Strike idles Eastern WA, Tri-Cities construction sites as workers seek ‘fair wages'
'Local 302 Eastern Washington is on strike. Hope negotiations can progress so guys can get back to work for fair wages,' a member posted to the union's social media accounts Tuesday.
IUOE Local 302 represents heavy equipment operators who run excavators, cranes, bulldozers and other construction gear. Workers who were not authorized to speak told the Tri-City Herald that the strike was also affecting Spokane.
In the Tri-Cities, work had visibly stopped on other prominent projects.
That included on Highway 240, where the state of Washington is widening a stretch of the Hanford highway to accommodate increasing traffic, particularly Hanford site commuters, and the Columbia Center Boulevard project, where the city of Kennewick is upgrading streets around the mall.
Details were thin, but workers picketed some job sites in Tri-Cities on Tuesday and Wednesday.
At the Horn Rapids Landfill in Richland, Apollo Inc. workers waved 'On Strike' signs to residents making dump runs. A gas collection and control system is currently under construction at the north Richland site..
The city of Richland announce Tuesday evening that work had halted on two roundabouts on Dallas Road at Badger South, near the Country Mercantile store, because of the labor dispute.
Kennewick-based Goodman & Mehlenbacher Inc. or GAME Inc. is the contractor for the work to build roundabouts at Ava Way and Trowbridge.
Some work is proceeding, but heavy equipment operators are not on site. Both intersections are open to regular traffic after the city previously announced road closures to accommodate road construction..
The Dallas Road work privately funded by the developer of Badger South. Even if construction is delayed, both intersections are operational, an official told the Herald.
KHQ Local News reports the Washington state Department of Transportation confirmed work on its North Spokane Corridor project was halted due to the IUOE Local 302 strike.
Union leadership could not be immediately reached. It has not publicly posted about the dispute.
This is a breaking story and will be updated.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
5 Big Reasons Leadership Effectiveness Is Imperative In Construction
The U.S. construction industry is standing at the edge of one of the most transformative decades in its history. Fueled by a $1.2 trillion federal infrastructure package and steady private-sector demand, the market was previously projected to expand from $1.77 trillion in 2024 to more than $2.12 trillion in 2025. At the same time, advances in technology and artificial intelligence are reshaping how projects are designed, managed, and delivered, while the rapid acceleration of clean energy initiatives is fueling unprecedented demand for new infrastructure and retrofitting. Another powerful force is the surge in data center development, as the digital economy and AI adoption require massive investments in high-capacity facilities. Yet beneath this headline growth lies a paradox. While opportunity abounds, growth alone does not guarantee long-term success. The companies that thrive will not be those with the largest projects in the pipeline, but those that invest in leadership, talent development, and organizational resilience to sustain performance at scale. In short, success will not hinge on cranes and concrete. It will hinge on people. The Leadership Imperative in a High-Growth Era Construction firms are scaling at unprecedented rates, but growth exposes cracks. As companies double or triple headcount, leadership gaps widen, succession planning falters, and decision-making slows under the weight of bureaucracy. Without intentional leadership development, the very growth firms are chasing can become the catalyst for cultural erosion and stalled performance. Research consistently underscores the impact. Organizations with robust leadership pipelines enjoy 1.5 times higher employee retention and 29% higher profitability than peers that neglect leadership development. For construction firms, where projects are complex, labor markets tight, and safety paramount, the consequences of leadership neglect are magnified. True leadership development isn't about checking a box with occasional training. It's about embedding leadership competencies into every layer of the organization—from executives shaping strategy to front-line supervisors setting daily standards of excellence. This top-down approach doesn't just prepare the next generation of leaders; it ensures cultural continuity and operational alignment during periods of hypergrowth. 1 - Safety: A Cultural and Financial Lever In construction, safety is more than a compliance issue—it is a leadership issue. The industry knows that unsafe environments cost lives. What's discussed less often is how safety incidents erode profitability, damage reputation, and accelerate turnover. Consider the numbers. Safety-related costs can consume 6–9% of project budgets. Conversely, companies that embrace a safety-leadership culture—where leaders model accountability, empower crews to intervene, and create psychological safety around reporting—see incidents fall by 20–50%. That isn't just fewer accidents. It's 15–25% higher productivity, improved morale, and greater client trust. The leaders who treat safety as a cultural cornerstone—not a compliance afterthought—will differentiate themselves in a crowded market. 