‘Flushed down the toilet': UC Berkeley student senate rejects Hindu Heritage month; sparks accusations of Hinduphobia, bullying
In a decision that has ignited widespread backlash, the Associated Students of the University of California (ASUC) at UC Berkeley voted against a resolution to recognize October as
Hindu Heritage Month
, prompting outrage from
Hindu students
, advocacy groups, and civil rights observers.
The proposal, Senate Resolution No. 2024/2025-042, was authored by a Caribbean Hindu student and focused solely on celebrating the contributions of Hindus to American society and the UC Berkeley campus. It highlighted Hindu achievements in science, technology, education, and the arts, deliberately avoiding any reference to Indian politics, Hindu nationalism, or current global events.
Yet despite its apolitical tone, the resolution faced vehement opposition.
Several student senators claimed the measure could be 'used to legitimize Hindu nationalist ideology,' even though those words appear nowhere in the text. The resolution failed to pass, with critics citing vague political concerns while allowing similar heritage recognitions for other groups to proceed without resistance.
The Coalition of Hindus of North America (CoHNA) called the vote discriminatory and accused the Senate of engaging in 'Hinduphobia masked as caution.'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
3 Reasons to Plug This Into Your Home Today
elecTrick - Save upto 80% on Power Bill
Learn More
Undo
The organization condemned what it described as bullying behavior during the March 5 public meeting and singled out Senator Isha Chander for allegedly steering the discussion toward divisive political rhetoric. CoHNA also expressed solidarity with Senator Justin Taylor, who supported the resolution and, according to observers, faced hostility and mockery from colleagues during the debate.
A video of the meeting, now widely shared on social media platform X, shows one student making a choking gesture and dramatically pretending to suffocate while the resolution was being discussed, a moment many interpreted as a disturbing display of disdain for Hindu concerns.
CoHNA demanded a formal investigation, an apology to the Hindu student community, and accountability for what it called "public bullying of a fellow senator.
"
Adding to the controversy, the ASUC temporarily removed the video of the meeting from its Facebook page during student elections. Critics argue this move amounted to political censorship aimed at avoiding scrutiny. 'What are they trying to hide?' CoHNA questioned, calling the deletion 'deeply suspicious' and 'indicative of institutional bias.'
The resolution's defeat has reignited concerns about unequal representation of minority faiths on campus. 'All three Abrahamic religions have formal representation at ASUC,' one student speaker said. 'But when it comes to Hindus, our culture is treated as a political threat. The resolution was flushed down the toilet', a crude phrase actually used by one senator during the session.
While the ASUC defended its decision as a measure to avoid 'unintended political implications,' Hindu students and supporters argue that the episode reflects a deeper problem: the growing tendency to conflate
cultural celebration
with controversial geopolitics—especially when it involves Hindu identity.
'It's exhausting,' said one student. 'We just wanted to celebrate our heritage. Instead, we were told to defend politics we don't even identify with.'
The debate at UC Berkeley is far from over, as Hindu student organizations, alumni, and advocacy groups now call for transparency, reform, and equal respect for all communities on campus—regardless of the geopolitical baggage others may project onto them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
29 minutes ago
- NDTV
Fact Check: Trump Says He Has Ended 7 Wars. The Reality Isn't So Clear Cut
President Donald Trump has projected himself as a peacemaker since returning to the White House in January, touting his efforts to end global conflicts. In meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders Monday, Trump repeated that he has been instrumental in stopping multiple wars but didn't specify which. "I've done six wars, I've ended six wars, Trump said in the Oval Office with Zelenskyy. He later added: "If you look at the six deals I settled this year, they were all at war. I didn't do any ceasefires." He raised that figure Tuesday, telling "Fox & Friends" that "we ended seven wars." But although Trump helped mediate relations among many of these nations, experts say his impact isn't as clear cut as he claims. Here's a closer look at the conflicts: Trump is credited with ending the 12-day war. Israel launched attacks on the heart of Iran's nuclear program and military leadership in June, saying it wanted to stop Iran from building a nuclear weapon — which Tehran has denied it was trying to do. Trump negotiated a ceasefire between Israel and Iran just after directing American warplanes to strike Iran's Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites. He publicly harangued both countries into maintaining the ceasefire. Evelyn Farkas, executive director of Arizona State University's McCain Institute, said Trump should get credit for ending the war. "There's always a chance it could flare up again if Iran restarts its nuclear weapons program, but nonetheless, they were engaged in a hot war with one another," she said. "And it didn't have any real end in sight before President Trump got involved and gave them an ultimatum." Lawrence Haas, a senior fellow for U.S. foreign policy at the American Foreign Policy Council who is an expert on Israel-Iran tensions, agreed the U.S. was instrumental in securing the ceasefire. But he characterized it as a "temporary respite" from the ongoing "day-to-day cold war" between the two foes that often involves flare-ups. This could be described as tensions at best, and peace efforts — which don't directly involve the U.S. — have stalled. The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam on the Blue Nile River has caused friction between Ethiopia, Egypt and Sudan