Former Austin mayoral candidate sues over TRE ballot language
Last week, Austin City Council approved its budget for next fiscal year and set a property tax rate, which is high enough that it triggers a tax rate election, or TRE, in November. Council members also approved an ordinance ordering that special election to be held on Nov. 4.
Austin signs off on $6B+ budget, triggering property tax rate election
If voters approve the new tax rate, the average homeowner's property tax bill will go up by a total of $302.14 annually.
The ordinance council members passed, ordering the TRE, lays out the rules of the election and what will appear on the ballot for voters. According to the ordinance, the TRE will be under Proposition Q on November's ballot, and it will say, 'this is a tax increase,' and describe what the money will go toward.
However, Jeffery Bowen, a candidate in the 2024 Austin mayoral race, filed a lawsuit this week claiming that the ballot language as described in the ordinance doesn't make it clear that the property tax hike would be recurring, and that the ballot's description of what taxpayers would get out of the increase is not clear enough.
Austin Mayor Kirk Watson, who defeated Bowen for the seat of city mayor last November, provided KXAN with the following statement:
'The City of Austin is confident the ballot language is appropriate and meets all legal requirements. We also have confidence in the court system and will respond in that venue.'
The full lawsuit can be viewed below.
Original Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus with App_1755530250Download
According to the ordinance, the ballot will be prepared to permit voting 'FOR' or 'AGAINST' Proposition Q, which will state the following:
CITY OF AUSTIN PROPOSITION QTHIS IS A TAX INCREASE
Approving the ad valorem tax rate of $0.574017 per $100 valuation in the City of Austin for the current year, a rate that is $0.05 higher per $100 valuation than the voter-approval tax rate of the City of Austin, for the purpose of funding or expanding programs intended to increase housing affordability and reduce homelessness; improve parks and recreation facilities and services; enhance public health services and public safety; ensure financial stability; and provide for other general fund maintenance and operation expenditures included in the fiscal year 2025 -2026 budget as approved or amended by City Council. Last year, the ad valorem tax rate in the City of Austin was $0.4776 per $100 valuation.
According to Bowen's lawsuit, Bowen hand-delivered a letter to the city council on Aug. 13 that outlined the deficiencies in the ballot language, and demanded that the council 'fulfill its nondiscretionary duty to adopt ballot language for the tax increase election that does not mislead voters about the tax increase proposition.'
The lawsuit alleged that, 'instead, the Austin City Council prescribed its own ballot language for the tax increase proposition that will grossly mislead voters and promote its passage.'
The first issue the lawsuit alleged was that city council violated Texas law that was set forth by the Texas Supreme Court in Dacus v. Parker (Tex. 2015) because the ballot language does not explain the 'purpose' of the tax increase in definite and clear terms.
The lawsuit specifically pointed out the phrase of the ballot that states, 'and provide for other general fund maintenance and operation expenditures included in the fiscal year 2025-2026budget as approved or amended by City Council,' alleging that several parts of the phrase 'mislead' voters.
It also said the ballot language fails to meet Dacus standards because 'several of the program descriptions are misleading for vagueness and non-neutral advocacy.'
The other issue the lawsuit alleged was that the ballot is also too vague to establish an enforceable 'contract with the voters,' because it does not describe exactly how the current council and future councils could spend the money.
The lawsuit said that because the tax increase would be a 'forever tax,' the ballot language should be 'definite and clear and become the foundation on which voters and taxpayers can rely—if the proposition passes—for how this huge tax increase will be spent, not only by this City Council but by all City Councils in the future.'
Bowen's suit, which was filed in the Third Court of Appeals in Austin, asks the court to 'issue a writ of mandamus ordering and compelling the Mayor and City Council of the City of Austin to promptly hold a validly called meeting of the Council to adopt ballot language that corrects each the deficiencies in the Council-adopted ballot language noted above so as to have accurate language on the November 4, 2025 ballot.'
