Former President Biden's Cancer Treatment Options
Former U.S. President Joe Biden speaks at a conference hosted by the Advocates, Counselors, and Representatives for the Disabled on April 15, 2025 in Chicago. Credit -In a statement from his personal office on May 18, former President Joe Biden revealed he has an aggressive form of prostate cancer that has spread to his bones. 'While this represents a more aggressive form of the disease, the cancer appears to be hormone-sensitive which allows for effective management,' his office said in a statement. 'The President and his family are reviewing treatment options with his physicians.'
Recent studies show that survival for men with prostate cancer that has spread to the bone is just under two years. But this form of cancer, though aggressive, can sometimes be controlled. Here's what oncologists who treat prostate cancer say are the most common strategies for treating a cancer like Biden's, and some of the challenges.
'The good news is this: we have now entered an era of different treatments that I call therapy intensification where we are trying to attack cancer with a multi-modality approach,' says Dr. Maha Hussain, deputy director of the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. 'We can come up with a significant prolongation of life by comparison to when I entered the field." She has seen patients with prostate cancer that has spread survive and "live many, many years.'
Most prostate cancer is fueled by the male hormone testosterone, so the most effective strategies to control it starve the cancer by cutting off its supply, say experts. Historically, doctors have removed the testes—the main source of the hormone—but today, pills and injections can suppress testosterone not just in the testes but in other organs that produce small amounts, such as the adrenal glands, as well. Doctors also now add chemotherapy to hormone-suppression to better control cancer growth.
Exactly which combinations of treatments are right for Biden will depend on whether his cancer is new or if it was previously diagnosed and recently re-emerged. Either scenario is possible, say experts.
Read More: The Race to Explain Why More Young Adults Are Getting Cancer
With respect to having prostate cancer initially diagnosed at such an aggressive state, after it has already spread, 'I don't think there is any reason to think this could not be the natural history of prostate cancer in an older person,' says Dr. Robert Figlin, cancer center director at Cedars-Sinai Cancer Center. 'And this would not [indicate] something that was missed or mismanaged in past years. This is certainly something that can occur in the course of a male's life—it's not unusual to present in this way.' Many older men are diagnosed with aggressive disease, with studies showing that about 20% of prostate cancer cases are diagnosed in men 75 years and older, and that men 70 and older tended to have higher Gleason scores, an indicator of the cancer's aggressiveness, at diagnosis. (Biden's Gleason score is 9, his office said in the statement, indicating a more aggressive cancer.) 'Prostate cancer can sit dormant for years and suddenly decide to wake up,' says Hussain. 'I've seen all kinds of cases—all shades of grey.'
Treatment options also depend on a patient's overall health. Other conditions a person might have can affect their ability to tolerate the therapies and side effects. 'We have to take into account other diseases a man may have, other medical conditions that may be life-limiting, goals that man has in terms of longevity and quality of life, and other medications he may be taking,' says Dr. Michael Morris, prostate cancer section head at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Immunotherapy—an exciting new treatment that harnesses the immune system to fight certain cancer types—is so far not effective against prostate cancer. While it has been successful in slowing melanoma, breast, lung, kidney and bladder cancers, and lymphoma, prostate cancer remains relatively hidden from the immune system, making it what doctors call a 'cold' cancer. 'I'd rather call it a sneaky cancer,' says Hussain. 'Prostate cancer cells literally sit inside the bone marrow next to the white blood cells," which are immune cells. "The white blood cells can't see it, so unlike other cancers, prostate cancer has still not been responsive to immunotherapies.'
Read More: A New Immune Treatment May Work Against Several Cancer Types
However, while current immunotherapy strategies may not be as effective against prostate cancer, new immune-based interventions are being explored, says Morris. 'For now, for a patient who presents today with prostate cancer, there is no real role for immunotherapy,' he says. 'But there are many ways of manipulating the immune system to activate against prostate cancer. If you ask me in another couple of years, we will have a quite a different message.'
Doctors are also exploring whether introducing chemotherapy earlier, along with hormone-suppressing treatments could improve their chances of controlling the cancer and preventing it from spreading and becoming more aggressive. 'One of the most important questions for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic disease would need to answer is whether they need docetaxel chemotherapy in addition to [hormone suppressing] therapy,' says Dr. Timothy Daskivich, associate professor of urology at Cedars-Sinai. "Data suggests that patients with higher volume metastases benefit the most from docetaxel. If these patients don't get it up front, it could be a missed opportunity."
Prostate cancer screening—done with a blood test for prostate specific antigen (PSA), a marker of cancer cells—has helped to lower deaths from the disease. But the screening has been controversial, since prostate cancer generally grows slowly and the test can pick up signs of benign prostate growth, which also occurs as men age.
