Xlear Sues FTC for Unlawful Scientific Censorship
Rob Housman, Xlear's lead lawyer explained:
'Under the Supreme Court's decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 369 (2024) a Federal agency applying a statute is limited to what the specific language of the law says on its face. And, Loper goes on to require that if the agency is interpreting the statute, its interpretation must be the 'best' reading of law. The FTC Act says nothing about requiring substantiation. And, for a host of reasons—most importantly violations of the First Amendment and Due Process Clause—the FTC's interpretation of the FTC Act is far from the 'best'. As such, we are petitioning the Utah District Court to invalidate the FTC's substantiation requirement.'
In 2021, the FTC sued Xlear alleging that the company lacked sufficient substantiation for statements the company made its Xlear Nasal Spray was an effective added layer of protection against the COVID-19 virus. Throughout the lawsuit, Xlear maintained that the science supported Xlear's COVID claims. On March 10, 2025, the Department of Justice, acting on behalf of the FTC, asked the court to drop the lawsuit with prejudice (Xlear joined in the motion).
About this new lawsuit, Nate Jones, Xlear's CEO, said:
'We agreed with the Government to drop the prior lawsuit because we wanted to get back to the business of helping Americans get and stay healthy through great oral and nasal hygiene products. However, we very much wanted our day in court. We wanted to stop the FTC's illegal misuse of the FTC Act to censor science. The effect of this is to stifle health innovation—which benefits Big Pharma over cutting-edge smaller companies with new approaches. We wanted to protect the right of all Americans to have access to science-based health information. By filing this lawsuit, we are pushing ahead with combating the Government's censorship of science.'
Jones added, 'Ironically, while the FTC demands substantiation from companies, they really don't care about science. Before the FTC sued us for substantiation, we sent them scores of studies that backed our claims. During the lawsuit the FTC admitted that not one single doctor or medical researcher had looked at the data we provided before they filed the suit.'
Xlear manufactures a suite of hygiene products ranging from Xlear nasal sprays to Spry toothpaste, which are sold at leading retailers across the country and online through Amazon.com. The company's is based in American Fork, Utah. More information about Xlear and its products, as well as the complaint can be found at Xlear.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
8 minutes ago
At least 600 CDC employees are getting final termination notices, union says
NEW YORK -- At least 600 employees of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are receiving permanent termination notices in the wake of a recent court decision that protected some CDC employees from layoffs but not others. The notices went out this week and many people have not yet received them, according to the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents more than 2,000 dues-paying members at CDC. Officials with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to a request for comment. AFGE officials said they are aware of at least 600 employees being cut. But 'due to a staggering lack of transparency from HHS," the union hasn't received formal notices of who is being laid off,' the federation said in a statement on Wednesday. The permanent cuts include about 100 people who worked in violence prevention. Some employees noted those cuts come less than two weeks after a man fired at least 180 bullets into the CDC's campus and killed a police officer. 'The irony is devastating: The very experts trained to understand, interrupt and prevent this kind of violence were among those whose jobs were eliminated,' some of the affected employees wrote in a blog post last week. On April 1, the HHS officials sent layoff notices to thousands of employees at the CDC and other federal health agencies, part of a sweeping overhaul designed to vastly shrink the agencies responsible for protecting and promoting Americans' health. Many have been on administrative leave since then — paid but not allowed to work — as lawsuits played out. A federal judge in Rhode Island last week issued a preliminary ruling that protected employees in several parts of the CDC, including groups dealing with smoking, reproductive health, environmental health, workplace safety, birth defects and sexually transmitted diseases. But the ruling did not protect other CDC employees, and layoffs are being finalized across other parts of the agency, including in the freedom of information office. The terminations were effective as of Monday, employees were told. Affected projects included work to prevent rape, child abuse and teen dating violence. The laid-off staff included people who have helped other countries to track violence against children — an effort that helped give rise to an international conference in November at which countries talked about setting violence-reduction goals. 'There are nationally and internationally recognized experts that will be impossible to replace,' said Tom Simon, the retired senior director for scientific programs at the CDC's Division of Violence Prevention. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
FTC sues LA Fitness for making it too hard to cancel gym memberships
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a lawsuit against the operators of LA Fitness on Wednesday, alleging the popular gym chain makes the process of canceling memberships too difficult for consumers. 'The FTC's complaint describes a scenario that too many Americans have experienced – a gym membership that seems impossible to cancel,' Bureau of Consumer Protection Director Christopher Mufarrige said in a statement, noting 'tens of thousands of LA Fitness customers reported difficulties.' 'The FTC will not hesitate to act on behalf of consumers when it believes companies are stifling consumers' ability to choose which recurring charges they want to keep,' he continued. LA Fitness did not immediately respond to request for comment. The complaint was filed in federal court in the Central District of California against Fitness International, LLC and Fitness & Sports Clubs, LLC. The companies operate gyms including LA Fitness, Esporta Fitness, City Sports Club and Club Studio, covering more than 600 locations and over 3.7 million members. The gym memberships cost anywhere from $30 to $299 per month and often involve annual fees. To cancel, LA Fitness requires consumers to go to the gym in person or send a cancelation notice by mail. But the FTC says it's not that simple. In the complaint, the FTC outlines the 'opaque and complicated methods' that LA Fitness allegedly uses to 'to make it extremely difficult for consumers to cancel their memberships.' First, consumers must print out cancelation forms by logging into its website. If consumers forget their log-in credentials, LA Fitness requires them to provide a 'key tag' number assigned to them at sign-up and to provide the first five digits of their credit card or bank account number to reset the account. They do not tell consumers, according to the FTC, that members have the option of submitting a written cancelation notice, nor did they specify what that request should include. The gyms also told consumers that the mail-in cancelations should be sent by certified or registered mail, according to the FTC. When consumers tried to cancel in person, the FTC said, they similarly faced obstacles. Members could only cancel with one specific employee — even though several were authorized to oversee cancelations — and only during designated hours when most people were working—even though most locations were open for 19 hours a day, according to the FTC. The FTC further alleges that LA Fitness has 'trained staff to reject escalated requests and to deny cancellations requested by phone or email, reiterating that all cancellations must be done in person with one specific employee or by mail.' 'Consumers who try to cancel their memberships by stopping charges to their bank or credit card find they are rebilled, often under new account numbers,' the FTC said. The FTC says these practices violate the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act (ROSCA) and it is seeking money back for consumers allegedly harmed by the practices.
