Chinese students face anxious wait for visas under Trump's crackdown
Chinese students face anxious wait for visas under Trump's crackdown
Sign of latest spillover from US-China trade war tensions
BEIJING: Caught in the middle of Washington's renewed visa crackdown on Chinese international students, Beijing postgraduate Lainey is anxiously waiting to resume the visa process to study a PhD at her dream school, the University of California. 'We feel helpless and unable to do anything,' said the 24-year-old sociology student, who declined to give her surname for privacy reasons.
'The situation in North America this year is not very good. From applying for my PhD until now, this series of visa policies is not very favorable to us. But we have no choice but to wait.' The US State Department said on Thursday it would not tolerate the 'exploitation' of American universities or theft of US research and intellectual property by Beijing. Spokesperson Tammy Bruce did not elaborate on how many Chinese students would be affected by a new plan announced on Wednesday to 'aggressively' revoke visas.
The visa crackdown is the latest in a series of moves targeting the international student community, especially Chinese nationals, who make up roughly 1 in 4 of all international students in the US, as the Trump administration pursues its hardline immigration agenda. If applied to a broad segment of the 277,000 Chinese students already at US colleges, the visa revocations could disrupt a major source of income for universities and a crucial pipeline of talent for US technology companies. Chinese students make up 16 percent of all graduate science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) students in the United States.
Defer enrolment?
The announcement on Chinese student visa holders came after the Trump administration ordered its missions worldwide to stop scheduling new appointments for student and exchange visitor visa applicants. If the visa appointment system is not resumed soon, Lainey wishes to defer enrolment for a year. 'Although everyone says the US admissions system may be biased against Chinese students, in reality US schools are indeed the top in terms of academic quality,' she said. 'I may also consider (applying to) some places outside the US, such as Europe, as well as Hong Kong and Singapore.'
The measures are a sign of the increasing spillover from a bruising trade war between the two global superpowers, and threaten to derail a fragile truce reached mid-May in Geneva. A Friday editorial by China's state-owned Global Times newspaper said the new visa measures raised 'the spectre of McCarthyism' and likened them to an 'educational witch-hunt'. 'In recent years, the suppression of Chinese students has increasingly become an important part of the US strategy to contain China,' the commentary said.
Potentially even more damaging than the immediate economic impact for the US could be a long-term erosion of the appeal of US universities and the subsequent brain drain. International students – 54 percent of them from India and China - contributed more than $50 billion to the US economy in 2023, according to the US Department of Commerce. 'If I really have to wait until 2026 to reapply, I might not have such positive feelings towards America,' said Lainey. 'If I can't even get a visa, then I'd have no choice but to go somewhere else.'— Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab Times
7 hours ago
- Arab Times
S.Korea's new president vows to pursue talks with North and bolster ties with US and Japan
SEOUL, South Korea, June 4, (AP): South Korea's new President Lee Jae-myung vowed Wednesday to restart dormant talks with North Korea and bolster a trilateral partnership with the US and Japan, as he laid out key policy goals for his single, five-year term. Lee, who rose from childhood poverty to become South Korea's leading liberal politician vowing to fight inequality and corruption, formally began his term earlier Wednesday, hours after winning a snap election that was triggered in April by the removal of then-President Yoon Suk Yeol over his ill-fated imposition of martial law late last year. In his inaugural address at the National Assembly, Lee said that his government will deal with North Korean nuclear threats and its potential military aggressions with "strong deterrence' based on the South Korea-US military alliance. But he said he would "open a communication channel with North Korea and establish peace on the Korean Peninsula through talks and cooperation.' He said he'll pursue pragmatic diplomacy with neighboring countries and boost trilateral Seoul-Washington-Tokyo cooperation. "Through pragmatic diplomacy based on national interests, we will turn the crisis posed by the major shift in global economic and security landscapes into an opportunity to maximize our national interests,' Lee said. It was unclear whether Lee's election would cause any major, immediate shift in South Korea's foreign policy. Lee, previously accused by critics of tilting toward China and North Korea and away from the U.S. and Japan, has recently repeatedly stressed South Korea's alliance with the US as the foundation of its foreign policy and avoided any contentious remarks that would raise questions on his views on the U.S. and Japan. "We'll have to now see if the pressures of office will cause Lee Jae-myung to govern from the center - at least when it comes to matters of national security and the alliance with the United States,' said Ankit Panda, an expert with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The toughest external challenges awaiting Lee are US President Donald Trump's tariff policy and North Korea's expanding military partnerships with Russia. But experts earlier said whoever becomes president can't do much to secure major progress in South Korea's favor on those issues. During his inauguration speech, Lee didn't directly mention trade issues with the U.S. The U.S. and Japan said they congratulated Lee's election and expressed their commitments to developing three-way cooperation.
