logo
Judge who ruled against Trump funding freeze has ties to taxpayer-funded homeless org

Judge who ruled against Trump funding freeze has ties to taxpayer-funded homeless org

New York Post13-05-2025

A Rhode Island federal judge who blocked President Trump's sweeping freeze on federal assistance earlier this year has been slapped with a complaint from a conservative legal group alleging that he could benefit from his decision.
Providence US District Judge John McConnell sat on the board of Crossroads Rhode Island, a homeless services provider that has benefited from federal assistance, from 2006 to at least 2023, the nonprofit's tax records show. Between 2011 and 2021, the judge served as the board's chairman.
America First Legal, which began digging into McConnell's past after he issued a preliminary injunction halting Trump's freeze earlier this year, argued in a complaint filed to the Boston-based 1st Circuit Court of Appeals that the judge's ties to Crossroads pose a conflict of interest.
The Trump-aligned legal group is pleading with the appeals court to 'take all appropriate action to resolve these issues.'
4 US District Judge John McConnell was hit by a conflict of interest complaint Tuesday.
US District Court RI
4 President Trump and Elon Musk have endeavored to slash government waste and bloat.
Getty Images
'Despite his long-time entanglement with this federally funded organization, Judge McConnell did not recuse himself,' America First Legal wrote in a 13-page complaint obtained by The Post.
'His failure to do so may violate federal law and judicial canons of ethics, raises profound concerns about Judge McConnell's judgment as an officer of the court, and his fitness for the bench.'
A spokesperson for Crossroads and McConnell told The Post that the judge left the organization's board in May 2024.
Since 2010, Crossroads has taken in at least $15.4 million in federal grants from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, including at least $2.2 million this year alone, according to public records cited in the complaint.
Over the last 12 years, Crossroads has received at least $18.7 million from state and local grants, including at least $4.5 million this year.
In 2023, government funding accounted for roughly 64.7% of Crossroads' roughly $28.78 million in revenue, according to numbers calculated from its Form 990 tax document.
Overall, America First Legal claims that Crossroads has reaped $128 million in government cash during McConnell's tenure on its board. The Post was not able to independently verify that sum.
A spokesperson for McConnell declined to comment on the complaint.
4 Crossroads Rhode Island has received millions of dollars from the feds over the years.
Crossroads Rhode Island
America First Legal pointed to judicial canons that warn 'a judge's obligation under this Code and the judge's obligation as a fiduciary may come into conflict.'
McConnell has been criticized by allies of the president over his ruling.
Back in January, the Office of Personnel Management issued a controversial and since-rescinded memo calling for a pause on certain types of 'federal financial assistance' while permitting exemptions on a 'case-by-case basis.'
Officials claimed that the freeze would not impact Medicare, Medicaid or Social Security and that the halt was merely intended to give the Trump administration time to parse through federal outlays.
Days after issuing the memo, Trump's budget team rescinded it, but White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt clarified that pulling back the memo did not lead to 'rescission of the federal funding freeze.'
As a result, a group of 23 states and the District of Columbia forged ahead with a lawsuit against the Trump administration.
The state of Rhode Island, which provided funding to Crossroads, was among the two dozen plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
McConnell, an Obama-appointed judge, issued a temporary injunction on the freeze in January and determined a month last that OPM had not fully complied with his order to free up all the funding.
At the time, McConnell held that the 'extraordinary and drastic remedy' was necessary because 'the States rely on federal funds to provide and maintain vital programs and services.'
4 President Trump's legal team is fighting in court to reverse the order blocking the funding freeze for federal aid.
AP
In March, the judge went a step further and issued an indefinite preliminary injunction against the Trump administration while litigation over the attempted pause on federal assistance played out.
'The executive's categorical freeze of appropriated and obligated funds fundamentally undermines the distinct constitutional roles of each branch of our government,' McConnell wrote in his order at the time.
'The interaction of the three co-equal branches of government is an intricate, delicate, and sophisticated balance — but it is crucial to our form of constitutional governance. Here, the executive put itself above Congress.'
Last month, the Trump administration revealed in court documents that it was appealing McConnell's order.
'While a careful analysis of judicial decisions is always warranted, it should avoid ad hominem partisanship and sensationalist rhetoric that are favored on the internet and in television soundbites,' Rhode Island Bar Association President Christopher Gontarz said in a statement earlier this year defending the judge.
'Judge McConnell is a well-respected jurist. The Rhode Island Bar Association stands firmly in support of Judge McConnell.'
Separately, the Trump administration is working to defang the lower courts' ability to issue broad, sweeping national injunctions against the president's actions.
Later this month, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Trump administration's bid to quash injunctions against the president's executive order ending birthright citizenship. That case is expected to test the power lower courts have to issue nationwide pauses on presidential actions.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Poland Election: Ukraine Skeptic Candidate Swings Surprise Victory
Poland Election: Ukraine Skeptic Candidate Swings Surprise Victory