2 - Reducing Rework: Through Continuous Improvement Few inefficiencies are as costly to construction firms as rework. Industry studies estimate rework can account for 5–10% of total project costs. For a firm managing billions in projects, the math is staggering. The solution isn't more oversight; it's more learning. Borrowing from high-performance domains like the military and aviation, structured debriefing systems create continuous feedback loops. Teams analyze what went well, what failed, and what must change. These insights become operational improvements that cut rework and drive efficiency across projects. Companies that operationalize these practices report 30–40% reductions in rework—savings that directly impact margins and competitiveness. More importantly, these practices foster cultures of adaptability and collaboration that scale far beyond a single project. 3 - Scaling Like a Startup: Even as an Enterprise Growth in construction doesn't always resemble the disciplined pace of Fortune 500 scaling. It often looks like a startup—rapid expansion, evolving systems, and a constant push to deliver more with less. Yet even the largest construction firms are learning that agility is no longer optional. Rigid hierarchies and siloed communication create drag at precisely the moment companies must move faster. By treating growth like a late-stage startup—emphasizing agile leadership, rapid decision-making, and scalable systems—construction companies can accelerate without breaking. Evidence backs this approach. Firms adopting agile leadership practices report 60% faster decision cycles and 30% greater project delivery efficiency. In an industry where delays can erase millions in value, agility becomes a competitive weapon. 4 - The Retention Challenge: Building Careers, Not Just Jobs The talent shortage in construction is not a future concern—it's a present crisis. Nearly 40% of the skilled workforce will retire within the next decade, creating an acute need for succession planning and career development. Yet turnover remains stubbornly high, and the cost is enormous. Replacing a single frontline employee costs 16–20% of their annual salary, not to mention lost knowledge and productivity. Mid-level managers and senior position can cost closer to 100% of salary to replace. So, even small incremental improvements in employee retention can have a dramatic impact. The most competitive firms are addressing turnover not with signing bonuses alone, but with systemic investments in onboarding, mentorship, and career pathing. Employees who see a future for themselves in the company are far more likely to stay. Structured onboarding and mentoring programs, for example, can improve retention by 50% in the first 18 months and accelerate time to full productivity by 20%. For younger generations entering the workforce, culture and development opportunities matter as much as compensation. Companies that fail to address this reality will lose talent to those that do. 5 - Building a Competitive Advantage Through People When you combine these levers—leadership development, safety culture, continuous improvement, agility, and career pathing—a clear pattern emerges. The construction firms that will thrive over the next five years are those that view organizational development as a growth strategy, not a cost center. This is not hypothetical. At EXCELR8, in our partnerships with leading construction companies, embedding leadership competencies and scalable operating systems - supported by AI-powered tools - has created the foundation for multi-year sustainable growth. In other organizations, structured mentoring frameworks stabilized turnover while strengthening cultural integration across expanding teams. In still others, leadership development programs tied directly to safety initiatives helped reduce incidents on job sites and reinforce trust across the workforce. The results speak for themselves: reduced costs, stronger margins, improved morale, and the ability to seize opportunities that competitors cannot. The Call to Action for Construction Leaders The U.S. construction industry will not suffer from a lack of projects in the coming years. The greater risk is that firms will lack the leadership, culture, and systems to execute at scale. In an environment of slowing growth rates, rising costs, and fierce competition, the human side of the business becomes the decisive edge. The path forward is clear: Growth in construction is inevitable. Sustained success is not. The difference will be made by leaders willing to go beyond the blueprint and invest in what truly drives performance: their people.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Some workers would be excluded from student loan forgiveness program for 'illegal' activity
