Fresh guidance issued on phone BAN in schools after €9m pouch fury as McEntee denies Government U-turn
EDUCATION Minister Helen McEntee has denied a Government U-turn on phone pouches as new school guidance was issued on students' use of mobiles.
National guidelines on
Advertisement
3
Simon Harris said the budget funding would be for all kinds of phone storage solutions
Credit: � 2024 PA Media, All Rights Reserved
3
Helen McEntee said the measure aimed to 'enhance' student wellbeing
Credit: Brian Lawless/PA Wire
The opposition criticised the pouch funding as a waste of public money while the Government said the funding averaged out at around €20 per student.
In the
This includes lockable boxes, cubby holes or drop off and collection at the school office.
He said a new procurement process is to be published 'in the coming days'.
Advertisement
Read more in News
He added: 'This will not delay schools in applying for and accessing funding for phone-storage solutions.
'An application process will be open to post-primary schools soon and the issuing of funding will commence shortly thereafter.
'A new procurement process will be published in the coming days and then schools will be able to seek to apply to draw down funding and put in place the phone-storage solution that works best for them. This is a pragmatic and sensible way to proceed.'
Speaking on
Advertisement
MOST READ ON THE IRISH SUN
Exclusive
She said: There is absolutely no U-turn here.'
Muireann O'Connell slams new proposed Budget 2024 plan for smarts phones in schools
In the guidance issued on Friday, primary schools now require a policy to ban the use of and access to mobile phones during the school day.
Secondary schools require a policy to restrict mobile phone use during the school day, using the
The Department of Education said the measure aimed to 'enhance' student wellbeing, reduce cyber bullying and exposure to inappropriate content, and 'promote' focus in school.
Advertisement
'CONSISTENT APPROACH'
McEntee said: 'First and foremost, this policy is about ensuring that our schools are phone-free learning environments.'
'Students should not be on their phones during the school day. This guidance and support will ensure all schools have the supports they need to achieve this, having regard to their own requirements.
'Having engaged with many different school communities across the country, I am confident that this policy will support student wellbeing, engagement and their interaction with their peers, while also recognising the experience and expertise of school communities and the need for consultation.'
She added: 'This initiative empowers school communities to lead on the issue, backed by €9m in funding to allow post-primary schools to use the phone storage solution that works best for their school community and their students.'
Advertisement
The department said the method used to limit phone use will be decided by each school, and could include phone storage pouches or lock boxes, keeping phones in lockers, using classroom lockable boxes or cubbies, and drop-off and collection at the school office.
It said: 'Schools will adopt a consistent approach for the full school day, with limited exemptions allowed for medical or compassionate grounds, as outlined in the guidance information."
3
The opposition criticised the pouch funding as a waste of public money
Credit: Getty Images - Getty
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
More smaller apartments and studios could be built under plans being considered by Government
Moves which could mean greater numbers of smaller apartments, including studio apartments, built are being considered by Government and are likely to be finalised in the coming weeks. The proposals, being discussed at the highest level of the Coalition, are among efforts to make building apartments more attractive for investors and developers in a bid to increase the supply in urban areas, according to several people familiar with the discussions. Rules governing size, insulation, requirements for dual aspect in many apartments, corridor lengths, high-spec finishes and the need to have balconies are all cited as reasons for runaway cost inflation in the price of apartments, and all are likely to be examined. [ Dublin studio flats 27% smaller than current limit get go-ahead Opens in new window ] There is agreement among senior Government figures that design standards for apartments have risen so high that they have driven costs of construction to a level that has made them unaffordable. READ MORE In addition, the mix of apartments required in developments is being discussed, with Government figures understood to favour allowing more and smaller apartments, including more studio apartments, and fewer large apartments. Government sources were adamant that things like energy ratings, disability access and fire safety would not be affected under any package of changes that could be agreed, but outlined a range of other apartment design stipulations which the industry has protested add cost to development. [ 'I grew up in an apartment in another country. I bought an apartment in Dublin and had to get out after a year' Opens in new window ] Sources stress that they are not talking about building standards – these are produced by technical experts in construction and cover things like fire safety. Instead, they are discussing possible changes in apartment standards, which are set by planners. 