logo
Channel crisis ‘deteriorating', No 10 admits as French use tear gas on migrants

Channel crisis ‘deteriorating', No 10 admits as French use tear gas on migrants

Hundreds gathered on the dunes before making dashes towards the Channel at Gravelines beach near Calais, all intent on boarding a single dinghy on Tuesday morning.
The French authorities stood by and watched as those not deterred by the gas waded into the water intent on boarding a single dinghy to risk the Channel crossing.
The scenes at Gravelines unfolded just hours after a meeting between Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron in Canada to address a situation No 10 acknowledged was 'deteriorating'.
Some 16,545 people have crossed in small boats so far in 2025 according to Home Office figures, a 45% increase on the same period in 2024.
At Gravelines on Tuesday, migrants of all ages who made it to the sea had to wait in waist-deep water for almost an hour before any of them were able to board the small boat.
An older man on crutches had to be carried out of the water by two others, who then ran off to re-join the crowd.
Many others did not make it to the water, raising their arms in surrender under a thick blanket of tear gas fired by the French Police Nationale.
Officers were trudging the sands at Gravelines beach before the sun had risen on Tuesday morning, armed with riot shields, tear gas and batons.
Pictures taken by the PA news agency show a cloud of smoke as migrants ran from the dunes.
A warning cry of 'baby, baby' was heard as a man carrying a tiny child sprinted out of the smog.
Those who made it to the water bunched into three groups and waited for the dinghy to collect them, watched by the French police from the shoreline.
While they waited, an Afghani migrant who wished to remain anonymous told PA that he was seeking a better life in the UK.
'Just I want to go for a good life, I have a situation bad in my country,' he said.
Well over 50 migrants made it aboard the small black dinghy before it finally took off into the Channel.
Others were left to watch as it floated out to sea.
Pictures from the morning show a woman sitting dejected on the sand after chasing the dinghy as it left the beach.
She and her friends, thought to be Ethiopian, complained that it was mostly men who had managed to get on the boat that morning.
They had been hit by tear gas when the migrants were making their initial sprint to the water.
The dinghy, which had originally come to shore around 7am local time (6am BST), headed out to sea at 9.30am.
The boat appeared to be overloaded and witnesses saw it was eventually brought back to shore at around 11am local time.
The police present on Gravelines beach would not confirm whether the use of tear gas had now become common practice during these clashes.
A beach comber who has begun to document crossings was watching events unfold on Tuesday.
The 28-year-old said of French police: 'I think they show them that they tried to stop them but they're happy if a few hundred or thousand are away because the camps are more empty.'
The Prime Minister and Mr Macron will hold a summit in July focused on tackling the migration problem, No 10 said after a meeting between the pair in the margins of the G7 in Canada.
'Migration should be a key focus given the deteriorating situation in the Channel, they confirmed – adding that they should continue to work closely with other partners to find innovative ways to drive forward progress,' an official readout of the meeting said.
Downing Street acknowledged there were 'no quick fixes', but insisted action was already being taken and 'the days of Britain being a soft touch for these gangs are over'.
That includes measures aimed at getting the French authorities to intervene even if migrants are already in the sea.
Asked if the Government approved of the use of tear gas, the spokesman said: 'Our work with the French has never been closer.
'We are the first government to have secured agreement from the French to review their laws so their border enforcement teams can intervene in shallow waters.'
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'Starmer is right, under his watch the Channel crisis is spiralling out of control.'
He said 2025 was the worst year on record but Labour's answer was 'to ask the British taxpayer to foot the bill for their accommodation or to pay half a billion pounds for the French to wave the boats off and do next to nothing to prevent Channel crossings'.
He added: 'The gangs are laughing, the boats keep coming, and Labour's response is to form another taskforce and hold a summit. It's weak and it's embarrassing.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer dismisses concerns on Trump's health after document gaffe
Starmer dismisses concerns on Trump's health after document gaffe

Telegraph

time17 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Starmer dismisses concerns on Trump's health after document gaffe

