The Orwellian nightmare in Gaza
The trigger was a statement made by Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz about plans to set up a 'Humanitarian City' on the ruins of the bombed-out town of Rafah, located near the border with Egypt on the southern extremity of the Gaza Strip. Without the slightest tinge of irony, he proposed to 'concentrate' 6,00,000 Palestinians in an area in which access would be strictly controlled, and residents would not be permitted to leave. He also reiterated his ambition to encourage the 'voluntary migration' of Palestinians to other countries. In Orwellian Newspeak, forced expulsion is being called voluntary migration and a planned concentration camp is being described as a humanitarian city. The 'encouragement', of course, comes in the form of mass starvation, destruction of water, electricity supplies and over 90 per cent of all housing units, and the continued targeting of medical infrastructure.
Another classic Newspeak is the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), set up and funded by unknown or dubious entities to replace the UNRWA that was established by the UN in 1949 to provide support to Palestinian refugees. But Israel banned the UNRWA, choked essential food and medical supplies, and then responded to the growing global outrage by establishing a sham organisation whose aid-distribution centres have been described as a killing field.
Between the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and the armed contractors of GHF, some 880 Palestinians have been killed and over 5,000 wounded since the GHF started its operations in late May 2025. Meanwhile, formula milk for babies remains scarce and six children have been killed earlier this week while trying to get drinking water. In a rare admission, the Israeli government attributed this one attack to a 'technical error' in the missile that it fired into the crowd.
Doublethink — that act of simultaneously holding two contradictory beliefs — comes through the daily assertions of the IDF being 'the most moral army in the world'. Even after they have killed over 58,000 civilians, two-thirds of them women and children, the respected Lancet journal thinks that this figure represents an underestimation of around 41 per cent. CNN and The New York Times have estimated Palestinian fatalities to be significantly higher than the official count. And Israel, 'the only democracy in the Middle East,' not only prohibits international media from entering Gaza, but has killed at least 186 mostly Palestinian journalists, according to the Committee for Protection of Journalists.
And there is the BBC which commissioned and then refused to screen a film titled Gaza: Doctors under Attack because it made a persuasive case that the IDF had deliberately and repeatedly targeted each one of Gaza's 32 hospitals. It also reveals that a completely disproportionate number of doctors and medical personnel have been killed and arrested since October 7, allegedly because the hospitals were built on Hamas tunnels. It was left to Channel 4 to muster the courage to show the horrors of Gaza.
Israel's advanced satellite and drone capabilities make sure that Big Brother is Always Watching. IDF has made extensive use of Lavender, an AI-based system developed with technology from US-based Palantir, to process large amounts of data including geospatial and signal intelligence, human sources and open-source information, to develop a list of some 40,000 suspects. The system produces target recommendations and the IDF's armed drones use face recognition systems to lock on these targets and fire. Gazans are being used as guinea pigs to refine this platform and when civilian casualties occur, who is to blame? The lines between ethics, law and accountability have been virtually erased. No wonder Palantir chairman Peter Thiel was distinctly evasive when these questions were posed to him in an interview, mumbling, 'I'm not on top of all the details of what's going on in Israel, because my bias is to defer to Israel.'
Meanwhile, legal scholars, foreign policy experts and even a handful of Israeli politicians have now started to ask the forbidden question. Do Israeli actions in Gaza constitute ethnic cleansing, war crimes or even genocide? Read this and form your own view: Article II of the Genocide Convention of 1948 says that 'genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group: Killing members of the group; Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; Deliberately inflicting living conditions calculated to bring about the group's physical destruction in whole or in part…'
Former Israeli prime ministers Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert now acknowledge that the actions of the Benjamin Netanyahu government in Gaza constitute war crime. Leading Jewish historians like Raz Segal, Amos Goldberg and Lee Mordechai have described it as a genocide. A group of 10 Holocaust survivors have issued a signed letter condemning Israeli actions as genocide. The Jewish Voice for Peace issued a statement on Holocaust Remembrance Day to call for an end to 'the Israeli government's genocide against the Palestinian people'. But the students of Harvard and Columbia or the musicians at Glastonbury are not allowed to say this. Criticism of Israeli actions in Gaza is now equated with blood libel if you are a Jew and with antisemitism if you are not. Either way, it attracts the wrath of the ever-vigilant Thought Police.