In other words, Bowen is asking the court to force the mayor and city council to change the ballot language for the proposition.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Denser housing near transit stops? L.A. City Council opposes state bill
After a tense and sharply divided debate Tuesday, the Los Angeles City Council voted to oppose a state bill that aims to vastly expand high-density housing near public transit hubs, arguing that the state should leave important planning decisions to local legislators. The council voted 8 to 5 to oppose Senate Bill 79, which seeks to mitigate the state's housing shortage by allowing buildings of up to nine stories near certain train stops and slightly smaller buildings near some bus stops throughout California. 'A one-size-fits-all mandate from Sacramento is not safe, and it's not responsible,' said City Councilmember Traci Park at a news conference before the vote. Park, who was joined at the news conference by Councilmembers Monica Rodriguez and John Lee, said the bill was an attempt by its sponsor, state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), and other state legislators to 'hijack' local planning from the city. Lee, who authored the resolution opposing the bill, called it 'not planning' but 'chaos.' Wiener lamented the City Council's vote. 'Opponents of SB 79 are offering no real solutions to address our housing shortage at the scale needed to make housing more affordable,' Wiener said in a statement. 'California's affordability crisis threatens our economy, our diversity, and our fundamental strength as a state.' In addition to creating more affordable housing, the bill would increase public transit ridership, reduce traffic and help the state meet its climate goals, he said. Councilmember Nithya Raman, who voted against opposing the bill, said the city's housing crisis is so dire that the council needs to work with the drafters of the bill — even if there are elements of it they do not support. 'Overall, we talk a lot about our housing crisis on this body, but our actions have not met the moment,' she said. 'If I thought that this body was acting in good faith to address our housing crisis, I would support this [resolution].' The bill, which passed the Senate and is before the Assembly Appropriations Committee, would allow heights of nine stories near major transit hubs, such as certain Metro train stops in L.A. A quarter-mile from a stop, buildings could be seven stories tall, and a half-mile from a stop, they could be six stories. Single-family neighborhoods within a half-mile of transit stops would be included in the new zoning rules. Near smaller transit stops, such as light rail or bus rapid transit, the allowed heights would be slightly lower. Next week, the Appropriations Committee will determine whether the bill goes to the Assembly floor for a vote. If passed in both chambers, the bill would go to Gov. Gavin Newsom to sign by mid-October. The City Council's resolution opposing the bill has no binding effect on the state Legislature but gives the council a platform to potentially lobby in Sacramento against its passage. The resolution also called for the city to be exempt from the bill because it has a state-approved housing plan. 'If they hadn't taken a position on this, the state Legislature would say, 'Well, the city of L.A. doesn't care,'' said Zev Yaroslavsky, a former City Council member and now the director of the Los Angeles Initiative at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs. Mayor Karen Bass has not yet taken a position on the bill. City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto came out against it in May, arguing that it would cost the city billions of dollars to upgrade infrastructure such as sewage and electrical systems to handle an influx of residents in previously low-density neighborhoods. Wiener's office said the bill allows for cities to exempt some properties near transit hubs if they meet density guidelines. This year, the City Council passed the Citywide Housing Incentive Program, which provides incentives for developers to build market-rate and affordable units and aims to boost building along commercial corridors and in dense residential neighborhoods. The council passed the ordinance, which left single-family zones largely untouched after pushback from homeowners groups, a week before a state deadline for the city to have a housing plan in place. As part of the plan, the city was required to find land where an additional 255,000 homes could be built.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Victorville Councilwoman Debra Jones makes ‘painful decision' to step down due to family crisis
Holding back tears, Victorville Councilwoman Debra Jones shared her 'painful decision' to step down after being reelected nearly three years ago. 'I want to be forthright, honest and transparent about the position that I find myself in,' Jones told the Daily Press on Tuesday night. 'Announcing that I'm stepping down was one of the hardest things that I've ever had to do.' Jones said after much prayer and discussion with her husband, Gene, and loved ones, her decision to resign came down to 'putting family first.' During Tuesday night's Victorville City Council meeting, Jones said her service on the council will end following the October 21 meeting, as her family prepares to relocate. Family first Jones explained to the Daily Press that she and her husband, who have been married for 42 years, had been looking for homes in the Banning area for a possible move 'maybe six years down the road.' The couple decided to focus on a single-story home in Sun Lakes Country Club, a gated active adult community in the Riverside County city. 'This summer, we found a home, fell in love with it and were planning on making a move to purchase it,' Jones said. 'After we left Sun Lakes, we ate dinner with my sister and planned to travel back home.' At that time, Gene had a 'medical emergency,' which turned the couple's 'life upside down,' she said. 'Gene is recovering, but living in a two-story house is no longer ideal for him, so we've decided to make the move to the single-story home sooner than later,' according to the councilwoman. Jones said stepping down was difficult because of her love for the community, people in the region, and the many individuals she's worked alongside within other agencies. 'City staff have been wonderful to work with, and I've really enjoyed getting to know them,' Jones said. 