Exclusive: Brazil lawmaker Eduardo Bolsonaro warns of more US sanctions, maybe tariffs
In an interview at the Reuters bureau in Washington after meetings with senior U.S. officials, the lawmaker said he saw no way for Brazil to negotiate a lower U.S. tariff on its exports without concessions from the Brazilian Supreme Court.
"The Supreme Court justices have to understand they've lost power," he said. "There is no scenario where the Supreme Court emerges victorious from this whole imbroglio. They're in conflict with the greatest economic power in the world."
The younger Bolsonaro's advocacy in Washington has put him at the center of bilateral tensions after U.S. President Donald Trump slapped a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods and financial sanctions on the Brazilian judge overseeing prosecution of the elder Bolsonaro, demanding an end to a "witch hunt" against the former president.
"I think he's an honest man... This is really a political execution that they're trying to do with Bolsonaro," Trump told reporters on Thursday.
Jair Bolsonaro is currently on trial before Brazil's top court over an alleged plot to overturn the 2022 election that he lost. He denies any wrongdoing.
Eduardo Bolsonaro described the U.S. tariffs on Brazilian beef, coffee, fish, footwear and other goods as "bitter medicine" aimed at curbing what he called an out-of-check legal offensive against his father.
"I've told everyone trying to approach this only through the lens of trade: it won't work. There needs to be a signal first to the U.S. that we're resolving our institutional crisis," he said.
The U.S. State Department ratcheted up pressure on Wednesday, moving to revoke and restrict visas on government officials and their family members from countries including Brazil due to their ties with an exchange program involving Cuban doctors.
Eduardo Bolsonaro said he expects those restrictions will soon hit Health Minister Alexandre Padilha and probably leftist ex-President Dilma Rousseff for their roles in the program.
Rousseff was the chief of staff and successor to current President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva when his second term ended in 2010. Representatives for Padilha and Rousseff did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Lula has dismissed Trump's demands as an affront to national sovereignty and said he has refused to "humiliate" himself with a call to the White House. In a Reuters interview last week, he called Eduardo Bolsonaro and his father "traitors" for courting Trump's intervention.
Brazil's top court is investigating both Bolsonaros over their appeals to Trump. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has increased pressure on the former president, putting him under house arrest and forbidding contact with his son in the U.S. or foreign officials.
In Thursday's interview in Washington, Eduardo Bolsonaro said he expected a U.S. response to that crackdown, including sanctions against Viviane Barci de Moraes, a high-powered Brazilian attorney married to Justice Moraes.
Bolsonaro also said he could see more tariffs on Brazilian goods on the way.
"I could expect more tariffs, because Brazilian authorities have not changed their behaviors," he said.
The Brazilian lawmaker, who moved in March to the United States in an effort to garner Trump's support for his father, said he had been advocating for sanctions targeting Moraes and his family, with tariffs as a "last resort."
He said immediate U.S. sanctions against other Supreme Court justices seemed unlikely, given the focus on isolating Moraes, whom he called a "gangster," a "psychopath" and a "mafioso."
The Supreme Court did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Moraes has described his rulings, which have been upheld by the wider court, as a defense of Brazilian democracy under constitutional law.
In an interview with Reuters last month, Jair Bolsonaro said he expected his son to seek U.S. citizenship to avoid returning to Brazil.
