
Loaded for Bear: Would left turns on red lights safely cut SA's fuel usage?
One of the many upshots of the Arab oil embargo in 1973 — aside from stagflation and the beginning of the end of blue-collar prosperity — was that it triggered a major traffic reform in North America: the right turn on right light or RTOR.
In 1973, Arab members of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) imposed an embargo on the US because of its support for Israel during the Yom Kippur War.
Canada was also hit hard by this embargo, and I can recall from my childhood in Nova Scotia sitting with my parents in long queues at petrol stations.
One of the many upshots of this drama — aside from stagflation and the beginning of the end of blue collar-prosperity — was that it triggered a major traffic reform in North America: the right turn on right light or RTOR.
The thinking behind it was that it would save on the consumption of petrol — or gas as it is called in North America — by allowing motorists to make a right turn on a red light if the coast was clear rather than waiting another 20 or 40 or 60 seconds while their engine idled.
For a single outing to work or the grocery store or wherever, that would not amount to much. But multiplied millions or tens of millions of times per day, savings were seen to be had in a time of chronic shortages and soaring prices.
The Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 required states to allow right turns on red lights to be eligible for federal assistance for mandated conservation programmes. It was an energy-saving and green policy at a time when even Republicans were not opposed to environmental regulations.
Straightforward
The rules are pretty straightforward. If you want to turn right you treat the red light as a stop sign, coming to a complete stop and making sure there is no traffic coming from your left before proceeding.
At some intersections, a sign will say that right turns on red lights are not allowed at certain times of the day such as during rush-hour traffic.
North Americans of course drive on the right-hand side of the road, so in South Africa such a reform would allow for left turns on red robots. When this correspondent first came to South Africa in 1998, it took me a while to realise that I was not, in fact, allowed to make a left turn when the light was red.
So, would such a reform be sensible in South Africa?
South Africa does not face a crisis in petrol supplies — at least, not yet! — and declining fuel prices have been a key driver of slowing inflation, though the fuel levy hike will arrest that promising trend somewhat.
But every drop counts and South Africa also needs to reduce its emissions of the greenhouse gases that are fuelling rapid climate change.
It must be said that in North America there has been some questioning of this rule of the road on both fuel saving and safety grounds.
One 2024 study by researchers at the Mineta Transportation Institute at San Jose State University found that '… RTOR movements are generally unsafe for pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers, while only marginally useful in lowering emissions and only under certain contexts. Those marginal benefits may further decline with increased electric vehicle (EV) adoption.'
Given the carnage on South Africa's roads, policy makers would need to think twice about introducing a measure that would make driving even more treacherous.
Dangerous and reckless driving
There is a lot of dangerous and reckless driving in South Africa, and minibus taxi drivers spring immediately to mind. How many of them would come to complete stops and make sure it is safe to execute a left turn at a red robot? I am guessing not that many and they are hardly the only menace on South Africa's roads.
Also, to make a left turn on a red robot you need functioning robots in the first place.
Many South African drivers don't seem to get the point that a traffic light that is not working at an intersection — a frequent occurrence — should be treated like a four-way stop. Such situations are often treated like a game of chicken and chaos, horns blaring, middle-fingers extended and road rage are often the result.
Imagine the stoners who try to make a buck out of this chaos by 'directing' traffic when the robots die trying to also navigate a left turn rule.
Still, I often grow impatient when I am at a functioning robot and could safely turn left but am prohibited from doing so. (Full disclosure — I sometimes do it. I did learn to drive in Canada.) I am sure many South African motorists feel the same.
But come to think of it, given how the rules of the road in South Africa are so frequently violated, maybe the left turn on the red light is fairly common anyway.
