Biden flooded our country with tens of millions of illegal aliens, CMS and DHS are exploring an initiative to ensure that illegal aliens are not receiving Medicaid benefits that are meant for law-abiding Americans," she continued.
Medicaid, the public health insurance program for low-income individuals, is funded jointly by states and the federal government. While undocumented immigrants are not eligible for Medicaid under federal law, 14 states and the District of Columbia offer coverage to eligible children regardless of immigration status. Seven of those states, along with D.C., also extend coverage to adults.
Federal law has long protected access to emergency medical care regardless of immigration status. Advocates argue that the new agreement undermines decades of precedent and threatens to erode public trust in health institutions—not only among undocumented individuals but across all communities.
"If upheld, Trump's policy to use sensitive medical data, which includes data on the types of health care services individuals receive, along with home addresses and ethnicities, for enforcement represents an irreparable turning point, forcing immigrant families to endure immense suffering or risk having their families torn apart," Savage-Sangwan said.
"What's more, it marks a significant breach of trust for all Americans who have confidence in the privacy of our medical data," she continued.
An HHS spokesperson told Newsweek: "CMS is aggressively cracking down on states that may be misusing federal Medicaid funds to subsidize care for illegal immigrants. This oversight effort—supported by lawful interagency data sharing with DHS—is focused on identifying waste, fraud, and systemic abuse."
What People Are Saying
CPEHN Executive Director Kiran Savage-Sangwan said in a statement: "We call on the courts to act swiftly to stop this unprecedented and dangerous violation of law."
An HHS spokesperson told Newsweek: "With respect to the recent data sharing between CMS and DHS, HHS acted entirely within its legal authority—and in full compliance with all applicable laws—to ensure that Medicaid benefits are reserved for individuals who are lawfully entitled to receive them."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

An Indiana hospital cut medical services. A new DNC billboard blames President Trump
An Indiana hospital cut medical services. A new DNC billboard blames President Trump

Indianapolis Star

time42 minutes ago

  • Indianapolis Star

An Indiana hospital cut medical services. A new DNC billboard blames President Trump

A new billboard on the southeast side of Columbus paid for by the Democratic National Committee blames President Donald Trump for recent medical service cuts at Columbus Regional Health and is part of a multi-state campaign to show Trump-voting communities what the party views as negative effects to rural health care in the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' The Indiana billboard, which was installed July 22, is one of four billboards the DNC unveiled addressing hospitals that are closing or cutting medical services across the country. In addition to Indiana, the DNC launched billboards in Missouri, Oklahoma and Montana. A spokesperson told IndyStar the party paid 'four figures' for the Indiana sign. All four billboards are bright yellow with messages in bold black lettering specific to a health care provider in each state. 'Under Trump's watch, Columbus Regional Health is cutting medical services,' the Columbus billboard reads. It directs passersby to a page on the DNC website with state-by-state impacts of the president's tax and spending cuts bill that was signed into law on July 4. Democrats and advocacy groups have decried the large cuts to Medicaid included in the bill through work requirements and an eventual decrease in the cap on provider taxes from 6% to 3.5%. Indiana relies on those taxes, paid by hospitals, to fund its Medicaid expansion program known as the Healthy Indiana Plan. Columbus Regional Health on June 30, prior to the bill's passage, announced it would close its inpatient rehabilitation unit and outpatient orthopedics and sports medicine services, which the organization said was due to no longer being able to 'cost-effectively provide inpatient rehab services.' The June announcement said some of the cost concerns are due to rising supply costs, 'legislative scrutiny' and state and federal funding cuts. In a statement to IndyStar on July 22, Columbus Regional Health said it was unaware of the DNC billboard and did not provide permission to be referenced. 'Recently, Columbus Regional Health made the announcement of service line and practice closings related to increasing financial constraints and burdens our health system is currently facing," the statement reads. 'These difficult decisions were made under consideration of the many challenges and risks facing not just CRH – but many hospitals, health systems, and medical providers statewide and nationally – in order to remain financially viable.' A $50 billion fund to support rural hospitals was added to the Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" toward the end of negotiations between lawmakers to appease senators who were concerned about the size of the proposed Medicaid cuts. But some health policy groups say it's likely not enough to help ease the impact of federal funding losses from the changes to Medicaid in the bill. Indiana could receive some amount of money from $25 billion of the rural health fund dedicated to states that submit applications with the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The CMS Administrator is expected to have flexibility to distribute the other $25 billion. Taxes to Medicaid: 4 ways Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' could impact Hoosiers A June letter to Republican leaders from four Senate Democrats argued that Trump's tax and spending cuts bill would put 12 rural Indiana hospitals "uniquely at risk" of closure or cutting services. But the letter, based on data from the Sheps Center for Health Services Research at the University of North Carolina, was sent out before the rural fund was added to the bill. An analysis from the Kaiser Family Foundation, though, found that the rural health fund only offsets about one third of the federal Medicaid funding rural areas around the country are expected to lose under the bill. Scott Tittle, the president of the Indiana Hospital Association, said in a statement to IndyStar that he is also concerned the rural fund will not be enough to cover expected losses for hospitals in Indiana and that the fund itself is temporary. 'There is no additional assistance following the end of the OBBBA's five-year period,' Tittle said in the statement. In a news release about the billboards, DNC chair Ken Martin said Trump 'put the last nail in the coffin for rural hospitals' and that Trump's voters 'will suffer the most.' Nearly 63% of voters in Bartholomew County, where Columbus is located, voted for Trump in the 2024 presidential election. "After blowing a lethal hole in rural hospital funding, Republicans are about to find out that their flimsy funding band-aid won't be enough to protect them from voters' righteous anger,' Martin said. 'These new DNC billboards plainly state exactly what is happening to rural hospitals under Donald Trump's watch.' Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Brittany Carloni at