Sir Keir Starmer has dismissed concerns about Donald Trump's health after the US president dropped pages of the UK-US trade deal when holding it up for the cameras. Mr Trump's slip happened as he held the bundle of documents when standing alongside the Prime Minister after their talks at the G7 summit in Canada. Mr Trump also told reporters he was pleased to have signed a deal with the 'European Union', rather than the UK. Earlier this month, he had tripped when climbing the stairs of Air Force One. Sir Keir reached down to pick up the pages of the trade deal, which dropped to the floor. The Tories mocked an image capturing him crouched at the feet of the president. Joe Biden, Mr Trump's predecessor as US president, often had slips and gaffes leapt upon by Right-wing critics when he was in the White House. Mr Biden dropped his attempt to seek re-election after concerns soared after a stumbling debate performance against Mr Trump last summer. Mr Trump, 79, is just three years younger than 82-year-old Mr Biden. Asked whether he had concerns about the US president's health, Sir Keir told reporters at the G7 summit. 'No. I mean, look, there weren't many choices with the documents and picking it up, because as you probably know there were quite strict rules about who can get close to the president. 'I mean, seriously, I think if any of you had stepped forward other than me.. I was just deeply conscious that in a situation like [that] it would not have been good for anybody else to have stepped forwards – not that any of you rushed to! There's a very tightly guarded security zone around the President, as you would expect.' The comments referenced the pack of reporters, photographers and cameramen who were standing nearby and covering the remarks from Sir Keir and Mr Trump. 'He's slightly more liberal than I am' The Prime Minister and the US president appear to have struck up a warm, constructive personal relationship despite their differing political and personal backgrounds. Mr Trump joked after their meeting in Canada: 'We're very long-time partners and allies and friends, and we've become friends in a short period of time. He's slightly more liberal than I am. 'The Prime Minister has done a great job. I want to just tell that to the people of the United Kingdom. He's done a very, very good job.' The Prime Minister was asked by reporters to explain why Mr Trump likes him so much, given that other world leaders have had strained relationships with the US president. Sir Keir said: 'That's really for him to answer rather than me, but we do have a good relationship. I think that is in the national interest, frankly. There's long been a close relationship between the US and the UK. 'As I've said many times, on defence and security and intelligence sharing in particular, we are closer than any two countries, and I'm very pleased that I've got a good relationship with him – notwithstanding, as both he and I acknowledge, that our political backgrounds are different. 'But it just goes to prove that it is possible to work in a constructive way if you keep your focus on the national interest.'

Fact check: China has made only one public statement on Chagos Islands deal
Fact check: China has made only one public statement on Chagos Islands deal

The Independent

time37 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Fact check: China has made only one public statement on Chagos Islands deal

