logo
Washington lawmakers look for ways to build more housing in rural areas

Washington lawmakers look for ways to build more housing in rural areas

Yahoo27-01-2025

(Getty Images)
Building more housing in rural parts of Washington is again top of mind for some state lawmakers.
Bills to allow backyard cottages in new areas, to expand where developers can receive tax breaks for building apartments and to let property owners split their plots are all making their way through the legislative process.
Similar proposals came up last year, but many failed, sparking criticism from Republicans who said the Democratic majority was not doing enough to expand rural housing.
This year, bipartisan support and early public hearings could signal an opening for getting the proposals across the finish line before the legislative session ends in April.
One bill from Rep. Sam Low, R-Lake Stevens, would allow counties to approve detached accessory dwelling units, like backyard cottages or mother-in-law suites, in areas outside of cities. The proposal is cosponsored by House Housing Chair Strom Peterson, D-Edmonds.
Under the bill, owners could have one additional detached unit on their property. It must use the same driveway and sewage system as the primary home. Water usage must be metered and cannot exceed the limits under current law when combined with the usage of the main property. The detached units could not be bigger than 1,296 square feet, excluding garages, porches and unfinished basements.
The proposal would also require counties to penalize those who build these units without proper permitting and to keep track of all the units built outside of their urban areas.
A similar idea last year got pushback from Democrats and groups like Futurewise, who warned of suburban sprawl in areas that lack transit, public sewer systems, firefighting services and other resources.
Supporters of the bill reject that argument.
'This is not about destroying the environment. This is not about blowing up the GMA,' Low said, referring to the state's Growth Management Act, which is designed to concentrate development in urban areas and to preserve open space, among other goals. 'This is truly about having more affordable housing options for our young people, for our seniors.'
Senate Housing Committee Chair Jessica Bateman, D-Olympia, said there will be a similar bill in the Senate and that supporters will continue to work on concerns around sprawl.
Low's proposal will receive a public hearing in the House Housing Committee on Monday.
Another proposal that has support this year would allow property owners to split their lots into smaller parcels.
The lot-splitting bill has passed the House multiple times in recent years but has yet to clear the Senate.
Sponsor Andrew Barkis, R-Olympia, is hopeful this is the year. He told the House Housing Committee last week that there has been a lot of work done since the last session to address opponents' concerns, particularly when it comes to ensuring that the lots are developable after they are redesigned.
The bill would prevent cities from denying applications to split lots into two. Both lots must be at least 1,000 square feet and must follow local zoning laws. The split could not result in the demolition of any existing housing that has rent restrictions.
'We've worked on a lot of policy with regards to increasing supply and the ability to build within the confines of an urban growth area,' Barkis said. 'This is a bill that is integral and important to that process.'
Bateman said the bill would be particularly helpful in increasing homeownership opportunities for duplexes, triplexes or fourplexes. Being able to split those lots could bring down the costs significantly for people who want to own a unit in those buildings, she said.
'This is the third year this bill is introduced, and this is going to be the year that we're going to pass it,' she said.
The proposal received a committee hearing in the House during the first week of the session. It had support from builders, realtors and housing developers who said it was essential to increasing the number of homes in many areas. It is scheduled for a committee vote on Monday.
There's also a bill to expand tax breaks developers get for building multi-family housing.
Washington's Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption exempts developers from paying taxes on the construction, conversion or rehabilitation of residential property for eight years. The exemption can be extended to 12 years, if at least 20% of the units are affordable.
Currently, only five of the state's more heavily populated counties are allowed to offer the exemption.
A proposal from Low would expand the exemption to all counties that complete comprehensive plans under the Growth Management Act. That would include 28 counties.
In a public hearing last week, the idea drew support from counties and developers who said the exemption could help get more housing up quickly.
'This is a tool that works,' said Anthony Hemstad, who represented Washington Housing Development, LLC. 'If you pass this, it will open areas and more housing truly will be built.'
Bryce Yadon at Futurewise said the organization supports the reasoning behind the bill but had concerns about development in parts of the state that lack infrastructure like roads and transit.
'We don't want to incentivize the development of more areas that don't have those amenities if we can,' Yadon said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lackawanna County election board certifies primary results
Lackawanna County election board certifies primary results

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lackawanna County election board certifies primary results

SCRANTON — The Lackawanna County Board of Elections certified Friday the results of last month's municipal primary, making those results official. Democratic Commissioner Bill Gaughan, Republican Commissioner Chris Chermak and county Judge Terrence R. Nealon, who filled the election board vacancy created by former Democratic Commissioner Matt McGloin's late February resignation, voted unanimously to certify the results of the primary held May 20. The results and other election-related information is available online at The last day for unregistered voters who want to vote in November's municipal election to register is Oct. 20. The election itself is Nov. 4. — JEFF HORVATH

