
When can Trent Alexander-Arnold make his Real Madrid debut?
Trent Alexander-Arnold will officially become a Real Madrid player in the coming days, a month earlier than was first anticipated.
The Galacticos hashed out a deal with Liverpool to let their right-back go when the summer transfer window opens on June 1 - just 29 days before his contract was due to expire at Anfield - paying a whopping £10m to secure his services early.
Sacrificing the opportunity to sign the Englishman on a free, it means Alexander-Arnold will now be available for Real Madrid's Club World Cup campaign in the United States, a tournament which the club are among the favourites to win.
Real clearly think he could prove the difference in their pursuit of lifting the trophy, feeling his month-early arrival warrants a transfer fee worth more than 10 per cent of the competition's £97m prize money.
The expedited switch shakes things up in terms of when we should expect to see the 26-year-old don the famous white kit for the first time. Here's everything you need to know about Alexander-Arnold's debut at Real Madrid.
With the LaLiga season concluded, Alexander-Arnold's first possible outing in Real Madrid colours will be at the Club World Cup.
He could make his debut in Real's tournament curtain raiser when they take on Saudi side Al-Hilal on Wednesday 18 June at Miami's Hard Rock Stadium.
If he is snubbed for the opener, Los Blancos still have two more opportunities in the group stage to grant Alexander-Arnold his debut - taking on Mexican club Pachuca on Sunday 22 June at Charlotte's Bank of America Stadium, before finishing off the opening round against Austrian outfit RB Salzburg on Friday 27 June at Lincoln Financial Field, home of Super Bowl LIX winners the Philadelphia Eagles.
Given the price paid for the Englishman, expect him to be used plentifully as Real Madrid look to make the most bang for their buck.
When is the Club World Cup?
The Club World Cup begins on Saturday 15 June, with the final taking place on Sunday 13 July at the MetLife Stadium in New Jersey.
What's the format?
The top two teams in each group progress to the knockout stage, which begins with a last 16 stage, before quarter-finals, semi-finals and a final. There is no third-placed play-off.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Bill Maher blasts Cassie saying she CHOSE to stay with Diddy and was 'enthusiastic' about freak-offs
Diddy trial for 'choosing' to stay with the disgraced rap mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs and was 'enthusiastic' about the infamous freak-offs. Maher slammed the singer for her role in Diddy's ongoing trial, and showed text messages Cassie sent Diddy at the time which proved her 'enthusiastic consent' in the freak-offs. 'We need to keep two thoughts in our head at the same time: One, Diddy is a bad dude - really bad. Like, the worst thing in rap since Hammer pants. A violent, sick f*** - I'm sorry, an alleged violent, sick f***. And we should lock him up and throw away the baby oil,' Maher began. 'And two, things have changed enough that moving forward, the rule should be, if you're being abused, you've got to leave right away.' Maher then referred to Cassie and insinuated that her 'enthusiasm' for the freak-offs and long running relationship with Diddy only bolstered his legal defense. 'If Diddy walks free, it will be because his lawyers can point to an endless stream of texts from Cassie expressing what's often called 'enthusiastic consent' to their sex life,' Maher said. 'If you're 'MeToo-ing' someone, it's not helpful to your case if you text him, 'me too!'' The host presented text messages of Cassie's 'enthusiasm', such as one which read: 'I'm always ready to freak off.' 'It's not victim-shaming to expect women to have the agency to leave toxic relationships. Quite the contrary, to not expect that is infantilizing,' Maher declared. 'I understand why it can be difficult for women to leave an abusive relationship, but this should be society's new grand bargain,' Maher said. 'We take every allegation seriously, but don't tell me anymore about your contemporaneous account that you said to two friends ten years ago.' 'Tell the police right away. Don't wait a decade. Don't journal about it. Don't turn it into a one-woman show. And most importantly, don't keep f***ing him. Your only contemporaneous notes about what he did should be a police report.' Maher's take is that with the MeToo movement, women have fewer reasons not to come forward about abuse and leave an abusive relationship. 'We're not in the 'no one listens to women or takes them seriously' era anymore. Operators are actually standing by to take your calls,' he said. The Real Time host declared that there should be a 'new rule,' that 'if you're being abused, you've got to leave right way,' and applied this rule to Cassie as she testifies against Diddy. 'When women felt, for good reason, that 'OG predators' like Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein would never be held accountable, why not at least get something out of it?' he said. 