Redress process for Post Office Horizon victims could go on for years
More than 900 subpostmasters were wrongfully prosecuted by the Post Office between 1999 and 2015 after faulty Horizon software made it look as though money was missing from their accounts.
The previous Conservative government said those who had their convictions quashed were eligible for £600,000 payouts – with victims such as Amanda and Norman Barber accepting the fixed offer.
Despite losing their business and home, the Warrington couple said they found it 'almost impossible' to provide the details required to have their case individually assessed so did not want to risk 'getting less'.
Unexplained shortfalls in their accounts at Thelwall Post Office eventually led to them being prosecuted over a deficit of £5,600 – despite using around £200,000 of their own money to attempt to balance the books.
Both received a community order of 12 months and 100 hours' community service.
Speaking about the redress process, Amanda, 55, said: 'We were being asked to produce evidence we simply couldn't get our hands on with regards to our losses as we are talking going back 15 years.
'We found it almost impossible to provide the details needed to go down the route of having our case individually assessed.
'It just didn't seem worth it. I think subpostmasters are still being left in an impossible situation when it comes to seeking true and full redress.
'Given the time it would take we simply couldn't risk a full assessment and getting less, particularly because the lack of documents we had.
'It got to the stage where, when the £600,000 was offered, it seemed the best way to bring years of torture to an end.'
Redress has been a key issue for subpostmasters since the scandal came to light, with many finding the various compensation schemes difficult to navigate.
Lead campaigner Sir Alan Bates previously described the various processes as 'quasi-kangaroo courts', telling The Sunday Times that the Department for Business and Trade 'sits in judgment of the claims and alters the goal posts as and when it chooses'.
The chairman of the Horizon IT inquiry, Sir Wyn Williams, is due to publish his findings on redress on Tuesday, with Amanda Barber saying she will join other subpostmasters in attending the report's publication event.
She said: 'We feel we just need to be there to hear what is said.
'Lives were ruined and compensation has been made too hard to get, and too little by far.'
One law firm involved in securing redress for victims, Hudgell Solicitors, said it still had more than 700 ongoing compensation cases to resolve.
Solicitor Neil Hudgell said the firm had agreed damages for more than 300 people, totalling £170 million, but said the redress process had 'far too much red tape to get through'.
He said: 'We have seen inconsistencies between the various compensation schemes, which remain over-engineered and over-legalistic, with far too much red tape to get through.
'There has also been a repeated failure to give the benefit of the doubt to subpostmasters in appropriate circumstances.
'It's made it far too long a process for so many people who have been through so much, and are now in the latter stages of their lives.
'It has been retraumatising for many, and increasing numbers are sadly passing away without seeing redress.'
Addressing how long it could take for all claims to be settled, the solicitor added: 'At the current speed, we are looking at another two to three years.'
Mr Hudgell said one client who was initially offered £50,000 has seen their offer rise to £500,000.
He added: 'It is not a one-off glitch, but a stark illustration of a very common issue.
'It has been a painful process for all, and ended with a new appeals process being confirmed earlier this year, in recognition that many people had been under-compensated.'
In a statement, the Department for Business and Trade said: 'We are grateful for the inquiry's work, which has revealed the immeasurable suffering that victims of the scandal have endured.
