DNA Decodes: From Alaska To Washington – Trump's Plan To End Ukraine War
In today's DNA, we analysed the outcomes of this high-profile meeting, the pressure it places on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and its wider geopolitical consequences for NATO, Europe, and global trade.
#DNAWithRahulSinha #DNA #DonaldTrump #Putin #Alaska #AlaskaSummit @RahulSinhaTV pic.twitter.com/puhqaWK8z3 — Zee News (@ZeeNews) August 16, 2025
Trump Briefs Zelensky, Sets Stage For Peace Talks
Following the Alaska summit, Trump immediately called Zelensky and briefed him for 90 minutes on the substance of his three-hour talks with Putin. Soon after, Trump invited the Ukrainian leader to Washington, with the meeting scheduled for August 18. Trump has made it clear that instead of a temporary ceasefire, he will push Zelensky towards a permanent peace deal with Russia.
Trump has also indicated that once the Washington meeting takes place, he will facilitate direct talks between Zelensky and Putin, setting the stage for what could be a decisive peace summit between Ukraine and Russia.
The White House talks will be their second encounter in six months. Zelensky still remembers his last visit in February 2025, which ended on a bitter note after public disagreements with Trump and Vice President JD Vance. This time, however, the stakes are even higher, with Trump openly stating that "agreement now depends on Zelensky."
Economic and Geopolitical Challenges Facing Ukraine
The analysis also highlights Ukraine's fragile economy, its heavy dependence on US and EU aid, NATO's role, and Trump's growing scepticism towards the alliance. With over $350 billion already poured into Ukraine by the US and Europe, any shift in American support could dramatically alter the war's trajectory.
Trump's Reception of Putin Stokes Speculation
Trump's warm reception of Putin in Alaska, complete with a red carpet, joint appearances, and symbolic military salutes, has further fuelled speculation of a new understanding between Washington and Moscow. Observers believe Trump may leverage peace in Ukraine for gains in energy, trade, and arms control negotiations, while sidelining NATO.
As the world waits for Trump-Zelensky talks in Washington, the key question remains: Will Zelensky accept Trump's terms for a Russia-Ukraine peace deal, or risk being left isolated by the US?
ALSO READ: Trump Says Xi Jinping Assured Him China Will Not Invade Taiwan During His Presidency
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
In crisis, defence builds bridges for India-US tariff tussle
Manish Kumar Jha is a defence editor and security expert. He is the Sr. Visiting Fellow & Editorial Adviser at the United Services Institution of India. He is a fellow of Oxford University/KPF. He writes on national security, military technology, strategic affairs & policies. LESS ... MORE Indo-US bilateral relations have seen a decade of sustained progress, growth, and strategic partnership. For all strategic elements that exist between India and the US, security remains at the core, the fundamental reason for the rapidly growing relations over the past decade. In fact, the military cooperation and high-value defence procurements have surpassed a staggering value of $20 billion, with many other potential military equipment on the horizon. The security relationship has a deep structural framework that won't vanish overnight despite the trade tariff. However, the current crisis leaves an uncanny feeling. The present crisis involves factors which were building up as per Trump's obsessions with trade tariffs, which he thinks is the panacea for industrial deficit. The hyper and open market economy that thrives in the US has its base in the technological superiority that feeds on the service industry by and large, making the US the strongest economic powerhouse. So, in Trump's policy for retribution is based on trade imbalances, tariffs, and oil imports from Russia in the case of India. If the US-Russia deal begins to work, oil import issues will be secondary as Russia puts it on its top agenda for its sanctions-hit economy. So far, Trump's offensive has been to extract a quick deal, which he managed to garner from the EU and Japan. With the EU, he focused on energy. Trump said the EU will purchase $750billion in US energy, in addition to increasing overall investment in the US by $600billion. However, the EU did manage to secure 'strategic products' as it will not attract any tariffs, including aircraft and their parts, chemicals, and some agricultural products, among others. And, Japan negotiated an immensely favourable deal on automobiles, against agri-concessions. Tokyo pledged investment of $550 billion in the US economy, in a mix of various financial instruments — equity, loans and guarantees, in exchange for lower tariffs on its exports to the US Ultimately, Japan avoided the prospect of a 25% tariff rate set to take effect on 1 August, and a 15% tariff, including automobiles, is just about 5% above the current applicable tariff. These are the ways, some sort of template to work on. However, the set of compulsions in an emerging economy like India is not easy, especially the agri sector, which is a heady mix of economic and political conditions; a direct impact on the livelihood of millions in some ways or other. So, the policymakers can navigate through despite the inherent challenges. Defence itself makes a compelling case here. Besides defence, there are already promising deals in the pipeline between Tata and Air India, including an order for about 230 planes from Boeing, which would be worth about $30 billion as per the reported estimated value. Strategic frameworks supporting defence ties Since 2016, the US has designated India as a major defence partner, enabling privileged access to advanced technologies. India also holds a Strategic Trade Authorisation Tier-1 status since 2018, easing defence trade protocols. Since then, the multiple foundational agreements signed are a testament to structural frameworks. The bilateral framework was strengthened through Logistics (LEMOA, 2016), Secure Communications (COMCASA, 2018), and Geospatial Data Sharing (BECA, 2020) agreements. Additionally, the Security of Supply Arrangement (SOSA) was inked in 2024. It strengthens mutual access to critical defence goods and ensures supply continuity under urgent operational scenarios. India became the first non-Nato country after Singapore to sign such a pact. Defence trade: The defence trade between the two countries has exceeded $ 20.25 billion in nearly 15 years, topping Russia as the major defence partner. Major acquisitions include C-130J and C-17 transports, P-8I patrol aircraft, Apache and Chinook helicopters, MH-60R, Harpoon missiles, M-777 howitzers, and GE engines for the Tejas and AMCA programmes. The US is now one of India's largest arms suppliers, with key deals including: AH-64E Apache Attack Helicopters: India has procured 22 Apache helicopters for the Indian Air Force (IAF), delivered by 2020, and an additional 6 for the Indian Army, enhancing India's precision strike capability. CH-47F Chinook heavy-lift helicopters: 15 Chinooks have been inducted into the IAF for heavy transport roles, including troop movement and equipment transport in high-altitude areas. P-8I Poseidon Maritime Patrol Aircraft: India operates 12 P-8I aircraft (a variant of the US Navy's P-8A) for anti-submarine warfare, surveillance, and reconnaissance, primarily in the Indian Ocean. MQ-9B SeaGuardian Drones (Predator B): In 2024, a deal valued at ~$4 billion was announced for the procurement of 31 MQ-9B UAVs (15 for Navy, 8 each for Army and Air Force) to enhance long-range ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance) and strike capabilities. SIG Sauer SIG716 Rifles: India acquired over 72,000 SIG716 assault rifles for frontline infantry, replacing older INSAS rifles under emergency procurement. Stryker armoured vehicles: Negotiations and co-development discussions are ongoing for the Stryker infantry combat vehicle, aimed at enhancing India's mechanised infantry. Strategic initiatives: Core elements India-US defence relations, highlighting key initiatives such as INDUS-X, DTTI, and iCET, and charting the future of co-development, co-production, and collaboration in critical and emerging defence technologies. Established in 2012, the Defence Trade and Technology Initiative (DTTI) marks a shift from buyer-seller dynamics toward joint technology development and co-production. Notable opportunities under DTTI include the co-production of GE F-414 jet engines in India with 80 % tech transfer to power the Tejas Mk II and Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA). It has another key development of drone variants, including armed UAVs, under DTTI – India may soon be the first non-Nato nation to field Predator-type systems. Building on that most significant Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology (iCET) was unveiled in May 2022 during the Quad Summit and formally launched in early 2023. iCET aims to accelerate defence-focused innovation in AI, quantum, semiconductors, telecom, clean energy, and biotech. It created the Defence Innovation Bridge, linking startups and research institutions across both countries. Additionally, a joint programme was launched in 2023 –INDUS-X — by India's iDEX and the US Department of Defence's DIU to promote early-stage co-innovation as part of the defence acceleration ecosystem. INDUS-X Gurukul (education series) extended to investor strategy sessions, and academic-industry workshops to facilitate tech transfer and capital access. It took shape as space imaging company KaleidEO, rocket makers EtherealX and AI-driven company Shyam VNL will participate in a programme for defence and dual-use technology and explore opportunities to work with the US Defence Innovation Unit, the Department of Defence. It brought partnerships with front-line US defence entities like Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, RTX, etc. Moreover, the defence cooperation broadened on key co-production & co-development projects under the Joint Impact Challenges across undersea, space-ISR, and dual-use technology. The US and India agreed to co-produce sonobuoys for undersea domain awareness. These units will be interoperable with US, Indian, and Quad naval systems (P-8, MH-60R, MQ-9B). Broader context & emerging trajectory In recent years, India has been reducing its reliance on Russian defence systems in favour of US and Western suppliers, aligning procurement and interoperable defence standards with American platforms. While it is the outcome of the US-Russia deal, which might indicate a direction, defence will bring back the elements of convergence. It certainly opens doors in times of crisis. India–US defence relations have evolved into a robust strategic partnership—rooted in trust, trade agreements, co-development frameworks, and defence innovation ecosystems. The future is set toward deeper co-production, co-innovation, and joint leadership in critical and emerging technologies, positioning the partnership as a central pillar of Indo-Pacific security architecture and global defence innovation. So much work is already underway in strategic areas of security and military cooperation, which mutually favours both India and the US in the overall security architecture. PM Modi has had much success in balancing geostrategic equations. Trump has three more years in the White House. Both democracies are nearly in sync on many crucial issues. It would be highly disappointing if the tariff deal gets into a rough patch. Washington hawks know where the real trouble is coming from. That is already a fact for the US with or without tariffs. Let's not divert. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Court Split Leaves Trump's Civil Fraud Appeal Stuck In Slow Lane
