Woman Screams As Snake Attacks—Dog Jumps In and Takes the Venom for Her
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A Border collie has been dubbed a hero after he protected his owner from a venomous rattlesnake—earning praise from people all over the world.
The 8-year-old canine, named Dog, lives in Killeen, Texas, with his owner. She let out a scream when she encountered a juvenile Western diamondback rattlesnake while pulling weeds outside her home.
Her niece, Chloe Palousek, 28, told Newsweek that the frightening moment took a dramatic turn when the snake reared its head—and Dog sprang into protector mode. "She saw it raise its head and screamed," Palousek said. "Dog, who was already outside, ran over to her and picked up the snake … It bit his lip."
From left: Dog the Border collie rests at home.
From left: Dog the Border collie rests at home.
cashmoneychloe/Reddit
The Western Diamondback Rattlesnake is native to the southwestern United States and northern Mexico and carries a dangerous venom that destroys blood cells and tissue, causes pain and swelling, and can impair blood clotting.
One of the most frequently responsible species for snakebites in the U.S., the rattlesnake's bites can be deadly if left untreated, especially for children and the elderly.
Dog was immediately rushed to the vet, where he received antivenin and spent the night under observation. Despite the painful encounter, thankfully he made a swift recovery.
"His doctor said he was doing amazing," Palousek said. "He's on antibiotics, steroids, and pain meds, but he's doing a lot better. The swelling from the bite only lasted about three days."
Palousek shared Dog's heroic actions on Reddit where the post has gained over 4,000 upvotes and more than 400 comments. The reactions flooded Dog with well wishes and admiration.
"What a good boy! I sure hope he makes it though this with no lasting issues," said one commenter.
Another wrote: "Poor baby. I love this breed. They truly love and protect their humans. They are so beautiful on the inside and out."
"Give that bestest boy a steak," posted a third. One comment added: "Oh my god I cried when I saw this. I'm glad he's going home. Best doggy gets all the love. Give him kisses for me!!"
Palousek was delighted by the reaction online: "The reaction from Reddit has been wonderful, and full of support and kind words. He has a huge support system, and we are very grateful," she said.
Dog isn't the first pet to have a face-to-face encounter with a snake. Last year, another canine learned the hard way that "snakes are friends, not food," when he was bitten by a rattlesnake.
Do you have funny and adorable videos or pictures of your pet you want to share? Send them to life@newsweek.com with some details about your best friend, and they could appear in our Pet of the Week lineup.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Elle
13 minutes ago
- Elle
The Ultimate Guide to Exfoliation
Exfoliation is arguably one of the most complicated steps in my skin-care routine. I know I have to do it — lest I miss out on the bright, radiant complexion my collection of scrubs, acids, and tools promise me — but how often, when, and which methods I should be using remains elusive. I'm always somewhere between doing it too often and not enough — and I'm not alone. 'How to exfoliate your face' continues to be a popular Google search, and the endless SkincareAddiction Reddit threads dedicated to exfoliation routines (and what to do when you've taken it too far) tell a tale of glow-seeking enthusiasts who are just trying to get it right. No matter what method you use, the goal of exfoliating is to remove dead skin cells from the top layer of your skin with the hope of revealing a brighter, more radiant complexion underneath. 'Exfoliation can have significant benefits for your skin when done safely and correctly,' says board-certified dermatologist Tiffany Jow Libby, MD. In addition to brightening skin, exfoliation can help improve texture, assist in product absorption (which enhances their efficacy) and unclog pores. Shani Darden, an esthetician whose client roster includes glowy-skinned celebs like Kelly Rowland and Shay Mitchell agrees, recommending that every skin type stands to benefit from working this step into their routine. There's no set frequency for exfoliation. It truly depends on your skin type, the type of exfoliation, and the other products in your routine. If you're just getting started, Dr. Libby advises exfoliating one to two times a week — working up to three times if your skin can handle it — and adding in one product at a time. It's essential to listen to your skin and not overdo it, which can lead to redness and irritation. That means using one active at a time and alternating the days you use exfoliants and other active products like retinol. You should also be checking your products, to ensure you aren't doubling up on your exfoliation with realizing. There are two methods of exfoliation, mechanical and chemical. Mechanical exfoliation (sometimes called physical exfoliation) is the process of using a physical agent, and likely what pops into your mind. This includes scrubs, sponges, brushes, and services like dermaplaning. Chemical exfoliation uses acids like alpha- and beta-hydroxy acids and has grown in popularity in the past few years. Both Dr. Libby and Darden suggest sticking to chemical exfoliants as they're often just as effective and less harsh than a scrub can be. 