Israeli air strike kills nine of Gaza doctor's 10 children
The children, aged 12 and under, were those of Dr Alaa al-Najjar, who was at work when she received the news, according to Ali al-Najjar, her brother-in-law.
After rushing back to her family home, she witnessed the charred bodies of four of her children being pulled out the rubble.
'They weren't just burned, they were roasted. No face, no hands, no back,' said Mr Najjar, who was also helping at the scene.
The tragedy comes as Israel's relationship with its allies plunges to new lows since it began its war in Gaza.
France, the UK and Canada have in recent weeks issued their strongest condemnation yet for the brutality of Israel's offensive, while Donald Trump's decision to avoid visiting Israel on a trip to the Middle East suggests he is also losing patience with the Israeli leader.
Friday's attack happened in the Khan Younis minutes after Dr Hamdi al-Najjar, their father, returned from driving their mother to work at the city's Nasser Hospital, according to Ali al-Najjar, Hamdi's brother.
Dr Hamdi Najjar, also a doctor at the hospital, was critically wounded with a head injury.
Ahmad al-Farra, the head of the hospital's paediatrics department, said: 'It is unbelievable.
'You can't imagine the shock that [Dr Najjar] had when she heard about that [attack]. But up until now, she is trying to be near her son and her husband to survive.'
Adam, the surviving child, 11, underwent surgery for severe injuries including lacerations and his left arm that was nearly severed, said Graeme Groom, a British surgeon who operated on the boy.
'His left arm was just about hanging off, he was covered in fragment injuries,' Mr Groom said, adding that Adam was 'quite small' for his age.
'Since both his parents are doctors, he seemed to be among the privileged group within Gaza, but as we lifted him onto the operating table, he felt much younger than 11.'
Mr Groom said in an interview with the BBC: 'Our little boy could survive, but we don't know about his father.'
Colleagues of the couple told media outlets that the family had no ties to Hamas.
Mr Groom said he had been told the father had 'no political and no military connections and doesn't seem to be prominent on social media'.
Dr Hamdi Najjar was also seriously wounded and suffered what Mr Groom described as a 'penetrating injury to his head'. Hospital officials said both the father and surviving son were injured but alive.
A spokesman for Gaza's Hamas-run civil defence, said that rescue teams had found eight bodies and several injured people after a strike on the al-Najjar family home near a petrol station.
A hospital first reported on Facebook that eight children were killed, then later said the number had risen to nine.
Dr Youssef Abu al-Rish, speaking for the Hamas-run health ministry, said he saw Dr Alaa Najjar in the operating room waiting for news about her surviving son and tried to comfort her.
Youssef al-Najjar, a relative to the family, said in an interview: 'Enough. Have mercy on us. We plead to all countries, the international community, the people, Hamas, and all factions to have mercy.
'We are exhausted from displacement and hunger.'
The Israel Defence Forces said its aircraft had struck 'a number of suspects who were identified operating from a structure adjacent to IDF troops in the area of Khan Younis'.
The military added 'the claim regarding harm to uninvolved civilians is under review'.
In a statement, the IDF said the Khan Younis area was 'a dangerous war zone' and that it had evacuated civilians from the area before beginning operations for their safety.
Hamas described the air strike as 'a horrific massacre'.
Francesca Albanese, the UN's special rapporteur for the occupied Palestinian territories, called the attack part of a 'distinguishable sadistic pattern of the new phase of the genocide'.
Antonio Guterres, the UN secretary-general, warned that Gaza is facing what could be the 'cruellest phase' of the war and criticised Israel's restrictions on aid.
Israel had blocked food, fuel, medicine and other supplies from entering Gaza for nearly three months, worsening the humanitarian crisis for 2.3 million Palestinians.
The country partially lifted the blockade last week, with 83 trucks carrying flour, food, medical equipment and pharmaceutical drugs entering Gaza on Friday.
