
Loaded for Bear: Would left turns on red lights safely cut SA's fuel usage?
In 1973, Arab members of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) imposed an embargo on the US because of its support for Israel during the Yom Kippur War.
Canada was also hit hard by this embargo, and I can recall from my childhood in Nova Scotia sitting with my parents in long queues at petrol stations.
One of the many upshots of this drama — aside from stagflation and the beginning of the end of blue collar-prosperity — was that it triggered a major traffic reform in North America: the right turn on right light or RTOR.
The thinking behind it was that it would save on the consumption of petrol — or gas as it is called in North America — by allowing motorists to make a right turn on a red light if the coast was clear rather than waiting another 20 or 40 or 60 seconds while their engine idled.
For a single outing to work or the grocery store or wherever, that would not amount to much. But multiplied millions or tens of millions of times per day, savings were seen to be had in a time of chronic shortages and soaring prices.
The Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 required states to allow right turns on red lights to be eligible for federal assistance for mandated conservation programmes. It was an energy-saving and green policy at a time when even Republicans were not opposed to environmental regulations.
Straightforward
The rules are pretty straightforward. If you want to turn right you treat the red light as a stop sign, coming to a complete stop and making sure there is no traffic coming from your left before proceeding.
At some intersections, a sign will say that right turns on red lights are not allowed at certain times of the day such as during rush-hour traffic.
North Americans of course drive on the right-hand side of the road, so in South Africa such a reform would allow for left turns on red robots. When this correspondent first came to South Africa in 1998, it took me a while to realise that I was not, in fact, allowed to make a left turn when the light was red.
So, would such a reform be sensible in South Africa?
South Africa does not face a crisis in petrol supplies — at least, not yet! — and declining fuel prices have been a key driver of slowing inflation, though the fuel levy hike will arrest that promising trend somewhat.
But every drop counts and South Africa also needs to reduce its emissions of the greenhouse gases that are fuelling rapid climate change.
It must be said that in North America there has been some questioning of this rule of the road on both fuel saving and safety grounds.
One 2024 study by researchers at the Mineta Transportation Institute at San Jose State University found that '… RTOR movements are generally unsafe for pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers, while only marginally useful in lowering emissions and only under certain contexts. Those marginal benefits may further decline with increased electric vehicle (EV) adoption.'
Given the carnage on South Africa's roads, policy makers would need to think twice about introducing a measure that would make driving even more treacherous.
Dangerous and reckless driving
There is a lot of dangerous and reckless driving in South Africa, and minibus taxi drivers spring immediately to mind. How many of them would come to complete stops and make sure it is safe to execute a left turn at a red robot? I am guessing not that many and they are hardly the only menace on South Africa's roads.
Also, to make a left turn on a red robot you need functioning robots in the first place.
Many South African drivers don't seem to get the point that a traffic light that is not working at an intersection — a frequent occurrence — should be treated like a four-way stop. Such situations are often treated like a game of chicken and chaos, horns blaring, middle-fingers extended and road rage are often the result.
Imagine the stoners who try to make a buck out of this chaos by 'directing' traffic when the robots die trying to also navigate a left turn rule.
Still, I often grow impatient when I am at a functioning robot and could safely turn left but am prohibited from doing so. (Full disclosure — I sometimes do it. I did learn to drive in Canada.) I am sure many South African motorists feel the same.
But come to think of it, given how the rules of the road in South Africa are so frequently violated, maybe the left turn on the red light is fairly common anyway.