Arab Times
7 hours ago
- Arab Times
Musk calls Trump's big tax break bill a ‘disgusting abomination,' testing his influence over GOP
WASHINGTON, June 4, (AP): Elon Musk blasted President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" of tax breaks and spending cuts as a "disgusting abomination" on Tuesday, testing the limits of his political influence as he targeted the centerpiece of Republicans' legislative agenda. The broadside, which Musk issued on his social media platform X, came just days after the president gave him a celebratory Oval Office farewell that marked the end of his work for the administration, where he spearheaded the Department of Government Efficiency. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk posted on X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' The legislation, which has passed the House and is currently under debate in the Senate, would curtail subsidies that benefit Tesla, Musk's electric automaker. The tech billionaire followed his criticism with a threat aimed at Republicans. "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' he wrote in another X post. It's a sharp shift for Musk, the world's richest person, who spent at least $250 million supporting Trump's campaign last year. He previously pledged to help defeat Republican lawmakers deemed insufficiently loyal to Trump, but now he's suggesting voting them out if they advance the president's legislative priority. However, it's unclear how Musk will follow through on his criticism. He recently said he would spend "a lot less' on political campaigns, though he left the door open to political involvement "if I see a reason." The tech titan's missives could cause headaches for Republicans on Capitol Hill, who face conflicting demands from Trump and their party's wealthiest benefactor. Alex Conant, a Republican strategist, said "it's not helpful' to have Musk criticizing the legislation, but he doesn't expect lawmakers to side with Musk over Trump. "Senate Republicans are not going to let the tax cuts expire,' Conant said. "It just makes leadership's job that much harder to wrangle the holdouts.' Trump can change the outcome in Republican primaries with his endorsements, but Musk doesn't wield that level of influence, Conant said. "No matter what Elon Musk or anybody else says - and I don't want to diminish him because I don't think that's fair - it's still going to be second fiddle to President Trump,' said Republican West Virginia Sen. Shelley Moore Capito. Musk's business interests stand to take a hit if lawmakers approve Trump's bill, which would slash funding for electric vehicles and related technologies. Musk is the chief executive of Tesla, the nation's largest electric vehicle manufacturer, and SpaceX, which has massive defense contracts. Last month, Musk said he was "disappointed' by the spending bill, a much milder criticism than the broadside he leveled Tuesday. The budget package seeks to extend tax cuts approved in 2017, during Trump's first term at the White House, and add new ones he campaigned on. It also includes a massive buildup of $350 billion for border security, deportations and national security.