However, the UN has repeatedly said the amount of aid delivered into Gaza has been insufficient, calling for 500 to 600 trucks daily compared to current levels.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Major study uncovers health risks of vaping for young people
A new study has revealed the health risks associated with children who vape. Children who engage in vaping are more likely to go on to be smokers, be diagnosed with asthma and have poor mental health. The largest global review on vaping in young people found 'consistent evidence' that children who vape are three times more likely to go on to become smokers. The study also pointed to links between vaping and increased odds of respiratory illness and substance abuse including drinking and marijuana use. Experts from the University of York and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) analysed all available reviews on youth vaping – also known as an umbrella review. This including 56 reviews on 384 studies. Some 21 of these looked at use of e-cigarettes among young people and later cigarette smoking. Not only were vapers more likely to smoke in later life, they were also more likely to smoke more frequently and intensely, experts said. Researchers also tracked breathing problems linked to youth vaping. The data suggested an increased risk among young people who vape of developing asthma or asthma exacerbation. Other harmful outcomes linked to youth vaping included pneumonia, bronchitis, lower total sperm counts, dizziness, headaches and migraines. There was also a link identified between depression and suicidal thoughts among young vapers. Writing in the journal Tobacco Control, the authors said the data available 'consistently indicated a significant association between e-cigarette use and later cigarette smoking in young people'. They said that it is difficult to 'infer causality' from their review, but said the 'repeated strong associations in prospective cohort studies are consistent with a causal relationship'. Dr Su Golder, associate professor in health science at the University of York, said: 'The consistency in the evidence is striking. 'Across multiple studies, young people who use e-cigarettes are more likely to smoke in the future. These findings support stronger public health measures to protect teens from the risks associated with vaping.' Dr Greg Hartwell, clinical assistant professor at LSHTM, said: 'We found consistent evidence around transitions to smoking which of course, in turn, opens the door to the multitude of harms that conventional cigarettes bring. 'As the UK Government's chief medical officer states, marketing vapes to children is always unacceptable, and our review shows exactly why further restrictions on the tobacco industry, who control the vaping market, are so important.' Dr Rebecca Glover, senior author of the study, assistant professor at LSHTM, added: 'Vaping is having a detrimental impact on the health of young people globally and vaping appears to be a gateway to other substances. 'Our study provides the strongest evidence to date that young people globally face a serious range of physical and psychological harms from vaping and are at higher risk of transitioning to smoking.' In June the ban on disposable vapes was introduced in a bid to curb their use among young people. The crackdown on the devices, also known as single-use vapes, makes it illegal for any retailer – ranging from corner shops to supermarkets – to sell them. The ban applies to both online and in-store sales across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and all disposable vapes whether or not they contain nicotine. Retailers are still allowed to sell reusable vapes. Commenting on the study, Jamie Strachan, operations director at VPZ, said: 'Vaping is intended solely for existing adult smokers as a less harmful alternative to combustible tobacco. It should never be marketed to, sold to, or used by children and non-smokers. 'VPZ supports strict regulation that prevents under-18s from obtaining vaping products.' Dr James Murphy, director of science and research at British American Tobacco (BAT), said: 'There is little evidence that vaping is a gateway to smoking. In fact, it has helped millions of adults move away from cigarettes. 'While not risk-free, experts agree it poses only a fraction of the risks of smoking. 'Smart regulation that gives adults access to better alternatives, while enforcing high standards and preventing under-age use, is vital to achieving the UK's smoke-free goal.'