However, the American Cancer Society currently recommends that men with average risk of prostate cancer get screened beginning at age 50, if they are expected to live at least 10 more years, and that men with higher risk, including African-American men and those with a father or brother diagnosed with the disease, start earlier, at age 45. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that most men stop screening at age 70, since at that time, men may be more likely to die of causes other than prostate cancer, and the risks of over-treating slow-growing cancers may outweigh the benefits.
As vice president under President Barack Obama, Biden led the Cancer Moonshot to spur research into new treatments. As president in 2022, he set a nationwide goal of reducing cancer death rates by 50% over 25 years. The quest was personal for Biden, whose son Beau died in 2015 of brain cancer at age 46.
'Cancer touches us all,' he wrote in an Instagram post on May 19. "Like so many of you, Jill and I have learned that we are strongest in the broken places. Thank you for lifting us up with love and support."
Contact us at letters@time.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Homeland Security stonewalling info on noncitizen DNA collection operation, lawsuit alleges
The Trump administration has been turning to DNA technology to help find and arrest immigrants, including children, but immigration advocates say it has been slow to spell out how it's using and overseeing the genetic information. Three groups sued the Department of Homeland Security on Monday after trying to get records about the data collection program since last summer, during the Biden administration. The plaintiffs are the Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology, part of the Georgetown University Law School that focuses on privacy and surveillance law and policy; the Amica Center for Immigrant Rights and Americans for Immigrant Justice, both immigrant rights groups. The groups describe in their lawsuit their back-and-forth with DHS, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection since they originally requested information about their DNA collection from noncitizens on Aug. 1, 2024. Since 2020, DHS has expanded its DNA collection program and increased DNA contributions to the FBI's database, CODIS, by 5,000%, becoming the largest contributor, according to the Georgetown center. The DNA database of the FBI can be accessed by police across the country for criminal investigations, the plaintiff groups said in a statement. Stevie Glaberson, director of research and advocacy at the Georgetown center, said in a statement that DHS is expanding its database by "collecting DNA from people accused of no crime and while operating with none of the constraints that are supposed to be in place before the government compels someone to give over their most sensitive personal information." He said Americans deserve more visibility on the program and said DHS's lack of transparency is unacceptable. DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Daniel Melo, senior staff attorney with Amica's Immigration Impact Lab, told NBC News that previous administrations have also collected DNA. A 2005 law mandated federal agencies collect DNA from people in custody, including noncitizens. Prior to 2020, the Justice Department had told DHS that its immigration enforcement and border agents did not have to routinely collect DNA from every noncitizen it detained, Melo said. The Biden administration adopted rules requiring full compliance with the 2005 law, but whistleblowers and a government watchdog complained compliance was uneven. The "Securing Our Borders" executive order signed by President Donald Trump requires the attorney general and the DHS to fulfill requirements on DNA collection from noncitizens mandated in the 2005 law. Privacy and civil rights groups have long had issues with the government's DNA collection program. Melo said the public should be concerned whether people are being advised of their rights and how the information is being collected and used. "This information could tentatively be used in all sorts of ways to map full communities, to basically build a more intricate web of surveillance around noncitizen communities," Melo said. He said if DHS can continue to collect the DNA of noncitizens, essentially "experimenting" on them, "then they are able to refine these technologies and deploy them in new and interesting and probably really dangerous and scary ways on the rest of us." Emily Tucker, the Georgetown center's executive director, said in a statement that "it is a mistake to think of DHS' DNA collection program as 'immigration enforcement.'" "Trump is using immigration powers to justify the activities of his militarized federal police force because there is so little institutional or judicial oversight or accountability for executive enforcement actions that invoke 'immigration authority," she said in a statement. "This program is one part of a massive surveillance dragnet that sweeps in information about everyone. They will use it for deportation, but they will also use it to intimidate, silence, and target anyone they perceive as the enemy.' This article was originally published on
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Education Department declares June ‘Title IX Month'