And maybe, some day, South African motorists will be overwhelmingly careful and law abiding, allowing for a left turn at a red light to be made legal with relative safety. I don't think EVs are going to rule the roads here any time soon and fuel needs to be saved — and greenhouse gas emissions slashed — by hook or by crook. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Weekly economic wrap: US tariffs come into effect, rand suffers, but recovers
With the US tariffs poised to hit this week, the rand fell to its lowest against the dollar but recovered by the end of the week. In what would normally would have been a quiet week on the economic front, the implementation of the Trump tariffs this week took all the headlines, especially since South Africa is stuck with a 30% tariff on goods exported to the US. Tracey-Lee Solomon, economist at the Bureau for Economic Research (BER), says increased bets on a Fed rate cut supported the gold price last week. 'Lower interest rates tend to boost non-yielding assets like gold, which is also benefiting from safe-haven demand amid rising concerns over a US economic slowdown. 'Recent data showed services sector stagnation, weak job growth and slowing consumer spending, partly linked to tariff-related pressures.' On the currency front, she says, broad US dollar weakness amid economic concerns helped the rand close stronger this week. The rand gained 1.7% against the dollar and 0.2%/euro and 0.4%/pound sterling. ALSO READ: US tariff an existential threat for a third of metals and engineering sector Solomon also points out that oil prices decreased after OPEC+ agreed on Sunday to increase oil production by 547 000 barrels per day for September, lifting fears of a global oversupply at a time when the US-led trade war is weighing on economic growth and energy demand. The potential ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine also put downward pressure on the oil price. Oil and gold react to US tariffs Bianca Botes, director at Citadel Global, says Brent crude is hovering near $66/barrel and is set for its worst week since late June as optimism around a potential Trump–Putin summit eased supply concerns. 'Sanctions on Indian oil imports from Russia and hints at broader tariffs on Chinese goods kept trade risks alive but expectations of higher output from the OPEC+ and slower demand growth weighed heavily.' ALSO READ: As if US tariff is not enough, more bad news for South African exporters Gold eased to about $3.380/ounce as traders took profits, although it remained on track for a second consecutive weekly gain, she says. 'Support came from the softer US economic outlook, tariff-related uncertainty and ongoing central bank purchases, including China's ninth straight month of buying. New US import duties on gold bars tightened supply prospects, adding a modicum of support to prices.' Rand looking much better despite dipping with US tariffs Botes says the rand strengthened to below R17.80/$, benefitting from a softer greenback and hopes for Fed cuts, although sentiment remained fragile as South Africa prepares for steep US tariffs on a wide range of its exports. Busisiwe Nkonki and Isaac Matshego, economists at the Nedbank Group Economic Unit, say the rand benefited from a broadly weaker US currency. 'Confirmation that president Cyril Ramaphosa had a telephone conversation with US president Donald Trump on Wednesday also buoyed the local unit. The rand was trading around R17.72/$ on Friday afternoon, from R18.05 last Friday. ALSO READ: Economic activity slowly improving although economic pressure persists They also believe that the oil price fell over the week after Trump indicated that he would be meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin, although Putin has not honoured many of the US demands for a ceasefire with Ukraine. 'Higher prospects of the end of the Russia-Ukraine war have raised hopes of oil supply, pushing the oil price to $68.50 per barrel this morning. The gold price is higher at around $3 401 an ounce after reports that the US will reclassify gold imports, resulting in import tariffs being levied on 1 kilogram gold bars. PMIs are still looking up despite US tariffs The Absa Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) recorded its first expansion in nine months, increasing by 2.3 points to 50.8 in July. Among the sub-components, new sales orders increased significantly, up 9.7 points to 55.9. Nadia Matulich, economist at the BER, says this reflected stronger domestic and international demand. The supplier deliveries index also ticked higher, driven by the rise in orders, although some suppliers noted that regulatory issues had become significant supply chain bottlenecks. ALSO READ: US tariff of 30%: Rand weakest in 3 months, thousands of jobs in danger Manufacturers remained cautious amid ongoing global uncertainty. While business activity improved by 5.2 points, it remained in contractionary territory, which likely contributed to the decline in the employment index, down 6 points to 43.7. The purchasing price index rose again, pointing to mounting cost pressures. 'While current conditions suggest some resilience, the longer-term outlook has softened. The index tracking expected business conditions in six months fell from 62.5 to 56.4,' she says. S&P PMI in expansionary territory for the third month The S&P Global South Africa PMI, which includes the services sector, also edged higher in July, increasing from 50.1 to 50.3 and marking a third consecutive month in expansionary territory. Growth was supported by new sales orders and employment, with respondents reporting an uptick in client activity and a mix of both permanent and temporary hires. Matulich says the demand increase was driven primarily by domestic sales, with exports falling for the fourth straight month. 'Output remained broadly unchanged, but firms noted stabilising supply chains. This was reflected in higher purchasing, lower inventories and reduced backlogs. Input costs accelerated to a three-month high, but firms remained cautious about passing these costs on to consumers. Notably, business expectations over the next 12 months improved, recovering from a near four-year low in June.'