The younger Bolsonaro declined to comment on the details of his immigration status, but said he and his family had permission to stay in the United States "for a good while," and left the door open to seeking asylum and eventually citizenship.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Mogul who backed Boston's woke Dem mayor outraged after she erected BIKE LANE outside his mansion
A construction mogul who was once an ardent supporter of Boston's woke mayor has turned against her after the city built a bike lane right outside his mansion. Jay Cashman, 72, poured millions into Mayor Michelle Wu's election in 2021, but became outraged when the new two-lane bike path was erected outside his $19 million mansion on Dartmouth Street last year, according to the Boston Globe. It was just part of Wu's plans to build an an elaborate cycling network around the city, as she doubled the number of dedicated bike lanes in Boston since she took office to 15 miles. Her administration had identified Dartmouth Street 'as a bike corridor project' because it provides direct access to the Charles River Esplanade, which city officials called a 'daily destination for residents, commuters and visitors alike.' But Cashman has argued that these new bike lanes were hastily built and ignored critics' concerns, which ranged from safety risks, loss of parking spaces, more congested street traffic and slower response times for emergency vehicles. 'I'm for bike lanes, but I'm for bike lanes that basically are safe,' he told the Globe as he cycled through the city himself. The mogul is now using his wealth and resources to fight the mayor's plans to expand the bike network even further. He founded an advocacy group called Pedal Safe Boston and is convening neighborhood groups and meeting with lawmakers about legislative fixes to create bike lane standards. The millionaire has also spent a whopping $100,000 to evaluate whether a statewide ballot measure to regulate bike lanes would be a more effective way to make city streets safer. He is even backing a plan for city officials to consider removing or altering the bike lanes Wu's administration created and set new rules for them moving forward. Until then, Cashman argues, any construction on new bike lanes should be paused. The proposal is being backed by Democrat mayoral challenger Josh Kraft - the son of New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft. 'We really need to take the time to study how they impact business and figure out where to put them,' he explained to Bloomberg. Kraft has seized on the issue of Wu's bike lane rollout as an example of how the mayor does not listen to criticism and is out of touch with the business community. Advertisements and text messages from a super PAC endorsing Kraft have called the bike lanes a 'disaster' and proof that Wu's plans 'only make things worse' for the city. The messaging seems to resonate with at least some voters, as a February poll from Emerson College found nearly half of all registered Boston voters think the city has too many bike lanes. Another 35 percent said they believed the city has enough bike lanes and just 17 percent said there were too few. But cycling enthusiasts are wary of Cashman's motives. Someone even set up a website with his organization's name, describing it as a 'scam.' They say creating more bike lanes makes cyclists safer and are frustrated that Cashman has not worked with them to come up with a solution. 'I would just wish that Pedal Safe Boston would engage in the conversations already taking place as opposed to throwing stones from the outside,' said Galen Mook, executive director of MassBike - a nonprofit that advocates for improving bike infrastructure. 'There's a little bit of privilege with the Pedal Safe Boston team because they have influence and money,' he continued. 'They haven't actually gone through the literal decades' worth of work of how the city has been putting down bike lanes.' The Wu administration has also defended the bike lanes she put up and is continuing to advocate for even more bike lanes, with nearly two miles planned in Cashman's neighborhood in the next few years. She claims the bike lanes make roads safer, pointing to city data showing that crashes have declined by 51 percent on streets where bikers and drivers are separated by posts or other barriers. Advocates also argue that bike lanes can boost store traffic as cyclists take breaks. At a business forum in June, Wu likened the city's new bike lanes to a family rearranging furniture. 'Once you move it around, it's always going to feel very weird because you are so used to how it was before,' she said. 'Sometimes, you need to live in it a little bit to see if that actually works.' City officials have also noted that they held more than 50 public meetings on roadway projects last year, and amid the criticism, the Wu administration has taken down some flex posts - plastic bollards that act more as a visual cue than a physical barrier to protect bikers. David Wean, a member of the Boston Cyclists Union, also acknowledged that there are some issues - like when a lane abruptly ends and bikers are forced into the middle of car traffic. Still, he argues that much of the new infrastructure has made the streets safer as he railed against Cashman's plans for a pause. 'Insisting on absolutely complete, rigorous data is just a way of stalling it,' Wean said. Business owners, though, seem to be taking Cashman and Kraft's side in the debate. Meg Mainzer-Cohen, the president and executive director of the Back Bay Association, for example, claims the once business-friendly neighborhood has become a hazard for storefronts and delivery trucks. Bike lanes 'basically drove a stake into the functionality of the whole neighborhood.' In the Brighton neighborhood, business owner Richie Singh said he also saw his revenue decline 40 percent year-over-year after the bike lanes went up late last year. Some of his best customers were slapped with $100 parking tickets for blocking bike lanes. Worst of all, he said, he only sees two or three cyclists utilizing the new lane each day.