And maybe, some day, South African motorists will be overwhelmingly careful and law abiding, allowing for a left turn at a red light to be made legal with relative safety. I don't think EVs are going to rule the roads here any time soon and fuel needs to be saved — and greenhouse gas emissions slashed — by hook or by crook. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
15 hours ago
- The Citizen
Weekly economic wrap: the bleak picture of SA's GDP
Even the Reserve Bank governor, Lesetja Kganyago, echoed the bleak picture, calling the GDP data 'not a pretty picture'. It was a busy week on the economic front with a few announcements, with almost all of them pointing out that the GDP data for the first quarter that showed the economy grew by only 0.1% is indeed correct. Tracey-Lee Solomon, economist at the Bureau for Economic Research (BER) says most of the data releases painted a bleak picture of South Africa's economy. 'Not only was the gross domestic product (GDP) growth dismal, but growth for 2024 was also revised lower to just 0.5%.' Bianca Botes, director at Citadel Global, says the rand strengthened to R17.86/$ before giving back some of its gains. 'The positive move for the rand is largely thanks to a softer dollar and positive news on the national budget.' Busisiwe Nkonki and Isaac Matshego, economists at the Nedbank Group Economic Unit, point out that the rand touched R17.75/$ on Thursday after US private jobs data pointed to a sharp fall in jobs growth in May, with the reading suggesting that US nonfarm payrolls figures could miss market forecasts. The rand traded at R17.77/$ on Friday afternoon. ALSO READ: This is where we would be if SA sustained an economic growth rate of 4.5% Gold starts to shine again, oil price increases OPEC+ and its allies agreed on Saturday to increase oil supply by 411 000 barrels per day in July, matching the additions for May and June, in line with expectations. However, Solomon points out, late-week reports stirred fears that the group might opt for a larger hike. 'This downside surprise, coupled with geopolitical developments, including bombings in Russia and Iran's reaction to a report highlighting its growing stockpile of enriched uranium, shifted market focus to reduced oil supply compared to what was expected at the end of last week. As a result, oil prices increased by nearly 2% over the week.' Botes says the increase in the oil price is partly due to higher demand expected during the summer, as well as concerns that trouble in certain parts of the world could disrupt oil supplies. 'Wildfires in Canada also temporarily reduced the country's oil output by about 7%, although the situation has improved as rain helped control the fires. However, the momentum for higher prices slowed after Saudi Arabia pushed for OPEC+ to boost oil production by over 400,000 barrels per day in August and possibly September, aiming to meet summer demand.' Gold also increased by 1.6% as rising geopolitical and trade tensions boosted demand for the safe-haven asset. Botes says gold prices climbed to around $3,360 per ounce this week, mainly due to recent US economic data, which has been weak, causing investors to seek safer assets in which to invest their money. 'Expectations that the US Fed may not increase interest rates further also made gold more attractive. Gold is on track for a weekly gain of about 2%.' ALSO READ: No fireworks expected, but GDP figures are disappointing — economists South Africa's bleak GDP According to Statistics SA, real GDP expanded by just 0.1% in the first quarter of 2025. This follows downwardly revised growth of 0.4% (previously 0.6%) in the fourth quarter of 2024, which meant that the economy expanded by just 0.5% (from 0.6%) in 2024, down from 0.8% in 2023. Nkonki and Matshego say the meagre 0.1% growth in GDP was slightly better than their and the market's forecasts of no growth. 'Compared to the same quarter a year ago, the economy grew by 0.5%, slower than in the fourth quarter. 'Despite the lower base and patchy picture of the first quarter, we still expect the economy to gain some upward traction in the quarters ahead. The boost will continue coming from consumer demand, which should accelerate as inflation remains subdued, and interest rates decline further, bolstering real incomes and lowering borrowing costs. 'The upside will be capped by slower government spending due to fiscal constraints and sluggish fixed investment, as well as a weaker net trade position caused by fading global growth, subdued commodity prices and persistent policy uncertainties. We expect GDP to grow by 1% in 2025, only moderately better than 0.5% in 2024.' Mamello Matikinca-Ngwenya, Siphamandla Mkhwanazi, Thanda Sithole, and Koketso Mano, economists at FNB, say that while household consumption expenditure growth was maintained, the demand side of the economy reflected ongoing declines in government consumption, exports, and total fixed investment. 