Man accused of assaulting retired judge remains in custody after being refused bail
The County Clare man charged in connection with the alleged street assault of a retired district court judge remains on remand in custody after being refused bail in the High Court, a court has heard.
At Ennis District Court, Jamie O'Connor was making his fourth appearance in court concerning the charge that he assaulted retired district court judge, Joseph Mangan on Saturday, June 14th.
Mr O'Connor (44) of Laurel Lodge, Clare Rd, Ennis has been in custody since June 18th after Judge Alec Gabbett refused an application for bail.
Mr O'Connor subsequently made an application for bail to the High Court and Sgt John Burke at Ennis District Court has told Judge Gabbett that the application was refused.
Sgt Burke said that there is progress in the investigation.
He said that the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) directions are not yet available but that the file in the case is ready to be submitted with the DPP.
He said that Gardai have also obtained a medical report on the alleged injured party.
In connection with the alleged assault, it is alleged that Mr O'Connor - who was appearing via video link from Limerick prison - told the former judge 'you put in jail for nothing' before allegedly punching him outside an Ennis cafe.
The retired judge - now in his early 80s - served as a judge for 27 years and was the assigned district court judge for Clare from 2001 to October 2011 when he retired at the age of 67.
In the case, Mr O'Connor is charged with the assault causing harm of Joseph Mangan at Barrack Court, Ennis contrary to Section 3 of the Non Fatal Offences Against the Person Act on June 14th.
At a contested bail hearing on June 18th, Judge Gabbett said: 'This is an extremely serious alleged offence where a retired district court judge now into his 80s was allegedly assaulted for carrying out a public duty when he was a judge.'
Sgt John Burke told the bail hearing that at 2.25pm on June 14th, Mr Mangan was sitting outside the Gourmet Store on Barrack Court in Ennis having a coffee.
Sgt Burke said that it will be alleged that Mr O'Connor approached Mr Mangan 'and told him aggressively 'you put me in jail for nothing'.
Sgt Burke said: 'Following a brief interaction it is alleged that Mr O'Connor stood up and punched Mr Mangan.'
Sgt Burke said that Mr O'Connor then fled the scene in the direction of O'Connell Street.
He said that Mr Mangan went to the local injuries unit in Ennis where he was treated for possible concussion and dizziness.
Sgt Burke said that Mr Mangan made a statement to local Gardai.
Sgt Burke said that Mr O'Connor was later arrested where he made no admissions 'and blamed alcohol for his memory loss'.
Mr O'Connor (44) of Laurel Lodge, Clare Rd, Ennis is also charged with on June 15th stealing three X cans of beer valued at €11.40 from Dunnes Stores, O'Connell Street, Ennis.
The alleged theft occurred one day after Mr O'Connor is alleged to have assaulted Mr Mangan.
The High Court. Stock image/Getty
News in 90 Seconds - July 24th
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sunday World
an hour ago
- Sunday World
Man who beat victim to death with shovel told gardai ‘I hope the c**t is dead'
GUILTY PLEA | Joseph Cahill (46) pleaded guilty to the unlawful killing of 43-year-old Gerard 'Ger' Curtin Joseph Cahill A sentencing hearing for Joseph Cahill (46), who pleaded guilty to the unlawful killing of 43-year-old Gerard 'Ger' Curtin, heard that Cahill had previously threatened to kill the deceased after Mr Curtin came to his house, threw stones at his windows, threatened to burn the house down and demanded money. Mr Curtin left after Cahill's partner gave him €300. Inspector James Ruddle of Roxboro Road Garda Station in Limerick told the court that Curtin returned to Cahill's house in the early hours about two weeks later, again demanding money. CCTV footage showed the deceased smashing a window of the Cahill home with a rock. The lock on Cahill's front door was broken so he had propped a shovel against it to keep out intruders. Cahill took the shovel, opened the door and struck the victim on the head, causing him to immediately fall to the ground, the inspector said. Cahill then struck Mr Curtin three more times as he lay "defenceless and immobile" on the ground. Gerard Curtin Before delivering the blows, Cahill called emergency services and asked for the police. After delivering the fatal blows, with Mr Curtin lying motionless on the ground, Cahill told the call-taker that a man was trying to get into his house. He waited a further eight minutes and 30 seconds before telling the call taker to send an ambulance. When asked why he needed an ambulance, Cahill said: "I think he's dead... I had to protect my kids. I don't give a fuck about going to jail. I beat a shovel off his head and I kept beating, to tell you the truth." The first garda at the scene made a note of Cahill saying: "I hit him with a shovel, I hope the c**t is dead." Garret Baker SC, for the Director of Public Prosecutions, told Ms Justice Eileen Creedon that Cahill was originally charged with murder. He said the DPP accepted the manslaughter plea on the basis that Cahill honestly believed that he was protecting himself, his property and his children but that the force he used in striking Mr Curtin four times with the shovel was excessive. On May 30 this year, Cahill, of Sarsfield Avenue, Garryowen, Limerick pleaded guilty to the unlawful killing of Gerard