Google taps top Obama Supreme Court lawyer for search antitrust appeal
Verrilli's hire is a key first step in Google's legal fight to undo the ruling, which it has said could pose a threat to its business.
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta last year ruled Google holds an unlawful monopoly in online search and related advertising, and is considering proposals to make the tech titan sell off its popular Chrome browser, or share data that CEO Sundar Pichai says would allow competitors reverse engineer its search engine.
Google has argued the DOJ failed to prove that competition was harmed by its exclusive agreements with device makers such as Apple to preload Google as the default search engine on new devices. The company has recently begun loosening its agreements to allow partners including Samsung to load rival apps.
Verrilli, who as solicitor general was the Obama White House's top Supreme Court advocate, is known for his work successfully defending the Democratic president's signature domestic healthcare law.
He will represent Google in its planned appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, where Democratic-appointed judges outnumber Republican ones 9 to 6.
Verrilli is separately the lead lawyer for law firm Susman Godfrey in its lawsuit against the Trump administration over an executive order that restricted its business. A judge in April blocked key provisions of the order.
Verrilli is representing hundreds of other firms that filed a court brief denouncing Republican President Donald Trump's attacks on prominent law firms. He is also representing U.S. Copyright Office Director Shira Perlmutter in a lawsuit challenging her firing, and the National Endowment for Democracy in a case accusing the Trump administration of illegally withholding funds.
Verrilli's firm Munger Tolles has represented Google in other lawsuits. The firm, whose founders include the late Charlie Munger, has counted Berkshire Hathaway and Bank of America as some of its other clients.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Four cities where Americans can find a cut-price mansion… for less than a regular home elsewhere
The American dream may be about owning a modest family home with a white picket fence, but some have grander ambitions. For those with dreams of owning their own mansion - defined as a home of at least 5,000 square feet - four cities have emerged as the best place to bag a deal this year. Across the country the median mansion will set you back $1.4 million, but in Buffalo, Indianapolis, Cleveland, and Memphis, it could cost less than $1 million, according to a new report from Zillow. In Buffalo, New York, median mansions are available for $825,500, and in Indianapolis, similar-sized homes are on the market for an average price of $965,500. In Cleveland, Ohio, and Memphis, Tennessee, buyers can bag a palatial pad for an average price of $995,200 and $996,700, respectively. Home prices have surged more than 50 percent in the years following the pandemic, and this is notable in the mansion market too. In June 2021, nearly half of all US mansions were valued at less than $1 million, according to Zillow. Today, just 30 percent are under the million-dollar threshold. 'Home prices surged during the pandemic, pushing even starter homes into million‑dollar territory in hundreds of cities,' Kara Ng, senior economist at Zillow, said. She continued: 'Especially on the coasts, champagne tastes require champagne budgets, but in some parts of the country, a million dollars still buys serious square footage. 'More room to roam, including outdoor space, became a must-have during the pandemic, and those preferences have held true.' By contrast, buyers would need a cool $4.5 million for the average mansion in four of California's major metros. The median mansion in San Jose is currently valued at $6.5 million, according to Zillow figures. San Francisco's averagely-priced mansions are listed at $4.9 million, mansions in Los Angeles are $4.7 million and in San Diego they are only slightly cheaper at $4.6 million. Experts at Zillow warned those looking to purchase such a large home should also keep in mind the costs of maintaining it. Larger properties can come with higher property taxes, utility bills and insurance premiums. In addition, Zillow recommends budgeting for annual upkeep of somewhere between 1 to 4 percent of the home's value. It comes as the US housing market is cooling overall with 33 out of the 50 largest metro areas seeing price cuts, and some falling more rapidly than others. The pace and severity of the slowdown varied in July, according to new data from In particular, the South and West shifted decisively in favor of buyers due to rising inventory, deeper price cuts, and homes spending longer on the market. The housing market in the Northeast and Midwest remains steadier. 'The housing market has cooled modestly in 2025, prompting our lowered outlook for home sales and price growth,' said Danielle Hale, chief economist at 'But the extent and persistence of rebalancing really varies across the country, and, regionally, homebuyers and sellers are likely to experience a very different market.'
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Chili's fans fume over shocking 'shrinkflation'... 'how could they do this to me?'
