
D.C. delegate in Congress insists for second time she's running for re-election. Her office again says no decision yet
Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District of Columbia's non-voting delegate in the House, told NBC News on Wednesday she was going to seek another term in Congress.
A short while later, her office walked back the remarks.
It was the second time that's happened this month.
Speaking to NBC News on Wednesday, Norton said, 'Yeah, I'm gonna run for re-election.'
A spokesperson for the Democratic delegate later told Axios that "no decision has been made" about seeking another term.
Norton's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The conflicting responses from Norton and her staff echo a similar proclamation from earlier this month.
On June 10, Norton said she planned to seek re-election, telling NBC News"I'm going to run." She also brushed off critics who raised questions about whether she should seek another term, saying, "I don't know why anybody would even ask me."
Hours later, Norton's office said that she wanted to run again but was "in conversations with her family, friends, and closest advisors to decide what's best.'
The questions over Norton's future come at a pivotal moment on two fronts. The Republican-led Congress is seeking to impose its will on the District by repealing local laws on policing and voting, and some D.C. leaders have questioned whether Norton is the right person to lead the pushback. Meanwhile, Democrats are in the midst of a reckoning over age and power after President Joe Biden's ill-fated attempt to run for re-election last year and three House Democrats dying in office this year.
At 88, Norton is one of the oldest members of Congress.
A similar miscommunication over re-election plans took place with Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who at the time was then the longest serving senator, and her staff after a statement announcing her retirement. Feinstein served in the Senate until she died in 2023 at age 90.
Norton has served in the House since 1991. Before she was elected to Congress, Norton was appointed by President Jimmy Carter to serve as the first woman to chair of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, in 1977.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Zohran Mamdani's policies: Where NYC mayoral candidate stands on issues
Mamdani led Cuomo 44% to 36% among first-place votes, with 96% of ballots counted as of around 1 p.m. on Wednesday, June 25. The Democratic nominee will begin the general election as the favorite in the overwhelmingly Democratic city. Considered the more progressive candidate of the two, Mamdani's platform has included stances on rent and housing, cost of living, safety, infrastructure and relations between the city and President Donald Trump. Here is a brief look at Mamdani's stance on major city issues, based on his campaign page and reporting from USA TODAY. Who is Zohran Mamdani? Mamdani is a 33-year-old politician and member of the Democratic Socialists of America party. He was born in Kampala, Uganda but moved to New York City with his family when he was 7 years old, where he attended the Bronx High School of Science, according to his assembly biography. Mamdani is currently the three-term representative for Assembly District 36, located in Queens, in the New York State Assembly. He is the first South Asian man and Ugandan to serve in the assembly and the third Muslim person to do so. He worked as a foreclosure-prevention housing counselor prior to serving in the assembly, according to his biography. Interestingly, he also worked a stint in film, writing and as a rap music producer. He is the son of Mahmood Mamdani, a professor at Columbia University, and Mira Nair, an Indian filmmaker. If elected, he would become New York's first Muslim mayor, as well as the city's first Asian and Millennial mayor. Where does Zohran Mamdani stand on issues? Rent and housing In a city with sky-high rent prices, cost of housing was a major tentpole in all mayoral candidates' campaigns. Mamdani's vision includes freezing rent on rent-stabilized apartments and building more affordable housing. Besides "immediately" freezing rent for rent-stabilized tenants, Mamdani's platform also outlines a plan for constructing 200,000 new "affordable, union-built, rent-stabilized" units over 10 years and fast-tracking approval for "affordable" developments. It also promises a "revamp" of the mayor's tenant protection efforts to bolster 311 services (non-emergency city services), allow tenants to request and track inspections and enable the city to step in when landlords are not meeting city standards. It would also create a new "Office of Deed Theft Prevention" for homeowners. Public transportation Free and faster buses are a major talking point in Mamdani's campaign. He says he would eliminate fares on all city buses and would improve their speed by building and expanding priority lanes, bus queue jump signals and dedicated loading zones. Health and safety Watch any NYC campaign commercial and you'll hear candidates talking about safety on the streets and subways. Mamdani plans to create the Department of Community Safety, a proposal that includes increased investment in