My Pixel 9 Pro is removing all color and warmth from my photos, and I'm sick of it
I have long been a proponent of the Pixel camera. From my Pixel 2 XL to the 4 XL, 5, 6 Pro, 7 Pro, 8 Pro, and 9 Pro XL, I've used a Pixel as my personal phone and my primary camera since 2017, taking over 10,000 photos in the process. For years, my Pixel phone's camera was near flawless, at least compared to everything else on the market. It took clear, accurate, and well-detailed photos in every situation. Darkness or light, in movement or steady, up-close or far away, zoomed-in or ultrawide, it did everything I wanted it to. And I used it to capture stunning photos again, and again, and again.
So when I say I'm getting sick and tired of this one issue with my Pixel 9 Pro XL's camera, you should know that I'm saying this out of love, not hate. And out of a growing frustration with the Pixel's propensity to suck every color and warm tone out of my pics in certain situations, leaving me with a bland, lifeless photo that is nothing like the real scene that my eyes are seeing. Let me show you some examples.
Are you happy with your Pixel 9 Pro's photos?
0 votes
Yes. I love the photos it takes!
NaN %
Kinda. Sometimes it gets things right, sometimes it fails.
NaN %
Not really. I was expecting so much more from this cam.
NaN %
Where the Pixel camera is failing me, repeatedly
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
The Pixel camera's post-processing has leaned heavily towards desaturated, closer-to-reality photos for years now, and this was the reason many of us fell in love with it in the first place. We didn't want the over-saturated effect of Samsung's camera, or the over-processed nature of many other cams that were trying too hard to compensate for bad optics or bad processing algorithms.
In its pursuit to capture the most balanced photo, though, Google has slowly left behind accuracy. Or reality, to be honest. I've been noticing this for years now, but my Pixel 9 Pro XL is the biggest culprit. I see it mostly in dark, warm environments. Cozy restaurants, dark airplanes, yellowish/reddish indoors. Anything that veers towards the warmer spectre of color is where my Pixel decides to even out the white balance no matter what, and thus strip all the color out of the photo.
In its pursuit of the most balanced photo, Google has slowly left behind accuracy or reality.
This is very obvious to me when I see pics captured with a Motion Photo. The short video is all warm and full of color; the still photo, in contrast, is cold and sometimes lifeless. Check out this photo of a Ratatouille plushie as an example. The entire still photo is better exposed, but it's also colder and less vibrant.
Still from motion photo
Final processed image
If the example above is not that obvious, here are a couple more. The wooden sculpture shot is the most glaring example.
Still from motion photo
Final processed image
Still from motion photo
Final processed image
But the most significant difference I notice is with people. I tend to snap pics of my husband in random cozy places, and most of those end up flatter than I ever thought they could. It's as if yellow, orange, and red hues are my Pixel 9 Pro's sworn enemy. It's so sad to see an interesting, lively, beautiful scene turn into a washed-out, over white-balanced snap time and again.
It's so sad to see an interesting and lively scene turn into a cold, flat, and washed-out photo.
Here's a screen recording showing the issue in action: I start with the cam viewfinder, tap to adjust white balance and exposure, take the photo, open it to see a good result that's similar to what I expected, then, when the 'Processing' is done, the final image is all flat and cold.
And here's another screen recording in an underground theatre with lots of red lights. This one ends up way too dark, too, as a side effect of Ultra HDR being enabled (I'll get to this later).
And one more. In this case, I didn't even tap to adjust white balance and exposure, to prove that my tap wasn't affecting the shot either.
I'm sure we can all agree that the final result is literally nothing like what the original shot was supposed to be. And in every case, I confirm that what I was seeing with my own eyes was closer to the viewfinder preview, and nothing like what the final photo ended up like.
Is it just Ultra HDR or…?
After noticing this repeatedly happening, I decided to dig in and see if Ultra HDR was messing with these photos. Maybe Google's over-processing was being affected by this zealous HDR or by my phone's display and its ability to show Ultra HDR images. So I tested it again and again, trying the same photos with and without Ultra HDR. The result? It's not the culprit.