'We need to change the viability equation for them,' said a Coalition source. Will rent reform make building apartments viable? Listen | 40:12 Some Government officials say that while balconies in a one-bedroom apartment are a useful amenity, they can also drive up the cost of construction and contribute to affordability issues for first-time buyers, leaving them unable to access the housing market. Tánaiste Simon Harris previously signalled an openness to the idea of revisiting apartment design standards, and it is understood that he again indicated they would be considered during a meeting of the Fine Gael parliamentary party last week, alongside plans to overhaul the remit of the Land Development Agency. [ Has Fingal County Council found a solution to our housing crisis? Opens in new window ] However, any move to revisit standards is likely to face some criticism. Orla Hegarty, assistant professor at the UCD School of Architecture, said that previous efforts to address affordability through changing design standards had proven unsuccessful. She said there was a risk of 'poorer quality housing for the very long term, for a very short-term balancing of the books'. It comes off the back of moves last week to overhaul the rental sector, including expanding rent pressure zones nationally, allowing more frequent resetting of rents, and improving some tenant protections.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Quarter of Irish ‘EU presidency' meetings to be held outside Dublin
Most of the big political events hosted in the State during Ireland's time holding the presidency of the council of the European Union next year will take place in Dublin. Ireland is due to take over the important deal-making role within the EU for the second half of next year, which will see Government ministers become responsible for pushing EU policy forward. Ministers and senior diplomats will chair a large number of meetings, in Brussels and Ireland, where they will be expected to steer the other 26 national governments towards compromise agreements on various decisions and pieces of legislation. Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris is expected to brief Cabinet next week about the ongoing preparations for the influential EU role. READ MORE It is understood that 22 meetings of ministers from all EU states will be hosted in Ireland, along with a big summit of European leaders, which will be a huge logistical undertaking. [ Irish officials step up plans for rotating EU presidency, which will cost more than €150m Opens in new window ] About a quarter of the Cabinet-level meetings will be held outside Dublin, Mr Harris is expected to tell Cabinet colleagues next week. The estimated cost of hosting the EU presidency has yet to be finalised, but it is likely to be about €170 million, according to two sources. The Government is keen to make sure there is some regional spread of events across the country. Work to refurbish State-owned venues that will be used to host high-level meetings, such as Dublin Castle, is already under way. Several other venues have been block-booked for the six-month period. A meeting of all EU finance ministers at Dublin Castle was the largest event during Ireland's last stint running the council presidency in 2013. This time around the biggest event will be a summit of nearly 50 European heads of state and government, a relatively new forum known as the European Political Community. It will be held back to back with a separate meeting of the 27 EU leaders. The venue for the summit has not been confirmed. Hosting the summit of European leaders, as well as more regular meetings of EU ministers, will pose an unprecedented security and planning challenge for the State, according to an internal Government briefing. The briefing, seen by The Irish Times, said An Garda Síochána and the Department of Justice were still working out the likely costs of securing the high-profile political events during the EU presidency. A changed security landscape and the more complex nature of potential threats would be a feature of the planning, the briefing said. Irish Ministers have begun to travel to Brussels more regularly for meetings, to build up closer working relationships with their counterparts from other EU states. A rota is to be drawn up so that at least one Irish Minister will also attend the monthly voting sessions of the European Parliament from September onwards, to develop contacts with senior figures in the parliament. Running a successful EU council presidency will be 'essential for Ireland's position, influence and reputation' in the union, a separate Department of An Taoiseach briefing stated. The briefing, dated March 27th and released under the Freedom of Information Act, said Ireland would be expected to play an 'honest broker' role during EU policy debates. Topics that would likely be high on the agenda included defence, migration, climate, economic competitiveness, CAP reform and negotiations to decide the size of the next EU budget, the briefing said. Work is ongoing to map out what policy areas the Government will prioritise during the six-month window where it holds the EU council presidency next year.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Political nerves jangle over rent reforms: ‘We're out defending something without any real evidence it's going to make a difference'