mental health programs and crisis response, expanding "evidence-based gun violence prevention programs" and increasing funding to "hate violence prevention programs" by 800%. Cost of living and labor; city-owned grocery stores Another cost of living strain on New York families, beyond rent, is the price of essentials, like groceries. Mamdani has said he plans to address the cost of food by creating city-owned grocery stores that will pay no rent or property taxes, buy and sell at wholesale prices from centralized warehouses and partner with local vendors to keep prices down. On childcare, Mamdani's campaign says it will offer free childcare for every New Yorker aged 6 weeks to 5 years. He will also seek to implement the distribution of baby baskets to parents of newborns, which would include items like diapers, baby wipes, nursing pads, post-partum pads, swaddles, books and local resource guides. Mamdani has also said he will aim to raise NYC's minimum wage to $30 by 2030 and regulate delivery apps like DoorDash, GrubHub and Uber Eats to strengthen licensure requirements and expand resources to assist app workers. Education Mamdani's plans surrounding K-12 education, as outlined in his campaign, include ensuring equal distribution of money and resources to city schools, creating car-free "School Streets," expanding the Bronx pilot Every Child and Family Is Known program to address homelessness in the school system and, on a collegiate level, investing in the CUNY system. He also champions the Green Schools for a Healthier New York City initiative that seeks to renovate 500 public schools with renewable energy infrastructure and HVAC upgrades, make asphalt schoolyards into green spaces and build hubs in 50 schools for community emergency situations. Taxation, bills and fees Running on a platform of pushing back against the proverbial "big guys," Mamdani has proposed a 2% tax on residents earning above $1 million annually and raising the corporate tax rate to 11.5%. Mamdani has also promised to "fight corporate exploration" by banning "hidden fees" and non-compete clauses, "fighting" misleading advertising and predatory contracts, limiting tax dollars given to companies under NDA agreements and funding challenges to ConEd's price increases. He plans to do so via enforcement of consumer protection laws, pushing legislation in Albany and working with the City Council, according to his campaign's policy memo. Responding to Donald Trump Another topline talking point among all of the mayoral candidates was handling relations with President Donald Trump and, in many cases, laying out plans to resist or respond to his policies. Among Mamdani's plans to "resist" Trump are strengthening sanctuary city protections by ending cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and barring them from city facilities, increasing legal support for migrants, preventing personal data from being given to ICE, protecting abortion rights and increasing the budgets of the NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection and the NYC Commission on Human Rights.


The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' has a big public opinion problem
Fewer than 30% of voters support the bill in three recent polls by Pew, Quinnipiac and the Washington Post-Ipsos. Republicans are advancing a legislative package that includes tax cuts and reduced spending on social safety net programs to help pay for them, particularly the Medicaid health insurance program for the poor. Trump is pitching the legislation as an economic booster that will ignite growth, but Democrats are spotlighting concerns it could hurt lower-income Americans to rally public opposition. Protesters have descended on the Capitol in recent days to complain about the Medicaid cuts, which have become a big point of contention for GOP lawmakers. A group of 16 Republican House members sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune complaining that the Senate's version of the bill goes too far in cutting Medicaid. Some Republican senators also are raising concerns, particularly about how rural hospitals could be impacted by the proposed Medicaid changes. "I think shutting down rural hospitals would be a big mistake," Sen Josh Hawley, R-Missouri, told USA TODAY in discussing potential political blowback to the bill. Other Republicans say the bill doesn't go far enough to reduce spending and are pushing for deeper cuts, putting their party's leadership in a bind. The House-passed legislation would add at least $2.4 trillion over the next 10 years. "I think the big blowback is if we don't do something to reduce the deficit we'll be seen as hypocrites," Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, told USA TODAY. The GOP wrangling over the legislation, which Senate leaders are positioning for a vote in the next few days, comes amid a string of polls showing it is deeply unpopular. A Fox News survey released June 18 found that 59% of registered voters opposed the bill and 38% support it. The majority of Republicans (73%) back the measure, but most Independents and Democrats are opposed. The survey found that 49% of voters believe the bill will hurt their family, 23% think it will help and 26% don't think it will make a