The New York court weighing President Trump's appeal of a roughly $500 million civil-fraud judgment typically acts swiftly and unanimously, with many of its decisions coming within weeks after hearing arguments. Trump's experience stands out as an unusual exception. A five-justice panel has yet to render a decision nearly a year after taking up the case, leaving him and his business in limbo. Behind the scenes, members of the panel have been divided, and three of them have been writing opinions, according to people familiar with the matter. It couldn't be determined how they are split. Justices do occasionally shift their positions, and the number of opinions could change, the people said. A spokesman for the New York state court system said it doesn't comment on pending litigation. A spokesman for Trump's legal team said, 'It is time for the New York Courts to step in and end this witch hunt once and for all.' For the New York Appellate Division's First Department, the Trump matter is among the most high-profile cases in its history, and the outcome could influence future business regulation in the state. For Trump, whose legal entanglements largely faded after his return to the White House, the fraud case is his main private legal headache. At stake isn't only the half-billion dollar penalty, growing by the day with interest, but the possibility that his sons could be barred from running his family company in the near term. The president asks regularly why the court hasn't ruled, said people who speak to him. If the appellate court upholds the trial judge's decision, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump would be barred from holding a position as an officer of a New York company for two years. New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, sued Trump in 2022, alleging he fraudulently inflated the value of parts of his real-estate empire for financial benefit, primarily lower-interest loans. Justice Arthur Engoron presided over a monthslong civil trial and ruled James proved her case, which relied upon a state statute that grants the attorney general broad authority to investigate 'persistent fraud or illegality' in business. The judge in February 2024 ordered Trump to pay more than $350 million plus interest and imposed an array of other sanctions that restricted the Trump Organization from borrowing money and effectively prohibited Trump's two eldest sons from running the business for two years. Trump quickly appealed, and the First Department put those restrictions on hold while it considered the case. The appeals court heard arguments this past September, and some of the judges' questions appeared favorable to Trump. One wondered whether there should be some 'guardrails' on the attorney general's power. Another questioned the size of the judgment. 'The immense penalty in this case is troubling,' said Justice Peter Moulton. A lawyer for James defended it: 'There was a lot of fraud.' Other justices appeared to see James's lawsuit as within the bounds of the law, despite the Trump lawyers' arguments that banks didn't lose money and no victims were harmed. Presiding Justice Dianne Renwick noted the statute refers to 'persistent fraud or illegality,' but not harm. Lengthy waits and disagreeing judges are a common occurrence on some appeals courts. But recent leadership of the First Judicial Department, which reviews thousands of lower-court decisions and motions annually, has emphasized speed. The First Department typically issues decisions within 30 days, according to a 2024 court report. For each of the past five years, that report said, the court began its new annual session each September with zero pending and undecided appeals. 'Is this normal? No,' said Bill White, a lawyer at appellate consulting firm Counsel Press. 'This is something I imagine they are anxious to have on their docket for so long, with everyone's expectation and the pressure building.' Alongside that promptness has come unanimity. From 2024 through this July, the court decided roughly 2,900 appeals, according to an analysis of public court data. Only about two dozen of those rulings—or less than .01%—came with a recorded dissent. If the court upholds the trial judge's decision, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. would be barred from holding a position as an officer of a New York company for two years. Trump and his company for three years couldn't apply for loans from financial institutions registered in New York. The losing side can appeal to the state's highest court. The wait has cost the company. It is paying a court-appointed monitor, the former federal judge Barbara Jones, whom Trump lawyers previously accused of charging 'exorbitant fees' amounting to more than $2.6 million over 14 months. On top of that, Trump has paid more than $2 million in fees on the bond he secured to guarantee the judgment while he appeals, according to a person familiar with the matter. The panel hearing the Trump appeal includes four judges appointed by Democratic governors and one Republican appointee, David Friedman, who is regarded as among the most conservative of the court's 21 members. The court's presiding justice, Renwick, also on the panel, is viewed as a stalwart liberal who has an institutional interest in seeking consensus and guarding the court's reputation. Write to Corinne Ramey at
Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
Putin CRUSHES Ukraine Talks, Blow To Trump? Russia Sends 100s Of Missiles Into Zelensky Territory
India Reacts To Trump-Putin Alaska Summit As Tariff Threat Looms Over Russian Oil And Exports India has welcomed the Trump–Putin summit in Alaska, praising the pursuit of diplomacy, but strongly opposed Washington's new tariff threats. The Modi government faces a 25% duty on exports starting August 27, a move explicitly linked to India's Russian oil imports. While Trump claimed Moscow had already lost India as a client, New Delhi dismissed the assertion, highlighting its reliance on discounted crude to ensure energy security. India condemned the tariffs as 'unfair and unjustified,' warning of severe impact on textiles, marine, and leather exports. With China and India as Moscow's top oil buyers, global energy geopolitics now collides with trade war risks. As India awaits clarity on the summit's next steps, New Delhi is preparing to defend its economic interests while continuing to call for dialogue and peace in Ukraine. 56.5K views | 1 day ago
