
The honeymoon is over: ANC and ActionSA's marriage turns 'toxic'
Morero is accused of not consulting his coalition partners on the budget and on his state of the city address.
Just a few months after ActionSA helped ANC regional chairperson Dada Morero become the mayor of Johannesburg, the party has described its relationship with Morero as 'toxic'.
This comes after Morero allegedly ignored ActionSA's concerns over the 2025/2026 budget, despite ActionSA being considered a coalition partner in the governing of Johannesburg.
Morero is accused of lobbying smaller parties to vote in favour of a controversial R89 billion budget that has been described as anti-poor and flawed.
Speaking to The Citizen on Friday, Mashaba said the passing of the budget is a sign that Morero no longer needs support from ActionSA.
'He has shown us that he does not need us but we will not become voting cows to serve his agenda,' he said.
Mashaba said he had complained to the ANC provincial task team about Morero's questionable leadership in Johannesburg.
This includes the appointments of tainted individuals to powerful positions and unethical behaviour.
'He is failing the residents of Johannesburg; he does not appoint people on the basis of merit. For him to tell me that he appointed the MMC of finance because he wants to control her is shocking.
'I have made the ANC aware of these things and they are also concerned,' he said.
Motion of no confidence
Mashaba said ActionSA had not decided which way it would vote when Morero faces a motion of no confidence vote next month.
'We will take the next step as it comes. He does not need our vote, it is clear that he has his partners that will protect him,' he said.
The DA and the African Democratic Christian Party (ACDP) have already indicated that they will vote in favour of the motion.
Will ActionSA take the opposition benches?
Meanwhile, Mashaba said even though ActionSA occupies the speaker position in the legislature, the party will not support questionable decisions by the mayor just to keep the position.
'We did not beg or ask anyone to give us the speaker position. If they decide that they do not want us, that decision is not ours.
'They are the ones who approached us to give us the position. If they gave us the position to soften us to become voting cattle, then they made a big mistake,' he said.
Mashaba said ActionSA will continue to use its position in the legislature to hold Morero's administration accountable.
'We will hold them accountable officially as long as we run the legislature,' he said.
Local government elections
He said the party still hopes to boot the ANC out of power in the upcoming local government elections next year.
'What we need to work on is to ensure that residents of Johannesburg vote ActionSA into power and remove the ANC.
'Residents cannot keep empowering the ANC, we have demonstrated that where we govern, we always act in the best interests of our residents,' he said.
Mashaba said it is unlikely that the ANC would remove ActionSA from the legislature, as negotiations for that position had taken place at the provincial level.
ALSO READ: Joburg's new city manager? Botes is a bad choice, says DA
Mashaba's soft spot for Joburg
The Citizen sent questions to the ANC in Johannesburg and Morero spokesperson Chris Vondo about tensions with ActionSA.
There had been no response at the time this article was published.
Meanwhile, Ntsikelelo Breakfast a political analyst from Nelson Mandela University (NMU) told The Citizen that Mashaba had leaned towards a relationship with the ANC despite challenges along the way to avoid working with the DA.
'One could say ActionSA is stuck between a rock and a hard place. The reason that this party was started wa because of the discontent that Mashaba had with the DA.
'So instead of Mashaba gravitating to a party that made him have a broken heart I think he chose to work with the ANC which was a surprise because ActionSA has always said they will never work with the ANC because the ANC is corrupt,' he said.
Breakfast said it is clear that Mashaba has a soft spot for Johannesburg because he had been mayor before and perhaps wanted to preserve his legacy.