difference. The Washington Post-Ipsos survey found nearly twice as many voters oppose the legislation than support it. An analysis of the House legislation released this month by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the poorest households would lose about $1,600 a year under the legislation, largely because of cuts to Medicaid and food aid. The wealthiest households would gain about $12,000 a year, according to the CBO. "What this bill represents is the biggest transfer of wealth from the poor and the middle class to the rich in the history of the country," Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Connecticut, said June 25 during a rally against the legislation at the Capitol. Murphy predicted that if Republicans don't listen to concerns about the bill "they'll be sent back home." "All the data shows that the public's against it two to one," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. It's not just Democrats saying the legislation could be a drag on the GOP. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-North Carolina, told his GOP colleagues at a closed-door meeting June 24 that deep Medicaid cuts could result in disaster for Republicans in the midterms, according to media reports. Major legislation has blown up on the party in power in the past. Democrats suffered big loses in 2010 after pushing through the Affordable Care Act, former President Barack Obama's signature legislative achievement. Tillis invoked the Affordable Care Act to warn about blowback to the Senate's Medicaid language, according to reports. Sen. Tim Sheehy, R-Montana, said 2026 could be a tough midterm year for Republicans - but that wouldn't be the fault of Trump's bill. "Whatever party's in control historically has a challenge in the midterms," he told USA TODAY. "I don't think it has anything to do with the big, beautiful bill. I think that just has to do with the dynamics of politics." Sheehy said the bill doesn't poll well because it has "been maligned so much." Rep. Randy Fine, R-Florida, noted that the bill contains tax cuts that help some lower-income individuals, including eliminating taxes on tipped wages, overtime and Society Security, in arguing it has been mischaracterized by Democrats. "I'm sure that when Americans see the impact of the bill they're going to be excited," Fine said. "I'm just focused on putting points on the board and helping the president get his agenda done." Contributing: Riley Beggin


The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
See a timeline of 70 years of history that led to U.S. bombing Iran
At the center of it all is the state of Israel, the United States' key ally in the region -- one that consistently finds itself at war with Iran or with the Islamic extremist groups that are proxies for Iran's interests. Some key moments in the relationship between the U.S. and Iran. Can't see the above timeline? Click here to reload the page. 1953: Coup d'etat | The United States and United Kingdom back a coup d'etat in what is then called the Imperial State of Iran. The aim is to stop the Iranian parliament's attempt to nationalize the country's lucrative oil industry. The prime minister is replaced, and the autocratic monarch Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, known as the shah, increases his power. 1957: Atoms for Peace | U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Iran sign an agreement allowing the developing country to participate in the "Atoms for Peace" program. The United States provided materials and training to Iran, and essentially kicked off its modern nuclear program. 1978-1979: Iranian Revolution | After Pahlavi attempts to remove Ruhollah Khomeini, a high-ranking religious leader known as an ayatollah, Iranians grow fed up with the shah's massive power. The people stage a revolution to end the same monarchy that the United States had strengthened. A constitution for the Islamic Republic of Iran is established, and Khomeini becomes Supreme Leader a religious-political position more powerful than the role of president. The new regime is markedly anti-Israel, a stance that contributes to 50 years of tense United States-Iran relations. 1979-1981: Iran hostage crisis | Pahlavi is in exile, but U.S. President Jimmy Carter allows him to come to New York for cancer treatment. As retaliation, Iranian militants take over the U.S. embassy in Tehran and take hostages. Carter issues a series of sanctions that freeze billions of dollars in Iranian government assets and block trade between the two countries. More than 50 people are held for more than 400 days and finally released just after Carter leaves office. 1980-88: Iran-Iraq War | Iraq invades Iran, and the United States, under President Ronald Reagan, eventually sides with Iraq and its leader Saddam Hussein. The war lasts for eight years, and hundreds of thousands of people die. More than a decade after the war ends, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright will call the United States' policies "regrettably shortsighted." 1984: State sponsor of terrorism | The U.S. Department of State declares Iran a state sponsor of terrorism and imposes new sanctions. The designation continues until this day. 1989: A new supreme leader | Ali Khamenei succeeds Khomeini as supreme leader of Iran. Now in his 80s, Khamenei has stayed in the position for nearly 36 years. 