This Week in Louisiana Poltics: Approaching the end of the legislative session
This Week in Louisiana Poltics: Approaching the end of the legislative session

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This Week in Louisiana Poltics: Approaching the end of the legislative session

BATON ROUGE, La. (Louisiana First) — We're approaching the end of the regular legislative session this week. We've seen many bills debated in the legislature. So far, Governor Jeff Landry has signed into law six bills from his tort and insurance reform effort, which he says will lower insurance rates. We've seen election security bills make it out of committee—they are headed to the House for final passage. And then there's the state's budget, which is House Bill 1 by Representative Jack McFarland. That bill easily passed out of the Committee on Appropriations and then sailed through the full House with bipartisan support. Louisiana House committee rejects bill on homeless camps It's awaiting final passage in the Senate, then will head back to the House, where it'll likely reflect priorities from both the legislature and the governor, including education, fully funding services, and teacher pay raises. This and more on Your Local Election Headquarters. Several injured after Tennessee plane crash Southern University Law Center offering help to clear criminal records with event in Gonzales The best midsize SUVs for 2025 Invasive tick that can be deadly for cattle causing concerns among researchers Tropical Storm Barbara strengthens off Mexico, expected to become hurricane Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Democrats blast Trump's decision to send National Guard to Los Angeles: ‘They want a spectacle'
Democrats blast Trump's decision to send National Guard to Los Angeles: ‘They want a spectacle'

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrats blast Trump's decision to send National Guard to Los Angeles: ‘They want a spectacle'

Several Democrats on Sunday criticized President Trump for ordering thousands of National Guard troops to the Los Angeles area in response to immigration protests over the past two days. Trump has ordered 2,000 troops to assist immigration agents in quelling the protests in L.A., where demonstrators are rallying against federal immigration raids. Troops began arriving in L.A. on Sunday morning. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Saturday said the move is a result of 'violent mobs' attacking 'Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations' in recent days. Trump said California Democrats Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass were to blame for the unrest that began as a result of Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. Newsom responded to Trump's order by calling it 'purposefully inflammatory' and stating that 'there is currently no unmet need.' 'If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!' Trump wrote in a Saturday Truth Social post. On Sunday morning, Newsom, in a post on the social platform X, claimed the federal government is 'taking over the California National Guard' because 'they want a spectacle.' 'Don't give them one. Never use violence. Speak out peacefully,' he added. In a separate post, Newsom reiterated his call for demonstrators to stay peaceful, claiming that Trump is 'hoping for chaos so he can justify more crackdowns, more fear, more control.' He also slammed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's threat to deploy active-duty Marines into LA, calling it 'deranged behavior.' Bass, in a Saturday night interview, said deploying the National Guard was 'completely unnecessary' and that it would only escalate tensions. 'My conversations with the administration today have been to assure them that if there are protests that break out and if there is violence associated with those protests, that the Los Angeles Police Department is well equipped to handle that,' she said. 'Two thousand officers, 2,000 in our city will not be a positive thing and will not be helpful.' Both Newsom and Bass also called out Trump for thanking National Guard troops on Sunday morning before they had arrived in LA. Rep. Nanette Barragán (D-Calif.) on Sunday echoed Bass in that the troops in the LA area are 'going to escalate the situation.' 'It's a concern,' Barragán told CNN's Dana Bash on 'State of the Union.' 'I mean, it's going to escalate the situation. People are going to protest because they're angry about the situation, and we have to just reiterate to people to do it peacefully.' Democrats outside of California have also pushed back on the Trump administration over its handling of the immigration protests. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Sunday went after Trump over the deployment of 2,000 National Guard members to the Los Angeles area, saying the president 'thinks he has a right to do anything.' 'He does not believe in the Constitution; he does not believe in the rule of law,' Sanders told Bash of Trump on 'State of the Union.' Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) slammed Trump's response to the protests as 'hypocritical at best' compared to how he responded to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. 'Since years before I was born, law enforcement knows it's good when there's cooperation and coordination,' Booker said. 'For the president to do this when it wasn't requested, breaking with generations of tradition, is only going to incite the situation and make things worse.' He compared Trump's reaction to the LA protests to his response to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. 'We are now at a point where we have a president who sat back and did nothing as people stormed our Capitol, viciously beat police,' he continued. 'And then when those people who viciously beat police and led to some of their deaths, therefore, cop killers, were convicted by juries, he then pardoned them all.' Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on X claimed Trump was not trying to 'heal or keep the peace.' 'He is looking to inflame and divide. His movement doesn't believe in democracy or protest – and if they get a chance to end the rule of law they will take it. None of this is on the level,' he added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store