Maybank downgrades Malaysia's Tan Chong Motor to ‘sell' amid widening losses, competition
[SINGAPORE] Maybank Investment Bank has downgraded Malaysia's Tan Chong Motor (TCM) to 'sell', from 'hold' previously, amid widening losses, weak product appeal and intensifying competition.
Despite the downgrade, Maybank maintained its target price for the Bursa-listed company at RM0.38, based on an unchanged 0.1 times its forecast book value for FY2025.
TCM is the franchise holder for Nissan in Malaysia and Indo-China, as well as Renault in Malaysia and MG in Vietnam.
In a report on Monday (May 26), Maybank analyst Loh Yan Jin cited increased downside risks following a recent rally in TCM's share price as the reasons for downgrading its call on the automotive company. The stock has climbed nearly 60 per cent from its 52-week low of RM0.29 to RM0.46 in recent months.
'We believe downside risks have increased following the recent rally in share price,' Loh said.
TCM reported a core net loss of RM44.5 million (S$13.5 million) for the first quarter of 2025, more than double the RM18.3 million loss recorded in the same period a year earlier.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Commenting on TCM's widening year-on-year losses, Loh said the latest results were in line with Maybank's full-year forecast of a RM147.3 million loss, but came in below the consensus estimate of a RM129.4 million loss.
Revenue for Q1 2025 slipped 2 per cent to RM553 million, weighed down by continued weakness in Nissan sales, which plunged 21 per cent year on year to 1,811 units.
However, Loh said the weakness in Malaysia was partially offset by growth in TCM's overseas operations, including Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar.
On a quarter-on-quarter basis, TCM's Q1 2025 revenue rose 8.2 per cent from RM511.2 million in Q4 2024, supported by a 22 per cent increase in Nissan sales in Malaysia and higher vehicle assembly and manufacturing activity.
Loh attributed this to a rebound from 'seasonally softer' year-end sales, which had been affected by intense promotions and competing model launches.
As a result, core net loss for Q1 2025 narrowed by 29 per cent to RM44.5 million from RM62.9 million in Q4 2024.
'Looking ahead, we expect challenges in TCM's automotive segment to persist, underpinned by weak product appeal and intensifying market competition,' Loh said.
'Soft consumer sentiment and unattractive model launches will further weigh down its earnings.'
A key re-rating catalyst, she added, would be stronger sales from new product launches or contract assembly deals, but 'visibility remains limited for now'.
'Improved operational efficiencies and better inventory management could also help enhance margins and profitability,' she said.
As at 4 pm on Tuesday, shares of TCM are trading RM0.455.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
35 minutes ago
- Straits Times
askST Jobs: What to do if it seems like you're sidelined from the start at a new job
While prolonged inactivity in a new job can quickly turn confusing and demoralising, there are valid reasons why a new hire might not be assigned work from the outset. ST ILLUSTRATION: LEE YU HUI askST Jobs: What to do if it seems like you're sidelined from the start at a new job In this series, manpower correspondent Tay Hong Yi offers practical answers to candid questions on navigating workplace challenges and getting ahead in your career. Get more tips by signing up to The Straits Times' Headstart newsletter. Q: I just took up a new job, but my boss isn't assigning me any tasks nor training. Am I being set up to fail? A: While prolonged inactivity in a new job can quickly turn confusing and demoralising, there are valid reasons why a new hire might not be assigned work from the outset, says Mr Alvin Goh, chief executive of the Singapore Human Resources Institute. 'Sometimes, the hiring manager is not ready for the new joiner to start due to internal delays or restructuring.' Teams might need longer to integrate new hires than the timeline the human resources department has in mind, especially in multinational companies and those with complex reporting structures that interlace across seniority levels and departments, he adds. Echoing his views, Ms Loh Kaili, associate director at BTI Executive Search, says: 'Sometimes, new hires come in during a messy period when projects are stalled, headcounts were approved prematurely or teams are being restructured. 'Hiring managers may not know what to do next and will keep things at status quo.' New employees might also need to clock milestones such as probation evaluations or study modules before they can be assigned tasks, or in the case of some sensitive industries, clear security checks, both experts add. However, Mr Goh notes all these are typically short-term scenarios that should be resolved within weeks, not months. When someone repeatedly gets turned away after asking to contribute and offering their expertise over a prolonged period, it may point to a structural dysfunction or existence of personal bias against them, he adds. Some bosses may also be insecure, fearing that a new hire could grow to replace them, and intentionally set the new hire up for failure, Ms Loh notes. Still, feeling threatened by subordinates is definitely not a valid reason to withhold work, she adds. Mr Goh suggests that workers who have not received any assignments or training for more than several weeks should request a meeting with either the HR team, or a leader one level above their direct boss. However, he advises workers to signal their commitment to growing and contributing in their role, rather than complaining right away in the first such meeting. New hires should initiate structured conversations with their manager to hash out clear priorities and performance targets, says Ms Loh. She also suggests workers keep a record of their attempts to proactively request for work and seek clarity on their position. 'I would recommend the new hire to give himself or herself a clear timeline of around two to three months to observe if there is any improvement to the situation.' If there is no improvement, and workers quit within three months with little to no work experience to show for it, they may omit the stint from their curriculum vitae, she adds. Mr Goh also encourages job seekers to pre-empt any potential issues by asking prospective employers questions about what success looks like in the new job, what the onboarding experience will involve and what support is given to ensure new joiners start well. 