Robinson accuses Israel of 'nonsense', 'malicious lying'
Mrs Robinson said that Israeli claims that UN agencies are not working quickly enough to distribute aid are "all ridiculous".
"We saw the most there was incredible collaboration between the Egyptian Red Crescent... and the UN," she said, after a visit to Egypt and the Rafah crossing alongside former New Zealand president Helen Clark.
Following the visit, Mrs Robinson said that targeted sanctions should be imposed on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and all members of his security cabinet.
Speaking on RTÉ's News at One, Mrs Robinson said that there are "piles of vital materials that have been rejected, sent back. Tents, wheelchairs, crutches".
She saw two lorries coming back with food parcels and one driver told her that he had been rejected twice in 24 hours for very minor reasons, such as the load being "too high".
"I mean, for goodness sake," Mrs Robinson said, calling it "unconscionable".
"We need to prevent and to punish, not to allow genocide."
Israel has denied responsibility for hunger spreading in Gaza, accusing Hamas militants of stealing aid shipments, which Hamas denies.
However, in response to a rising international uproar, Israel late last month announced steps to let more aid into the enclave, including pausing fighting for part of the day in some areas and announcing protected routes for aid convoys.
'I don't know how many will die before September'
She praised "the effort on one side" of the border and condemned "the lack of even working hours on the other (Israeli) side", who often "knock off at four in the afternoon".
"It is nonsense and it's part of the malicious lying on the Israeli side to deny starvation and to blame the UN".
She recalled a trip to Somalia during the famine there in the 1990s, and "what it means when you have a severely malnourished child".
But in Somalia those children "were getting exactly the medical aid" they needed.
"There are 325,000 severely malnourished children in Gaza today," Mrs Robinson said, adding: "I don't know how many of them will die before September."
She said that "there are stockpiles ready to go", and that "tomorrow they could flood Gaza with necesssary food".
Mrs Robinson insisted that trade with Israeli is "crucial".
She called on the EU "to implement the commitment under Article 2 of the Israeli-EU trade agreement, and stop the preferential trade" with Israel.
The fact that three G7 countries are going to recognise Palestine in September "is really important".
She also called on the League of Arab States "to step up".
Asked of the prospects for a ceasefire, she said: "If President Trump would put some of his political energy behind it, it would happen."
"We know that... he's the man that can do things fairly instantly."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Post
8 minutes ago
- Business Post
Apple lobbied Irish government on landmark EU regulation weeks before €500m fine
• What Apple said to Irish ministers ahead of its €500m Digital Markets Act fine — and how they responded • Details of Apple's private warnings over EU regulation and US tariffs
Irish Times
36 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Catherine Connolly says we ‘cannot trust' the US, England and France
Presidential election candidate Catherine Connolly has said the European Union has 'lost its moral compass' and that we 'cannot trust' the United States , England and France . She said Irish people should resist a 'trend towards imperialism' in the EU, as the bloc is becoming 'increasingly militarised'. Ms Connolly, the only confirmed candidate for the upcoming election, has also renewed her criticism of Russia, Nato and countries such as the US,, the UK and France, when asked about her stance on certain international issues. Setting out her position in response to questions posed by The Irish Times, Ms Connolly said: 'The US, England and France are deeply entrenched in an arms industry which causes bloodshed across the world – as a staunch advocate for neutrality, this behaviour must be condemned.' During a Dáil speech last February Ms Connolly referred to Government plans to scrap the 'triple lock' on the deployment of Irish troops abroad – a proposal she opposes, arguing it threatens Ireland's neutrality. She agreed with another contributor that there are countries 'we certainly cannot trust' adding: 'America is one of those and England and France are others. READ MORE 'What is behind their motivation is simply an arms industry, more war' and 'making huge profits'. She said: 'That needs to be called out over and over.' The left-wing Independent TD is the only confirmed candidate in the race for Áras an Uachtaráin after Fine Gael politician Mairead McGuinness dropped out for health reasons. Ms Connolly, who has the backing of the Social Democrats, Labour and People Before Profit to enter the election, has long been a campaigner for Irish neutrality and has been vocal on the horror of the war in Gaza. Her stance on global issues such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine are coming under scrutiny now that she is running for president. The Galway West TD has condemned Russia and branded its president Vladimir Putin a 'dictator' during Dáil statements on the conflict and has spoken of the need to 'show solidarity with the people of Ukraine'. She has also strongly criticised the Nato military alliance, accusing it of engaging in 'warmongering' on the eve of the conflict. In response to questions on this, Ms Connolly said: 'Russia is conducting an illegal invasion of Ukraine – it must immediately end its horrific assault.' She also said: 'I have criticised Nato as its warmongering and escalation towards conflict over the years is at odds with achieving peace in regions across the world.' She accused US president Donald Trump of 'supporting Israel trampling on international law and reducing Gaza to nothing'. Asked if she would meet Mr Trump should he visit Ireland, Ms Connolly replied: 'If elected, I would meet all heads of state as mandated by the Constitution and the office of president.' She also said she supports the EU but argued that it has 'lost sight of its foundations: a project developed to promote and preserve peace'. She contended that: 'The EU has become increasingly militarised under the leadership of Ursula von der Leyen and the European People's Party – this direction can only bring pain. 'As Irish people, we must resist this trend towards imperialism and show support for Palestine and Ukraine as Europeans. 'The EU has lost its moral compass.' Meanwhile, Ms Connolly has also been joined by former Independent TD Maureen O'Sullivan in defending a 2018 trip they took to Syria with then-fellow TDs Clare Daly and Mick Wallace at a time when brutal dictator Bashar al-Assad was still in power and a civil war was raging. Ms O'Sullivan said the trip was 'humanitarian visit' insisting: 'We weren't going there to support Assad.'