NOW READ: How Joburg plans to spend R89 billion

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
Top 10 stories of the day: Shivambu removed as MK Party SG
Here's your daily news update for Tuesday, 3 June 2025: An easy-to-read selection of our top stories. News today includes the MK party leader has removed Floyd Shivambu as secretary-general of the party. Meanwhile, the EFF has lost its urgent bid to halt the upcoming increase in the general fuel levy. Furthermore, in his welcome note at the memorial service of actor Presley Chweneyagae, the mayor of Mahikeng, Tshepiso Mphehlo, reflected on the pinnacle of the province's art scene when Tsosti was released. Weather tomorrow: 4 June 2025 Damaging waves and strong winds are forecast to impact coastal areas of the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal, while cold weather is expected across much of the country. Full weather forecast here. Stay up to date with The Citizen – More News, Your Way. MK party removes Floyd Shivambu as SG The MK party leader has removed Floyd Shivambu as secretary-general of the party. This comes after an investigation into Shivambu's trip to Malawi to visit fugitive pastor Shepherd Bushiri's Enlightened Church. Former MK party secretary-general Floyd Shivambu. Picture: Nigel Sibanda MK national chair Nathi Nhleko said Shivambu is now deployed as a Member of Parliament. CONTINUE READING: MK party removes Floyd Shivambu as SG US extradition of Magashule's ex-PA Moroadi Cholota declared unlawful The Free State High Court in Bloemfontein has ruled that it does not have jurisdiction to try Moroadi Cholota, the former personal assistant to ex-Free State premier, Ace Magashule. Judge Philip Loubser, who is presiding over the R255 million asbestos corruption trial, handed down his judgment on Tuesday. Moroadi Cholota (former PA to Free State Premier Ace Magashule) at the Bloemfontein High Court on 15 April 2025. Picture: Gallo Images/Mlungisi Louw This followed two weeks of testimony from state witnesses Benjamin Calitz and Nicholas 'Nico' Jacobus Gerber, both officers with the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI), commonly known as the Hawks, in a trial-within-a-trial relating to Cholota's extradition from the United States (US). CONTINUE READING: US extradition of Magashule's ex-PA Moroadi Cholota declared unlawful Fuel levy hike to go ahead as EFF fails in court The EFF has lost its urgent bid to halt the upcoming increase in the general fuel levy. The Western Cape High Court in Cape Town ruled against the party on Tuesday, a day before the new levy was set to take effect. Petrol pumps are pictured at a filling station in Melville on 20 January 2021. Picture: Tracy Lee Stark The EFF had sought an urgent interdict in Part A of its court application to suspend the planned hike of 16 cents per litre for petrol and 15 cents for diesel. CONTINUE READING: Fuel levy hike to go ahead as EFF fails in court No fireworks expected, but GDP figures are disappointing — economists Economists expected no fireworks from the GDP figures for the first quarter of the year, but they all agree that the growth of 0.1% is disappointing. They even wonder if expecting economic growth of 1% is already a stretch, as the economy was drifting from slow growth to virtually no growth. Picture: iStock Jee-A van der Linde, senior economist at Oxford Economics Africa, says the South African economy continued to trend sideways at the start of 2025. CONTINUE READING: No fireworks expected, but GDP figures are disappointing — economists Presley Chweneyagae: Mourners gathered at Mmabatho like they did in 2018 for HHP In his welcome note at the memorial service of actor Presley Chweneyagae, the mayor of Mahikeng, Tshepiso Mphehlo, reflected on the pinnacle of the province's art scene when Tsosti was released. 'That period was a pinnacle period for the arts and culture in Mahikeng,' shared Mphehlo. The first memorial service of Presley Chweneyagae was hosted in his hometown of Mahikeng. Picture: Presley Oageng Chweneyagae/Facebook The memorial service is being held at the Mmabatho Convention Centre for the late 40-year-old actor, who passed away a week ago. CONTINUE READING: Presley Chweneyagae: Mourners gathered at Mmabatho like they did in 2018 for HHP Here are five more stories of the day: Yesterday's News recap READ HERE: Likhona killed for being lesbian? | Slain Kutlwano's 'wrong' gender | inmates boycott graduation


The Citizen
9 hours ago
- The Citizen
Alex residents ‘tried to hold city power officials hostage'
City Power said payments should only be made through authorised electricity vendors, not to individuals, and should go toward purchasing electricity units. River Park community members forcefully ask City Power employee to reconnect them after he disconnected them during the cut-off operation in Alexandra in Johannesburg, 29 May 2025. Picture: Nigel Sibanda / The Citizen Electricity supply has been restored to the River Park community in Alexandra following a five-day disconnection that began after residents allegedly attempted to hold City Power officials hostage during a routine meter inspection operation. The utility company announced on Tuesday that power would be switched back on, but residents must now pay R2 000 per household toward electricity purchases as part of the reconnection process — a significantly reduced amount compared to standard reconnection fees. Attack on city power officials leads to area-wide disconnection The crisis began on Thursday, 29 May 2025, when City Power teams conducting scheduled meter audits and disconnection operations in the River Park area encountered violent resistance from residents. 