logo
Why Switzerland's strong franc could lead it back to negative interest rates

Why Switzerland's strong franc could lead it back to negative interest rates

Reuters5 days ago

LONDON, June 6 (Reuters) - Switzerland could be the first big economy to return to negative interest rates to fight a surging currency and falling prices, highlighting how quickly central bankers may be running out of conventional policy tools as a global trade war rages on.
Data this week showing Swiss consumer prices fell in May prompted traders to prepare for the Swiss National Bank to cut its 0.25% benchmark rate to below zero, as it struggles to cool the red-hot franc , .
In 2022, Europe's central banks left behind a decade of below-zero rates that hurt banks and savers alike. Introduced to stimulate lending, negative rates turned money orthodoxy on its head by charging banks to park deposits with their central bank rather than paying them interest for doing so.
Many policymakers have since concluded they didn't work as well as hoped, weighing on bank profits at a time when they needed to invest and pushing investors into riskier assets.
As Switzerland tries to stimulate its economy it is under scrutiny by the U.S. administration for how it deals with its currency, traditionally seen as a safe-haven in unstable times.
U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war has raised the risk of inflationary pressures and slower growth - a nightmare combination for central bankers, politicians, businesses and households.
Complicating matters for non-U.S. policymakers is an across-the-board appreciation in tariff-sensitive currencies, from the euro and pound to the Korean won and Taiwan dollar, which hurts their respective exports and economies.
The Swiss franc has gained nearly 11% against the dollar in 2025, marking its best performance at this point in the year since 2011.
The problem the SNB and its peers face is that traditional policy tools, such as talking their currencies down or tinkering with short-term lending rates, are ineffectual in this environment.
"Drivers of inflation which lie out of the control of any central bank always cause them to get into a bad equilibrium or a policy error," James Athey, fixed income manager at Marlborough, said.
The SNB "are bullied by the FX market into going to negative rates," he said.
The SNB declined to comment on that notion, but separately on Friday said it would intervene in currency markets where necessary to keep inflation on track after Switzerland was added to a U.S. list of countries monitored for unfair currency and trade practices.
While other central banks are also dealing with the fallout of a weaker dollar, Switzerland has the lowest rates among big developed economies, followed by Japan, at 0.5%. Japan too is fighting to anchor inflation and the yen has gained 9% year-to-date.
Japan and euro zone governments plan huge spending packages that could stimulate growth and keep negative rates off the menu.
The European Central Bank on Thursday cut rates to 2% and traders expect just one more quarter-point cut this year . The Bank of Japan is still in tightening mode, even as it too has been stymied by uncertainty over tariffs .
"There are fairly good reasons to think that negative rates are not impossible over the next few years ... but I just don't think at the moment, unless there's a big shift in the economic narrative, that we're going to get even close to a point of negative interest rates anywhere apart from the SNB," George Moran, European economist at RBC, said.
Trump has berated Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell for being too slow to loosen U.S. monetary policy, while other central banks cut rates.
Exchange rates are another bugbear: he has repeatedly called out China for keeping the yuan artificially low to keep exports cheap. Other countries that use currency intervention as a tool, such as Japan and Switzerland, also risk drawing Trump's ire, exactly when they are racing to seal trade deals with him.
The U.S. Treasury Department on Thursday in its semi-annual currency report did not label Switzerland a currency manipulator, but it did add it to its "monitoring list" that includes China, Japan and Taiwan, among others.
The SNB on Friday said it did not engage in manipulation of the franc.
"It's going to be difficult for them (Switzerland) to be overly aggressive on the currency, but they have been in the past," Toby Gibb, head of investment solutions at UK fund manager Artemis, said.
"While the obvious thing these countries will want to do is devalue, that's going to put them in the firing line," he said.
Marlborough's Athey said the rapid shifts taking place in the global economy is raising the risk of mis-steps.
"All that has to increase the chances that we don't know, that we're wrong. That's all of us. Investors, central banks, everyone," he said.
"We're more likely to be wrong about where we are, where we're headed and what the outcomes for economies, inflation and currencies will be."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Poundland rescue deal in doubt as councils seek unpaid business rates
Poundland rescue deal in doubt as councils seek unpaid business rates