'Start by using a cleanser once a week that contains chemical exfoliant ingredients like salicylic acid, glycolic acid, and lactic acid,' says Dr. Libby, increasing the frequency if your skin tolerates it well. If you have rosacea-prone, sensitive skin, Dr. Libby recommends using lactic acid, which tends to gentler and more hydrating. For acne-prone skin types, she likes salicylic acid because it's lipophilic (meaning it's attracted to oil), and excellent at getting deep into pores. If you can't tolerate either method of exfoliation, Darden suggests removing your cleanser with cotton gauze. 'The gauze will gently exfoliate the skin in the process, resulting in brighter skin. This is great for someone with really sensitive skin,' she shared. Here is a helpful guide to finding the best exfoliating products for your skin type. One way to tell if you've exfoliated too much is your skin feels 'squeaky clean.' That's a sign you may have over-cleansed or over-exfoliated, Dr. Libby warns. Skin that's been over-exfoliated will be dry, itchy, and generally irritated. If this happens, you should stop using any actives immediately and focus on hydrating the skin. Switch to a gentle cleanser and add a hyaluronic acid serum into your routine both morning and night. This will help your skin to attract moisture, and help repair the skin's natural moisture barrier. Ultimately, what your skin needs is time, so give yourself a lengthy break and add actives back in slowly. The skin on your body is thicker than the skin on your face and thus may tolerate physical exfoliation better. Darden swears by the Nyakio Kenyan Coffee Body Scrub as a weekly treatment, which she loves for the scent and the luxurious feeling it leaves behind. Dr. Libby, however, says sticking to chemical exfoliants for your body is best, and recommends using a wash formulated with acids. It might seem intuitive to exfoliate every inch of your body, but certain spots require extra caution. Dr. Libby warns against exfoliating the lips at all, pointing to the lack of oil glands and delicate, thin skin. This makes the lips more susceptible to water loss and damage she says, and recommends hydrating instead. Darden cautions exfoliating your neck and chest too often and being careful when you do. 'They can be more sensitive areas,' she shared, 'so you may not be able to exfoliate them as often as your face.'
Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Americans Advised To Avoid the Sun in 15 States This Weekend
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Fifteen states will experience elevated ultraviolet (UV) radiation levels this weekend, according to the National Weather Service (NWS) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Why It Matters The EPA said that elevated UV radiation levels greatly increase the risk of skin burns, eye damage and long-term health problems like skin cancer. What To Know The UV index runs on a scale of one to 11. The levels, and their corresponding advice, are: 1-2: Low (minimal risk from UV rays for the average person) Wear sunglasses on bright days. In winter, snow can reflect UV and nearly double exposure. Use SPF 30+ sunscreen if you burn easily. 3-5: Moderate (moderate risk of harm from unprotected sun exposure) Cover up, wear a hat and sunglasses. Use SPF 30+ sunscreen. Stay in the shade near midday when the sun is strongest. 6-7: High (high risk of harm from unprotected sun exposure) Limit sun time between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. Wear protective clothing, sunglasses, and SPF 30+ sunscreen. 8-10: Very High (very high risk of harm; sun protection is essential) Take extra precautions including wide-brimmed hats and long sleeves. Minimize exposure between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. Be aware: white sand and similar surfaces reflect UV and increase exposure. 11+: Extreme (extreme risk of harm; unprotected skin can burn in minutes) Avoid sun exposure from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Reapply SPF 30+ sunscreen every 2 hours. Seek shade, wear full coverage, and use sun protection. A forecast map shows which areas could see the highest UV levels on Saturday. A forecast map shows which areas could see the highest UV levels on Saturday. EPA According to the EPA's UV index forecast for Saturday, solar noon—when the sun is at its highest point in the sky at a specific location—parts of Nevada, California, Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, Colorado, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Kansas and Wyoming could see levels of at least 11. On Sunday, Florida and Mississippi were expected to see similar UV levels in addition to the other states, while Nebraska and Missouri will experience UV levels below 11. A forecast map shows which areas could see the highest UV levels on Sunday. A forecast map shows which areas could see the highest UV levels on Sunday. EPA What People Are Saying Anthony Young, emeritus professor of experimental photobiology, dermatology, at King's College, London, previously told Newsweek: "The UV index [UVI] is a measure of the sunburning power of higher the UVI, the shorter the time you need in the sun to burn." Richard Weller, professor of medical dermatology, at the U.K.'s University of Edinburgh, previously told Newsweek that sunlight can cause photoaging—premature aging of the skin as a result of prolonged and repeated exposure to UV radiation, adding: "Sunburn is a risk factor for melanoma skin cancer, which is the most serious of the skin cancers." What Happens Next The UV index forecast map is generated each day using data from the NWS.