Here's another screen recording where I snap a photo of my husband with Ultra HDR on, then go and disable it, and snap another photo. Both exhibit the same over-processing flatness and warmth-stripping symptoms that I've talked about earlier; Ultra HDR played no role in making that effect better or worse.
And here are the two shots, side by side. Like here, Ultra HDR doesn't make a tangible difference in most cases.
With Ultra HDR
Without Ultra HDR
So, what's the solution?
Throughout all this testing, what has annoyed me the most — beyond the fact that my Pixel 9 Pro is stripping photos out of their vibrance and color — is the fact that it's not obeying the white balance and exposure preview. When I tap a specific part of the image to focus there and tell the camera to adjust its settings around this particular area, I expect the preview and end result to be similar.
Instead, I see one thing on my screen and get a photo that has nothing to do with it. Google pipes the camera directly to the viewfinder but then applies heavy white balance, HDR, and color processing after you hit the shutter. With no indication of how that final picture will turn out, adjusting your settings via the viewfinder feels essentially useless. The only advantage to tapping on my subject is adjusting the plane of focus, nothing else.
I see one thing on my screen, then get a photo that has nothing to do with it.
Over the last few weeks, I've tried to adjust white balance before snapping the pic; it didn't do much. I tried editing the photo post-capture to add warmth, but it felt too artificial and unlike what the original shot should've been like, had my Pixel stuck with the viewfinder original colors and white balance. I wanted to try third-party camera apps, but there's still a lot I love about the Pixel Camera app and its processing in most situations that I don't want to give up on.
I think the only real solution to this is an update from Google itself, either for the Pixel Camera app or the phone's entire firmware. Clearly, something has gone amiss with the phone's processing powers and it's not doing what it's supposed to do anymore, which is give us true-to-life shots. I haven't tested this on other Pixels, but several Redditors have confirmed this is also an issue on their Pixel 7 and 8 series, too.
The ball's in your court, Google. You can't lose one of the biggest selling points of your phones.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
28 minutes ago
- Android Authority
I've used Pixel and Galaxy phones for a decade, and Google wins in one aspect every time
Robert Triggs / Android Authority I've been using smartphones since 2011, and they've all been Samsung and Google devices (aside from a few other brands due to my job). Both companies have come a long way over the years, and while the S24 Ultra is my phone of choice for now, that may soon change for one reason. Pixels and Galaxy phones each have their strengths and weaknesses, but one thing I've always found Google is best at is customer support, while Samsung has more reliable devices. As I think back on my experience with both, I've started to reevaluate which of those things is more important to me. Do I want a phone that's less likely to be a problem and accept that it'll be a fight if something does go wrong, or the inverse? How has your customer support experience been? 0 votes Samsung: Good NaN % Samsung: Bad NaN % Google: Good NaN % Google: Bad NaN % Galaxy phones have held up well, but foldables make it complicated Eric Zeman / Android Authority I've owned a lot of Samsung phones over the years. I started with the Galaxy S2 and S4, and then after a dip into the Google ecosystem, I've had the Galaxy S10 Plus and every Ultra from the S20 to the S24 series and a smattering of foldable review units. Of the eight Galaxy phones I've personally owned, only one has had an issue. Being in the UK, I've had to endure my fair share of Exynos-powered phones, and my S20 Ultra was by far the worst, suffering from an unfortunate failure in the summer of 2020. It got so hot during a video call with my then-fiancé that it cooked its motherboard. Samsung covered this on warranty, so I didn't have to pay for any repairs, but the process was a joke. Samsung has a repair-at-all-costs policy in the UK, causing considerable delays of weeks before I get my phone back. Samsung has a repair-at-all-costs policy in the UK. Because of that, my S20 Ultra was gone for six weeks while they replaced the motherboard, two of the rear cameras, the battery, and the rear glass, which cracked during removal. Replacing the phone would've been much simpler, but Samsung insisted on repairing it. To make matters worse, the phone got lost in shipping for another week. In total, I was without my phone for nearly two months. The experiences get worse when we look at my wife's phones. She's had the Z Flip 4, 5, and 6, and so far, only the latter has endured a full year with no more than an in-store screen