'This Government has quadrupled the total amount paid to affected postmasters to provide them with full and fair redress, with more than £1 billion having now been paid to over 7,300 claimants.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
3 hours ago
- Daily Record
Postmaster's widow said wrongly-convicted husband could have been 14th suicide
Anne Quarm, from North Uist, shared husband William's torment after a bombshell public inquiry report revealed the Horizon scandal could be to blame for 13 people taking their own lives. The widow of a wrongly-convicted Scots postmaster who died before seeing justice said he could have been the Post Office's 14th suicide yesterday. Anne Quarm, from North Uist, spoke of husband William's torment after a bombshell public inquiry report revealed the Horizon IT scandal could be to blame for at least 13 people taking their own lives. Sir Wyn Williams' first report laid bare the 'disturbing' toll of false accusations against at least 1,000 postmasters as a result of the faulty software - saying a further 59 victims had considered suicide. Anne, who successfully fought to overturn William's conviction after his death in 2015, said the dad-of-five was amongst those who had 'contemplated' taking their own life after he faced the threat of jail over false embezzlement charges. She said: 'There were many more potentials, including my husband. My brother stopped him from doing it. 'That is so painful. Although William knew he was innocent he believed that people thought he was guilty. 'To know that on your death bed is bad enough, but carrying it with you - that's so tough.' More than 700 sub-postmasters were prosecuted, including up to 100 in Scotland, for theft and false accounting from 2000-14 as a result of shortfalls flagged by the faulty Horizon system. William Quarm was convicted in 2010 of embezzling cash from the Paible Post Office and ordered to carry out 150 hours of unpaid work. He died a 'broken man' two years later aged 69. But he was completely exonerated by a court in 2023 after a long fight by his loved ones. The public inquiry heard last year that William had reported a suspected error with the ATM at his branch when an audit found missing cash. He could not explain the mystery £40,000 shortfall that would destroy his life - explaining he had moved around money within the business to account for it while he awaited a bank loan to plug the loss from his own pocket. The inquiry heard an investigator admit that no Horizon data had been requested from software developer Fujitsu in relation to William's case and there was no identification of when Post Office money had benefited William's own personal accounts. Despite this, he was forced to plead guilty after being warned he could go to prison following trial. Anne said the proud grandfather 'lost everything' as a result. Inquiry chairman Williams stated on Tuesday that he is satisfied that employees of the Post Office and Fujitsu knew that Horizon was capable of producing 'illusory' errors in accounts. He stated there was 'wholly unacceptable behaviour' perpetrated by a number of individuals, while a number of employees at the Post Office 'maintained the fiction' that Horizon's data was 'always accurate'. He will address this in the later part of his report. Anne said she hopes she will live to see justice served. She said: 'They were making money all the time. To them it was a game of Monopoly. They were there to squeeze as much out of people as they possibly could. They were torturing people to the core. It's unreal a human could do such a thing to another. 'I'll be 74 soon. I just hope in my lifetime I see justice. 'They took innocent people's lives from them and destroyed their families. We want justice for that. We need justice for that to give us some sort of peace. 'Everybody involved who knew they were doing wrong should all be accountable. 'It has to start from the top. Those who knew full well and allowed it to come down the ladder like a snake. 'These people have no idea what life is like to be stripped naked of your dignity, all your possessions and everything you've loved. 'My blood runs cold when I hear 'the Post Office'. It's just been so traumatic and it's hard to live with it. 'There will never be justice until these people are held accountable.' Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Police have identified seven suspects, and has 45 to 50 potential suspects in view in relation to the scandal but has said criminal trials may not start until 2028. Williams made 19 recommendations, largely relating to expediting victim compensation, in his first report. Post Office Chair Nigel Railton, said he wanted to make a 'clear and unequivocal apology to every single person affected' by the scandal. He said: 'Post Office did not listen to postmasters and, as an organisation, we let them down.' A spokesperson from Fujitsu Services Ltd said: 'We have apologised for, and deeply regret, our role in sub-postmasters' suffering, and we wish to reiterate that apology today.'