Telegraph

time20 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Poundland rescue deal in doubt as councils seek unpaid business rates

A rescue deal for Poundland has been thrown into doubt after the struggling high street chain was hit with a series of court claims for outstanding debts. A string of local councils are pursuing the discount retailer over unpaid business rates, potentially piling further pressure on its already-stretched finances. Sources close to sale talks for Poundland fear the overdue taxes, thought to be worth millions of pounds, could scupper attempts to safeguard the company's future by scaring away potential buyers. It is understood that Poundland is hoping to write off the outstanding payments as part of a radical turnaround plan drawn up by management. The company is also proposing a freeze on future business rates payments for as long as nine months if it ends up in the hands of new owners. The plan also envisages between 150 and 200 store closures and steep rent cuts of between 10pc and 50pc on hundreds more. Poundland has more than 800 shops across the UK, employing 16,000 people. The measures, designed to put the business on a firmer financial footing, are expected to be implemented via a court-sanctioned restructuring scheme. However, there is no guarantee that a judge will approve the proposal. It comes after an auction of Poundland was whittled down to a shoot-out between the distressed investment funds Gordon Brothers and Hilco. Reports suggest Gordon Brothers, which owns Mothercare, is the frontrunner. Poundland was put on the block earlier this year by its Polish owner Pepco after becoming an increasing financial burden. Pepco crashed to a £548m loss in December after taking a £650m write-down on Poundland, as bosses blamed a 'significant decline in performance' and spiralling costs. Last month, Pepco told investors not to expect 'major proceeds' from any sale of Poundland. It also warned that the chain might not make a profit in the forthcoming financial year. The business continued to face 'highly challenging trading conditions' in the six months to the end of March, it said. Like-for-like sales were down 7.3pc and pre-tax earnings slumped three quarters to €22m (£18.6m).

Formula One AXE season launch show at the O2 Arena for 2026 after just one year - with Max Verstappen and Christian Horner targeted by booing fans at London event
Formula One AXE season launch show at the O2 Arena for 2026 after just one year - with Max Verstappen and Christian Horner targeted by booing fans at London event

Daily Mail​

time22 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Formula One AXE season launch show at the O2 Arena for 2026 after just one year - with Max Verstappen and Christian Horner targeted by booing fans at London event

Formula One bosses have elected to axe a season launch show for the 2026 campaign after it was held just once before being given the boot. The 2025 campaign, which is the 75th in the history of the sport, got underway with a glamorous event at London's O2 Arena in February. The event was a sell-out - with millions more watching proceedings unfold online - as all 10 teams revealed their liveries for 2025. It was conceived as a way to pay homage to the sport in its Diamond Anniversary year having begun since 1950. However, Autosport revealed that commercial rightsholder FOM opted not to repeat the event ahead of the 2026 season. The organisation felt that it would have been counter-intuitive to hold it on an annual basis given it was initially held for anniversary celebrations. Another factor behind the decision was said to be the numerous regulation changes set to be in place for 2026, which means teams will have to run new cars and power units from next season. There is also the prospect of integrating an F1 newcomer, Cadillac, into the sport, while there were concerns over teams needing to finalise their 2026 sponsors. It comes after Red Bull received a hostile reception at the F1 75 event back in February, with both Max Verstappen and Christian Horner booed when they were introduced to spectators. Footage that circulated on social media showed Horner being booed, but he did his best to ignore the dissent as he battled through a speech while alone on stage. The reaction was the second awkward moment of the night for Horner, after host Jack Whitehall described him as former Spice Girl Geri Halliwell's plus one, with his wife also in attendance at the live event. Furthermore, reigning world champion Max Verstappen was also subjected to boos by the crowd. Asked about his rival Lewis Hamilton's chances over the coming 12 months having switched from Mercedes to Ferrari for minimally £50million a year, the Dutchman said: 'It is almost like he is reborn after a long time at one team.'