MAHA-inspired Coke shift isn't a health win, nutritionists say
MAHA-inspired Coke shift isn't a health win, nutritionists say

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

MAHA-inspired Coke shift isn't a health win, nutritionists say

Nutrition leaders have this to say about Coca-Cola's decision to launch a U.S. product made with cane sugar: It won't make America healthier. Why it matters: President Trump's announcement last week that the company would pivot from corn syrup was as much about power and asserting leverage as it was about advancing the "Make America Healthy Again" agenda. It also reflected the movement's preoccupation with rooting out ingredients it deems harmful like corn syrup, seed oils or food colorants that — a strategy nutritionists say ignores the bigger point. The big picture: Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. may be correct that high-fructose corn syrup is a driver of obesity and other chronic disease, but physicians and food experts say alternatives like sugar cane and beet sugar also lead to weight gain and bad outcomes. "These one ingredient changes don't make these foods healthy," said Marion Nestle, professor emeritus of nutrition and public health at New York University. "They're not going to make any difference unless they change the dietary intake of what people are eating." Substituting cane sugar for high fructose corn syrup is more like a cosmetic change, said Priya Fielding-Singh, director of policy and programs at George Washington University's Global Food Institute. It "feels like a bit of a misplaced effort," she said. State of play: Coca-Cola said Tuesday that a new Coke offering made with cane sugar will appear on shelves this fall alongside traditional, high-fructose corn syrup Coke. Only it's not exactly "new." U.S. consumers have already been able to get cane-sugar Coke imported from Mexico. It's even made limited runs of "Passover Coke," made with sugar instead of corn syrup. Kennedy nonetheless welcomed the announcement, telling Axios in a statement that "Americans deserve access to the same natural foods that other countries enjoy and we are delivering that." The food industry has made other moves to align itself with MAHA's agenda. The Consumer Brands Association on Tuesday said it would encourage members to stop making products with artificial dyes by the end of 2027. The dairy industry this month committed to eliminating artificial dyes from ice creams. Fast-food chain Steak 'n Shake also announced earlier this year that it was "RFK"ing it's french fries by cooking them in beef tallow instead of seed oils. Zoom out: Scientific reviews show that ultra-processed foods can contribute to the development of chronic conditions like obesity, heart disease and diabetes. But replacing one ingredient — even if it's a highly processed ingredient — isn't going to change the fact that the food product is still ultra-processed. "It doesn't matter whether it has cane sugar or high fructose corn syrup —it's still sugar," Nestle said. "They're fine as occasional treats, but nobody should be drinking liters of soda and nobody should be eating quarts of ice cream" even after MAHA-influenced ingredient changes. Cutting back the sodium content in foods, reducing intake of ultra-processed foods and making fresh produce more affordable are some interventions that could actually improve population health, Nestle added. Reality check: Kennedy speaks frequently about reducing Americans' intake of ultra-processed foods, and has championed state efforts to restrict SNAP benefits from being used to purchase soda. Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey told investors in April that the company is making progress on reducing sugar in its beverages by changing recipes and using global marketing and distribution resources to increase "interest in our ever-expanding portfolio."

Taliban say efforts to release a British couple from Afghan prison not yet complete
Taliban say efforts to release a British couple from Afghan prison not yet complete

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Taliban say efforts to release a British couple from Afghan prison not yet complete

ISLAMABAD (AP) — The Taliban said Wednesday that efforts to free a British couple from an Afghan prison are not yet complete and denied that their rights were being violated despite concerns from their families and U.N. officials. Peter and Barbie Reynolds, who are in their 70s, were arrested in early February after being taken from their home in central Bamiyan province to the capital, Kabul. The husband and wife run an organization that provides education and training programs. Family members in the U.K. have said they are being mistreated and held on undisclosed charges. U.N. human rights experts on Monday called for the couple's release, warning their physical and mental health was deteriorating rapidly and that they were at risk of irreparable harm or even death. The Taliban's Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi rejected concerns about rights violations. 'They are in constant contact with their families,' Muttaqi told reporters at a media briefing in Kabul. 'Consular services are available. Efforts are underway to secure their release. These steps have not yet been completed. Their human rights are being respected. They are being given full access to treatment, contact and accommodation.' He did not say what steps were being taken to secure their release. According to the U.N. experts, the couple's spell in detention included time in a maximum-security facility and later in underground cells, without sunlight, before being moved to above-ground cells at the General Directorate of Intelligence in Kabul. Peter needs heart medication and, during his detention, has had two eye infections and intermittent tremors in his head and down his left arm. He recently collapsed, the experts added, while Barbie suffers from anaemia and remains weak. Officials from the U.K. Foreign Ministry visited the couple on July 17, family members said. Peter and Barbie have no bed or furniture and sleep on a mattress on the floor, the family said in a statement Sunday. Peter's face is red, peeling and bleeding, likely due to the return of skin cancer that urgently needs removing. 'We, their four adult children, have written privately to the Taliban leadership twice, pleading for them to uphold their beliefs of compassion, mercy, fairness, and human dignity," the children added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store