Scots pensioner couple lose legal fight against winter fuel payment cut
Two Scots pensioners have lost their legal fight against the UK and Scottish Governments over their decisions to cut the winter fuel payment and its Scottish equivalent.
Peter and Florence Fanning, from Coatbridge, North Lanarkshire, brought their petition to the Court of Session in Edinburgh following the announcement last July from Chancellor Rachel Reeves of plans to cut the universal element of the payment.
The couple then lost their entitlement, and became worried about being able to afford their heating bills.
In April 2024, the provision of a winter fuel-related payment was devolved to Scottish ministers who proposed a new benefit - the pension age winter heating payment (PAWHP). They proposed the payment would be universal, and not means-tested.
After Labour swept to power in Westminster in July 2024, Ms Reeves announced the WFP would no longer be available to those not in receipt of pension credit or other means-tested benefits, resulting in a reduction to the block funding grant estimated to be around £160 million.
The court heard Scottish ministers considered they had no option but to replicate the decision of the UK Government with regards to the PAWHP.
Former SNP MP Joanna Cherry KC, who represented the couple as senior counsel, told the court at the start of proceedings in March that the Fannings are 'elderly pensioners', and that both have disabilities.
She said: 'Like most pensioners they live on a fixed income and they struggle to afford to heat their home in the winter.
'They are exactly the sort of people who the winter fuel payment was designed to help.'
The Fannings, who received the WFP in 2023 but were not eligible for PAWHP in 2024, challenged both decisions, claiming neither government had considered the Equality Act 2010 and had both "failed to consult" with pensioners.
They sought to quash the decisions of both governments, and sought a finding they both acted in a way which was "irrational and unreasonable".
The couple also sought a finding that both decisions were unlawful under the Human Rights Act 1998.However, Judge Lady Hood rejected all six requests.
In a U-turn earlier this week, the UK Government announced the vast majority of pensioners in England and Wales will again receive the winter fuel payment this winter, and the Scottish Government said it is "working through the options" in the wake of that decision.
In her decision, published on Friday, Lady Hood found neither government had failed to exercise their duties under the Equality Act 2010, and neither government was under a duty to consult.
She also held the decisions were neither "irrational nor unreasonable" and did not breach the Human Rights Act 1998, and she ruled they were "in pursuit of a legitimate aim".
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
In a written judgment, Lady Hood said: "In this case, the decision which each respondent faced as to whether the payment of WFP, or PAWHP, should be made on a universal or means-tested basis fell within the field of socioeconomic policy.
"It was a policy decision involving questions of the allocation of resources, and practical and political assessments that this court would not be well-placed to judge.
"That the policy decisions could result in hardship for those falling on one side of a brightline rule is not enough to render it irrational in the legal sense."
Lady Hood said: "The petitioners asserted that elderly people suffering from disabilities rendering them vulnerable to cold temperatures constituted a group in our society which has suffered considerable discrimination in the past... However mere assertion is not enough to bring a group within that definition, and the petitioners did not sufficiently demonstrate to the court that this cohort of the population did do so."
She added that "in the absence of any evidence of past widespread discrimination against elderly persons by the government having been put before the court by the petitioners, the categorisation could not be applied to elderly people as a cohort".
The petition was refused on all grounds.
Lady Hood wrote: "In respect of each of the respondents, the rules as to eligibility for payments of WFP and PAWHP were set out in terms of the legislation implementing the respective respondents' policy decisions.
"In these circumstances, and standing the decision reached above on the public sector equality duty and the issue of consultation, the schemes are in accordance with law.
"They are in pursuit of a legitimate aim."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
a minute ago
- ITV News
People 'glamourise' migrant hotels, refugee tells ITV News
Sami Gichki was in the asylum system for 12 and a half years. He initially travelled from Balochistan in Pakistan to the UK aged ten with his parents. While he only spent a month in hotel accommodation in 2013, he sympathises with people who are now spending long stints in temporary conditions. "I think often people glamourise the fact that asylum seekers are living in hotels, but it's not the same sense as in a hotel you go to when you're going on holiday," he said. "You are restricted, there are curfews around what time you can be in, what time you can go out, what people can actually visit you, about what you eat. "It's basically just sitting there like a sitting duck, waiting for the Home Office to give you status." The number of asylum seekers living in UK hotels has risen by 8% under Labour, compared to the same point last year, despite falling slightly since March 2025, according to Home Office figures. The data is part of the usual quarterly immigration statistics and covers Labour's first year in office. It shows 32,059 asylum seekers were in UK hotels by the end of June. The new figures come days after a court ruled that more than 100 asylum seekers staying at a hotel in Essex should be removed after the local council brought a legal case. "I think as a society we have become so polarised," Sami told ITV News. "So when I see in the news things around the Epping Hotel and the court saying that asylum seekers should not be housed there, my initial thoughts are, yes, I agree they should not be housed there. "They should be housed in permanent housing with agency and be able to rebuild their lives in a way that is meaningful for them, but also gives them that sense of dignity and purpose and respect that. "These places can be quite isolating and they're very disconnected from services or places. "For example, they don't have access to medical healthcare properly because of the inability to access a GP, because of not having a permanent address, not being able to go to schools in the same way that most people do, just because of not having access to a permanent address. "Things like this become real barriers to people and their livelihoods." 