Judge considering whether to dismiss Nebraska medical cannabis preemption lawsuit
Attorney Eddie Greim of Kansas City speaks in Lancaster County District Court during a hearing on a lawsuit arguing Nebraska's medical cannabis laws are preempted by federal law. He represents the plaintiff, former State Sen. John Kuehn, at right. May 20, 2025. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)
LINCOLN — A Lancaster County district judge is reviewing whether to dismiss a lawsuit alleging that Nebraska's voter-approved medical cannabis laws violate federal law after in-person arguments Tuesday.
This is the second medical cannabis case to reach District Judge Susan Strong, who in late November ruled against a preelection lawsuit challenging that the ballot measures shouldn't have been placed on the ballot because of allegedly fraudulent notarizations. Strong rejected those arguments. In the latest case, Strong must first decide whether to let the federal preemption case proceed based on whether a longtime marijuana opponent, John Kuehn, has the necessary 'standing' to sue.
That's the legal term of art required for cases to proceed, meaning that Kuehn, a former state senator and former member of the State Board of Health, must show injury as a result of the new medical cannabis laws legalizing and regulating the drug.
The ballot measures overwhelmingly passed in November, with 71% approval for legalization and 67% approval for a regulatory law. Tuesday's arguments came on the same day state lawmakers are considering Legislative Bill 677, a separate effort to create a clearer regulatory scheme around medical cannabis to assist in the program's implementation.
Many of the arguments in court Tuesday mirrored legal briefs filed earlier. Largely, they argue that Kuehn is not the right party to challenge the measures under 'taxpayer standing,' or that, as a taxpayer, he should get to challenge 'illegal' taxpayer spending.
All 11 defendants named in the case from Kuehn have filed to dismiss the case. Attorney Jason Grams, for the three members of the new Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission that voters' regulatory law established, told Strong no taxpayer funds had been spent by Jan. 10, when Kuehn amended his lawsuit to include the commissioners.
'He couldn't wait to take the time to meet the demand requirement for taxpayer standing,' Grams said.
Grams represented the Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana campaign in 2020 against a lawsuit brought by Lancaster County Sheriff Terry Wagner. The Nebraska Supreme Court ruled against the campaign and removed the measure from the 2020 ballot.
Attorney Daniel Gutman, who is now representing the three sponsors of the 2024 cannabis ballot measures, said the 'ship has long sailed' for election-related challenges against his clients. Gutman continues to defend the sponsors as Kuehn and the Attorney General's Office appeal the earlier notarization case, also from Kuehn, to the Nebraska Supreme Court.
Gutman said the sponsors didn't agree to be 'sued in perpetuity' for any challenge from Kuehn.
Of the dozens of states that have legalized medical cannabis, Gutman and Grams said no court has tossed the laws.
Gutman said states are meant to be 'labs of democracy' and that the federal government and Congress do not preempt the Nebraska laws. He also noted a provision in annual federal spending bills prohibiting the U.S. Department of Justice from spending federal money to prosecute people following state medical cannabis laws.
'We would literally be here all day if I cited all the cases rejecting this recycled argument,' said Gutman.
Deputy Solicitor General Zach Pohlman, defending Gov. Jim Pillen, Secretary of State Bob Evnen, Treasurer Tom Briese and two other state defendants in the case, summed up morning arguments that someone should challenge the laws, but Pohlman said it shouldn't be Kuehn.
'Just because that statute is on the books doesn't mean that Kuehn can run around the normal standing requirements,' Pohlman said.
Instead, the AG's staff has said Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers and his staff should be the ones to challenge the law, which they've pledged to do if and when the Medical Cannabis Commission issues any dispensary licenses under the new laws.
Attorney Eddie Greim of Kansas City, representing Kuehn, said the challenge should proceed in part because public records requests indicate that staff for the Liquor Control Commission, which the regulatory law voters passed and tied closely to the Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission, have discussed how to implement the laws and estimated possible costs.
'If we can snip this off at the bud, and we can enjoin the NMCC from doing anything,' Greim said, 'then the harms will never flow down to the other defendants.'
Some of the records received include fiscal or lobbying requests related to pending legislation just down the street from the courthouse at the Nebraska State Capitol, which Greim said show regulatory steps being taken. Grams said the records are 'utterly irrelevant' to the lawsuit.
Grams also filed affidavits from each of the three commissioners on the Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission stating that the commissioners had taken no regulatory action as of Jan. 10, when the commissioners were added to the lawsuit.
Greim objected to that evidence, saying he needed to be able to 'look behind the veil' and challenge the commissioners' statements.