Claims have circulated around international support for the Government's deal with Mauritius over the Chagos Islands and its implications for the US-UK military base on Diego Garcia. The Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said the deal had 'secured the base for the long term' and that 'has been opposed by our adversaries' including China. The Conservative Party has claimed it is 'pure disinformation' that critics of the deal are siding with China. Evaluation There is limited information on what Beijing thinks about the deal. Certainly the only known public statement from a Chinese official on the deal applauded the agreement in the context of safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity. It did not mention China's view on the continued presence of the military base on Diego Garcia. China abstained on the UN vote which was a key stage in the road to the deal, and one expert the PA news agency spoke to said he believes that Beijing 'privately views the agreement … somewhat as a setback', citing a variety of reasons. The facts How long have the Chagos Islands been in UK hands? Britain took control of Mauritius from 1810 when it was seized from the French. Between 1814 and 1965 the Chagos Archipelago was administered by the UK as a dependency of the Mauritius colony. In 1965 the UK detached the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius and several Islands from the Seychelles and created the new British Indian Ocean Territory. Three years later Mauritius became an independent country. Between 1967 and 1973 the UK removed the population of the Chagos Archipelago. What has China said about the UK-Mauritius deal? On May 26 the new Chinese ambassador to Mauritius, Huang Shifang, gave a speech at a reception attended by the Mauritian Prime Minister, the Vice President and others. The official text of the speech – which was sent to the PA news agency by the Chinese embassy in Mauritius – does not directly mention the Chagos deal. A release from the Mauritian Prime Minister's office the next day said of the ambassador's speech: 'Acknowledging Mauritius's firm adherence to the One-China Policy, she commended the recent achievement regarding the Chagos Archipelago.' The closest that the official text of the speech comes to this is a section where the ambassador says: 'China highly appreciates Mauritius's adherence to the One-China Policy, and fully supports Mauritius in safeguarding its national sovereignty and territorial integrity.' However, a short video excerpt from the speech, posted to YouTube, shows that immediately afterwards the ambassador added: 'In particular we applaud loudly for the historical achievement on the Chagos agreement. Massive congratulations.' What might Beijing think behind closed doors? It is difficult to say what policymakers in the Chinese capital might be thinking about the deal behind closed doors. The prime minister's statement appears to claim that China opposed the part of the deal which allows Diego Garcia to remain open. When the ambassador's speech supported Mauritius's work on its territorial integrity she linked that to the country's One China Policy. The One China Policy is Beijing's claim that 'Taiwan is an inalienable part of China's territory'. So the ambassador's statement – if an accurate representation of Beijing's thinking – could show that China supports the handing over of Chagos to Mauritius because it reinforces the principle of territorial integrity which the Chinese leadership thinks supports its claim to Taiwan. But this does not rule out Beijing being disappointed about the part of the deal which allows the Diego Garcia base to remain open. When quizzed on Sir Keir's claims, his official spokesperson pointed towards the deal's support from the US and other allies. This included a post from US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth who said the deal secures 'key US national security interests in the region' and added: 'We are confident the base is protected for many years ahead.' Benjamin Sacks, a professor of political geography at the RAND School of Public Policy in the US, told PA: 'I contend that Beijing privately views the agreement, even if modified to ameliorate some Chagossians' outstanding demands, somewhat as a setback. In practical terms, it gains little if any advantage from it.' He said the deal resolves the question as to whether the UK, 'a major state actor supporting existing rules-based orders (RBOs), was violating them in respect to the Chagos'. He added: 'The Chagos issue constituted a perennial problem for British foreign policy; one that China could simultaneously exploit to demonstrate its supposed adherence to existing RBOs and undermine the UK's traditionally important role in maintaining it.' The deal 'deters Port Louis (Mauritius) from becoming an effective client state of Beijing' while allowing it to balance a strong economic relationship with China while continuing its close relationships with Beijing's competitors, India, the UK and the US, he said. Dr Sacks added: 'Analysis … suggests that China prioritises decolonisation so as to replace European and American influence with its own. For this reason, Beijing will applaud the agreement as a 'win' against the major Western powers.' As for the base at Diego Garcia: 'Beijing will have to contend with its continued presence for at least the next 99 years, and likely longer.' He said it can also be argued that the base's deterrence effect 'is stronger now that the agreement has secured and clarified its future within international laws and norms'. What has China said about the Chagos Islands in the past? In 2017 China abstained on a UN General Assembly vote which asked the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to deliver an advisory opinion on the dispute between the UK and Mauritius. This ICJ opinion was ultimately cited in the UK-Mauritius agreement. At the time the Chinese representative to the General Assembly said: 'China calls upon the countries concerned to continue to make efforts in good faith and to continue to carry out bilateral negotiations and consultations, so as to seek an appropriate solution to the question of Chagos archipelago as soon as possible.' The court opinion that followed in 2019 was that the UK is 'under an obligation to bring to an end its administration of the Chagos Archipelago as quickly as possible'. In the wake of this opinion, in 2019 the General Assembly adopted a resolution which welcomed the court's decision. At this point China was one of the 116 votes for the resolution. Six countries voted against and 56 abstained. The Chinese representative said at the time: 'The Chinese Government is a consistent and firm supporter of the decolonisation process.' More recently in a China-Mauritius meeting on August 1 last year – according to a Mauritian press release – the Chinese representative 'reiterated China's aid to Mauritius in its quest for sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago'. UNGA – Thursday, 22 June 2017, 10 am (archived)

The Daily T: ‘I don't trust Labour one bit' – grooming victim's father on new inquiry
The Daily T: ‘I don't trust Labour one bit' – grooming victim's father on new inquiry

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

The Daily T: ‘I don't trust Labour one bit' – grooming victim's father on new inquiry

Keir Starmer's decision to U-turn on the launch of a national inquiry into the historic sexual abuse of thousands of young girls hasn't been met with the praise he might have hoped. The PM's announcement followed a report by Baroness Casey, which found that police and council leaders failed to act against Asian grooming gangs due to fears of being called racist. But has the Government already lost the trust of victims after months of resisting calls and saying Tories calling for the national inquiry were 'jumping on the bandwagon of the far-Right'? Earlier today, during a press conference in London by Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, victims and campaigners of the grooming gang scandal criticised Starmer's inquiry for not going far enough. Camilla spoke to Badenoch about why the issue is so personal to her and what the Tories plan to push Labour on in the next stage of the inquiry's timeline. And Tim met to Marlon West whose daughter Scarlett was groomed from age 14 to 18 and said he isn't 'reassured one little bit' that the authorities will face accountability.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store