Irish Times
36 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Donald Trump's era of Dick Turpin economics is a menace to our State
US president Donald Trump and his cronies 'flood the zone' with so much noise that it is easy to let stuff slip past. But sometimes we need to listen. Because there is a risk that these guys actually mean at least part of what they are saying. Little attention was paid this week, for example, when US treasury secretary Scott Bessent spoke in an interview with Fox News about the 'promises' countries like Japan, Korea and the EU had made to invest money in the United States as part of trade agreements. The countries involved made these commitments in the full knowledge that they couldn't fulfil them. They were a way to dress up trade deals with a little fluff, based on the likelihood that big companies were likely to continue to invest in the US in any case. After all, how could European Union governments, for example, direct their companies to invest $600 billion (€513 billion) in the US by 2028 , which is the figure mentioned in the political deal reached between Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen ? Did the EU have its hands tied before striking a trade deal with the US? Listen | 23:32 But Bessent has a different view. He likened the money promised in the deals to an offshore wealth fund, with the US able to 'direct' where the money would be invested. The trade surpluses these countries had with the US were to be recycled into investment in the US, at the president's discretion. READ MORE Whether this is serious or just part of the ongoing public relations of Trump 'winning' is anyone's guess. Still, perhaps it explains why we have yet to see anything by way of a written agreed statement of the US-EU 'deal', even though the 15 per cent tariffs have been applied. The EU has fudged that the $600 billion is 'as an indication based on the executive's contacts with industry'. Which, of course, is nonsense. Trump has said that if the money is not invested, then the EU tariffs will go back up to 35 per cent. So we have the emergence of this kind of Dick Turpin economics as Trump and his team perform a 'holdup' on countries that want access to US markets. And companies are having to pay the Maga highwaymen, too. After all, Nividia and AMD are to pay the US Government a 15 per cent share of revenues from sales of advanced artificial intelligence chips in China, in return for export licenses. This isn't the free market economics traditionally championed by the Republican Party. It is instead a particular kind of Trumpian crony capitalism – countries and businesses that are in favour, or pay the required price, are okay, while others, like Brazil and Canada at the moment, are targeted. Control from the White House is everything. Against this chaotic backdrop, the 'certainty' that the trade deal was meant to bring European businesses, including those in the Republic , thus looks qualified and uncertain. If you thought everything was settled with a handshake in Scotland, then you haven't been paying attention. The absence of an agreed statement between the two sides on how the deal will operate may well reflect Trump's desire to give him the scope to duck and dive. The issue of the promised European 'investment' in the US remains contested. And Trump has made it quite clear he is willing to take whatever measures he feels are necessary – tariff-based or otherwise – to increase the security of supply for the US in vital pharma and semiconductor products. Pharma is the latest sector subject to the squeeze from Washington, demanding lower prices in the US and more investment there, which will mean higher drug prices and fewer factories and jobs elsewhere. This week Eli Lilly announced it would hike the price of its weight loss Mounjaro in the United Kingdom market by up to 170 per cent, saying it supported Trump's view that drug prices – which are up to three times higher in the US – need to be rebalanced. You can choose to be optimistic or otherwise about how this might play out for pharma investment and tax revenues in this State. But the Central Statistics Office's latest trade figures, published on Friday, show our trade surplus with the US in the first six months of this year was €64 billion, up from €22 billion in the same period last year. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and US president Donald Trump at Turnberry in Scotland on Sunday. Video: Reuters. Illustration: Paul Scott Now the 2025 figures are distorted by the huge movement of pharma to the US to try to beat the initial imposition of tariffs in April. But our huge surplus with the US – based almost entirely on pharma – keeps us under the spotlight in Washington and means the companies concerned will remain under relentless pressure from the White House to change their investment and pricing plans. There is no point in the Republic waiting around for the sky to fall in as all this plays out. The risks are clear, but the outcome will remain uncertain, perhaps for many months to come. The publication of the study by the Trump administration into the pharma sector – the so-called section 232 investigation – will be an important moment, for sure, and should happen soon. Presumably, it will be accompanied by some policy measures and much noise. Trump, as he has done with his other 'holdups', will look for something here – in terms of price cuts and investment commitments from the industry, perhaps – and given our reliance on pharma investment and tax, this could well hurt us. He may well threaten more tariff pain for companies if they do not fall into line. And so the uncertainty will persist. This strategic risk needs to be the backdrop to Budget 2026, along with using the opportunity given by our strong economic figures and record tax haul to invest in infrastructure vital for people's lives and business investment. There is no point waiting for some kind of 'certainty' because it isn't coming. We need to do this on the basis that this may be our last chance to plan this before – sometime over the next few years – the exchequer picture starts to look a lot tighter. And that in the meantime, disruptive shorter-term risks remain. Instead, we may well spend the next six weeks arguing over whether households should get a few euros in energy credits and a double child benefit week.