protector change. Zac Kew-Denniss / Android Authority The Flip 4 had an unfortunate encounter with our fish tank, so I arranged a repair through our Samsung Care policy. Due to Samsung's insistence on repairing rather than replacing, the phone was initially gone for five weeks, during which time it had its motherboard, screen, hinge, frame, rear glass, and all of its cameras replaced. The only part of the phone that stayed the same was the cover display. The issues began when the phone came back. My wife was at work, so I started the phone up, intending to sign in for her and restore her data so she could switch back to it during her lunch break. Imagine my surprise when the phone defaulted to French out of the box and said 'Z Flip 4 Maison Margiela Edition' on the bootloader. That was a special black and white version of the phone, only sold in France, and the device in my hand was still Bora Purple. The phone was a mess once I got it started, with constant UI crashes, warnings, and an OS build several months old, with the software update screen not working. I called Samsung and learned that the repair center had flashed the wrong software build onto the phone after it was repaired, and I would need to send it off to be reflashed. A simple software flash sounds like something that could be done quickly, but it was gone for another three weeks. If I'm being realistic, those two instances aren't that bad. My S20 Ultra repair was in the middle of the pandemic, which certainly would have contributed to the longer wait. With the Z Flip 4, mistakes do happen in isolated instances. Unfortunately, things only got worse the following year with the Z Flip 5. Zac Kew-Denniss / Android Authority It's been over a year, and my blood still boils whenever I think about it. Aside from the Flip 4 that slept with the fishes, my wife and I baby our phones. They are always protected by a case and screen protector, and we take them out of those cases for a thorough cleaning at least once a week. But in February 2024, the Flip 5 died. It had never been dropped or banged, but the screen destroyed itself. The culprit? One of the rubber seals at the side of the display, along the hinge, came loose and got caught in the hinge mechanism. Claiming a component is 'engineered not to fail' on a foldable and asking me to pay full-price to repair it is a joke. Rather than send the phone away, we took it to a Samsung Store. The employee inspected the device and then told us that while it was clear the phone was in pristine condition, we'd need to pay for the repair. According to Samsung's repair guide for the Z Flip 5, that component was 'engineered not to fail.' Last time I checked, most things aren't engineered to fail, but it sometimes happens anyway. Thankfully, our Samsung Care plan meant it cost £90 rather than the full repair cost, but even so, this was a low blow. Pixels break, but Google cares My experience with Google devices has been the opposite. I've owned the Nexus 6, 6P, Pixel XL, 2XL, and 3XL, and each of them had to go through warranty at least twice. Two of my Nexus 6s popped their rear panel, four Nexus 6Ps either bent or had the display pop out of the frame, two Pixel XLs developed dead speakers, one 2XL got dead display pixels while the other decided it didn't want to take pictures anymore, and my 3XL couldn't record video without crashing. The latter was in its return window, so I sent it back and got an S10 Plus instead. That's a terrible track record to be sure, and my Android Authority colleagues tell me I'm the unluckiest guy on the planet because nothing this terrible has ever happened to their Pixels, especially this frequently. But something impressed me during that time: Google's support really looked after me. I purchased all of those devices through the Google Store, and it replaced each of them with either a brand-new phone or a freshly refurbished unit in less than 48 hours of my reporting the issue. Aside from the support agent encouraging me to use the charging brick that came with the phone (the 6a doesn't come with one), Google's support experience was perfect. Google's warranty policy, at least in the UK, is to replace the faulty phone right away to minimise the impact on the user. Then the defective device gets repaired and fully refurbished so that it can be used as a replacement for someone else who makes a warranty claim. It's an efficient process that made me feel cared for as a customer. Google's customer support is always friendly and (usually) asks questions and offers troubleshooting steps that make sense. Zac Kew-Denniss / Android Authority I had another solid experience with Google support in the last few weeks. Pixel 6a battery problems are widespread, and my Grandfather's 6a developed a swollen battery. In the UK, phones get a two-year manufacturer's warranty, but this 6a was over three years old, so Google didn't have an obligation to do anything. Still, I reached out to support, and in less than 