The Education Department announced Monday that June, typically known as Pride Month, would be honored as 'Title IX Month' as it works to undo Biden-era transgender protections. The department said the move is 'in honor of the fifty-third anniversary of Title IX of the Educational Amendments (1972) being signed into law.' 'June will now be dedicated to commemorating women and celebrating their struggle for, and achievement of, equal educational opportunity,' its press release states. The Education Department will also highlight steps it has taken to 'reverse the Biden Administration's legacy of undermining Title IX' and says it will step up measures to 'protect women in line with the true purpose of Title IX,' it added. The move comes after the Trump administration has aimed to undo protections for transgender athletes, arguing it is unfair for transgender women and girls to play on teams that match their gender identity. The Department of Education has also launched numerous investigations against K-12 districts and higher education institutions for allowing transgender individuals on women's sports teams. 'The Department is recognizing June as 'Title IX Month' to honor women's hard-earned civil rights and demonstrate the Trump Administration's unwavering commitment to restoring them to the fullest extent of the law. Title IX provides women protections on the basis of sex in all educational activities, which include their rights to equal opportunity in sports and sex-segregated intimate spaces, including sororities and living accommodations,' said Education Secretary Linda McMahon. 'This Administration will fight on every front to protect women's and girls' sports, intimate spaces, dormitories and living quarters, and fraternal and panhellenic organizations,' she added. As Pride Month begins, LGBTQ rights organization GLAAD released a report indicating it recorded more than 1,000 incidents within the past year targeting the community, with more than half of those specifically going after transgender and gender-nonconforming Americans. 'This goes along with the really intense conversations that we're having right now around trans rights,' said GLAAD analyst Sarah Moore. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Biden State Department Spokesman Now Says Israel Is Committing War Crimes
Former State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller says that he personally believes Israel has been committing war crimes against the Palestinian people — including during his tenure in the Biden administration, where, as a major voice of U.S. foreign policy, he daily defended Israel's flattening of Gaza to the American public. Speaking to Sky News' Mark Stone on the 'Trump 100' podcast, Miller said on Monday that it is 'without a doubt true that Israel has committed war crimes' in the territory. When Stone asked if he held this belief while serving as spokesperson, he said yes. 'Look, one of the things about being a spokesperson is you're not a spokesperson for yourself. You're a spokesperson for the president, the administration — and you espouse the positions of the administration,' Miller said. 'And when you're not in the administration, you can just give your own opinions.' The ex-State Department official said he believes Israeli soldiers committed war crimes in individual instances rather than as part of a wider policy of systematically erasing the Palestinian people, as muchof the international community has now accused the Israeli government. 'We were expecting it coming,' Hamid Bendaas, spokesperson for the pro-Palestinian nonprofit IMEU Policy Project, told HuffPost of Miller's admission. 'But I think this is the first foray of that — of Biden admin officials being like, 'Oh yeah, we were hard on Israel, we weren't super pro-Israel,' after saying for over a year that they were the most pro-Israel administration of all time, and a lot of the reporting since then obviously backing it up.' 'But [Miller] is saying that he's speaking about covering war crimes, right? It's not even covering up Biden's age or stuff like that,' Bendaas continued. 'But covering up a war crime that you know happened, and saying that doesn't happen because you're following orders? That's basically what he's saying he did. It's just a different thing.' United Nations officials,human rights groups and some world leaders have described Israel's actions as genocidal, a term Miller rejected. Still, his comments on Monday represent a huge pivot from the statements he made every day on behalf of former Secretary of State Antony Blinken while heclashed with reporters who tried to push himon the U.S. role in unconditionally supporting and arming an Israeli offensive that has now reached its nineteenth month. 'It has to be said that Miller is also guilty of, at minimum, facilitating these war crimes,' progressive strategist Rania Batrice posted on X. 'Matthew Miller, almost daily, not only lied to the public and the press, he did it in a shitty condescending way, in an attempt to mislead the public.' Though Miller insisted that he believed Israeli war crimes were individual acts, the State Department was aware that the Israeli government was committing possible war crimes. Experts within the U.S. government concluded last year that Israel was intentionally blocking humanitarian aid from entering Gaza — a major development that would legally require the Biden administration to stop sending weapons to Israel. Blinken rejected the findings and delivered a report to Congress without that information, leading report author Stacy Gilbert to resign in protest. Gilbert was one of many Biden appointees who, unlike Miller, resigned over the administration's unconditional support for Israel in its bombing campaign. Biden resignee and A New Policy co-founder Josh Paul told HuffPost, 'The Biden Administration's wanton lawbreaking when it came to what was happening in Gaza was no less a scandal than Watergate, and in the context of its human impact, probably a greater one.' Miller is the latest in a growing number of voices changing their tune and speaking out against Israel's military campaign, the plight of Palestinians and the humanitarian crisis plaguing Gaza. The former spokesperson said that he wished the Biden administration did more to pressure Israel to accept a ceasefire deal after May 2024, when documentation of the military's indiscriminate violence against civilians became nearly impossible to ignore. 'I'm happy to be punitive to Matt Miller, but we also want to see more people be doing what Matt Miller is doing in a way, because it's a sign that they are recognizing that public opinion has shifted pretty rapidly on this,' Bendaas said. 'And especially on the Democratic side, it's just extremely unpopular to be pro-Israel in the way that Democrats have been for the last few decades.' At Least 31 Palestinians Killed After Israeli Forces Strike Gaza Aid Hub 'Freedom Flotilla' Tries Again To Break Israel's Blockade On Gaza 'Indiscriminate, Unrestrained, Brutal': Former Israeli PM Calls Gaza Assault 'War Crimes'