The Guardian
5 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Pam Bondi threatens prosecution for leaders not complying with immigration officers
Pam Bondi, the attorney general, said Thursday she has sent 'sanctuary city' letters to the mayors of 32 cities and a handful of county executives, warning that she intends to prosecute political leaders who are not in her view sufficiently supportive of immigration enforcement. 'You better be abiding by our federal policies and with our federal law enforcement, because if you're not, we're going to come after you,' she said, speaking to a Fox News reporter. 'Our leaders have to support our law enforcement.' Bondi's letter asks the recipients to provide a response by 19 August that 'confirms your commitment with complying with federal law and identifies the immediate initiatives you are taking to eliminate laws, policies and practices that impede federal immigration enforcement'. Bondi cites an executive order issued by Donald Trump on 28 April which called for the attorney general to identify jurisdictions that 'obstruct the enforcement of Federal immigration laws' then to 'notify each sanctuary jurisdiction regarding its defiance of Federal immigration law enforcement and any potential violations of Federal criminal law' as a precursor to prosecution or withholding grants. Each of the recipients appears to have received a near-identical letter, none of which specify what local laws or practices fail to comply with Bondi's assertions. Initial responses from state and local governments receiving the letters include a mix of incredulity and defiance. 'Nothing in Attorney General Bondi's letter is new and none of it has legal merit,' said Barbara Pierce, director of communications for the city of Rochester, New York. 'The letter reiterates many of the frivolous arguments that the federal government has already made in its pending suit against the City of Rochester. These same arguments were levied against the City of Chicago and were dismissed by the Federal District court for the Eastern District of Illinois nearly a month ago. We look forward to the opportunity to respond to Attorney General Bondi's letter, and continue to underscore the inaccuracies of the federal government's position.' Bruce Harrell, the Seattle mayor, said the letter's portrayal of his city and its laws was untruthful. 'Immigration enforcement is the exclusive responsibility of the federal government. The City neither interferes with nor carries out those federal duties,' he said. 'We have received and are reviewing the latest letter from Attorney General Bondi and strongly disagree with its assertions. Our laws and policies protect the safety, privacy and constitutional rights of all Seattle residents while remaining compliant with applicable law. We remain committed to our local values, including being a welcoming city for all. We will continue to defend our residents and our rights – and we will not hesitate to do so in court.' The office of Eric Adams, the New York City mayor, a Trump ally and embattled re-election candidate, offered a less strident immediate response. 'The job of a mayor is to protect the safety of every single person in their city – and that's exactly what Mayor Adams has worked to do every day for nearly four years,' said Kayla Altus, Adams' press secretary. 'Keeping New Yorkers safe also means making sure they feel safe, and Mayor Adams has been clear: no one should be afraid to dial 911, send their kids to school, or go to the hospital, and no New Yorker should feel forced to hide in the shadows. 'That's why the mayor supports the essence of the local laws put in place by the city council, but he has also urged the council to reexamine them to ensure we can effectively work with the federal government to keep violent criminals off our streets.' The letters follow the publication of a revised 'sanctuary jurisdiction' list on 5 August . The Department of Homeland Security withdrew a previous list after an outcry from rural sheriff's offices and conservative jurisdictions that argued the list was created without input from sheriffs and 'violated the core principles of trust, cooperation, and partnership with fellow law enforcement'.
The Guardian
8 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Alleged DC sandwich-thrower worked at justice department, attorney general says
The US attorney general, Pam Bondi, announced on Thursday that the man facing a felony assault charge for allegedly throwing a sandwich at a federal law enforcement officer in Washington DC worked at the Department of Justice. In a statement posted on social media, Bondi said that the man, identified in court documents as 37-year-old Sean Charles Dunn, has since been fired. 'If you touch any law enforcement officer, we will come after you. I just learned that this defendant worked at the Department of Justice – NO LONGER. Not only is he FIRED, he has been charged with a felony,' Bondi wrote. 'This is an example of the Deep State we have been up against for seven months as we work to refocus DOJ. You will NOT work in this administration while disrespecting our government and law enforcement.' Dunn served as an international affairs specialist in the criminal division of the office of international affairs at the Department of Justice, according to CNN. On Wednesday night, the FBI director, Kash Patel, said that Dunn had been charged with felony assault on a federal officer. In court documents, authorities say that the incident occurred on Sunday night on 14th Street in north-west DC. They say that Dunn approached and confronted a group of US Customs and Border Protection officers who were patrolling the area. Authorities claim that Dunn pointed his finger in an officer's face and yelled, 'Fuck you! You fucking fascists! Why are you here? I don't want you in my city,' before 'winding his arm back and forcefully throwing sub-style sandwich' at an officer. Authorities said that Dunn then attempted to flee on foot but was apprehended. During processing, authorities say that Dunn confessed to the incident and told the officers, 'I did it. I threw a sandwich,' according to court documents. The incident was captured on video, which has since gone viral. In the footage, a man can be seen yelling 'You see these fascists? Fuck you!' and 'Shame!' at a group of officers patrolling the area before throwing a wrapped sub-style sandwich at one of them. He is then chased by the officers. The US attorney for the District of Columbia, Jeanine Pirro, who was recently confirmed to the position, announced the charges against Dunn on Wednesday. 'This guy thought it was funny – well, he doesn't think it's funny today, because we charged him with a felony,' the former Fox News host said. The incident came several days after Donald Trump ordered federal officers to start sweeping the streets of Washington DC, in what the White House said was part of an effort to crack down on violent crime, despite statistics showing that the city's violent crime rate hit a 30-year low in 2024. On Monday, one day after the sandwich incident, Trump announced that he was deploying the national guard in Washington DC and seizing control of the city's police force. National guard troops began deploying across the city on Tuesday night.