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Pregnant Women Issued Drinking Water Warning
Pregnant women have been advised to use water filters by experts who spoke to Newsweek after a study found levels of arsenic in water systems considered safe are impacting birth outcomes, A national study led by researchers at Columbia University evaluated risks from 13,998 pregnancies across 35 cohort sites participating in the National Institutes of Health's Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, and published its findings on the medical journal site JAMA Network last week. The researchers discovered that prenatal exposure to arsenic was associated with a higher likelihood of babies being born preterm with lower birth weights, factors that they said are important "predictors of infant mortality and morbidity across the life span." This was the case even at the level of exposure the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) currently deems safe, 10 micrograms per liter, a regulation that was established in 2001 and has not been changed since. Arsenic is a natural element found in soils, sediments, and groundwater, meaning it can feed into public drinking water systems. While this study highlights concerns of arsenic exposure in relation to pregnancy and birth outcomes in particular, the contaminant poses health risks to any individual. In the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) toxicology report on arsenic, the agency notes, "it is widely accepted that arsenic is carcinogenic," and that "numerous epidemiological studies have examined associations between exposure to arsenic in drinking water and various health outcomes." "Arsenic can cause a variety of cancers, including cancer of the bladder and urothelium, gastrointestinal tract, kidney, liver, lung, pancreas, and skin; as well as cardiovascular effects, and neurologic effects," Brett A. Poulin, a professor in the Department of Environmental Toxicology at the University of California, Davis, told Newsweek via email in response to the study. States also have different exposure levels, the study said, with Michigan, South Dakota, Nevada, and California all having areas with levels of higher than 5 micrograms per liter of arsenic in drinking water systems. "Arsenic levels tend to be higher in drinking water that comes from groundwater sources, such as community wells or private household wells," Poulin said. "In many cases, the arsenic comes from natural minerals in the aquifer—especially in regions with sedimentary rocks or glacial deposits that contain arsenic-bearing materials." He added that people living in areas that depend heavily on groundwater, and have geology rich in arsenic-containing sediments, are more likely to have elevated arsenic in their drinking water. Asked whether the agency believes the level of arsenic exposure considered safe needed to be updated following the release of the study, an EPA spokesperson told Newsweek that determining a safe level of exposure requires a consideration of implementation and cost, as well as public health. "The Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) established under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) is set at zero for arsenic," the spokesperson said. The MCLG is identified in the act as the maximum level of a contaminant in drinking water at which "no known or anticipated adverse effect on the health of persons would occur, allowing an adequate margin of safety," they added. However, MCLGs are "non-enforceable public health goals," the spokesperson said. "MCLGs consider only public health, therefore, they sometimes are set at levels which water systems cannot meet due to technical limitations." The spokesperson said the act requires the EPA to set the enforceable Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) "as close as feasible to the MCLG taking cost into consideration." Therefore, in its determination of a MCL of 10 micrograms per liter of arsenic exposure, the EPA had to evaluate the impact on costs and on public health, in a "health risk reduction and cost analysis." The spokesperson added that the EPA regularly reviews National Primary Drinking Water Regulations and "evaluates whether there are new peer reviewed health assessments for a contaminant." According to the spokesperson, in July 2024 under the Biden administration, the agency "completed the fourth cyclical review of drinking water regulations and determined that arsenic was not a candidate for revision at the time." "The Biden Administration noted that a regulatory revision for arsenic was not appropriate because the reassessment of the health risks resulting from exposure to arsenic was ongoing," the EPA spokesperson said. Although, in light of the study, Poulin said: "One thing the EPA must consider when revising MCLs is feasibility of achieving a more stringent MCL." "There is no such thing as completely safe water, whether it is bottled or tap water," Marc Edwards, a professor in civil and environmental engineering at Virginia Tech, told Newsweek. Although, he added this new research should be "considered in future revisions of the regulated arsenic level." Given the impact of even accepted levels of arsenic exposure on pregnancy and birth, experts have advised expecting mothers at risk of higher exposure to use water filters. "In situations with high risk of lead or arsenic, filters are recommended," Edwards said. "Waters with elevated arsenic are relatively rare compared to the problem of lead, and can be identified by reading your water companies consumer confidence report," he added. "This research underscores our responsibility as a society to protect the health of pregnant women," Marci Lobel, a professor in the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine at Stony Brook University, New York, told Newsweek. "Clearly, we must reduce arsenic levels in public water supplies," she said and advised pregnant women to filter their water if possible. Although, Lobel added that "pregnant women should not be unduly alarmed," as despite the study's findings, which are a "serious concern," the impacts are "not large." "We should consider the results of this important study in the context of what we already know about reducing health risks for pregnant women," she added. "It is well known that pregnancy is a highly vulnerable time for environmental exposures to have an impact on pregnant women and their babies," Natalie Exum, a professor in the Department of Environmental Health and Engineering at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told Newsweek. She added that she was "concerned" about the findings of the study, and that they indicate that the "current regulation set in the Safe Drinking Water Act may not be protecting maternal and child health." "If you are pregnant and living in an area where there are detectable levels of arsenic in the drinking water, it would be best to use a filter that removes the arsenic to non-detectable levels," she said. Related Articles RFK Jr. Says 'More Cavities' Due to No Fluoride in Water Is 'a Balance'Hidden Danger in Drinking Water Revealed in New StudyUS States Issued Drinking Water WarningMap Shows States Where Drinking Water Contamination is Highest 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