Kuwait Times
12 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Global economy remains vulnerable to US tariffs
KUWAIT: The global economy remains vulnerable to US tariff policy with the recent US court developments injecting a new layer of uncertainty. In effect, as long as tariff cases are in front of the courts, not much progress can be expected in terms of US trade negotiations with trading partners. In the US, irrespective of court developments, the administration is sticking with its plans to impose tariffs, utilizing, if need be, other routes. In the Euro-zone, the ECB is set to cut rates again while the EU's trade negotiations with the US will likely be very difficult. In the UK, despite positive deal-making with the US/EU/India, the outlook is shaky amid limited policy support and global trade uncertainty. In Japan, soaring bond yields further complicate the BoJ's job and bring the public finances to the limelight. Finally, despite the recent heightened China-US tensions, a resumption of the de-escalatory bias between them will not be surprising. Irrespective of how the current tariff-related legal developments will unfold, the US administration will likely stick with its plans to impose tariffs, utilizing, if need be, several other routes. However, until the courts' final say on the current cases is clear, President Trump's bargaining power in his ongoing negotiations with the US's key trading partners is weakened substantially. Importantly, this means that not much can be expected from the US's trade negotiations with its main trading partners as long as the cases are in front of the courts. And while policy uncertainty has already been very high since Trump took office, another layer of court-related legal uncertainty has now been added. Court developments aside, a key date is July 9, which is the date when the pause on the 'reciprocal' tariffs would end. Earlier, the US and China had diffused their trade war, but negotiations have since stalled, and tensions re-escalated recently. While further escalation following the 90-day window is possible, we think the more plausible scenario is that a de-escalatory bias will resume as the world's two largest economies got a feel of the enormous economic damage that will ensue from a full-blown trade war. Meanwhile, the House passed the GOP's 'Big, Beautiful Bill', which is a step in the wrong direction given that it worsens an already unsustainable debt trajectory, although it is positive for economic growth in the short term. The bill is now in front of the Senate, where it is expected to undergo some amendments although it will very likely remain a debt-increasing bill. Meanwhile, GDP contracted in Q1 on tariff front-running, but the labor market remains broadly resilient with three-month average job gains at 155K/month. Hence, the Fed will likely remain in a wait-and-see mode while markets are currently pricing-in around two 25 bps rate cuts by year-end. In our view, a US recession will be avoided on condition that a major tariff escalation does not get re-ignited. The prior tariff de-escalation drove a V-shaped rebound in the S&P 500 index although the US dollar index remains 10 percent below a recent high reached in January. The Euro-zone economy started the year on a good note, growing by a higher-than-expected 0.3 percent q/q in Q1, strengthening from 0.2 percent in the previous quarter. Meanwhile, headline inflation is almost at target, standing at 2.2 percent y/y although further progress is needed in terms of core and services inflation. Nevertheless, more recent indicators are starting to reflect the tariff-related headwinds with the PMI dropping below 50 (49.5 in May) for the first time this year. The ECB has carried on with its easing policy, cutting rates seven times since June 2024, and near certain to cut again in its meeting this week. Despite the bank, back in March, dropping reference to their policy remaining 'restrictive', the futures market is still indicating additional one-to-two cuts in the second half of the year, reflecting the magnitude of the trade-related uncertainties ahead. Obviously, the EU's (US's largest trading partner) trade-related developments are a key factor shaping the outlook, especially following Trump's threat to hike the 'reciprocal' tariffs on the EU to 50 percent. Even if the courts upheld the initial ruling of blocking Trump's reciprocal tariffs, sectoral tariffs on autos and steel/aluminum (soon doubling) remain in place, while many other sectoral tariffs are in the pipeline, meaning that the Euro-zone will not be immune to further trade-related shocks. Irrespective of the court rulings, Trump's statements, on several occasions, exhibited high animosity towards the EU, which coupled with a high merchandise trade imbalance in favor of the EU, mean that US-EU negotiations will likely be very difficult. The structure of the EU, and its generally slow decision-making process, is another factor making these negotiations challenging. Having said that, EU officials have exhibited a strong preference not to escalate matters with the US. Notwithstanding an above-consensus GDP growth in Q1 (0.7 percent q/q), UK's outlook remains uninspiring as the rise came mainly on manufacturing and exports front-running US tariffs, while domestic consumption remained stagnant. The UK managed to strike a trade framework with the US, which should benefit UK auto