Big changes are being proposed for a US food aid program. Here's a breakdown by the numbers
Big changes are being proposed for a US food aid program. Here's a breakdown by the numbers

The Independent

time31 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Big changes are being proposed for a US food aid program. Here's a breakdown by the numbers

President Donald Trump 's plan to cut taxes by trillions of dollars could also trim billions in spending from social safety net programs, including food aid for lower-income people. The proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program would make states pick up more of the costs, require several million more recipients to work or lose their benefits, and potentially reduce the amount of food aid people receive in the future. The legislation, which narrowly passed the U.S. House, could undergo further changes in the Senate, where it's currently being debated. Trump wants lawmakers to send the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' to his desk by July 4, when the nation marks the 249th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Here's a look at the food aid program, by the numbers: Year: 2008 The federal aid program formerly known as food stamps was renamed the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, on Oct. 1, 2008. The program provides monthly payments for food purchases to low-income residents generally earning less than $1,632 monthly for individuals, or $3,380 monthly for a household of four. The nation's first experiment with food stamps began in 1939. But the modern version of the program dates to 1979, when a change in federal law took effect eliminating a requirement that participants purchase food stamps. There currently is no cost to people participating in the program. Number: 42 million A little over 42 million people nationwide received SNAP benefits in February, the latest month for which figures are available. That's roughly one out of every eight people in the county. Participation is down from a peak average of 47.6 million people during the 2013 federal fiscal year. Often, more than one person in a household is eligible for food aid. As of February, nearly 22.5 million households were enrolled SNAP, receiving an average monthly household benefit of $353. Dollars: $295 billion Legislation passed by the House is projected to cut about $295 billion of federal spending from SNAP over the next 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. A little more than half of those federal savings would come by shifting costs to states, which administer SNAP. Nearly one-third of those savings would come by expanding a work requirement for some SNAP participants, which the CBO assumes would force some people off the rolls. Additional money would be saved by eliminating SNAP benefits for between 120,000 and 250,000 immigrants legally in the U.S. who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents. Another provision in the legislation would cap the annual inflationary growth in food benefits. As a result, the CBO estimates that the average monthly food benefit would be about $15 lower than it otherwise would have been by 2034. Ages: 7 and 55-64 To receive SNAP benefits, current law says adults ages 18 through 54 who are physically and mentally able and don't have dependents would need to work, volunteer or participate in training programs for at least 80 hours a month. Those who don't do so are limited to just three months of benefits in a three-year period. The legislation that passed the House would expand work requirements to those ages 55 through 64. It also would extend work requirements to some parents without children younger than age 7. And it would limit the ability of states to waive work requirements in areas that lack sufficient jobs. The combined effect of those changes is projected by the CBO to reduce SNAP participation by a monthly average of 3.2 million people. Percentages: 5%-25% The federal government currently splits the administrative costs of SNAP with states but covers the full cost of food benefits. Under the legislation, states would have to cover three-fourths of the administrative costs. States also would have to pay a portion of the food benefits starting with the 2028 fiscal year. All states would be required to pay at least 5% of the food aid benefits, and could pay more depending on how often they make mistakes with people's payments. States that had payment error rates between 6-8% in the most recent federal fiscal year for which data is available would have to cover 15% of the food costs. States with error rates between 8-10% would have to cover 20% of the food benefits, and those with error rates greater than 10% would have to cover 25% of the food costs. Many states could get hit with higher costs. The national error rate stood at 11.7% in the 2023 fiscal year, and just three states — Idaho, South Dakota and Vermont — had error rates below 5%. But the 2023 figures are unlikely to serve as the base year, so the exact costs to states remains unclear. As a result of the cost shift, the CBO assumes that some states would reduce or eliminate benefits for people. Margin: 1 House Resolution 1, containing the SNAP changes and tax cuts, passed the House last month by a margin of just one vote — 215-214. A vote also could be close in the Senate, where Republicans hold 53 of the 100 seats. Democrats did not support the bill in the House and are unlikely to do so in the Senate. Some Republican senators have expressed reservations about proposed cuts to food aid and Medicaid and the potential impact of the bill on the federal deficit. GOP Senate leaders may have to make some changes to the bill to ensure enough support to pass it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store