The Sun
16 hours ago
- The Sun
Tragedy as man dies outside city centre Primark store in front of horrified shoppers
A MAN has tragically died after suffering a medical emergency in a busy shopping centre. Paramedics rushed to Broadgate, in Coventry, yesterday morning following reports of a man suffering a cardiac arrest. 1 Horrified shoppers dialled 999 just after 9am yesterday, with emergency crews arriving in minutes. A cordon was put in place in the middle of the busy shopping centre, with shops taped off from the public. Cops were seen performing CPR on a man near Primark before paramedics were able to take over. He was rushed to the local University Hospital Coventry, receiving advanced life support en route. Despite the best efforts of medical teams, the man was sadly pronounced dead upon arrival at A&E. A spokesman for West Midlands Ambulance Service said: 'We were called to reports of a medical emergency outside Primark on Broadgate, Coventry, at 9.08am today (August 18). "Crews arrived to find police officers performing CPR and using a defibrillator on a man in cardiac arrest. 'Ambulance staff quickly took over resuscitation efforts and continued advanced life support on the man en route to University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire. "Sadly, nothing could be done to save him, and the man was confirmed deceased on arrival in A&E.'
The Guardian
17 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Too hungry to think, too weak to sit upright. Concentration slips away': the struggle to stay focussed as an academic in Gaza
I must admit: I write this piece while starving – too hungry to think clearly, too weak to sit upright for long. I do not feel ashamed because my starvation is deliberate. I refuse my hunger even as it decays me. I can survive no other way. Since 2 March 2025, Israel has imposed a full blockade on Gaza. Little aid – food, medicine, fuel – is getting in or being distributed. The markets are empty and bakeries, community kitchens and fuel stations are shuttered. On 27 July, the World Health Organization confirmed 74 deaths from 'malnutrition' in Gaza this year – 63 of them in July. Among the dead are 24 children under the age of five and one older child. Starvation is avalanching, nearly unstoppable. A trickle of aid was dropped. The humanitarian agency Médecins Sans Frontières has called these airdrops 'notoriously ineffective and dangerous'. The distribution points of US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation have been denounced as 'death traps', the UN warning that the system violates humanitarian principles and has cost more lives than it has saved. Famine is no longer a threat – it is here. Some days, my stomach cramps as I try to revise a single paragraph. My fingers feel dry and achy, parched from lack of fluids. Hunger is loud. I read, but hunger is shouting in my ear. I write, but the maw snaps with every keystroke. And when I try to still myself, to think in the meagre pleasures of drone-infused quiet, my mind floats: what rabbit hole could I be down if I were in a library? Oh, for a coffee in between articles. A sandwich in between sentences. A snack alongside a lazy perusal of the latest issue of TESOL Quarterly. I wonder: how can I keep my mind sharp when my body has gone so thin and dehydrated? The hunger starts with a rumble, and it spreads so quickly. My legs barely carry me to the nearest internet cafe. There, I try to keep up with work and commitments, charge my devices, and catch a brief connection to the outside world. But with a heavy laptop bag on my shoulder, the journey feels less like a short walk and more like crossing a desert. Some days, survival comes down to a single sachet of Plumpy'Nut, a peanut-based nutrient paste usually distributed for free in famine zones, but here sold for about $3.50, a price many can no longer afford. If you are more fortunate, you might buy a few overpriced fortified biscuits. But the problem is not just paying for food. It is about accessing money in the first place. With every bank in Gaza damaged and not a single functioning ATM left, cash has become both scarce and essential. Online transactions, or Eftpos, are not common here – almost all purchases depend on cash. After nearly two years of war, banknotes are torn and worn, and often rejected in shops. Getting money from your own account can be exploitative: withdrawing through an informal money exchange outside standard bank processes can cost up to 50% in commission. This deeply contradicts the spirit of Gaza – known for its generosity, where neighbours always looked after one another, and where, for as long as many of us can remember, no one went to bed hungry if someone else had food to share. That spirit has not vanished. People still share what little they have. But the scale of deprivation has grown so severe that even the most generous hands are now often empty. Families go to bed hungry and wake up hungry. One day in particular, I had been working nonstop, pushing through dizziness and exhaustion. By the time I reached the stairs to my apartment, my legs were barely holding me up. My blood sugar had crashed. I collapsed just as I reached my bedroom. I was rushed to the