exporters among others, but the 10 percent baseline tariff remained in place, the status of which is in front of the courts now. Talks are continuing to finalize details with still several key sticking points. In other positive developments, the UK successfully reset its post-Brexit trade ties with the EU and signed a long-awaited trade agreement with India. Despite these favorable trade-related developments, the Bank of England (BoE) warned of US' tariff policies and their indirect impact through disruptions to global supply chains. A continued subdued growth outlook would further pressure the public finances, noting that Chancellor Reeves, in March, had reduced some welfare and other spending items to help maintain her fiscal rule. Moreover, the hike in employers' national insurance contributions could continue to adversely impact employment levels. Accordingly, the BoE, in May, trimmed its growth forecast for the coming quarters, to only 0.1 percent q/q in Q2 and around 0.3 percent in Q3/Q4 while cutting the policy rate by 25 bps to 4.25 percent, but simultaneously guiding for 'a careful and gradual approach' and anticipating 'temporary' spikes in inflation over the coming months. CPI inflation jumped to a 15-month high of 3.5 percent y/y in April from 2.6 percent in March mainly on higher utility and other government fees, which the BoE does not expect to persist next year. Amid an uninspiring economic landscape but still elevated wage growth (5.6 percent y/y) and slow progress on services inflation (5.4 percent y/y), markets are currently pricing-in one to two 25 bps rate cuts by end-2025. Soaring bond yields in Japan further complicate BoJ's job and bring the public finances to the limelight. Japan's economy contracted by 0.2 percent q/q in Q1, its first decline in a year, driven by flattening consumption, a 0.6 percent q/q decrease in exports, and a sharp 2.9 percent rise in imports. Despite a robust 5.4 percent wage hike from the 2025 Shunto negotiations that built on a similar increase last year, real wages decreased in Q1, weighing on household spending while export performance deteriorated under the strain of US tariffs. Meanwhile, inflationary pressures continued with the core CPI (excluding fresh food) rising by 3.5 percent y/y in April, the highest since January 2023 with food inflation remaining particularly acute. In response to these challenges, the government recently rolled out a relief package worth JPY2.8 trillion ($20 billion) to support households grappling with the rising cost of living and to counter the negative impact of higher US tariffs. Trade negotiations with the US are continuing with the US-imposed 25 percent sectoral tariff on autos, a key sector for Japan, one of several important sticking points. Prime Minister Ishiba and President Trump are scheduled to meet in mid-June on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada, and agreeing on some sort of a trade framework by then remains a possibility although a limited one given the court developments in the US. Meanwhile, increasing fiscal vulnerabilities coupled with the Bank of Japan's (BoJ) ongoing tapering of bond purchases have contributed to pushing long-term bond yields to multi-year highs. This is putting the BoJ in an even more difficult position, which has already been grappling with major growth headwinds and inflation that has exceeded target for around three years. The steep rise in bond yields will strain public finances, dampen growth, and risk delivering large losses to institutional investors' balance sheets. Despite the headwinds, the Chinese economy grew 5.4 percent y/y in Q1, beating expectations and the 'around 5 percent' government's growth target for 2025. Exports continue to be a main growth driver, surging by 12 percent and 8 percent y/y in March and April, respectively, easily beating expectations as lower exports to the US were more than compensated by higher exports elsewhere, especially to East Asian countries. The prior de-escalation with the US, although supposedly temporary given the 90-day window, was a major relief. In our view, China has emerged having the upper hand as, even before the recent court rulings in the US, and excluding the original 20 percent fentanyl-related deemed tariffs, US tariffs on Chinese imports stood at 10 percent, equal to the Chinese tariffs on US imports. Comparatively, almost all countries globally were slapped with that 10 percent baseline US tariff, that none had retaliated against. While renewed escalation following the 90-day window is possible (especially given the current stalled negotiations), we think the more plausible scenario is that a de-escalatory bias will resume, as mentioned before. Prior to the de-escalation with the US, overall sentiment weakened with the official PMI decreasing to 50.2 in April with the manufacturing PMI falling to a 16-month low of 49.0, before both improved slightly in May. Meanwhile, domestic demand remains muted with CPI inflation in negative territory for the third straight month in April and the PPI in deflation for more than 2.5 years. Given the headwinds, the central bank eased policy in May, cutting several of its policy rates and the reserve requirement ratio, among other measures taken. Looking ahead, while a stronger fiscal and monetary policy support may be forthcoming, a sustained de-escalatory stance with the US will lower the scale of such support.