12 hours, a refurbished 6a that had a brand new battery and display arrived at my door. Aside from the support agent encouraging me to use the charging brick that came with the phone in the future (the 6a doesn't come with one), the support experience was perfect, and everything was sorted via a live chat in less than half an hour. Pixels have improved Robert Triggs / Android Authority Another thing to consider is that Pixels have improved over the last few years. My cousin has had a Pixel 6 Pro since launch, and it's never let him down. A friend has a 7a and loves it, and several people I know have various models of the Pixel 9 series and couldn't be happier. Phones from all manufacturers will have issues at times, but from the experience of those around me, it seems that Google's reliability has improved, and users aren't facing frequent issues like I did in my early Pixel days. Even with Android 16's expressive redesign, I still prefer One UI. But that's undermined by the knowledge that Samsung's customer support will be an uphill battle if anything goes wrong. Pair the improved reliability with fantastic customer support, and I'm left wondering if I should go back to using a Pixel. I still love Samsung's products. I've had the S24 Ultra since it launched, and it's never once let me down. The Material Expressive redesign of Android 16 looks fantastic, but I still prefer One UI overall. However, no matter how much I love One UI or the phone it runs on, I always have that fear that if something does go wrong, getting it fixed would be an uphill battle with Samsung, and until the company changes that, it could be time for me to move on. Follow
CNET
28 minutes ago
- CNET
Gmail's New Feature Lets You Clean Up Your Inbox in a Couple of Taps
Unless you're always on top of what's going on in your Gmail inbox, there's a good chance that you're subscribed to at least a few newsletters that you've been meaning to unsubscribe to. While it wasn't hard to unsubscribe to a single newsletter before, Gmail's new feature will let you get an overview of your existing subscriptions and bulk unsubscribe with a few taps. Previously, when you viewed an email newsletter, an "unsubscribe" option would appear at the top so you could quickly unsubscribe with a single tap or click, but that would (obviously) only work for the individual newsletter. The new feature centralizes all of your newsletter subscriptions so you can declutter unnecessary future emails with ease. Below, we'll show you where to find the new feature and how to quickly unsubscribe from unnecessary or out-of-control senders to tame your inbox. While you're at it, here's how to free up 15GB of Gmail space. Here's where to find the new Manage Subscriptions feature in the Gmail app The new Manage Subscriptions feature is tucked into the sidebar of the Gmail app. Gmail/Screenshot by Arielle Burton Before you can use the feature, you should check to see if you have it first. Here's how. Open the Gmail app on your iPhone or Android phone app on your iPhone or Android phone Tap the menu bar at the top left (three stacked lines) If you have the feature, Manage Subscriptions should be below the Trash section How to find Manage Subscriptions Gmail for the web Login to Gmail from a web browser On the left, click More Click on Manage Subscriptions The feature is currently rolling out to the web, Android and iPhones in select countries, so you might need to wait a bit if you don't have the new view just yet. How to manage subscriptions from the new view Once you arrive at the Manage Subscriptions section, a list of the newsletters you're currently subscribed to will be displayed, sorted by the most frequent senders and the number of emails they've sent in the past few weeks. Tapping directly on the sender name will bring up the most recent emails received and you can easily unsubscribe by tapping the icon to the right of the name, which looks like an email with a minus sign "-" in front of it. Gmail will send an unsubscribe email to the newsletter you no longer want to receive. Google Once you've tapped that unsubscribe icon, Gmail will ask if you want to stop receiving emails from the sender. Once you tap unsubscribe, an email will go to the sender notifying them of the unsubscribe request. It can take a few days for the sender to honor the request but all emails sent by them should be sent to your Spam folder going forward. If you want to get an even better grip on Gmail, don't miss these 10 tips.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why the Latest Meme Stock Craze Won't Take Down the Overall Market