Newsweek
30 minutes ago
- Newsweek
How Prices for Common Groceries Have Changed Since Trump Took Office
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Since President Donald Trump took office in January, grocery prices at the national level have remained elevated and, in many categories, are rising even further. Federal forecasts and multiple price trackers show continuing inflation for common items such as eggs and beef, and the USDA Economic Research Service projected overall food prices will increase over the remainder of this year and 2026. Why It Matters Food represents a large and visible share of household spending, and high grocery bills influence public perceptions of the economy and the administration's performance. A mid-2025 poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that a majority of Americans reported stress over grocery costs, and retailers have reported shoppers shifting purchases toward cheaper brands and smaller sizes. Roughly 53 percent of respondents said grocery costs were a "major" stressor. Vegetables on display in a grocery store on August 15 in Delray Beach, Florida. Vegetables on display in a grocery store on August 15 in Delray Beach, To Know Trump campaigned on promises of lowering grocery costs, but federal forecasts and private trackers showed only modest easing overall and price gains in several food staples. The USDA Economic Research Service reported that the all-food Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 0.3 percent from May to June and was 3 percent higher than June 2024. It also projected overall food prices would rise 2.9 percent this year and 2.7 percent in 2026. "Most headlines lean on 'core CPI,' which excludes food and energy," Kevin Thompson, CEO of 9i Capital Group and host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. "That's fine for economists, but for real households, those are the two biggest non-discretionary expenses. So when they say prices are 'stabilizing,' it leaves out the areas where people actually feel it the most." The exact price increases vary by grocery item. NBC News' grocery-price tracker showed eggs, chicken and beef remained higher year-over-year in the most recent update. While eggs were up 64 cents, chicken cost 81 cents more and beef had seen an increase of 67 cents. The USDA projected egg prices to have strong volatility, with a 24.6 percent change forecast for 2025, and beef and veal prices were anticipated to rise substantially, 8.8 percent, this year. "The reality is that inflation is weighted across categories," Thompson said. "If your personal diet leans heavy on protein, beef, chicken, coffee, or soda, you've likely felt double-digit increases while the official number is closer to 3 percent. Everyone's 'personal inflation' is different, and for many it feels far higher than the reported average." Trump previously warned of short-term effects from trade policy, saying, "We may have, short term, a little pain." What People Are Saying Trump said during his campaign: "When I win, I will immediately bring prices down, starting on Day One." Thompson also told Newsweek: "Tariffs during Trump's presidency did raise costs on imported goods, and new tariffs under the current administration are continuing that trend. Immigration policy does have some effect on labor costs in agriculture and food processing, but the bigger driver of food prices has been weather, disease, and global supply chain issues not immigration directly." Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "All of the inflationary pressures that were in place prior to 2025 have largely remained the same, with some everyday items actually going higher in price, if only incrementally so. The prevailing problem is the pricing structure on many consumer goods is formed through a domino effect which includes costs of production, shipping, stocking, and everything in between. "In order for prices to go lower, not only do you have to have falling demand, but also the series of transactions that make it ready to buy have to trend lower in order for businesses to continue to generate a profit. Until this happens, we're going to continue to see higher costs." What Happens Next The USDA ERS forecasts and monthly CPI releases from the Bureau of Labor Statistics will remain primary sources to measure whether grocery prices fall back, stabilize or resume faster growth in coming months. Since Trump's tariffs have gone into effect, the higher costs will likely be passed down to the consumer, Thompson said: "Businesses may absorb some costs in the short term, but over time those costs show up in the checkout line. The current tariff environment has raised the baseline market price, which means U.S. producers can charge more too, capturing extra margins. "Going forward, unless there's a consistent and predictable tariff policy, shoppers should expect continued price volatility. Once markets adjust to a clear set of rules, prices may stabilize, but likely at a higher level than before."