Strong said she would take the evidence challenges and the motions to dismiss from all defendants under advisement and rule at a future date.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
2 days ago
- Washington Post
Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services
WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Friday denied a request by the American Library Association to halt the Trump administration's further dismantling of an agency that funds and promotes libraries across the country, saying that recent court decisions suggested his court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon had previously agreed to temporarily block the Republican administration, saying that plaintiffs were likely to show that Trump doesn't have the legal authority to unilaterally shutter the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which was created by Congress.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Nebraska Secretary of State Bob Evnen announces reelection bid
Nebraska Secretary of State Bob Evnen hosts a news conference announcing his bid to seek a third four-year term in 2026. June 6, 2025. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner) LINCOLN — Nebraska Secretary of State Bob Evnen is seeking reelection as the state's chief elections officer. In his campaign kick-off event Friday, the secretary of state touted the state's elections as the nation's most 'secure or accurate.' But he said he wonders whether any non-citizens might have gotten on the voter rolls. Evnen appeared to be trying to balance defending the state's elections his office administers and echoing the concerns of some Republicans and President Donald Trump over election integrity since the 2020 presidential election, national framing that some election experts have warned could undermine trust in elections. 'There is more work to be done, and we must continue to focus on being proactive in the future,' Evnen said. 'Threats to election security are not static.' U.S. Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Neb., and Lt. Gov. Joe Kelly joined Evnen's reelection announcement, as well as a handful of Nebraska state senators. Evnen is running for his third term as secretary of state, but this race follows his closest contest to date, a 2022 GOP primary in which he faced two populist Republican challengers who combined to hold him under 50% of the vote. He won the general election without any major party opponent. His office, in addition to overseeing elections, also handles business registrations and international relations. Kelly emphasized that the country has seen 'some very poorly orchestrated elections,' but 'not in Nebraska.' 'We've been so lucky to have Bob Evnen,' Kelly said. Kelly and other speakers praised Evnen for how he has represented Nebraska when speaking to other counties about trade opportunities with the state, and for his handling of elections. Nebraskans passed a state constitutional amendment in 2022 requiring the Legislature to implement voter ID in Nebraska. Nonpartisan poll watchers have praised Evnen's office for its implementation of the law, and Fewer voters were turned away under the law than in other states with similar laws. Evnen, in talking about the voter rolls and what he described as the risks of non-citizens voting, said years of the U.S. having an 'open border' left him questioning 'whether some of those people ended up on voter rolls.' Election watchdogs have said that framing from some Republicans is based on the 'myth' of widespread voting by non-citizens. The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, analyzed election conduct from 2003 to 2024 and found 24 instances nationally of noncitizens voting out of millions of votes cast. Evnen also reemphasized his support for Trump's executive order overhauling the administration of U.S. elections. The secretary signed on to a joint letter with 19 other Republican secretaries of state this year that requested more access to federal immigration data to help verify voter registrations. Evnen told KETV earlier this year that he would like to investigate whether 46 Nebraskans who have voted over the past several elections are U.S. citizens. When the Nebraska Examiner asked the Secretary of State's Office earlier this year how many non-citizens had been removed from voter rolls or voted in past elections, a spokesperson said the agency has not 'removed anyone due to their status as a non-citizen, nor do we believe that there are many such people registered to vote.' Evnen's office, in the regular course of business, removed 13,550 voters from the voter rolls after the November 2024 election – most due to death or relocation from the state. Such removals are routine and required by federal and state law. Evnen said Friday that his office is working with the Nebraska Attorney General's Office to establish a process to confirm the citizenship of people registered to vote in Nebraska. Current Federal law doesn't require proof of citizenship to register — but it bans noncitizens from voting in elections. Other states, such as Wyoming and Louisiana, have passed state laws requiring anyone registering to vote to provide proof of citizenship. Those bills align with the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, which the U.S. House passed in April. The SAVE Act would require proof of citizenship in federal elections. If the SAVE Act passes the Senate and becomes law, it would codify parts of the Trump executive order that Evnen calls a 'new and hopeful chapter.' 'The President's executive order all but points to Nebraska as the model for how free and fair elections should be conducted,' Evnen said. Evnen has talked about potentially requesting more time from the Legislature to verify signatures on petition drives for ballot measures after questions were raised about the validity of some signatures gathered for recent petitions, including ones targeted in a lawsuit aimed at stopping medical marijuana. Legislation seeking to provide more time fell short this year. Evnen also said Friday that he is 'proudly pro-life and pro-Second Amendment' — topics beyond the scope of his office that could signal that the Secretary of State has bigger aspirations. He said he expected a challenger in 2026, whether from his right flank, a Democrat or both. 'If one is going to run for office, the only safe assumption to make is that one will have an opponent,' Evnen said. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Fox News
2 days ago
- Fox News
Trump admin asks Supreme Court to lift injunction blocking dismantling of Education Department
The Trump administration is asking the Supreme Court to block a lower court ruling that is keeping it from restructuring the Department of Education. "That injunction effectively appoints the district court to a Cabinet role and bars the Executive Branch from terminating anyone, even though respondents conceded that some other [reductions in force] would plainly be proper," the SCOTUS filing reads. This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