It was one of the first signals that Micheál Martin chose to send up after he became Taoiseach again at the start of the year. He had repeatedly identified 'housing, housing, housing' as the new Government's chief priority before, during and after the election. Now back in power, he was ready, he said, to take tough decisions to fix the country's dysfunctional housing market One of the first issues in his sights was the system of rent pressure zones (RPZs) introduced as a short-term measure in 2016 as a response to rising rents but which had become embedded into the rental market. He promised he was prepared to take 'politically very difficult decisions'. READ MORE The property sector had been warning that the system was strangling investment, but Ministers were wary that getting rid of the rent caps would lead rents to spike. And yet, without taking action to spur investment, the supply of new apartments would continue to dwindle. At its heart, the trade-off was simple. Potential investors wanted to see measures that would increase their returns; but that would come at the expense of rising rents. Keeping the rent caps meant investment would go elsewhere, and supply would not increase. Fast-forward to this week and it is not clear that the Government has managed to square this circle. Communications confusions It is an undeniably complex set of reforms. Among other things, the Cabinet this week agreed to create new classes of landlords, expand RPZs nationally, introduce new tenant protections, bring in new rules around resetting rents, and to vary the rate at which rents can increase. Communicating this was always going to be a challenge – made more difficult, some in Government feel, by the partial leaking of the plan. The process of trailing the Government proposals kicked off last weekend, with all the Sunday newspapers briefed that landlords would be able to reset rents between tenancies – a key measure that landlords and investors believe will allow their investment returns to rise over time. [ Rules for renters: What are the planned reforms and will they work? Opens in new window ] It seemed as if good news for landlords was on the way. One key element of the package was held back, however: the extension of RPZs to the whole country, and the extension of protections for existing tenants. As word leaked out after the party leaders met the budget Ministers and Minister for Housing James Browne to finalise matters on Monday night, the Government moved to present the long-awaited move as a package of tenant protections. 'I think landlords will be less happy,' said one senior Government figure on Monday evening. But assembling the different parts of the plan into an easily digested whole would prove difficult. 'I don't think it was very helpful that it came out the weekend before,' said one Fine Gael figure last week. 'The way it appeared in the papers caused a lot of confusion,' said another Coalition source. [ The Government is finally showing some political courage in tackling the housing crisis Opens in new window ] The confusion extended to those who were actually making the announcements. The original press release announcing the changes had to be amended to clarify that not all landlords had the right to reset rents every six years – only when a tenancy had been agreed after March 1st next year. Of course, Sinn Féin spotted the change and taunted the Taoiseach in the Dáil. The Opposition drove at the question of when RPZs would be extended nationally, arguing that a delay could leave tenants vulnerable to rent hikes. They then claimed victory on Thursday when the Government indicated it would make its move in weeks. Coalition sources argue that the plan was always to move quickly on this, privately pointing out that draft legislation to do this came before Cabinet on Tuesday as well. But from the outside, it layered further complexity and confusion on to an already-dense set of reforms. Will it work? When he saw the final package, one developer asked: 'Why did they bother? They would have been better off doing nothing.' Others in the sector are scornful of the notion that this will unlock a wave of investment from the nerve centres of global finance. 'There's nobody sitting in London going: 'Okay, finally, it's time, we're cracking on,'' one said. Dermot O'Leary, chief economist with stockbrokers Goodbody and a former member of the Housing Commission, said clarity on the RPZs was 'overdue', while the ability to reset rents which the government approved was a 'positive policy development'. 