Curtin on November 4, 2023 outside his home. Mr Baker said the offence warrants a headline sentence of ten to 15 years. In an impact statement, Bianca Hickey told the court that the deceased was a brother, father, partner and friend. She said the family has always been "close-knit" but the killing tore them apart. Joseph Cahill News in 90 Seconds - Thursday, July 31 She said they have watched their parents become "completely different people". Their mother "traded nights at bingo for sleepless nights and endless nightmares" while their father lost interest in his hobbies and no longer loves chatting and laughing with his family. They never got to say goodbye or kiss him one last time because his injuries were so catastrophic that his coffin had to be closed. Inspector Ruddle agreed with Michael O'Higgins SC, for Cahill, that gardai were aware of allegations over many years that Mr Curtin had smashed windows of houses and threatened the occupants. The court heard that eight days after the killing, Cahill's home was petrol bombed and the family was forced to move out of the area. Cahill's sister's home was also petrol bombed at 5am while all people living there were in bed, the court was told. When Mr O'Higgins began to read a letter of apology from his client, the deceased's family stood up and walked out of court. In the letter, Cahill said he wanted to "express how deeply sorry I am" to the victim's partner and children. He said he carries the "massive burden" of what he did every day and has turned the lives of his own family upside down. "I never set out or imagined that night going to bed that anything like this would happen," he said. Mr O'Higgins said his client has a long history of mental illness, polysubstance abuse and a gambling addiction. He pointed to a psychiatric report which states that due to childhood trauma, Cahill is predisposed to act irrationally and to overreact to threats against himself and his family. He has no relevant previous convictions and, Mr O'Higgins said, is not likely to come before the courts again. Counsel asked the court to take into account that Cahill was woken on the night by a volatile man smashing his windows and trying to cross the threshold into his home. The four blows took just four seconds, he said, and although the force used was excessive, counsel asked the court to consider how quickly his brain could process what was happening. While Mr O'Higgins said the court would have to impose a custodial sentence, he asked Ms Justice Creedon to offer the "maximum leniency" possible. Ms Justice Creedon adjourned sentencing to November 24.
Sunday World
an hour ago
- Sunday World
Pervert's suspended sentence for bombarding boy with explicit chat is overturned
James Varian (32) was found to have 7,781 child pornography images on his mobile phone James Varian (32), with an address at Lois na Greine, South Douglas Road, Cork was found to have 7,781 child pornography images on his mobile phone, with the majority of the files related to prepubescent children under the age of 12. Varian pleaded guilty to using information and communication technology to facilitate the sexual exploitation of a child contrary to section 8 (1) of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2017. He also pleaded guilty to the possession of child pornography contrary to section 6 (1) of the Child Trafficking and Pornography Act 1998, as amended by section 14 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2017. The judge also took into consideration an offence of attempting to pervert the course of justice contrary to common law. James Varian talks to our reporter at his Cork home On November 19, 2024, Varian was sentenced by Judge Dermot Sheehan in Cork Circuit Criminal Court. He received four years fully suspended for the charge of facilitating the sexual exploitation of a child, and two years fully suspended for the possession of child pornography. The Director of Public Prosecutions had appealed the sentence on the grounds that it was too lenient. At the original sentencing hearing, Detective Sergeant Brendan Corry said that on January 4, 2022, gardai were called to an address and spoke to a father who said that images and other media files of a sexual nature were found on a home computer a 15-year-old boy had been using. Det Sgt Corry said that gardai found messages of a sexually explicit nature were being sent to the boy, mostly through the messaging site Telegram. He said that on January 5, the respondent phoned gardai to say that he was the subject of a garda enquiry and on January 6 a warrant was obtained to search his home. He said that the communication discovered by gardai was 'alarmingly excessive, with in excess of two thousand five hundred messages exchanged over a period of nine days spanning between December 26, 2021 and January 4, 2022." At the time of offending, Varian was 28 years old, while the boy was 15. Det Sgt Corry said that on January 4, upon discovering that gardai were investigating, Varian also directed the boy to 'purge chats, delete everything'. James Varian talks to our reporter at his Cork home He said that Varian was arrested on May 30, 2022, was detained and interviewed on two occasions, where he made no admissions at interview. He said that the seized phone was found to contain 7,781 images classed as child pornography, with 6,431 of these images deemed as 'child animation'. Counsel for the DPP, Emmet Boyle BL, told the Court of Appeal that the sentencing judge erred in failing