Chili's is under fire for offering what one social media user has called 'tiny a** portions' of quesadillas. The customer ranted about his Chili's DoorDash order in a Reddit post on August 8, claiming it was an example of 'shrinkflation.' Shrinkflation is when products shrink in size or quantity while the price remains the same or even increases. 'I ordered a brisket casadilla [sic] and it's the size my child would eat when the hell did they cut portion sizes and jack up prices of the quesadilla?,' the user wrote. Other users are backing up the post creator, claiming they would send the food back if they received something so 'ridiculous.' 'It was the size of my hand when I was 6. Now it's half the size of my hand. I don't understand how chilis could do this to me,' a customer wrote. 'Wow, they're about the size of my mini pancakes I made for my kid this morning,' another commenter responded. Another user defended Chili's, however, saying that the quesadillas are the same size but they simply look smaller because the packaging has got bigger. Chili's has been the topic of conversation for months since pulling off what some say is ' the best restaurant comeback of all time.' An increasing number of brands have been accused of shrinkflation over the last few years following the rise of inflation. It's caused backlash from social media users, with some even threatening to boycott companies they believe are guilty of shrinking items while keeping the price the same. Social media has been accusing Chili's of shrinkflation for at least a year. 'I would simply never eat at that place again in my life,' a Reddit user wrote last year. The Brisket Quesadilla comes with eight quesadillas made with smoked pulled brisket, cheese, jalapeños and BBQ sauce — served with pico, sour cream and ranch. Chili's is also known for its meaty offerings like the Oldtimer — a popular cheeseburger that was altered this year. Following a successful fiscal third quarter, its parent company, Brinker International, announced Chili's delivered a strong fiscal fourth quarter ending on June 25 — surpassing analysts' expectations. Multiple social media users backed up the Reddit post creator's shrinkflation accusations Multiple restaurant chains, including Chipotle, have been accused of shrinking portion sizes. Some accusations have even ended in lawsuits. A New York resident sued Arby's last December — claiming the chain shrunk its fry and beverage sizes without changing prices or informing customers. The lawsuit is still ongoing. In April, a customer also sued The Cheesecake Factory, alleging the chain shrunk its cake slices. Daily Mail has reached out to Chili's for comment regarding its quesadillas and is awaiting response.
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Fury as economy passengers lumbered with hefty tax to 'subsidize' the use of private jets
Commercial plane passengers are subsidizing private jet air travel to the tune of $1 billion a year, shocking new analysis has revealed. Passengers travelling on the likes of United, JetBlue and Southwest are subject to an often overlooked 7.5 percent tax that goes to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The FAA oversees the safety of planes from the runway, in the sky and upon landing at their destination by monitoring all air traffic and ensuring there are no collisions. Private jets also make use of the FAA's air traffic control services but pay significantly less tax towards their upkeep, analysis by the New York Times has found. Private jets account for around 7 percent of all flights the FAA manages in the skies, yet they pay just 0.6 percent of the fees the agency collects, according to the publication. This is because private jet passengers do not buy tickets for flights, so they are not subject to the same tax. The disparity traces its origins back to the commercial airline boom of the 1970s. As more people took to the skies to go on vacation or travel for business, the government needed funds to expand airports and air traffic control. The solution was the introduction of the per-ticket tax on passengers. Congress soon tried to balance this out by charging private jets a higher fuel tax. However, this still comes nowhere close to covering the FAA's costs of looking out for the safety of private jets. Economy passengers are therefore providing a more than $1 billion subsidy to cover the shortfall every year, the New York Times analysis found. Comparable systems in Canada manage the issue in a more equitable way by charging all planes that use the air traffic control system a fee based on the weight of the plane and the distance it is travelling. Economy passengers have also been passed over in favor of a boom in business class travel this year. United unveiled its new business class Polaris Studio suites in May, complete with caviar and champagne service, while slashing regular flights. The new suites, complete with sliding doors and Wi-Fi from Starlink, will debut on international routes from San Francisco to London and Singapore by the end of the year. Tickets will cost between $3,000 and $15,000 return. Economy passengers must pay a 7.5 percent tax to the FAA on each ticket It comes as the US's largest airline said it would be cutting back late night and early morning flights due to a sharp drop in demand as nervous consumers pull back their spending. Major airlines are increasingly investing millions into first and business class travel, creating a growing divide in the skies. They are betting that these seats will keep airlines profitable even if economy passengers are hit by an economic slowdown. It is a strategy that banks on deep-pocketed travelers to buoy profits, even as economy passengers face fewer seats, higher prices, and diminishing amenities.