WASHINGTON (AP) — Teachers, social workers, nurses and other public workers would be cut off from a popular student loan cancellation program if the Trump administration finds their employer engaged in activities with a 'substantial illegal purpose,' under a new federal proposal released on Friday. The Education Department took aim at nonprofits or government bodies that work with immigrants and transgender youth, releasing plans to overhaul the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. Opponents fear the new policy would turn the loan forgiveness benefit into a tool of political retribution. The proposal would give the education secretary the final say in deciding whether a group or government entity should be excluded from the program, which was created by Congress in 2007 to encourage more college graduates to enter lower-paying public service fields. The proposal says illegal activity includes the trafficking or 'chemical castration' of children, illegal immigration and supporting foreign terrorist organizations. 'Chemical castration' is defined as using hormone therapy or drugs that delay puberty — gender-affirming care common for transgender children or teens. President Donald Trump ordered the changes in March, saying the loan forgiveness program was steering taxpayer money to 'activist organizations' that pose a threat to national security and do not serve the public. The public will be given 30 days to weigh in on the proposal before it can be finalized. Any changes would take effect in July 2026. Under current rules, government employees and many nonprofit workers can get their federal student loans canceled after they've made 10 years of payments. The program is open to government workers, including teachers, firefighters and employees of public hospitals, along with nonprofits that focus on certain areas. The new proposal would exclude employees of any organization tied to an activity deemed illegal. The Education Department predicts that fewer than 10 organizations would be deemed ineligible per year. It doesn't expect a 'significant reduction' in the percentage of borrowers who would be granted forgiveness under the program, according to the proposal. Yet the agency acknowledges that not all industries would be affected evenly. Schools, universities, health care providers, social workers and legal services organizations are among those most likely to have their eligibility jeopardized, the department wrote. It did not give more specifics about what 'illegal' actions those groups were taking that could bar them from the program. But the proposal suggests that performing gender-affirming care in the 27 states that outlaw it would be enough. If a state or federal court rules against an employer, that could lead to its expulsion from the program, or if the employer is involved in a legal settlement that includes an admission of wrongdoing. Even without a legal finding, however, the education secretary could determine independently that an organization should be ejected. The secretary could judge whether an organization participated in illegal activity by using a legal standard known as the 'preponderance of the evidence' — meaning it's more likely than not that an accusation is true. Once an organization is barred from the program, its workers' future loan payments would no longer count toward cancellation. They would have to find work at another eligible employer to keep making progress toward forgiveness. A ban from the Education Department would last 10 years or until the employer completed a 'corrective action plan' approved by the secretary. Critics blasted the proposal as an illegal attempt to weaponize student loan cancellation. Kristin McGuire, CEO of the nonprofit Young Invincibles, which advocates for loan forgiveness, called it a political stunt designed to confuse borrowers. 'By using a distorted and overly broad definition of 'illegal activities,' the Trump administration is exploiting the student loan system to attack political opponents,' McGuire said in a statement. The Education Department sketched out its plans for the overhaul during a federal rulemaking process that began in June. The agency gathered a panel of experts to help hash out the details — a process known as negotiated rulemaking. But the panel failed to reach a consensus, which freed the department to move forward with a proposal of its own design. The proposal released on Friday included some changes meant to ease concerns raised by the expert panel. Some had worried the department would ban organizations merely for supporting transgender rights, even if they have no direct involvement in gender-affirming care. The new proposal clarifies that the secretary would not expel organizations for exercising their First Amendment rights. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Solve the daily Crossword
Bloomberg
31 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Roblox Case at SEC Concluded in May, Agency Document Shows
The US Securities and Exchange Commission concluded a case involving the online video-game platform Roblox Corp. in May, according to a document seen by Bloomberg News. The case was opened in October and finished seven months later, according to a May 13 'Case Closing Report.' It was shared with Bloomberg by Joe O'Donnell, chief executive officer of Canary Data, an AI intelligence platform for investors, who said he obtained the report under a Freedom of Information Act request. The document doesn't describe the nature of the investigation or whether it made any determination.