1992-1997: More sanctions | Congress passes laws and President Bill Clinton signs executive orders that sanction Iran. The policies begin with attempts to stop the country from getting chemical or nuclear weapons, crippling its oil industry, and harming its general economy. They culminate with a near-embargo on goods and services traded between the United States and Iran. 2002: Axis of Evil | U.S. President George W. Bush, in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, identifies three countries -- Iran, Iraq and North Korea -- as an "Axis of Evil" that threaten American security. "Iran aggressively pursues these weapons and exports terror, while an unelected few repress the Iranian people's hope for freedom," Bush says. Later that year, the world learns that Iran has been enriching uranium, a key step toward building a nuclear bomb. 2007-2010: Stuxnet | The Bush administration deploys a cyber weapon called Stuxnet that sabotages the computers Iran uses in its nuclear program while making users believe everything is running as usual. The public learns about the program, built in conjunction with Israel, in 2010, after U.S. President Barack Obama's administration also uses it. 2011-2013: Obama-era sanctions | U.S. President Barack Obama issues a series of sanctions designed to harm Iran's ability to move money around the international banking system and profit off its oil industry. 2013: Preliminary nuclear deal | Obama announces a temporary deal between U.S., its allies, and Iran. The deal requires Iran to limit its nuclear program for six months in exchange for reducing sanctions that have been harming the country's economy. 2015: Final nuclear deal | Obama -- along with leaders of China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the European Union -- reaches a deal with Iran to put significant restrictions on its nuclear program. The terms include limits on enriched uranium, and inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency. While defending the deal from critics, Obama says the only other alternative is war. 2016: Sanctions end | Obama signs an executive order revoking sanctions against Iran that were originally designed as consequences for its nuclear weapons program. The order says there has been a "fundamental shift in circumstances with respect to Iran's nuclear program." 2017: Axis of Evil 2.0 | Fifteen years after Bush, President Donald Trump identifies a new "Axis of Evil" that includes Iran, North Korea, and Venezuela.2018: Trump reverses course | Trump withdraws the United States from the Iran nuclear deal and instead renews sanctions on Iran. The administration says the campaign, called "maximum pressure," devastates Iran's economy and oil revenue. 2020: Soleimani assassination | Trump orders a drone strike in Iraq that assassinates Qasem Soleimani, an influential Iranian military leader. Iran threatens revenge, and international experts and policymakers warn that the United States may have started an unwinnable war. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praises Trump for "acting swiftly, forcefully, decisively," and says Israel stands with the United States in its "just struggle for peace, security and self-defense." 2022: Jerusalem Declaration | U.S. President Joe Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid meet in Jerusalem to sign a declaration reaffirming the "unshakeable" alliance between the two countries. "The United States stresses that integral to this pledge is the commitment never to allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon, and that it is prepared to use all elements of its national power to ensure that outcome," the pledge says. 2023-2024: Tensions rise | Israel goes to war in Gaza, following a brutal terrorist attack by Hamas that galvanizes the nation. The Iran-backed militant Houthis in Yemen attack ships in the Red Sea. The conflict expands when Israel conducts a first-of-its-kind attack on Iran-backed Hezbollah, detonating explosives hidden inside their handheld communication devices. The following month, Iran fires nearly 200 missiles at Israel, which intercepts most of them, but promises revenge. March 2025: U.S. takes on Houthi rebels | In March, the United States bombs the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, a now-notorious attack that officials discussed it on Signal. June 2025: Israel-Iran war | Israel launches airstrikes on Iran, killing top military leaders and damaging nuclear technology. Iran counters with its own missile attacks on Israel. The United States bombs Iran's nuclear facilities days later. The Western intervention escalates the war and stokes fears of a wider global conflict. Contributing: Shawn J. Sullivan More visual stories explaining the Iran conflict: Current conflict timeline: From Israeli attack to Iran's retaliation, US bombing and ceasefire How Operation Midnight Hammer unfolded: Details of US bombing in Iran How does a bunker-buster bomb work? A closer look at the GBU-57 Iran fires missiles at U.S. base in Qatar. Where else could it strike? Live updates: Ceasefire in place, but Iran nuclear program may have survived