Spectator
7 hours ago
- Spectator
Good Lords: the House is losing some of the best
Keir Starmer has not been the luckiest general. But, in one respect, he has bested Napoleon. The Duke of Wellington will shortly be purged from parliament, two centuries after Waterloo. Like his ancestor, Charles Wellesley has led a life of public service. For that, he will shortly receive the sack as part of the greatest purge of active lawmakers since Oliver Cromwell. All this so Starmer can make way for the likes of Tom Watson, Sue Gray and Richard Hermer. Among the hereditary peers are Olympians and entrepreneurs, artists and academics. Some are genuine blue bloods, others political animals. Senior Tories across both Houses lament the loss of Earl Howe and Lord Strathclyde, both of whom are described by colleagues as 'first-rate ministers'. Between them, the pair have clocked up 80 years in parliament. Strathclyde is the son of the last Tory MP to sit for a seat in Glasgow and is known across the House to be shrewd and gregarious. He led the Lords under David Cameron after beginning his career as a whip for Margaret Thatcher. Having helped carve a compromise which saved 92 hereditaries from Tony Blair, he will go down in history as the last one to sit at the cabinet table. Earl Howe succeeded him as the longest continuously serving Conservative frontbencher after Strathclyde quit the coalition in 2013; his life on the burgundy benches began when the Soviet Union still existed and he has since served six Conservative prime ministers. Howe worked at the Ministry of Defence, where he introduced the Armed Forces (Flexible Working) Act 2018. And his experience ranges from financial services to charity, including disability and epilepsy advocacy, the RNLI and the Chiltern Society. The parliamentarians I spoke to from both chambers talked of a decent and knowledgeable man. Not all relations between the Commons and the Lords are as harmonious. Wellington has gained a reputation as a thorn in the side of ministers. The Duke is married to Princess Antonia of Prussia and was chosen to carry Queen Mary's Crown at the King's coronation. He is also a former councillor and MEP. Although he entered the Lords as a Conservative in 2015, he broke ranks over Brexit, eventually becoming a crossbench peer. Wellington is a staunch environmentalist and has put down wrecking amendments to save green protections. He was expected to cause Labour trouble on their planning bill, and there are those in government who will be relieved to see the Duke go. Viscount Thurso is one of four Lib Dem hereditary peers. He has both a luxuriant beard and a serious lineage, being the grandson of Archie Sinclair, Winston Churchill's wartime Air Secretary. On the Labour benches sit Viscount Hanworth, a nuclear expert and statistics professor, and Viscount Stansgate, son of Tony Benn. Awkwardly, his brother Hilary Benn is a member of the government and is committed to his sibling's expulsion. While some hereditaries have followed the well-trodden path of the military, agriculture and finance, others prove that there is no mould. Lord Hampton is a photographer turned department head at a local state school. The Earl of Minto ran Paperchase. The Earl of Rosslyn started out patrolling the streets of Peckham for the Metropolitan Police. Lord Trefgarne was a pilot, and the Earl of Oxford and Asquith was a spy. Perhaps no one better illustrates the experience of the hereditaries than Lord Moynihan. He coxed Oxford to victory in the 1977 Boat Race and won a silver medal in the 1980Moscow Olympics, taking over the British Olympic Association in the run-up to the 2012 games. Moynihan was a political adviser to Francis Pym when he was foreign secretary, and he first entered parliament in 1983 not as a Lord but as the MP for Lewisham East. He served as minister for sport under Thatcher, supporting her through the Hillsborough disaster, before eventually joining the Lords in 1997. While Conservatives make up more than half of hereditary peers, Labour's purge will hit the crossbenchers hardest. Nearly one in five will be removed. Among them is their convenor, Lord Kinnoull. He is a chemist by training and a former barrister, who spent 25 years in insurance and chairs a wildlife conservation trust, promotes Scottish culture and tourism and runs a farm. He also sits on seven parliamentary committees and is regarded by colleagues as 'erudite, charming yet wily'. For some hereditaries, Labour's expulsion will mark the end of a parliamentary career that had only just begun. Lord Camoys, one of the youngest at 50, entered the Lords two years ago, following a career in finance and diplomacy – with postings in Afghanistan and Delhi and working in counter–terrorism. His latest venture – a £3.5 billion development for a film studios in Marlow – would create more than 4,000 new jobs. Sign-off on the project rests with the Housing Secretary, Angela Rayner. If Lord Camoys is unlucky, he may find he has not one but two careers cut short by this Labour government.