Meme stocks are back from the dead. Penny shares are soaring. Stocks that leap and crash by multiples of the market are desirable again. July in summary: wild speculation. Should investors who don't want to gamble on daily stock moves, or three-times leveraged versions of them, worry about this? Thanks for Your $1 Billion Job Offer, Mark Zuckerberg. I'm Gonna Pass. Federal Reserve Governor Adriana Kugler to Resign The Wild Week in the American Economy Jury Says Tesla Must Pay $243 Million Over Fatal Autopilot Crash The Leaner, Meaner Chevron Is Ready to Fight There are two reasons for concern. The first is that excessive gambling in the market leads to unsustainably high prices that have to crash. GameStop and AMC Entertainment Holdings, the stars of the meme-stock boom in 2021, are down 74% and 99% respectively from their peaks. If speculation has lifted the market as a whole, it will eventually sink it, too. The second concern goes back to something the economist John Maynard Keynes wrote in 1936—that when 'enterprise becomes the bubble on the whirlpool of speculation,' capital will flow to the wrong companies, damaging growth and jobs. Both worries are reasonable, but neither is the right reason for concern at the moment. A lot has been written about what my colleague Spencer Jakab dubbed the DORK stocks from the tickers of Krispy Kreme, Opendoor Technologies, Rocket and Kohl's, the riders of the new meme roller coaster. They are merely the public face of a summer boom in bets by private traders. Andrew Lapthorne, head of quantitative research at Société Générale, points to gains of 10% or so from betting on rises in the most-shorted stocks, companies with the weakest balance sheets and the highest-volatility stocks in the midst of massive trading. 'The volumes are mental,' he said. That this is the purest of speculative gambling is most obvious in the performance of penny shares: The 10th of the market with the lowest share price at the start of July had a median gain of 16% by July 23, when the new meme stocks peaked, while the 10th with the highest price rose only 1.4%. The starting share price was by far the best predictor of performance during the month—and also of the size of losses in the last week, when the boom went into reverse and the cheapest stocks fell 6%. Institutional investors and anyone who understands stock issuance can rightly say this is farcical. The only times the price matters is when it stays below $1 long enough to be delisted because of stock-exchange rules, or is so high that a single share is out of reach for a buyer (and even then, retail brokers now sell fractional shares). A company can double or halve the price (or more) by a simple stock split or reverse split, with no impact on the percentage of the company and implied share of the profit that any shareholder owns. The share price shouldn't matter. A lot of private traders either don't understand this or don't care. In July, they were right, and the pros were wrong: Share price did matter, both on the way up and more recently on the way down (perhaps, as private traders took profits ready for holidays). Such speculation can also lead to badly allocated capital, as shown when the last round of meme stocks, led by GameStop and AMC, issued billions of dollars of new shares. The stocks collapsed anyway. Yet, this mostly passes big investors by. There aren't any penny stocks in the S&P 500, and there was no pattern showing that cheaper shares among big companies did better or worse in July. Back in 2021, private traders helped inflate full-blown bubbles in green stocks, SPACs and loss-making technology stocks alongside the meme excitement, yet the wider market was entirely unaffected when those bubbles burst. Equally, Keynes was just wrong when he warned that Wall Street's speculative fervor worked less well at providing capital to the right parts of the economy than the more cautious British approach of investing for income. What critics call 'casino capitalism' and a willingness to take big risks helped finance U.S. growth companies—and even the U.K. government is now trying to kindle animal spirits among voters, worrying that the City of London institutions are failing to provide speculative capital to the British economy. Long-running sentiment surveys from the American Association of Individual Investors and Investors Intelligence are much more positive than earlier this year, but not excessively so. Futures traders are skewed toward bullish calls, but not nearly as much as they were in 2021. My guess is that retail traders helped push up the S&P when they bought the dip from April on, but that they didn't have that much impact in July. It's reasonable to worry that stocks are too expensive, that earnings are likely to take a hit from tariffs, that the economy, while superficially strong, has many weak spots, and that excitement about artificial intelligence is overdone. But when it comes to meme stocks and penny shares, the boom and bust has little overspill to the rest of the market. Write to James Mackintosh at Strava's CEO Has a New Way to Improve Your Workouts 'House Rich, Cash Poor' Was Just a Saying—Until We Bought an Apartment U.S. Hiring Slowed Sharply Over the Summer Intel Chip-Packaging Expert Takes Job at Samsung Cooling Job Market Opens Door to September Cut Despite Inflation Jitters
