logo
Fact check: China has made only one public statement on Chagos Islands deal

Fact check: China has made only one public statement on Chagos Islands deal

Independent6 hours ago

Claims have circulated around international support for the Government's deal with Mauritius over the Chagos Islands and its implications for the US-UK military base on Diego Garcia.
The Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said the deal had 'secured the base for the long term' and that 'has been opposed by our adversaries' including China.
The Conservative Party has claimed it is 'pure disinformation' that critics of the deal are siding with China.
Evaluation
There is limited information on what Beijing thinks about the deal.
Certainly the only known public statement from a Chinese official on the deal applauded the agreement in the context of safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity. It did not mention China's view on the continued presence of the military base on Diego Garcia.
China abstained on the UN vote which was a key stage in the road to the deal, and one expert the PA news agency spoke to said he believes that Beijing 'privately views the agreement … somewhat as a setback', citing a variety of reasons.
The facts
How long have the Chagos Islands been in UK hands?
Britain took control of Mauritius from 1810 when it was seized from the French. Between 1814 and 1965 the Chagos Archipelago was administered by the UK as a dependency of the Mauritius colony.
In 1965 the UK detached the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius and several Islands from the Seychelles and created the new British Indian Ocean Territory. Three years later Mauritius became an independent country.
Between 1967 and 1973 the UK removed the population of the Chagos Archipelago.
What has China said about the UK-Mauritius deal?
On May 26 the new Chinese ambassador to Mauritius, Huang Shifang, gave a speech at a reception attended by the Mauritian Prime Minister, the Vice President and others.
The official text of the speech – which was sent to the PA news agency by the Chinese embassy in Mauritius – does not directly mention the Chagos deal.
A release from the Mauritian Prime Minister's office the next day said of the ambassador's speech: 'Acknowledging Mauritius's firm adherence to the One-China Policy, she commended the recent achievement regarding the Chagos Archipelago.'
The closest that the official text of the speech comes to this is a section where the ambassador says: 'China highly appreciates Mauritius's adherence to the One-China Policy, and fully supports Mauritius in safeguarding its national sovereignty and territorial integrity.'
However, a short video excerpt from the speech, posted to YouTube, shows that immediately afterwards the ambassador added: 'In particular we applaud loudly for the historical achievement on the Chagos agreement. Massive congratulations.'
What might Beijing think behind closed doors?
It is difficult to say what policymakers in the Chinese capital might be thinking about the deal behind closed doors.
The prime minister's statement appears to claim that China opposed the part of the deal which allows Diego Garcia to remain open.
When the ambassador's speech supported Mauritius's work on its territorial integrity she linked that to the country's One China Policy.
The One China Policy is Beijing's claim that 'Taiwan is an inalienable part of China's territory'.
So the ambassador's statement – if an accurate representation of Beijing's thinking – could show that China supports the handing over of Chagos to Mauritius because it reinforces the principle of territorial integrity which the Chinese leadership thinks supports its claim to Taiwan.
But this does not rule out Beijing being disappointed about the part of the deal which allows the Diego Garcia base to remain open.
When quizzed on Sir Keir's claims, his official spokesperson pointed towards the deal's support from the US and other allies. This included a post from US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth who said the deal secures 'key US national security interests in the region' and added: 'We are confident the base is protected for many years ahead.'
Benjamin Sacks, a professor of political geography at the RAND School of Public Policy in the US, told PA: 'I contend that Beijing privately views the agreement, even if modified to ameliorate some Chagossians' outstanding demands, somewhat as a setback. In practical terms, it gains little if any advantage from it.'
He said the deal resolves the question as to whether the UK, 'a major state actor supporting existing rules-based orders (RBOs), was violating them in respect to the Chagos'.
He added: 'The Chagos issue constituted a perennial problem for British foreign policy; one that China could simultaneously exploit to demonstrate its supposed adherence to existing RBOs and undermine the UK's traditionally important role in maintaining it.'
The deal 'deters Port Louis (Mauritius) from becoming an effective client state of Beijing' while allowing it to balance a strong economic relationship with China while continuing its close relationships with Beijing's competitors, India, the UK and the US, he said.
Dr Sacks added: 'Analysis … suggests that China prioritises decolonisation so as to replace European and American influence with its own. For this reason, Beijing will applaud the agreement as a 'win' against the major Western powers.'
As for the base at Diego Garcia: 'Beijing will have to contend with its continued presence for at least the next 99 years, and likely longer.'
He said it can also be argued that the base's deterrence effect 'is stronger now that the agreement has secured and clarified its future within international laws and norms'.
What has China said about the Chagos Islands in the past?
In 2017 China abstained on a UN General Assembly vote which asked the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to deliver an advisory opinion on the dispute between the UK and Mauritius. This ICJ opinion was ultimately cited in the UK-Mauritius agreement.
At the time the Chinese representative to the General Assembly said: 'China calls upon the countries concerned to continue to make efforts in good faith and to continue to carry out bilateral negotiations and consultations, so as to seek an appropriate solution to the question of Chagos archipelago as soon as possible.'
The court opinion that followed in 2019 was that the UK is 'under an obligation to bring to an end its administration of the Chagos Archipelago as quickly as possible'.
In the wake of this opinion, in 2019 the General Assembly adopted a resolution which welcomed the court's decision. At this point China was one of the 116 votes for the resolution. Six countries voted against and 56 abstained.
The Chinese representative said at the time: 'The Chinese Government is a consistent and firm supporter of the decolonisation process.'
More recently in a China-Mauritius meeting on August 1 last year – according to a Mauritian press release – the Chinese representative 'reiterated China's aid to Mauritius in its quest for sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago'.
UNGA – Thursday, 22 June 2017, 10 am (archived)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Asylum seekers who commit child sex crimes ‘a border security issue'
Asylum seekers who commit child sex crimes ‘a border security issue'