'It was not illogical for an abused women to say, 'Well, if I can't get justice for my pain, can I at least get a receipt? A coupon?'' he continued, insinuating that Cassie was benefiting in her career from their relationship. An emotional and heavily pregnant Ventura broke down on the stand as she testified against Diddy with claims that he raped her, was an out-of-control drug addict, and someone she felt she couldn't leave Maher said that having an 'honest conversation about abuse' must include the realities of 'what people are willing to do for stardom.' 'If you want a No.1 record so bad, you'll take a No.1 in the face, some of that is on you,' he said. 'And if you're doing it for love, well, c'mon, Oprah and Dr. Phil and every podcaster in the world by now have done a million shows about 'abuse is not love' and 'abusers don't change.'' Maher finished his relationship expertise by drawing comparisons from Ike and Tina Turner's relationship, he said: 'R&B singer Ike Turner was a psycho, just like Diddy. But in an era when there was no movement to help her, Tina Turner somehow got away and she did it with 36 cents in her pocket and a mobile card.' His slam on Cassie recieved mixed messages online, with some supporting the host while others finding it out of touch. One comment on X said: 'He's not wrong. There is 0 doubt that Diddy is a pos scumbag & he should've gone to jail for assault & battery. But if Cassie is the star witness on this 'RICO' case, Diddy should be freed today.' 'You can look at this situation from all different directions, maybe she stayed for fame and fortune, maybe she stayed in fear. People will do anything for fame and Fortune, the industry is the devils play ground, in the worst way,' another said. '@billmaher showing his true colors with his acceptance of the psychological warfare and terror of controlling abusive men in the industry and beyond, but especially if you have a lot of money to contribute to the @DNC.' 'Obviously He has no clue how a victim can be mentally like Diddy do it on a grander scale..,' another said. Another wrote: 'Cassie was groomed at a young age; then she was dragged into a culture she was drowning in with no sign of getting out by a complete monster who terrified everyone around him. Let's make @billmaher someone's b*** and see how he likes it, because that's what Cassie was to Diddy.' Maher's brutal analysis comes only days after Cassie welcomed her third child with her husband Alex Fine not long after testifying at Diddy's trial. The Me & U singer welcomed her baby boy on Tuesday at a hospital in New York City, according to TMZ, citing sources with direct knowledge. Insiders say the child arrived slightly ahead of schedule, but Cassie and her newborn are healthy and well. Ventura was around eight months pregnant when she began her horrifying testimony in the trial on May 12. She delivered graphic testimonies alleging that the music mogul physically and psychologically abused her over more than a decade from 2007-2018. She detailed the regular beatings she allegedly experienced, the rapper's use of blackmail and scare tactics to coerce and manipulate, depraved sex acts she claims she was forced to participate in - and the medical toll she suffered as a result. Ventura concluded testifying on May 16, just 11 days before she went into labor. Controversy first publicly grew around Diddy in late 2023, when he quickly settled a sex abuse case Ventura filed against him for a rumored $30million. Multiple properties across the country he owned were raided in March of 2024 and he was arrested six months later in September. In May 2024 Combs' downfall was hastened by the release of a devastating video of him beating Ventura in the corridor of a hotel in Los Angeles in 2016. The video, which was first broadcast by CNN last May, was played in full to the trial before Ventura, a male escort and others gave their testimonies. He has remained incarcerated at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn awaiting his trial after he was refused bail on multiple occasions. He faces life in prison on five federal charges: racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking and two counts of transporting individuals for prostitution. Combs has plead not guilty to all the charges. His defense team has said the alleged victims are ex-girlfriends who willingly participated in threesomes. In the latest update, Diddy's lawyers asked the judge on Wednesday for a mistrial after arguing the prosecution made an unacceptable suggestion in front of the jury. The defense said it was 'outrageous' when prosecutors appeared to suggest the mogul had destroyed fingerprints taken from Kid Cudi's house after the January, 2012 bombing of his car. Prosecutors had asked LAFD official Lance Jimenez about the fingerprints, and he said the evidence was destroyed in August 2012. Jimenez said 'somebody within LAPD' authorized the destruction of the evidence. This is when Diddy's team objected. 'They know what they were doing,' the defense said of prosecutors. 'They were suggesting that someone in this courtroom has something to do with improper and suspicious destruction of these fingerprint cards and that's outrageous.' The attorneys added: 'The only proper remedy to cure the outrageous prejudice is a mistrial.' However, the defense's motion for a mistrial was denied.


Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
TONY HETHERINGTON: Help! Storage firm lost entire contents of our five-bed home
Tony Hetherington is Financial Mail on Sunday's ace investigator, fighting readers corners, revealing the truth that lies behind closed doors and winning victories for those who have been left out-of-pocket. Find out how to contact him below. Mrs J.P. writes: We put the contents of our five-bedroom home into long-term storage, costing £200 per month. We had retired to Spain, but returned to the UK and contacted the storage firm to have our goods delivered to our new home. It then informed us that it had accidentally disposed of them. Tony Hetherington replies: It has taken months of enquiries to unravel everything that took place. You first put your belongings into storage in 2017, but in 2018 your mother-in-law was nearing the end of her life so you returned to the UK and your belongings were returned to you. In 2019 you and your husband put everything into storage again and went back to Spain. Last year you decided to return to this country, but were then told your belongings had gone. The name of the storage company you gave me was Herts And Essex Removals Limited, which you told me was run by Martin Sontag. But this was impossible. That company did not exist until 2021, and it was compulsorily dissolved by Companies House in March last year so it cannot have been trading when you came home several months later. I asked you to search out your agreement and you came up with a slightly different company name, Herts & Essex Removals & Storage Ltd, based at Matching Green in Essex. The agreement pledged: 'Your furniture and effects are covered to a substantial £100,000.' I checked, and this company was formed in 2011. But no one named Sontag was involved, and it was voluntarily dissolved in 2013. Judging by the dates, you should have been dealing with another of this crop of similarly named companies, Herts and Essex Removal and Storage Ltd – not 'Removals', with an 's'. This was set up in 2012 and, yes, it was run by Martin Sontag. The snag was, it went bust in 2018. Martin Sontag borrowed over £30,000 before the business collapsed, and is repaying this gradually. So you may have put your belongings into storage with this company in 2017, and got them back in 2018, but when everything went into storage again in 2019 it cannot have been with this company because it was in liquidation. So just who were you paying? No surprise, you were paying Martin Sontag himself. Your husband told me: 'We always paid him cash as this was his preferred method of payment.' The money was handed over by a family member and you repaid them. When the bad news came about the loss of your possessions, Martin Sontag explained that he told his employees to prepare your belongings to be returned, and on the same day other items that were not yours were to be dumped. The instructions were accidentally reversed. He stressed he had a 'gold plated insurance policy', but his inventory of your possessions was on a corrupted computer drive. You put together your own list, and insurance giant Sedgwick, the company handling the claim on behalf of Axa, offered you £4,700. You asked me, how could you replace the contents of an entire house for £4,700! Armed with your signed authority, I asked Sedgwick for a copy of the policy. It refused, but did tell me that the insurance did not provide 'new for old' replacement cover. And Sedgwick then slashed its offer to just £2,800. But who would pay £200 a month to store goods worth only £2,800? Martin Sontag was more helpful, and gave me a copy of the policy. It was made out to him personally. He also produced his agreement with you, in the name of one of the companies that had ceased to exist. He told me he had bought its customer base. Without realising it, you had been switched from a contract with a company to a cash-in-hand deal with an individual. On the brighter side, Martin Sontag told me the damaged computer had been repaired, but the inventory did not match your own. He said your inventory showed items not on his, and you told me that he had failed to list some items. I explained to Sedgwick that there was no way I could encourage you to accept £2,800. It had to think again, and it did. When you received the new offer, it had rocketed to just under £15,000. Absurdly, it was accompanied by an alleged copy of your storage deal – in the name of the company that folded in 2013. I invited Sedgwick's legal team to explain this. The question was clearly too difficult as they failed to answer. I have discussed the offer with you, so I can now report that you have accepted it. Isn't it amazing that an insurance payout can shoot up by 400 per cent! And, of course, the payment you have accepted lets Sedgwick and Axa off the hook, but Martin Sontag could still be impaled if you feel it falls short. Handing over your worldly goods to a storage firm should not involve sleepless nights, loss of belongings or a lengthy battle for fair payment, yet that is what you faced and you deserve a fair outcome.


Reuters
35 minutes ago
- Reuters
Stroll to miss Spanish GP due to wrist injury
BARCELONA, May 31 (Reuters) - Canadian Formula One driver Lance Stroll will miss Sunday's Spanish Grand Prix due to hand and wrist pain, his Aston Martin team said on Saturday. The team said Stroll, son of team owner Lawrence, had been experiencing pain for the past six weeks which his medical consultant believed stemmed from surgery following a cycling accident in 2023. "His medical team have confirmed that he will not race tomorrow and he will undergo a procedure to rectify these issues before focusing on his recovery," the team said. Stroll qualified 14th at the Circuit de Catalunya but was summoned by stewards after the session for failing to be weighed. Aston Martin will not be able to replace him for the race.