'The benefits of the economic reforms implemented so far are taking longer to materialise, as evidenced by the continued weakness in fixed investment. Nonetheless, we still expect growth to increase towards 2.0% by 2027, supported by ongoing structural reforms and cyclical tailwinds, including easing inflation and interest rate cuts, which should bolster household consumption. 'Overall, our near-term forecasts balance weak investment trends with a gradual recovery in consumer spending. However, risks remain tilted to the downside, particularly for fixed investment, given the still-fluid macroeconomic and policy environment. ALSO READ: Warning from industry that Steel Master Plan has stalled Business confidence decreases for first time in more than a year The results of the RMB/BER Business Confidence Index decreased by five points to 40 in the second quarter of 2025 as the recovery that started in the second quarter of 2024 stalled. Matikinca-Ngwenya, Mkhwanazi, Sithole and Mano say, considering the prevailing weakness in private sector investment and subdued business confidence, they revised their 2025 growth forecast down to 1.0%, from 1.3% previously. 'Businesses were aware that a proposed VAT hike was scrapped, although many responded before the release of Budget 3.0. Political uncertainty surrounding the GNU also influenced sentiment, though concerns about its stability eased somewhat during May.' Nkosiphindile Shange, economist at the BER, says this implies that only four out of ten business respondents in the most cyclically sensitive sectors of the economy were satisfied with prevailing business conditions. 'Only wholesale traders saw an increase in confidence, with declines across all other business segments. However, despite the declines, the confidence of retailers and new vehicle dealers remained above the long-term averages.' ALSO READ: Business confidence tanks in second quarter due to pessimism about trading conditions Absa PMI down for the seventh consecutive month The Absa PMI decreased to 43.1 points in May from 44.7 points in April, remaining in contractionary territory for a seventh consecutive month. There were some improvements in business activity and new sales orders, but the supplier deliveries index pushed the headline PMI lower. The S&P Global South Africa PMI was more positive and rose to 50.8 points in May from 50 points in April as output and new orders rose for a second consecutive month. Shange says this is the first time the PMI has been in growth territory since November 2024. Matikinca-Ngwenya, Mkhwanazi, Sithole and Mano say, fortunately, the index for expected business conditions in the near term increased by 13.9 points to 62.5, highlighting a lift in sentiment as external tariffs have been reduced, and local policy uncertainty has abated. ALSO READ: Manufacturing PMI falls to lowest level since April 2020 — bad news for GDP New vehicle sales 22% higher than a year ago According to the National Association of Automobile Manufacturers of South Africa, new vehicle sales in May 2025 came in at 45 308 units, an increase of 22% compared to a year ago after sales grew by 11.9% in April. Out of the total reported industry sales of 45 308 vehicles, 88.4% represented dealer sales, while 6.8% represented sales to the vehicle rental industry, industry corporate fleets (3%) and government sales (1.8%). Exports, on the other hand, performed poorly and fell by 14.6% compared to a year ago. Nkonki and Matshego note that exports fell to 30 112 units as a major original equipment manufacturer (OEM) halted production for upgrades. ALSO READ: New vehicle sales extended winning streak for a fifth time in May Current account deficit still narrowing The latest data from the Sarb showed that South Africa's account deficit narrowed to R35.6 billion in the first quarter of 2025, from a revised R39.3 billion in the fourth quarter of 2024. The current account deficit as a ratio of GDP remained at 0.5%, while the trade surplus fell slightly to R221.2 billion from R226.4 billion in the fourth quarter as the value of imports (3.6%) increased more rapidly than exports (2.9%). Nkonki and Matshego say the drop in the nominal figure reflects an improvement in the non-trade deficit (consisting of the services' primary and secondary income accounts), which narrowed due to lower dividend and interest payments. 'Due to subdued trade performance, the current account balance will likely deteriorate this year. Imports are anticipated to outpace exports, driven by a more favourable domestic environment. Subdued inflation, higher real incomes and a relatively resilient rand will continue to bolster import demand. 'Exports face notable downside pressures due to a weaker, uncertain and generally volatile global economy. Export demand will ease on slow growth in key trade economies and softer commodity prices.'