'The safety of our staff was severely compromised, with incidents of intimidation, road blockades, and attempts to hold our personnel hostage, forcing City Power to act decisively by cutting off supply to prevent further risk,' said City Power CEO Tshifularo Mashava. The utility responded by disconnecting electricity to the entire area as a safety measure, leaving the community without power for five days while negotiations took place with community leaders and the local ward councillor. ALSO READ: WATCH: What happened when City Power cut illegal connections in Alex City Power gives Alexandra residents conditional power restoration Following meetings with community representatives, City Power agreed to restore the electricity supply effective Tuesday, 3 June 2025. However, the restoration comes with strict conditions and ongoing enforcement measures. 'While we condemn the unlawful behaviour witnessed during the operation, we acknowledge the importance of constructive dialogue and have resolved to give law-abiding residents a fair opportunity to engage,' Mashava stated. The utility will immediately resume meter auditing operations once power is restored, with teams conducting comprehensive inspections to identify households that have tampered with or illegally bypassed their electricity meters. These operations will proceed under law enforcement protection to ensure worker safety. ALSO READ: City Power crackdown on illegal connections met with resistance in Alexandra Reduced service fees offered In what appears to be a compromise measure, City Power is requiring previously disconnected customers to pay only R2 000 per household toward electricity purchases rather than full reconnection fees. Isaac Mangena, the utility's General Manager, emphasised that this amount represents a significant concession. According to Mangena, the R2,000 charge 'is not a penalty or reconnection fee, but rather a minimum charge to begin recovering outstanding service costs'. He noted that standard reconnection costs far exceed this amount, with single-phase meters typically costing more than R14 000 per household to reconnect and three-phase meters used by businesses and backroom rental accommodations costing more than R30 000. The utility stressed that payments should only be made through authorised electricity vendors, not to individuals, and should go toward purchasing electricity units. ALSO READ: City Power allays fear that hackers may cut your power Free electricity program available For residents unable to afford electricity payments, City Power is promoting its Expanded Social Package (ESP), which provides free basic electricity to qualifying households. According to the utility, the programme currently serves more than 10 000 customers and aims to assist vulnerable residents through free electricity provision and waiver of the R200 surcharge. Eligibility for the ESP extends to senior citizens, unemployed persons, women and children, child-headed households, and persons with disabilities who earn less than R7,503.01 monthly. However, applicants must have fully functioning meters to qualify for the program. Those seeking to apply for free electricity must bring their South African Identity Document, City of Johannesburg rates and taxes account, three months of bank statements, proof of residence, and their City Power account or meter number to municipal offices. Zero tolerance warning City Power maintains a firm stance against electricity theft and meter tampering, with Mangena warning that the utility will continue working with law enforcement and local leadership to ensure compliance. The company has issued a clear ultimatum regarding future interference with operations. 'Should our teams encounter violence again this week, we will resolve to switching the lights off again and suspend our services in the area,' the utility warned through Mangena's statement. The company emphasised that paying for electricity services remains the only way to ensure a continued and reliable supply, urging residents to allow utility teams to perform their duties without interference. READ NEXT: How Joburg plans to spend R89 billion

IOL News
10 hours ago
- IOL News
GNU's Fragile Unity: Israel and the Ideological Crisis Within SA's Ruling Coalition
A child waits with others to receive food at a distribution point in Nuseirat, central Gaza Strip, June 2, 2025. The supposed GNU is not united on core policy pillars, particularly foreign affairs. This dissonance undermines South Africa's moral authority and strategic coherence, says the writer. Image: Eyad BABA / AFP Clyde N.S. Ramalaine Since the 2024 national elections, South Africa has been governed by a new coalition misleadingly branded as a Government of National Unity (GNU). This alliance, led by the African National Congress (ANC) and the Democratic Alliance (DA), excludes major opposition parties like uMkhonto we Sizwe (MK) and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) while it accommodates much smaller parties like the PA. Despite its name, the coalition resembles a Grand Coalition formed out of electoral necessity, and political machinations, not ideological consensus. This dissonance is increasingly visible in policy disputes, most glaringly in the lack of a unified foreign policy, especially on South Africa's stance toward Israel. While the term 'GNU' is repeatedly invoked by the state and its coalition members, some of us have persistently argued that it inaccurately describes the coalition's identity and structure. The 7th Administration, inaugurated in June 2024, has already faced serious internal tensions: National Budget : The DA and Freedom Front Plus (FF+) voted against it, exposing fiscal division. BELA Bill : The DA challenged President Ramaphosa's assent to the Basic Education Laws Amendment Bill through legal action. Expropriation and NHI Bills : The DA declared formal disputes, accusing the ANC of violating coalition commitments. Internal Trust : The ANC