'I ended up being quite suicidal' Sami went to school until he was 18, but then would have needed scholarships to go to university. This left him unable to work but also unable to study, which had a huge impact on his mental health. "I was in the state where after sixth form, I really struggled with my mental health, ended up in the space where I didn't really want to be here, and I ended up being quite suicidal until I started getting support after a year and a half through mental health services," he said. It was only when he ended up in A&E that he was able to get support. He was pointed towards Manchester Cathedral and a running charity, both of which helped him - he then ran in the London Marathon on his 20th birthday. Sami has said that his good English has helped his progress through the asylum system - even though it has still been very long. "The judgement that comes from being in an asylum process is... decreased by a large scale. If someone does not speak English... I have seen how people are treated completely differently in my circumstances," he said. But ultimately, Sami says it is the "imbalance of power" that really affects people arriving in the UK. "Even though there might not be direct consequences for some seekers and refugees, I think just being in the system and waiting for so long and that uncertainty can really affect you and impact your mental health like it did for me," he said. Sami eventually got refugee status earlier this year - he separated his claim from his family's and is allowed to stay in the UK because of his sexuality and the risk of political persecution if he was forced to return to Pakistan. 'Everything fell apart' Abdul has been in the UK for just over three years after travelling from Sierra Leone in 2023. He is staying in shared accommodation in Stockton provided by the Home Office. He has been there for around a year and said he had previously been living elsewhere but was moved because of faults with the building. Abdul is not allowed to work because he does not have a permit. He said this was because of difficulties with his solicitor. "Everything fell apart," he said. "I don't like wasting time without creating anything within yourself, the community, the country." Back in Sierra Leone he had lots of areas of expertise - football, refereeing and athletics coaching, as well as basic knowledge of construction, and health and social care. "With all this knowledge, sitting on the couch, without getting any form of job... It's really, really devastating," he said. While he is not allowed to work he is dependent on the money he receives from the Home Office every week. In the meantime, he is trying to make the most of his time. He described voluntary coaching as his "backbone" now, as it is the only thing he still does that he used to do at home. "There are so many volunteering activities that I've been doing now because that's the only thing that will do to let me... reclaim myself. To increase value, to create more impact within the community." "For my name to be written within the community - I want to feel proud of that," he added. Abdul won an award last year for his volunteering work in the community. It recognised his horticulture work in the area as well as his sports coaching efforts. "That was one of the greatest achievements... I'm happy I got that achievement because it's within the community and based on what I have doing the community," he said. Abdul has no idea how long he might spend in his current accommodation and does not know how long his asylum seeker process will take. 'You feel sad and discouraged' Anti-immigration protests have erupted across England, typically in areas that house asylum seekers in hotels. Abdul said those protests have an impact on asylum seekers. "Of course protests... on that issue are not normally friendly ... All this protesting is not good within the community ... Protesting has some, let me say, negative response on the individual," he said. "You feel sad, you feel a little bit discouraged based on the situation," he added. He asked people to "pardon" those who live in accommodation provided by the Home Office. "You might want to get out of that particular situation, but it's not in your own power to do it, it's in the power of the Home Office to make sure that your pending situation is being amended and you're being moved on to the next level," he said. "So, I would say to them to pardon us, based on our situations. It is not a situation that we created, we don't want to be part of it, but it happened," he added. More people living in hotels Asylum seekers and their families can be housed in temporary accommodation, known as contingency accommodation, if they are awaiting assessment of their claim or have had a claim approved and there is not enough longer-term accommodation available. When there is not enough housing, the Home Office, which has a legal obligation to provide accommodation to asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute, can move people to alternatives such as hotels and large sites, like former military bases. Epping Forest District Council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel in Epping. Almost 30 councils are considering whether to take legal action or monitoring developments over asylum hotels after the Epping High Court ruling, ITV News understands. Included in the 28 local authorities considering next steps are eight Labour-run councils - placing further pressure on Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's government.