'These questions not only help you gauge how prepared the team is, but they also signal that you are not just looking for a job but a meaningful runway to contribute.' Mr Jason Chua, a former assistant registrar at the Employment Claims Tribunals, who now teaches law at Temasek Polytechnic, says that it is possible, but unlikely, that withholding work or training amounts to constructive dismissal. Constructive dismissal is a type of unfair dismissal in which an employee is found to not have resigned voluntarily, but was forced to do so due to the action or inaction of an employer. Mr Chua notes that work may not be explicitly assigned to you because your employer might expect new employees to take the time to get to know their colleagues, observe them at work and understand where they fit into the work of the company. He also suggests that new joiners compare their workload with peers in the team, and ask their bosses if they could also help with the work their peers are doing. However, should employers or managers make explicit indications or statements that they are withholding work or training to drive an employee out of the role, Mr Chua suggests the employee could collate and gather evidence of such behaviour and words. 'This helps the employee to build a case to show that the employer, through his words or conduct, is seeking to drive the employee out of employment and, therefore, constructively dismiss the employee. 'If the employee can prove that he or she has been constructively dismissed, he or she can stop work, resign and claim for salary in lieu of notice from the employer.' Employers who have withheld work or training due to reasons such as an employee's nationality and age may also fall afoul of upcoming workplace fairness laws, Mr Chua adds. Have a question? Send it to askst@ Check out the Headstart chatbot for answers to your questions on careers and work trends.
Business Times
2 days ago
- Business Times
Stonepeak said to be in exclusive talks for RM9 billion buyout of Yinson
STONEPEAK Partners is in exclusive talks for a buyout of Yinson Holdings that may value the firm at as much as RM9 billion (S$2.73 billion), according to people with knowledge of the matter, in what could be one of the biggest deals in Malaysia this year. New York-based Stonepeak is teaming up with the Lim family, Yinson's founder and biggest shareholder, to take the Kuala-Lumpur-listed energy infrastructure company private, said the people, asking not to be identified because the discussions aren't public. The Lim family owned 26.6 per cent of Yinson as at May 30. Considerations are ongoing and there is no certainty a deal will be reached, the people said. Yinson's shares jumped as much as 14 per cent following the Bloomberg News report on the talks, the biggest intraday gain since June 2019. That cut the year-to-date loss from 20 per cent as at Thursday's close and lifted Yinson's market value to about RM6.5 billion. Representatives for the Lim family and Yinson declined to comment. Stonepeak didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. Founded in the 1980s as a transport and logistics firm, Yinson has since diversified into energy infrastructure, renewables and technology, its website shows. The company signed an agreement with a consortium of investors in January for a US$1 billion funding round for a unit that makes vessels used by the offshore oil and gas industry, Bloomberg News reported at the time. BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
Manchester United expects annual core profit to return to pre-COVID levels
FILE PHOTO: Soccer Football - Friendly - Hong Kong v Manchester United - Hong Kong Stadium, Hong Kong, China - May 30, 2025 Manchester United players pose for a team group photo before the match REUTERS/Tyrone Siu/File Photo FILE PHOTO: Soccer Football - Europa League - Semi Final - Second Leg - Manchester United v Athletic Bilbao - Old Trafford, Manchester, Britain - May 8, 2025 Manchester United players pose for a team group photo before the match REUTERS/Scott Heppell/File Photo Manchester United raised their annual core profit forecast on Friday to levels last seen before the pandemic as the club's strong performance in the Europa League drove ticket sales and broadcast revenue. Ticket sales jumped more than 50% to 44.5 million pounds in the three months to March as the club had a good run in the Europa League, before losing the finals to Tottenham Hotspur. United's New York-listed shares rose 4.4% in U.S. premarket trading. The club's annual core profit, which excludes player trading and finance cost, is expected to jump 21% to 28% to a range of 180 million to 190 million pounds for the year ending June. United had their worst Premier League season since they were relegated in 1974 and hopes of participating in a European competition next season were dashed after they lost the Europa League final. "We had a difficult season in the Premier League, which we all know fell below our standards and we have a clear expectation of improvement next season," CEO Omar Berrada said in a statement. United's absence from European competitions, which are lucrative sources of broadcasting revenue, deals a huge blow to the club's future finances and has drawn anger and disappointment from fans. Jim Ratcliffe, who holds a stake of about 29% in the club and runs their football operations, has taken steps to revive the club's fortunes, including by cutting jobs, raising ticket prices and stopping free lunches at staff canteens. United reported a net loss of 2.7 million pounds for the three months ended March 31, smaller than the 71.5 million pounds it posted a year earlier. The Glazer family, who own a majority of the club, have faced strong criticism from fans for saddling the club with debt, overspending on players and putting off investments on infrastructure. Manager Ruben Amorim said in May that the club did not need a big squad since they were not playing in the Champions League. In March this year, United announced plans to build a new 2-billion-pound 100,000-seat stadium, next to the existing Old Trafford. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