nearest GP, where I was given an IV [intravenous fluids] to stabilise me. The next morning, I was back at work. Not because I had recovered, but because I felt I could not afford to stop. There were interviews to conduct and transcribe, students to support, messages that needed to be sent. The urgency to bear witness outweighed the need to rest. This is not about ego. It is about refusing to disappear. About resisting the slow erasure that comes with war and famine. About insisting that our thoughts and our work continue, even when it must be done in the ruins. In Gaza, to be an academic today is to refuse to be reduced to a statistic. There are days when continuing feels impossible. The body simply gives out. Reading leaves me light-headed. Concentration slips away. Teaching becomes a battle to remain coherent. And beyond the physical toll, there is another erosion – of identity. As scholars, we are meant to cultivate emancipatory and liberatory thinking among our students. But when our daily realities are hunger, grief and displacement, we begin to question whether we are still fulfilling that role. What does it mean to be a scholar when the conditions needed to think, teach and create are stripped away? What does academic freedom mean when intellectual, political and pedagogical freedom is restricted by siege? What does it mean to mentor youth towards critical inquiry when we ourselves are battling to stay upright? These questions linger, not as abstract concerns but as lived tensions. Still, we carry on. Because to stop would be to relinquish one of the last remnants of our agency. Sign up to Global Dispatch Get a different world view with a roundup of the best news, features and pictures, curated by our global development team after newsletter promotion I often find myself caught between two difficult choices in the classroom: either avoid discussing the crisis, fearing retraumatising my students; or confront it directly, opening space for collective reflection. Both paths are fraught, yet driven by the same hope – to use education not only to inform, but to liberate in helping students believe their voices still matter. The work goes on. Research calls. Project check-ins. Webinars. Recorded lectures. Training sessions, though they must often pause. This is our reality. Still, we show up: attending classes, writing proposals, giving talks, joining conferences, publishing. Not because we are strong or brave, but because we believe in the transformative power of education. And because to stop would be to give in to silence. Yet, the most basic truth remains difficult to say aloud: we are hungry. Not by accident, but by design. When did naming that become taboo? For days, split lentils have been my only meal. Finding flour is a scavenger hunt. And when we do manage to gather ingredients, baking over an open fire is exhausting, physically and emotionally. We burn wood from broken furniture to make bread. Used notebooks and scrap paper become fuel; otherwise, we must buy wood just to finish the job. This is not just about hunger. It is about being forced to fight for survival in silence. Lighting a fire is a daunting challenge. Matches have run out. Lighters are nearly impossible to replace – and when one is available, it can be prohibitively expensive. Those who still have a working lighter refill it cautiously with small amounts of gas. In many cases, families or neighbours share a single flame, passing it from household to household – another quiet act of solidarity and enduring spirit. So we keep documenting. Not out of heroism, but to remain present. Because behind every report, every footnote, every lecture lies a deeper truth: knowledge is still being produced in Gaza. Even now. Especially now. What does solidarity mean when some of us must think, teach and work while starving? What does inclusion mean when access to food, water and safety determines who gets to take part? This is not a call for charity. It is a call to face an uncomfortable truth: solidarity is meaningless if it does not name – and challenge – the systems that keep people excluded while they struggle to survive under siege, occupation and deliberate deprivation. True solidarity means asking hard questions: Who gets to speak? Who is heard? Who can keep learning and imagining a future when bombs fall and hunger bites? Solidarity means changing the way the world works with those in crisis: adapting deadlines, waiving fees, opening access to books and journals, and making space for voices from Gaza and beyond – not as victims but as equal partners. It means understanding that grief, hunger and destroyed infrastructure are not 'disruptions' to work – they are our current conditions of life. To generate knowledge in the context of hunger is to think through pain. To teach students who have not eaten and still tell them their voices matter. To insist, against all odds, that Gaza still thinks, still questions, still creates. That, in itself, is an act of resistance. Ahmed Kamal Junina is an assistant professor of applied linguistics and head of the English department at Al-Aqsa University in Gaza and a fellow at Bristol University's Centre for Comparative and International Research in Education