to attach appropriate weight to aggravating factors in the case. He said these factors included the amount of messages sent to the child, the disparity of age between the defendant and the victim, his urging the boy to delete the messages and his risk of reoffending which was outlined by the probation services. Mr Boyle also said that the sentencing judge put undue weight on the mitigating factors in the case, like Varian's lack of previous convictions and his early guilty plea. Defence counsel for Varian, Jane Hyland SC, said that the decision to fully suspend his sentence was justified and the judge was exercising within his discretion in the sentencing. She said that her client lost his job as a result of the incident, that he suffers from mental health problems and that he also suffered reputationally from the incident. Returning judgement, Mr Justice John Edwards said that the sentencing judge's reasons for fully suspending the sentences were 'relatively sparse', giving only Varian's age and the fact that he was a first time offender. He said that the judge acted in error to fully suspend the sentences and that the decision was not proportionate to the gravity of the offending. He said that the sentencing was 'outside the norm and unduly lenient'. James Varian He also said that although the court noted Varian's assertions of his remorse, his letter of apology presented to the judge failed to mention his young victim at all. Mr Justice Edwards said that the court decided to quash the original sentences and proceeded to resentencing. He said that there was no issue with the original headline sentences imposed at six years for sending explicit messages and four years for the possession of child pornography. He said that the court also accepted the discount of two years for both counts given in mitigation by the sentencing judge. The Court of Appeal sentenced Varian to four years in custody with the final 12 months suspended for a period of 12 months for the count of sending explicit messages. They also sentenced him to two years in custody for the count of possession of child pornography, to run concurrently with the first.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Child claims he was leapfrogged in school waiting list on foot of NCSE decision, court hears
A six-year-old child with additional needs who allegedly lost out on a school place on foot of an order made by the National Council for Special Education (NCSE) is set to resolve a High Court action. The child, who sued the NCSE and other State parties through his mother, had sought to quash the council's purported designation directing another child – who is not a party to the proceedings – be given a place at the specialist school the plaintiff was seeking to attend in September. Both children were on the school's waiting list for a place, but the plaintiff child was higher in the list, his case contends. It was the plaintiff's case that the plaintiff child was next in line when a place became available at the school. On foot of the NCSE designation, the other child, referred to as Child A in the proceedings, 'skipped the queue' for school places, the plaintiff claimed. READ MORE The purported designation was issued under section 67 of the Education Act 1998, which gives powers to the NCSE to compel a school to offer a given child a school place. As an alternative to quashing the council's purported designation, the plaintiff sought a court declaration that section 67 of the Education Act 1998 is unconstitutional. Hugh McDowell, barrister for the child instructed by KM Solicitors, on Thursday told Ms Marguerite Bolger that following the initiation of the child's legal action, the school contacted the child's mother to say it was hopeful of providing him a place at the school. Mr McDowell said the matter could be adjourned, with a view to the case being struck out on the next occasion it comes before the court. [ More than 30 children without school places taking High Court action Opens in new window ] The child cannot be identified by order of the court. The plaintiff's case claimed that the NCSE declined to explain to the child's mother how it came to make the designation under section 67 of the Education Act. [ Five children with special needs bring High Court actions over access to education Opens in new window ] Mr McDowell said it was a source of distress for the child's mother that she will never know why the NCSE allegedly believed it appropriate that another child be allowed to skip a place on the school's waiting list. Counsel said his client was a reluctant litigant, but it was only through bringing proceedings that they received a satisfactory resolution. The plaintiff's case claimed the NCSE failed to comply with fair procedure in making the designation. It says the application of section 67 is not intended for utilisation in scenarios where a school is oversubscribed, and does not permit the NCSE to allow a child to circumvent a waiting list. David Leahy, senior counsel for NCSE and other State parties, said the school's admission policy expressly states that the NCSE may make a designation under section 67, and the school must comply with such a designation. Mr Leahy said his client was concerned by how applications such as the plaintiff's are perceived. He said he was concerned about a perception that people who have a difficulty with a school waiting list can use the High Court to secure a school place. Ms Justice Bolger adjourned the case to October.