And what is more Orwellian than the bizarre spectacle of PM Netanyahu — designated as a war criminal by the International Criminal Court — proposing Donald Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize while the US President sanctions senior ICC and UN staff for doing their job. Or, the intellectual gymnastics of the president of the European Commission, tying herself in knots as she tries to balance her angst over Ukraine with her nonchalance on Gaza.
Truly, as Orwell wrote in Animal Farm, 'All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.'
The writer is a former ambassador to Egypt and UAE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Netanyahu's Massacre Network Worse Than Hitler'
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan delivered a scathing condemnation of Israel's military campaign in Gaza, accusing Prime Minister Netanyahu's government of "surpassing Hitler in barbarism." Speaking at a defense industry event in Istanbul, Erdogan called for an immediate ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian aid. He emphasized the catastrophic conditions in Gaza, where over 2 million Palestinians face famine, mass displacement, and daily violence. He also condemned global silence, saying no one with human dignity can accept what is unfolding. His remarks come amid increasing international criticism of Israel's war, which has led to an ICC arrest warrant and mass protests worldwide.#erdogan #GazaCrisis #IsraelGazaWar #HumanitarianCrisis #CeasefireNow #FreePalestine #netanyahu #MiddleEastNews #IstanbulSpeech #WarCrimes Read More
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Harvard publisher cancels journal issue on Palestine, cites ‘a number of complex issues'
In the wake of the standoff between United States administration and Harvard University, the Harvard Education Publishing Group, a prestigious American education journal's publisher, last month, abruptly canceled the release of a special issue titled, 'education and Palestine,' The Guardian reported. The special issue, which was set to be published this summer was almost ready, as contracts with most authors were finalized and articles were edited, the report noted. On June 9, in an email to the issue's contributors, the publisher cited 'a number of complex issues', taking authors and editors by surprise, The Guardian learnt. This remarkable move comes amid an escalation of United States' confrontation with Harvard University, where it has warned that the elite institution could lose its accreditation over allegations related to 'antisemitism' on campus. Officials have accused elite universities in the US of fostering leftist ideologies and failing to protect Jewish students amid brewing tensions on campus. What did the special issue entail? The special issue of the journal covered topics such as the annihilation of Gaza's schools to the challenges of teaching about Israel and Palestine in the US. The issue was intended to promote 'scholarly conversation on education and Palestine amid repression, occupation, and genocide,' as per internal emails accessed by The Guardian. It included research articles, essays and other writings on topics ranging from education in Israel-Palestine and among the Palestinian diaspora, to academic freedom in the US. The journal articles explored the evolution of the concept of 'scholasticide', a term describing the systematic annihilation of education, first coined during Israel's 2008 invasion of Gaza; the 'ethical and educational responsibilities' of English language teachers in the West Bank; and the impact of 'crackdowns on dissent' on teaching about Palestine in US higher education institutions, according to finalized abstracts of the articles shared with The Guardian. What did the cancellation email state? The email sent to the body of authors and editors, announcing the cancellation of the issue, did not exactly cite 'antisemitism' as its reason. The executive director of the publishing group, Jessica Fiorillo, wrote that the decision stemmed from an 'inadequate review process' and the need for 'considerable copy editing'. Intimating them that the issue was being pulled altogether, Fiorillo claimed the manuscripts were 'unready for publication', in part due to a copy editor's resignation. She also cited an unspecified 'failure to adhere to an adequate review process', a 'lack of internal alignment' between the authors, editors and the publisher, and 'the lack of a clear and expedient path forward to resolving the myriad issues at play'. 'This difficult situation is exacerbated by very significant lack of agreement about the path forward, including and especially whether to publish such a special issue at this time,' she wrote in her email, as seen by The Guardian. She added that the cancellation was not 'due to censorship of a particular viewpoint nor does it connect to matters of academic freedom'. Chronology of the cancellation The speculations began when Rabea Eghbariah, a Palestinian doctoral candidate at Harvard Law School, and the writer of the afterword for the special issue, requested to amend his contract with the Harvard Educational Review (HER) to add a clause seeking to safeguard his academic freedom, which was later declined by the journal. Days later, the journal's editorial board wrote to the authors, citing an 'increasingly challenging climate' and asking for their availability for a meeting, which never ended up happening, as per The Guardian report. However, this was not the first time the publisher tried to pressurise the journal editors. In January this year, the editors were told that an 'institutional review' of the manuscripts would be required. Moreover, in February, the publisher attempted to alter the back cover of the spring issue promoting some of the forthcoming articles. As per an editor quoted by The Guardian, the publisher acknowledged that it was seeking a 'risk assessment' legal review by Harvard's counsel out of fear the issue's publication would prompt 'antisemitism' claims, which authors and editor referred to as an 'unprecedented' at that stage of publication. 