since the power-generating project was announced more than a decade ago. In July, Ethiopia declared the project complete, with an inauguration set for September. Egypt and Sudan oppose the dam. Although the vast majority of the water that flows down the Nile originates in Ethiopia, Egyptian agriculture relies on the river almost entirely. Sudan, meanwhile, fears flooding and wants to protect its own power-generating dams. During his first term, Trump tried to broker a deal between Ethiopia and Egypt but couldn't get them to agree. He suspended aid to Ethiopia over the dispute. In July, he posted on Truth Social that he helped the "fight over the massive dam (and) there is peace at least for now." However, the disagreement persists, and negotiations between Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan have stalled. "It would be a gross overstatement to say that these countries are at war," said Haas. "I mean, they're just not." The April killing of tourists in Jammu and Kashmir pushed India and Pakistan closer to war than they had been in years, but a ceasefire was reached. Trump has claimed that the U.S. brokered the ceasefire, which he said came about in part because he offered trade concessions. Pakistan thanked Trump, recommending him for the Nobel Peace Prize. But India has denied Trump's claims, saying there was no conversation between the U.S. and India on trade in regards to the ceasefire. Although India has downplayed the Trump administration's role in the ceasefire, Haas and Farkas believe the U.S. deserves some credit for helping stop the fighting. "I think that President Trump played a constructive role from all accounts, but it may not have been decisive. And again, I'm not sure whether you would define that as a full-blown war," Farkas said. The White House lists the conflict between these countries as one Trump resolved, but there has been no threat of a war between the two neighbors during Trump's second term, nor any significant contribution from Trump this year to improve their relations. Kosovo is a former Serbian province that declared independence in 2008. Tensions have persisted ever since, but never to the point of war, mostly because NATO-led peacekeepers have been deployed in Kosovo, which has been recognized by more than 100 countries. During his first term, Trump negotiated a wide-ranging deal between Serbia and Kosovo, but much of what was agreed on was never carried out. Trump has played a key role in peace efforts between the African neighbors, but he's hardly alone and the conflict is far from over. Eastern Congo, rich in minerals, has been battered by fighting with more than 100 armed groups. The most potent is the M23 rebel group backed by neighboring Rwanda, which claims it is protecting its territorial interests and that some of those who participated in the 1994 Rwandan genocide fled to Congo and are working with the Congolese army. The Trump administration's efforts paid off in June, when the Congolese and Rwandan foreign ministers signed a peace deal at the White House. The M23, however, wasn't directly involved in the U.S.-facilitated negotiations and said it couldn't abide by the terms of an agreement that didn't involve it. The final step to peace was meant to be a separate Qatar-facilitated deal between Congo and M23 that would bring about a permanent ceasefire. But with the fighting still raging, Monday's deadline for the Qatar-led deal was missed and there have been no public signs of major talks between Congo and M23 on the final terms. Trump this month hosted the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan at the White House, where they signed a deal aimed at ending a decades-long conflict between the two nations. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan called the signed document a "significant milestone," and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev hailed Trump for performing "a miracle." The two countries signed agreements intended to reopen key transportation routes and reaffirm Armenia's and Azerbaijan's commitment to signing a peace treaty. The treaty's text was initialed by the countries' foreign ministers at that meeting, which indicates preliminary approval. But the two countries have yet to sign and ratify the deal. Armenia and Azerbaijan have been locked in a bitter conflict over territory since the early 1990s, when ethnic Armenian forces took control of the Karabakh province, known internationally as Nagorno-Karabakh, and nearby territories. In 2020, Azerbaijan's military recaptured broad swaths of territory. Russia brokered a truce and deployed about 2,000 peacekeepers to the region. In September 2023, Azerbaijani forces launched a lightning blitz to retake remaining portions. The two countries have worked toward normalizing ties and signing a peace treaty ever since. Officials from Thailand and Cambodia credit Trump with pushing the Asian neighbors to agree to a ceasefire in this summer's brief border conflict. Cambodia and Thailand have clashed in the past over their shared border. The latest fighting began in July after a land mine explosion along the border wounded five Thai soldiers. Tensions had been growing since May, when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a confrontation that created a diplomatic rift and roiled Thai politics. Both countries agreed in late July to an unconditional ceasefire during a meeting in Malaysia. Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim pressed for the pact, but there was little headway until Trump intervened. Trump said on social media that he warned the Thai and Cambodian leaders that the U.S. would not move forward with trade agreements if the hostilities continued. Both countries faced economic difficulties and neither had reached tariff deals with the U.S., though most of their Southeast Asian neighbors had. According to Ken Lohatepanont, a political analyst and University of Michigan doctoral candidate, "President Trump's decision to condition a successful conclusion to these talks on a ceasefire likely played a significant role in ensuring that both sides came to the negotiating table when they did."