Times

time41 minutes ago

  • Times

Asylum seekers who commit child sex crimes ‘a border security issue'

The Conservative Party has claimed that grooming gangs are a 'border security issue' after a landmark report found that many suspects in live cases were foreign or claiming asylum. Baroness Casey of Blackstock recorded the observation in her review on child sexual exploitation after seeing details from a dozen investigations. She said more effort was required to identify the nature of grooming and understand whether the profile of offenders was changing. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, said the finding showed the issue of grooming gangs went 'beyond criminal justice' and 'into borders'. The shadow home secretary, Chris Philp, added: 'It is a border security issue. This year so far has been the worst in history for illegal immigration across the English Channel. The government has no idea who the people coming are, what their previous records are … the vast majority are men. The lack of control of the border is fuelling the risk here.'

MPs vote to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales
MPs vote to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

MPs vote to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales

MPs have voted to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales. The amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill, abolishing the prosecution of women for terminating their pregnancy at any stage, passed by 379 votes to 137. It represents the biggest shake-up in reproductive rights for almost 60 years. Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, who tabled the so-called "New Clause One" (NC1), said it would ensure women do not face investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment in relation to any pregnancies. She said the current "Victorian" laws had been used against vulnerable women, citing cases such as Nicola Packer, who was prosecuted on suspicion of having an illegal abortion. She was found not guilty in May. "Nicola's story is deplorable, but there are many others," Ms Antoniazzi said. Abortion in England and Wales is currently a criminal offence but is legal with an authorised provider for up to 24 weeks after conception. The procedure is allowed after this time in very limited circumstances. It is also legal to take prescribed related medication at home if a woman is less than 10 weeks pregnant. Ms Antoniazzi said NC1 was "a narrow, targeted measure" that would not change how abortion services were provided or the rules under the 1967 Abortion Act. She said: "The 24 [week] limit remains. Abortions still require the approval of signatures of two doctors, and women would still have to meet the grounds laid out in the Act." The MP said that meant healthcare professionals "acting outside the law and abusive partners using violence or poisoning to end a pregnancy would still be criminalised, as they are now." She added: "This piece of legislation will only take women out of the criminal justice system because they are vulnerable and they need our help. "As I have said before, and I will say it again, just what public interest is this serving? This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end." 16:48 The change will not come into effect immediately as the Crime and Policing Bill is still making its way through Parliament. A separate amendment, put forward by Labour MP Stella Creasy, went further with a measure to "lock in" the right of a person to have an abortion while protecting those who help them. However, her amendment was not voted on because Ms Antoniazzi's passed, as expected. Conservative MP Sir Edward Leigh, speaking against both amendments, described them as "not pro-woman" and argued they "would introduce sex-selective abortion". How did MPs vote? MPs were given a free vote on the amendment, as is typically the case with so-called matters of conscience. A breakdown of the vote showed it was passed overwhelmingly by Labour and Lib Dem MPs. Just eight Conservative MPs voted in favour, while all Reform UK MPs opposed the amendment, with the exception of the party's leader Nigel Farage, who abstained. Sir Keir Starmer was not present for the vote as he is currently in Canada for the G7 summit, but said earlier that his "longstanding in-principle position is that women have the right to a safe and legal abortion". The issue of women investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions has been in the spotlight due to several recent high-profile cases. Ms Packer was cleared by a jury last month after taking prescribed abortion medicine at home when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal limit of 10 weeks. In the Commons, Ms Antoniazzi cited another case of a young mother who was jailed for two years after she was forced to take illegal abortion medication by her abusive partner. He was never investigated.

Government to announce another delay to HS2
Government to announce another delay to HS2

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Government to announce another delay to HS2

The government will announce another delay to the beleaguered HS2 project on Wednesday, saying the latest target is now impossible. Sky News understands that Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander will announce that the London to Birmingham line will no longer be ready to open by 2033. It is not clear what the new target date will be. Ms Alexander is expected to blame the Tories for a "litany of failure" that drove the costs up by £37bn since 2012, when the high-speed rail network was approved by the coalition government. As first reported by The Telegraph, she is also expected to raise concerns that taxpayers may have been defrauded by subcontractors and pledge that "consequences will be felt". Ms Alexander's announcement will come alongside the findings of two reviews into HS2, looking into what went wrong and how and when to construct the rest of it. She will tell MPs: "Billions of pounds of taxpayers' money has been wasted by constant scope changes, ineffective contracts and bad management. "It's an appalling mess. But it's one we will sort out." HS2 was originally planned to cut journey times and improve connectivity between London and the Midlands and the North. It was given the go-ahead in 2012 with the aim of operating by 2026, but has since been mired in setbacks and spiralling costs. 3:09 The initial plan was to build the first phase connecting London and Birmingham, followed by adding two branches to Manchester and Leeds. However, Boris Johnson scrapped the leg to Leeds in 2021, while Rishi Sunak pulled the plug on the remainder of the second phase to Manchester in 2023 because of spiralling costs. The latest time scales give an opening date of between 2029 and 2033 for the London to Birmingham leg, which is under construction. The most recent cost estimate was £49bn to £56.6bn (in 2019 prices), according to a House of Commons research briefing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store