has been accused of unilateralism, particularly after Ramaphosa claimed the ANC remained ' in charge ' despite lacking a majority. Cabinet Disputes : The DA initially rejected the six ministerial positions offered, demanding greater power. Policy Vacuum : The coalition lacks a coherent agenda, with criticism that economic and industrial interests are prioritised over urgent social needs. While each of these tensions merits attention worth unpacking, this article focuses on the coalition's failure to articulate a coherent foreign policy, with particular attention to the South African state's position on Israel. The ICJ case against Israel, alleging genocide in Gaza, was initiated under the ANC-led sixth administration before the coalition's formal establishment. However, its continuation under the 7th Administration places shared accountability on all coalition partners. The critical question: Can these parties, having entered into government, reasonably distance themselves from state actions on the international stage? Can coalition members simultaneously maintain pro-Israel positions while serving in a government prosecuting Israel for genocide? These contradictions expose not just fragility within the coalition but a deeper ideological incoherence. This has implications for both domestic accountability and South Africa's credibility on the world stage. A closer look at the DA and Patriotic Alliance (PA), two vocal coalition partners, reveals shared support for Israel. Often painted as ideological rivals, both parties converge in their staunch backing of Israel, underpinned by different but overlapping motivations. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The DA frames its support through a purported liberal-democratic lens, casting Israel as a fellow constitutional democracy. It has routinely criticised the ANC's pro-Palestinian stance as biased, reaffirming Israel's right to security and sovereignty. This position is echoed by party leaders and in parliamentary debates, often aligning with mainstream pro-Israel rhetoric. The PA's support is more overtly religious, grounded in its alignment with Coloured Pentecostal and Charismatic communities. The party has sent several delegations to Israel, praising its economic and security frameworks. This pro-Israel stance is not incidental; it reflects both ideological affinity and, arguably, strategic political alignment. Though unproven, allegations persist that both parties receive support from Israeli-linked institutions. Regardless of their accuracy, the frequency and visibility of DA and PA engagements with Israel, amid a state-led genocide case against that very country, raise at least three critical questions. 1. Can coalition partners conduct parallel diplomacy that contradicts official policy? Parallel diplomacy by coalition members, especially when it directly opposes formal state positions, raises serious constitutional and political challenges. It undermines South Africa's diplomatic identity, weakens international trust, and confuses global partners about who represents the state. While ideological diversity is inherent to coalition governance, the lack of a binding foreign policy framework risks turning pluralism into instability. 2. Does public support for Israel breach collective governance and cabinet responsibility? In parliamentary systems, coalition members with executive roles are bound by collective governance and cabinet responsibility. Public dissent, especially on significant matters such as the ICJ case, can erode cabinet cohesion and undermine state credibility. Yet, the current coalition lacks a transparent agreement that clarifies such responsibilities. Without a formalised framework, parties like the DA and PA may argue their actions fall within party autonomy, especially if they do not control foreign affairs portfolios. 3. What does this reveal about South Africa's foreign policy credibility under the so-called GNU? The contradictory positions of coalition partners on Israel reflect a broader governance crisis. The supposed GNU is not united on core policy pillars, particularly foreign affairs. This dissonance undermines South Africa's moral authority and strategic coherence. Without a clear, binding coalition framework, foreign policy risks becoming a terrain of partisan expression rather than a reflection of national interest. The ANC's long-standing solidarity with Palestine, rooted in anti-colonial struggle, clashes with the DA and PA's pro-Israel stances. This ideological disconnect renders key diplomatic positions vulnerable to internal sabotage or ambiguity, weakening South Africa's moral clarity and domestic trust in the state's international engagements. The invocation of 'national unity' masks what is, in reality, a fragile arrangement between actors with divergent worldviews. The absence of a formal coalition agreement available to the public deepens concerns about the ad hoc nature of governance. Foreign policy, like other key domains, appears to be negotiable rather than principled. The Israel question thus becomes a prism for understanding deeper contradictions within South Africa's coalition government. Until the 7th Administration resolves these ideological fractures, it remains a government of convenience, not unity. The claim of national consensus is untenable when major foreign policy initiatives are undermined by internal dissent. Conversely, it can be argued that parties like the DA and PA have every constitutional right to maintain independent foreign policy positions. The coalition was not founded on ideological unity or a detailed agreement binding all members to specific international stances. The Grand Coalition 'GNU', born of electoral arithmetic and political sophistication rather than shared vision, does not require unanimity on all matters.