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump administration to screen ‘anti-Americanism' for immigrants seeking lawful work, citizenship in US
In another major hurdle for the immigrants seeking to live and work in the United States legally, President Donald Trump's administration has said that they will screen immigrants for 'anti-Americanism', which has raised the eyebrows of critics who said the move could give too much leeway to officers in rejecting foreign applicants based on subjective judgements, AP reported. According to the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the officers will vet applicants who have applied for benefits, like green card, whether they 'endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused' anti-American, terrorist or antisemitic views. USCIS is committed to implementing policies and procedures that root out anti-Americanism and fully support the enforcement of rigorous screening and vetting measures. We've updated our policy guidance to ensure our officers are aware of the factors they may consider in… — USCIS (@USCIS) August 19, 2025 In a statement, the USCIS spokesperson Matthew Tragesser said 'America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies.' Clarifying the air over immigration benefits, Tragesser said 'Immigration benefits, including to live and work in the United States remain a privilege, not a right.' However, an exhaustive list wasn't released by the USCIS that specifies what constitutes anti-Americanism and it wasn't immediately clear how and when these directives would be applied on the immigrants applying to work and live in the US. As per Elizabeth Jacobs, director of regulatory affairs and policy at the Center for Immigration Studies, the United States and immigration agencies have given a message that they are going to be less tolerant towards anti-Americanism or antisemitism when vetting and deciding the applications of immigrants. 'The agency cannot tell officers that they have to deny — just to consider it as a negative discretion,' Jacobs said, reported AP. Critics have said the policy revision by the USCIS would allow more subjective views of officers regarding anti-Americanism and their judgements could be clouded with personal bias. The policy changes follows a series of other major changes that have cropped up under Trump administration since January this year, including social media vetting and the recent addition of assessing applicants seeking naturalization for 'good moral character' (with inputs from AP)
Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump finally broke deadlock between Russia & Ukraine but…: White House slams media for rooting against President
The media was 'actively rooting' against US President Donald Trump's peace efforts, White House press secreatary Karoline Leavitt said during her press briefing on Tuesday "One thing that has absolutely not changed is the media's negative and downright false coverage of President Trump and his foreign policy accomplishments. From the beginning of this entire process, much of the left-wing media has been actively rooting against the president of the United States in the pursuit of peace," she said. Leavitt said that the media had falsely claimed that Trump suffered defeat after he met with Russian President Vladimir Putin, even though the meeting was meant to test the waters before going forward. "Initially, the media ridiculously claimed that President Trump was somehow beholden to Russia for even agreeing to have a face-to-face discussion with President Putin inside the United States. The media said President Trump was making a grave mistake by " legitimising Putin. They were aghast that President Trump would treat another world leader like a world leader. The media relentlessly attacked President Trump and claimed he suffered a 'major defeat' for not immediately emerging with a final agreement. Even though he said heading into that meeting, this was a meeting to listen and to understand how to move the ball forward," she said. US Vice President JD Vance on Tuesday lauded Leavitt for cracking down on the media for 'lying' about their negotiations on the Russia-Ukraine war. In a post on X, Vance said, "Karoline Leavitt is lighting the American media up for lying about our negotiations with Russia and Ukraine." It is worth noting here that ahead of his August 15 talks with Putin, Trump threatened that Russia would face "severe economic consequences" if Putin didn't show interest in de-escalating the Ukraine conflict. Leavitt continued her plaints, saying that the 'clueless pundits', who back the spending of thousands of taxpayer dollars on the war with no end in sight. "All weekend following those historic US-Russia bilateral talks, we listened to clueless pundits on television trying but failing to claim that the president had failed. The so-called experts in the foreign policy establishment whose record is nothing but endless wars, trillions of wasted taxpayer dollars, and dead Americans have the nerve to try and lecture President Trump, who has solved seven global conflicts in seven months about peace. It was, this is the same president, by the way, who brokered the Abraham Accords in his first term on top of more than half a dozen other peace deals this year alone," she said.