Daily Maverick
16 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Trump and Musk to speak on Friday after alliance descends into public feud
By Nandita Bose and Andrea Shalal A White House official said the two men would speak on Friday. The official did not give a time for the call, which could ease the feuding after an extraordinary day of hostilities – largely conducted over social media – that marked a stark end to a close alliance. Shares in Musk's Tesla TSLA.O closed down over 14% on Thursday, losing about $150 billion in market value in the largest single-day decline in value in its history. In pre-market European trading on Friday they pared some of those losses, rising 5% after the news that the two men were scheduled to speak. Politico first reported the planned call. Musk had bankrolled a large part of Trump's presidential campaign and was then brought as one of the president's most visible advisers, heading up a sweeping and controversial effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. The verbal punches erupted on Thursday after Trump criticized Musk in the Oval Office and the pair then traded barbs on their social media platforms: Trump's Truth Social and Musk's X. The falling-out had begun brewing days ago when Musk, who left his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency a week ago, denounced Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill. The president initially stayed quiet while Musk campaigned to torpedo the bill, saying it would add too much to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt. Trump broke his silence on Thursday, telling reporters he was 'very disappointed' in Musk. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said. As Trump spoke, Musk responded on X. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' wrote Musk, who spent nearly $300 million backing Trump and other Republicans in last year's election. In another post, Musk asserted that Trump's signature import tariffs would push the U.S. into a recession later this year. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump posted. Minutes after the closing bell, Musk replied, 'Yes,' to a post on X saying Trump should be impeached, something that would be highly unlikely given Trump's Republicans hold majorities in both chambers of Congress. Musk's businesses also include rocket company and government contractor SpaceX and its satellite unit Starlink. Musk, whose space business plays a critical role in the U.S. government's space program, said that as a result of Trump's threats he would begin decommissioning SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft. Dragon is the only U.S. spacecraft capable of sending astronauts to the International Space Station. Late on Thursday, Musk backed off the threat. In another sign of a possible detente to come, Musk subsequently wrote: 'You're not wrong,' in response to billionaire investor Bill Ackman saying Trump and Musk should make peace. PUNCHING BACK Trump and Musk are both political fighters with a penchant for using social media to attack their perceived enemies, and many observers had predicted a falling-out. Musk hit at the heart of Trump's agenda earlier this week when he targeted what Trump has named his 'big, beautiful bill', calling it a ' disgusting abomination ' that would deepen the federal deficit. His attacks amplified a rift within the Republican Party that could threaten the bill's prospects in the Senate. Nonpartisan analysts say Trump's bill could add $2.4 trillion to $5 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt. A prolonged feud between the pair could make it harder for Republicans to keep control of Congress in next year's midterm elections if it leads to a loss of Musk's campaign spending or erodes support for Trump in Silicon Valley. 'Elon really was a significant portion of the ground game this last cycle,' said a Republican strategist with ties to Musk and the Trump administration who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity. 'If he sits out the midterms, that worries me.' On Tuesday, Musk posted that 'in November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.' Musk had already said he planned to curtail his political spending in the future. Musk's increasing focus on politics provoked widespread protests at Tesla sites, driving down sales while investors fretted that Musk's attention was too divided.


The South African
19 hours ago
- The South African
Donald Trump-Elon Musk blow-up: How it unfolded
A timeline in quotes of the public meltdown of Donald Trump and Elon Musk's relationship over several astonishing hours on Thursday. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore. I was surprised,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. The US president was responding to comments made by Musk two days earlier in which Musk had called his 'big, beautiful bill' on tax and spending a 'disgusting abomination'. Responding on X to Donald Trump's comments on Thursday, Musk fired back at 12:19 local time: 'ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill… Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.' In the Oval Office, Trump continued: 'I'm very disappointed, because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here… All of a sudden, he had a problem.' To this, South Africa-born Musk responded: 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' (12:25) And then in a fresh post 21 minutes later: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' 'Such ingratitude.' Just over an hour later, at 13:57, Musk carried on, with a post that he pinned to the top of his timeline: 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' Donald Trump fired back on Truth Social under an hour later, as the spat got increasingly bitter. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' (14:37) US media have put the value of the contracts at $18 billion. At 15:10 Musk referred to US government documents on disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, who committed suicide in jail while awaiting trial for sex crimes. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress.' (Trump, 16:06). 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately' (Musk, 16:09). SpaceX's Crew Dragon is currently the only US spacecraft certified to carry crew to the International Space Station under a contract worth more than $4.9 billion. Later in the day, Musk appeared to walk back his earlier comment on this subject, replying to a user on X: 'OK, we won't decommission Dragon,' though his tone was unclear. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news. By Garrin Lambley © Agence France-Presse