'And despite my fellow council members and myself not agreeing on everything, we learned to come alongside each other with the goal of working for the betterment of the city.' Elected positions, achievements Jones was first elected to the Adelanto Elementary School District board in 2010 and was re-elected in 2014. In 2018, she was elected to the Victorville City Council, then reelected in 2022. During that time, she also served as mayor for three years. The city had not made a public announcement about the departure on Tuesday night, however, a personal press release from Jones revealed that she played a key role in strengthening public safety through the voter-approved Measure P. It also stated that she attracted major employers like Amazon and CarMax, and championed compassionate solutions to homelessness. She also helped lead the creation of the Wellness Center in Old Town Victorville, which opened in December 2023. The Wellness Center was the first facility of its kind in San Bernardino County, providing housing, medical care, and wraparound services. Since its opening, Victorville's unsheltered homeless population has dropped 57% compared to last year. Jones also supported the city's ongoing development of a new police station and civic plaza, which will serve as a hub for community activities and events. She served on regional boards including the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, the Victor Valley Wastewater Reclamation Authority and the Mojave Desert & Mountain Recycling Joint Powers Authority. Jones also serves as an alternate on the Victor Valley Transit Authority and sits on the League of California Cities Revenue and Taxation Committee. 'While it has been a tremendous honor to serve the people of Victorville, this change in our family's circumstances means my time on the Council must come to an end,' Jones said in a written statement. 'Serving as your City Councilmember has been one of the greatest honors of my life, and Victorville will always be my home at heart. I'm proud of the progress we've made together and confident the city will continue to thrive in the capable hands of its leadership and engaged residents. I will always cherish the trust you placed in me and remain deeply committed to Victorville's continued success.' Moving forward Mayor Elizabeth Becerra, Mayor Pro Tem Bob Harriman, Councilwoman Leslie Irving and Councilwoman Tiffany Gaudin will be faced with three possible options to deal with Jones' vacant seat, which include: Appointing an interim council member to fill the seat until the General Election in November 2026. Approving a special election to replace Jones until the election. Conducting council meetings with four members through Nov. 2026. The City Council will discuss filling the vacancy at an upcoming meeting in accordance with city policy. Daily Press reporter Rene Ray De La Cruz may be reached at RDeLaCruz@ Follow him on X @DP_ReneDeLaCruz This article originally appeared on Victorville Daily Press: Victorville Councilwoman Debra Jones makes 'painful decision' to step down Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Gardner Preliminary Election Guide: What you need to know, from deadlines to early voting
Before Gardner residents vote for the next mayor in November, voters will have to cast a ballot at the preliminary election on Tuesday, Sept. 16. The preliminary election will determine which two candidates will move on to the general city election ballot for mayor on Tuesday, Nov. 4. Voters will also elect five city councilors for wards 1-5, six city councilors at large, and three school committee members during this year's general city election. All candidates running for the city councilor and school committee positions are uncontested, which means no preliminary election is required. All candidates are current city officials seeking re-election. Here's what to know about the upcoming preliminary election next month and the general election in November, as well as deadlines and where to register to vote. What's a preliminary election? If there are more than two candidates for a position, a preliminary election will be held automatically in September. The two candidates with the highest total votes will be placed on the general city election ballot in November. A primary election is held for political parties to decide who will run for their party if there is more than one candidate running for office. This year, three candidates running for mayor will be on the preliminary election ballot on Sept. 16: Kimberly Blake, Ann Debarros, and Michael Nicholson. When is the deadline to register to vote Residents who haven't registered to vote must do so by the registration deadline before they can cast a ballot at either the preliminary or general mayoral election. The last day to register to vote for the preliminary election is Saturday, Sept. 6 by 5 p.m. If you don't plan to vote in the preliminary election but want to vote in the city's general election in November, you need to register by Saturday, Oct. 25 at 5 p.m. To check your voter registration status and register to vote, go to the Secretary of State's website. Residents can also register to vote at the City Clerk's Office during operating hours: Monday to Thursday from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Friday from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. How do I vote early or through absentee or mail-in ballots? Mail-in and absentee ballots are available for both the preliminary election and the general city election. The last day to request a mail-in ballot for the preliminary election is Tuesday, Sept. 9 by 5 p.m. Mail-in ballot requests for the general city election in November are due Tuesday, Oct. 28 at 5 p.m. Gardner City Clerk Titi Siriphan said that the reason for not offering in-person early voting is that it has not been well-attended in the past, with more voters opting for mail-in voting. There is a key difference between an absentee ballot and a mail-in ballot. Siriphan said voters request an absentee ballot when they will not be in the city during the election. She said that mail-in ballots are intended for voters who aren't leaving the city but are unable to reach their polling location on election day. When are polls open for the preliminary election in Gardner? All polls are open from 7 a.m. until 8 p.m. in Gardner. Anyone standing in line at 8 p.m. will be permitted to vote. What if I have specific questions about my voter registration status or polling location Siriphan said the Secretary of State's website is the place where residents can get their basic election day questions answered about voter registration, vote by mail, absentee ballots, and where to vote. Siriphan said on both election days, signs will be posted all over the city to guide voters to the polls. "Of course, people can always give the Clerk's Office a call if they can't find what they are looking for on the website," she said. "We also have city election information posted on our website, but people can always give us a call." Voters can call the City Clerk's Office at 978-630-4058 or email Siriphan at tsiriphan@ This article originally appeared on Gardner News: Election 2025: Gardner preliminary vote for mayor is Sept. 16 Solve the daily Crossword