eNCA
2 days ago
- eNCA
Israel to 'take control' of Gaza City, sparking wave of criticism
Israel's military will "take control" of Gaza City under a new plan approved by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's security cabinet, touching off a wave of criticism Friday from both inside and outside the country. Nearly two years into the war in Gaza, Netanyahu faces mounting pressure to secure a truce to pull the territory's more than two million people back from the brink of famine and free the hostages held by Palestinian militants. Israel's foe Hamas denounced the plan to expand the fighting as a "new war crime", while staunch Israeli ally Germany took the extraordinary step of halting military exports out of concern they could be used in Gaza. Under the newly approved plan to "defeat" Hamas, the Israeli army "will prepare to take control of Gaza City while distributing humanitarian assistance to the civilian population outside combat zones", the premier's office said Friday. Before the decision, Netanyahu had said Israel planned to seize complete control of the Gaza Strip, but did not intend to govern it. "We don't want to keep it," the premier told US network Fox News on Thursday, adding Israel wanted a "security perimeter" and to hand the Palestinian territory to "Arab forces that will govern it properly without threatening us". Israel occupied Gaza from 1967, but withdrew its troops and settlers in 2005. AFP | AHMAD GHARABLI Netanyahu's office said a majority of the security cabinet had adopted "five principles", including demilitarisation of the territory and "the establishment of an alternative civil administration that is neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority". The new plan triggered swift criticism from across the globe, with China, Turkey, the UK and the UN's rights chief issuing statements of concern. In a major shift, meanwhile, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced his country was halting military shipments to Israel, saying it was "increasingly difficult to understand" how the new plan would help achieve legitimate aims. "Under these circumstances, the German government will not authorise any exports of military equipment that could be used in the Gaza Strip until further notice," he said. - 'March of recklessness' - Reactions in Israel were more mixed. Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid denounced the cabinet's move as "a disaster that will lead to many other disasters". He warned on X that it would result in "the death of the hostages, the killing of many soldiers, cost Israeli taxpayers tens of billions, and lead to diplomatic bankruptcy". The main campaign group for hostages' families also slammed the plan, saying it amounted to "abandoning" the captives. "The cabinet chose last night to embark on another march of recklessness, on the backs of the hostages, the soldiers, and Israeli society as a whole," the Hostage and Missing Families Forum said. An expanded Israeli offensive could see ground troops operate in densely populated areas where hostages are believed to be held, local media have reported. AFP | Olivia BUGAULT, Pauline PAILLASSA, Julie PEREIRA Other Israelis, meanwhile, offered their support. "As they take control of Gaza, they will eliminate Hamas completely -- maybe not completely, but at least a good percentage of them," said Chaim Klein, a 26-year-old yeshiva student. The Israeli army said last month that it controlled 75 percent of the Gaza Strip, mainly from its positions in the territory along the border. Out of 251 hostages captured during Hamas's 2023 attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the military says are dead. - 'Extremist agenda' - Gaza residents said they feared for the worst, as they braced for the next onslaught. "They tell us to go south, then back north, and now they want to send us south again. We are human beings, but no one hears us or sees us," Maysa al-Shanti, a 52-year-old mother of six, told AFP. Hamas on Friday said the "plans to occupy Gaza City and evacuate its residents constitutes a new war crime". It warned Israel that the operation would "cost it dearly", and that "expanding the aggression means sacrificing" the hostages. International concern has been growing over the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza, where a UN-backed assessment has warned that famine is unfolding. The World Health Organization said at least 99 people have died from malnutrition in the territory this year, with the figure likely an underestimate. AFP | Eyad BABA In late July, Israel partially eased restrictions on aid entering Gaza, but the United Nations says the amount allowed into the territory remains insufficient. Amjad Al-Shawa, head of the Palestinian NGO Network in the Gaza Strip, told AFP that lengthy inspection procedures at entry points meant few trucks could come in -- "between 70 to 80 per day -- carrying only specific types of goods". The UN estimates that Gaza needs at least 600 trucks of aid per day to meet residents' basic needs. Israel's offensive has killed at least 61,258 Palestinians, according to Hamas-run Gaza's health ministry. The 2023 attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. By David Stout And Herve Bar

TimesLIVE
2 days ago
- TimesLIVE
Israel approves plan to take control of Gaza City
Israel's political-security cabinet approved a plan to take control of Gaza City early on Friday, hours after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel intended to take military control of the entire strip despite intensifying criticism at home and abroad over the devastating almost two-year-old war. 'The IDF will prepare to take control of Gaza City while providing humanitarian aid to the civilian population outside the combat zones,' Netanyahu's office said in a statement, referring to the Israeli Defence Forces. Gaza City, in the north of the strip, is the largest city in the enclave. Axios reporter Barak Ravid, citing an Israeli official, said on X the plan involved evacuating Palestinian civilians from Gaza City and launching a ground offensive there. Netanyahu on Thursday told Fox News Channel's Bill Hemmer in an interview 'we intend to' when asked if Israel would take over the entire coastal territory. 'We don't want to keep it. We want to have a security perimeter. We don't want to govern it. We don't want to be there as a governing body.' He said Israel wanted to hand over the territory to Arab forces that would govern it. He did not elaborate on the governance arrangements or which Arab countries could be involved.