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Arts venues should lose funds if they stifle free speech, says ex-minister
A former SNP cabinet minister has demanded arts bodies lose their public funding if they stifle free speech after the 'disgraceful' Kate Forbes cancel culture row. Fergus Ewing said the bid by Summerhall Arts to ban the deputy First Minister from an Edinburgh Festival Fringe venue was 'utter nonsense'. He also took a swipe at John Swinney for taking a week to condemn it. Speaking to the media on Tuesday, the First Minister said it was not 'appropriate' and there was 'no reason why Kate Forbes shouldn't be able to speak at any venue in Scotland'. Summerhall Arts effectively banned Ms Forbes, a devout Christian who opposed the SNP's gender self-ID plans, from returning after she appeared at a political discussion, before rowing back. Bosses set up a 'safe room' for artists and staff when she was in the building, after performers reported being 'terrified' of the 5ft 2in MSP. The arts charity, which was awarded £608,000 in public funds in January, apologised 'unreservedly' and said the booking was an 'oversight' which would not happen again. But after an outcry about censorship - which chimed with similar rows at the Edinburgh Book Festival and National Library of Scotland - Summerhall bosses backed down. Chief executive Sam Gough told the Mail: 'No one is banned from appearing on the stages.' Writing on X, Mr Ewing, who quit the SNP in June to stand for re-election in his Inverness and Nairn seat as an Independent, said: 'After a week of silence, our FM eventually gets round to support his DFM and criticise the disgraceful 'cancellation' of Kate Forbes by Summerhall Arts in Edinburgh. 'I have tabled a question to ask the Scottish Government if they will insist any arts body getting a grant must undertake to honour freedom of expression under the law, or else forfeit the grant and repay any amount paid 'Summerhall got bailed out with £600,000 of taxpayers' money - then 'cancelled' Kate Forbes because she was, in their eyes, a 'threat' to the safety of performers. 'What utter nonsense. But will the Scottish Government stamp it out? I doubt it. 'And why are millions of taxpayers' cash being dished out to those who would ban freedom of expression? 'I have countless constituents with special needs kids whose lives would be transformed for a fraction of these eye-watering amounts.' He ended his comments with a pointed quote from 1984 author George Orwell: 'The further society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.' Benny Higgins, chair of the Fringe Society for the last four years, yesterday said freedom of speech was 'crucial' to the festival He told the Herald: 'It's from the embers of the Second World War that this festival was formed. We must support freedom of expression. It's crucial. 'If we don't support freedom of speech within what is legal then we let ourselves down. 'It's something we have got to protect and cultivate. 'I think it would be sad if politicians were not be able to speak at the Fringe. Politics is part of the fabric of our society.' Lori Anderson, director of Festivals Edinburgh, added: 'The Edinburgh festivals - with their bold ideas, brave voices and global reach - are a celebration of possibility. They are spaces for challenge and debate.'
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
SNP membership falls, deficit soars and £100,000 campervan now only worth £41,000, accounts reveal
Why you can trust Sky News The SNP spent more than £100,000 on the campervan that was seized from the driveway of Nicola Sturgeon's mother-in-law, the party's financial accounts have revealed. The luxury vehicle, which was confiscated two years ago by Police Scotland as part of Operation Branchform, remains impounded and is now worth less than half of its original cost. Financial accounts for last year show the party spent £100,790 on the motorhome, but that has since depreciated to £41,284 as of 31 December 2024. Treasurer Stuart McDonald said: "This asset has been impounded by authorities since April 2023 and has not been available for the party's use since that time. "The party retains ownership of the motorhome and expects its future release." The SNP said the cost is based on the assumption that there has been "no additional impairment beyond normal depreciation" while in the custody of the national force. The 2024 accounts, published by the Electoral Commission this week, show a £455,254 deficit - compared to a surplus of £661,568 the year before. Mr McDonald explained: "It is important to point out that a deficit of this nature is not unusual during a parliamentary election year - for example 2021, 2017 and 2016 all saw similar or greater deficits incurred. "It is also important to point out that significant steps have been taken to improve financial performance, and the one-off costs of some of these steps account for much of that deficit, but have already delivered significant savings since." Decreasing membership numbers, staff redundancies, and the loss of MPs at last year's general election were said to have impacted the party's finances. Membership has fallen to 56,011 as of 1 June 2025, down from 64,525 the same time last year and less than half of its peak of around 125,000 in 2019. Membership fees stood at £1,833,039 in 2024, down from £2,093,967 the previous year. However, donations surged from £369,308 in 2023 to £937,167 in 2024 - the highest level since 2017. The accounts show the party still owes former chief executive Peter Murrell £60,000 following a loan of £107,620 in 2021. The party repaid £47,620 the same year. Mr Murrell, the estranged husband of former first minister Ms Sturgeon, has been charged with embezzlement, with a further court date to be set. Ms Sturgeon was also arrested as part of the police probe into the SNP's funding and finances, however the investigation was later dropped with no further action to be taken. The campervan was seized from the driveway of the Dunfermline home of Mr Murrell's mother. In regards to the loan, Mr McDonald said: "There is no formal loan agreement in place, no interest is charged on the outstanding balance, and no specific repayment terms have been agreed. "The former chief executive has not formally requested repayment of the outstanding balance. "Due to the absence of agreed repayment terms and the lack of recent communication regarding settlement, there is uncertainty as to when, or if, this loan will be repaid to the former chief executive, and whether it may ultimately be waived or written off." The annual accounts of the SNP Westminster group of MPs were also published, showing a deficit of £155,803. The accounts were independently audited by MMG Chartered Accountants, which identified no "material uncertainties". Craig Hoy MSP, the Scottish Conservative shadow finance secretary, said the deficit in the SNP's accounts showed the party "cannot be trusted to even run their own finances, never mind the ever-growing blackhole they are presiding over in Scotland's finances". An SNP spokesperson said: "The SNP is the largest political party in Scotland by far and it is very encouraging to see extraordinary levels of donations over the course of last year - the highest since 2017. "Our success relies on all of our members and supporters who contribute in whatever way they can. "We are approaching the 2026 election ahead in the polls and ready to take our positive vision of Scotland's future as an independent country to the people."