'In the context of the need to attract a large amount of international capital to finance the needed ramp-up in housing supply over the coming years, this move should be welcomed. It is not, however, a panacea for the market and for a return of supply of the scale that the country requires,' he said. Dr Michael Byrne, a rental market and housing expert at UCD's school of social policy, said the measures were a 'radical transformation' of the rental sector. He said the deregulation of rent controls would 'likely erase' affordability gains seen under the RPZ regime in a few years, which was 'very significant'. However, he said the removal of no fault evictions for tenants of large landlords 'transforms' rental housing in Ireland by creating the possibility for a secure home in the sector, 'bringing us in line with western European norms'. He said there would likely be a reduction in homelessness, increased house prices due additional investor demand,and increased competition for first-time buyers from prospective landlords lured by the returns offered by deregulation. While tenants will benefit from increased protections next year, nobody in Government is able to say when rents will fall. Research produced by the Housing Agency to inform the policy acknowledges that average rents are likely to increase in the short term, with the hope being that increased investment will boost supply and drive down rents eventually. [ Rents unlikely to come down for several years after reforms, Coalition told before agreeing overhaul Opens in new window ] That is a hard political sell: the intended market effect of the reforms may well materialise, but the political costs of stubbornly high or increasing rents will accrue much more quickly. The costs are certain; the benefits less so. Some backbenchers fume about having to line up behind measures like this. 'I think it's absolute bollocks; I don't see the fucking point. We're out defending something without any real evidence it's going to make a difference,' says one Fine Gael TD. Other TDs in the party are more sanguine, saying it is evidence of intent, albeit not sufficient by itself. A party source acknowledges the tension. 'There is always a challenge between the political, which wants and needs everything right away, and the policy stuff that isn't right away,' the source said. One Fine Gael Minister who feels the reforms should have gone further fears that the costs may outweigh the gains, and that the risk is of it becoming 'another thing in housing that draws [attention to] the fact we did not hit our targets last year, and are not going to hit them this year'. Another senior Government figure explained that the desire to attract investors back into the market had to be tempered with the political impossibility of allowing widespread large rent increases. But, this source also said further initiatives would be unveiled in the coming weeks that would make investment more attractive. 'We scared investors out of the market with rent caps and by calling them vulture funds and all that,' the source said. 'Now we're trying to get them back.' There is a need, another source says, for steely-mindedness – that 'any short-term political pain is preferable to long-term pain of political disruption' at the next election. And now what? So what next? The danger of pleasing nobody is clear. But Government figures insist that this must been seen not in isolation but as part of a series of measures. And Browne has already signalled further announcements in the weeks to come. Several figures agreed that some form of tax incentives are likely to be proposed, though they acknowledged that the Department of Finance and its Minister remain strongly opposed to such a move. That battle will take place in Government over the coming months. [ This is a housing strategy written by Flann O'Brien Opens in new window ] The Land Development Agency is due to be overhauled, while Tánaiste Simon Harris also pointed to measures in the National Development Plan review next month. Another move on the cards is revisiting apartment standards – something Harris has previously signalled openness to, and that he again mentioned at the Fine Gael parliamentary party meeting this week. Such a move has also been discussed at the Cabinet subcommittee on housing, although the exact parameters of what it might entail are a closely guarded secret. That said, one backbench participant at the Fine Gael meeting this week said: 'That can only mean one thing – the size of the apartment', adding that they are 'basically certain' such a move will come. Those same investors who are unmoved by the RPZ reforms believe changes to allow more homes on the same piece of land would have a genuine impact. In addition to new measures, expect focus on metrics such as headline rents, eviction numbers and above all, apartment building – evidence of the success, or otherwise, of the Government's moves. A lot is on the line – some say, the whole ball game. During the process, tensions between the two parties were kept to a minimum. Fine Gael is often privately a bit impolite about the Minister for Housing, while even his friends say he has been 'finding his feet' and 'reading his way into the brief'. But, said one party figure: 'We need [Browne] to succeed. Because if he doesn't succeed the Government doesn't succeed and then we're all screwed.'