'This sends a dangerous message to scholars globally: that academic publishing contracts are conditional, revocable, and subject to external political calculations,' they wrote in a letter to the journal's editorial board and publisher in the month of May. However, less than a month later, the special issue was pulled out entirely. Reacting to the move, one of the editors of the HER, said that the censorship of the issue is 'exactly how authoritarianism grows'. Next steps Many scholars have come to refer to the incident as the 'Palestine exception' to academic freedom. The authors are now in talks with other journals and are hopeful their pieces can be published as planned. The Guardian's interviewees, including authors and journal's editor, all expressed fear that the incident would deter other scholars from pursuing work on Palestine. Other steps taken by Trump administration against Harvard Harvard has been facing a brutal battle with the Trump administration, after it targeted the Ivy League University for failing to keep Jewish students safe and allowing antisemitism to flourish. Soon after university protests against Israel's war in Gaza gained traction, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) sought information on various foreign national visa holders who have been a part of 'illegal and violent' activities within the campus. Eventually, the US Secretary of Homeland Security ordered the DHS to revoke Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification even after receiving a detailed list with the number and information of enrolled foreign students. In a letter to the university, the Secretary wrote that current students would need to transfer or risk losing their legal status. The University has so far managed to sue the administration on the matter, with Judge Burroughs issuing a ruling against Trump's June 4 proclamation, where he had said that any foreign national who enrolled at the university would be banned from entering the US. Harvard also sued the Trump administration in April this year against the funds freeze, saying the administration was using 'leverage to gain control of academic decision making at Harvard'. The New York Times reported about Harvard receiving seven stop-work orders for research awards between April 14 and May 6, after which 950 such orders totalling $2.4 billion were passed. Most recently, the US Departments of Education and Health and Human Services announced that they had notified Harvard's accrediting agency that the university had potentially violated federal law by failing to address claims of harassment against Jewish students. Losing accreditation would have severe consequences, including making Harvard students ineligible for federal financial aid.
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Trump envoy Witkoff to travel to Europe and discuss Gaza, U.S. official says
U.S. President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff will travel to Europe this week for meetings on Israel's war in Gaza and a range of other issues, a U.S. official said on Tuesday (July 22, 2025), adding Witkoff will continue pushing for a ceasefire in the Palestinian enclave. Axios reported that Mr. Witkoff is expected to depart for Rome on Wednesday and arrive on Thursday (July 24) for a meeting with Israeli Minister of Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer and a senior Qatari envoy. Also Read | U.S. issues sanctions against UN investigator probing abuses in Gaza If sufficient progress is made, Witkoff will travel from Rome to Doha toward the end of the week to secure a deal, the news website reported, citing a U.S. and an Israeli source. Why it's important Talks on a proposal for a 60-day Gaza ceasefire between Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas are being mediated by Qatar and Egypt with Washington's backing while the humanitarian crisis in the Palestinian enclave from U.S. ally Israel's military assault continues to mount. The ongoing war in Gaza has seen two ceasefires thus far, the most recent of which ended after two months when Israeli strikes killed over 400 Palestinians on March 18. The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered in October 2023 when Hamas attacked Israel, killing 1,200 and taking about 250 hostages, Israeli tallies show. Israel's subsequent military assault has killed over 59,000 Palestinians, Gaza's Health Ministry says. The assault has also caused a hunger crisis, internally displaced Gaza's entire population and prompted accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice and of war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Israel denies the accusations.