Newsweek

time10 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Poland Election: Ukraine Skeptic Candidate Swings Surprise Victory

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Poland's relationship with Ukraine and the U.S. will become a new focus of the country's politics following the presidential election victory of right-wing nationalist Karol Nawrocki, a Warsaw-based political expert has told Newsweek. Why It Matters Sunday's election was being closely watched as a signifier of Poland's political direction including its approach to Polish-Ukrainian relations. Nawrocki, who was supported by the opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party, is said to adopt a "Trumpian" style of politics and during the campaign he visited the Oval Office where he was pictured with the U.S. president. U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had urged Poles to elect him. Karol Nawrocki, presidential candidate for the Law and Justice Party, following the Polish presidential runoff election on June 1, 2025, in Warsaw, Poland. Karol Nawrocki, presidential candidate for the Law and Justice Party, following the Polish presidential runoff election on June 1, 2025, in Warsaw, Poland. Sean Gallup//Getty Images What To Know In Sunday's run-off, Nawrocki defeated his liberal rival, Warsaw Mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, according to Poland's National Election Commission, in a surprise turnaround from the first exit poll which indicated that Trzaskowski was ahead. Nawrocki got the support of President Donald Trump and he backs Warsaw's support for Ukraine against Russian aggression, but does not want to see Kyiv join NATO nor the EU. "Poland remains deeply divided," Piotr Buras, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, told Newsweek on Monday. After all the votes were counted, Poland's electoral commission said Nawrocki had won 50.9 percent of the vote, compared with Trzaskowski's 49.1 percent. It was a switch from an exit poll at 9 p.m. Sunday that showed Trzaskowski ahead 50.3 percent to 49.7 percent, after which he declared a premature victory. Trzaskowski's campaign hinged on supporting Prime Minister Donald Tusk's democratic reforms. While Poland has a parliamentary system in which the president's authority is largely ceremonial, the head of state can veto legislation proposed by lawmakers. The president has a key role in foreign affairs and serves as commander-in-chief of the armed forces and Nawrocki is likely to continue to use his veto power to block Tusk's pro-EU program. The result is also likely also rejuvenate the conservative PiS opposition that lost power eighteen months ago as it eyes taking on Tusk's coalition in 2027 parliamentary elections. Buras, head of the ECFR's Warsaw office, told Newsweek that Warsaw's relations with the U.S. and Ukraine are likely to become subject to party political conflict. Buras said Nawrocki and the PiS will play the Trump or American card in domestic politics, criticizing Tusk's alleged abandoning of the trans-Atlantic partnership by siding with Poland's European allies. Nawrocki has struck an "anti-Ukrainian" sentiment on the campaign trail, reflecting his own convictions as the head of the Institute for National Remembrance which embraces nationalist historical narrative, he said. Both Poland's role as a promoter of a stronger EU defense policy and as an important actor in Ukraine's EU and NATO integration process could be seriously hampered given the changed domestic political context, added Buras. What People Are Saying Piotr Buras, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations: "This election was a battle between two strong negative emotions—or 'projects fear' Between the rejection of the Tusk government and the fear of [a] PiS return to power." What Happens Next Nawrocki will succeed Andrzej Duda, a conservative whose second and final term ends on August 6. Poland's president serves for a five-year period and may be reelected once under the country's constitution. The U.S. has about 10,000 troops in Poland and Homeland Security Secretary Noem suggested military ties could deepen with Nawrocki as president. But Buras said Poland will enter a period of conflict and instability, with a weakened government in terms of legitimacy and ability to act. While a snap election is not likely this year, it could happen as early as 2026, Buras added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store