Spectator
7 hours ago
- Spectator
Corbyn's new party is Starmer's creation
Have you ever been to an activist meeting? A proper one, not a cocktail party for potential donors. If Keir Starmer has been to one lately, I suspect he didn't stay past the minutes or he would have been better prepared for what happens when you try to get a roomful of lefties to point in the same direction. Starmer's team have been so busy admiring their enormous majority that it has taken them a while to realise that they are trapped with 400 left-wingers in every shade of red from post-Soviet carmine to the most delicate salmon pink, all of them high on victory and spoiling for a fight. One might as well try to herd 400 cats into formation. In our sclerotic two-party, first-past-the-post system, a majority as large as Starmer's is meant to give the leadership a free hand. But this depends on internal discipline and the appearance of consensus, which is not easy for Labour. In my experience, the only activist meetings that reach a consensus in under three hours are direct action groups such as Just Stop Oil and Palestine Action, which might explain why the government is trying to have them locked up before they become too powerful, free speech be damned. One suspects that Starmer might deal similarly with Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana, if he could. The MPs for Islington North and Coventry South are apparently going to form a new left-wing party. I'm happy for them. They make sense together. Between them, the former Labour leader and the young rising star have covered the two major modern left aesthetics: Soft Business Attack Femme and Wizard of No Fixed Address. And neither of them, apparently, is happy with purely vibes-based politics. They're the sort of terrifying people who actually go to meetings, stay until the end and listen. Rather than ask why this sort of thing is popular with voters, the government's loyalists are grumbling about how badly Corbyn and Sultana have betrayed the Labour party – which is a bit rich, considering that Corbyn didn't expel himself. Modern Labour acts as if only it can protect Britain from being further ravaged by the Bullingdon set. As such, any opinion that might go down badly with centrist dads from Stevenage is by definition a luxury belief. And there is a place for that sort of pragmatism. There are situations so desperate that 'you should see the other guy' is a winning argument. Last summer, just before the general election, someone threw a plastic bag full of raw meat into the building site behind my flat. The construction company had gone bankrupt and the site was fenced off, so we had to watch and smell the meatbag slowly rot until even the foxes wouldn't go for it. But if you'd decorated it with a red ribbon, I would have held my nose and voted for that rotting meatbag rather than allow the Conservative party another moment's control over what's left of the country. As it happens, I didn't have to make that choice. Because I live in Islington North, and Corbyn was and remains my MP. He is also my neighbour. I often see him in the corner shop. I could easily have brought up the rotting meatbag issue in person, but Corbyn does actually try to solve problems for his constituents, and there was a very real possibility that he might have tried to scale the fence himself. And with the greatest respect, he's 76. Corbyn was supposed to go away. That's what party leaders are meant to do when they're ousted: slink off to a discreet life of lucrative after-dinner talks. Instead, he has carried on standing up for his principles, which remain pro-social and anti-war. Instead of going back to rusticate on his allotment, he keeps on suggesting outrageous socialist plots like raising taxes rather than kicking children off welfare. When your entire political tradition is based on scamming, spin and weary pragmatism, honesty and consistency are the wild cards. Which is where Sultana comes in. The young MP (she's only 31) has a rare talent in this anaemic political culture: she speaks clearly and with conviction. 'Just 50 families now own more than half the UK population,' she declared in her announcement that she was quitting Labour. 'Poverty is growing, inequality is obscene, and the two-party system offers nothing but managed decline and broken promises.' Sultana was one of the first Labour MPs to have the whip withdrawn for voting to scrap the two-child benefit cap. This early crackdown was designed as a warning to newcomers to the Commons about what happens if you don't toe the party line, wherever the leadership chooses to draw it. Unfortunately, somebody failed to frisk the new MPs on the way in to check they weren't carrying any concealed principles. Labour was never going to be able to control its MPs. Consensus is difficult to achieve among people who, by their very nature, believe that some things matter more than power. This is a feature of the left, not a bug. In a sensible democracy, politicians who stand up for their constituents should not automatically be a liability and smaller parties should not automatically be a threat. Most modern democracies have some form of proportional representation, which is, of course, a boring way to run a country. Proportional requires a lot more careful negotiation with smaller parties, a lot of coalition building, a lot of dull, grown-up compromise. Urgh. First past the post is far more exciting, if you're the sort of person who likes politics in primary colours. A two-horse race! All or nothing! Win or lose! Goodies and baddies! Adventure, corruption, intrigue, last-minute heel turns! Small men doing dangerous things for money! It's a game the two largest parties have spent generations learning to master. This is one of many things that Labour has the power to change in a heartbeat and doesn't dare. But this is no longer a two-party country, and the voting public can no longer be convinced by an appeal to a stability that barely anyone can remember. Sooner or later, Labour has got to come up with something better than 'you should see the other guy'.
