David Murray says sorry over disaster of Rangers sale
The former owner of Rangers, Sir David Murray, has apologised to fans for his part in the financial calamity that befell the club more than a decade ago.
Sir David, who sold the Ibrox side for £1 to businessman Craig Whyte, presided over Ibrox when the club gave £47m in tax-free loans to players and staff between 2001 and 2010.
Advertisement
Under Mr Whyte's ownership the Rangers business went into liquidation in 2012 - a year after the sale.
In a wide-ranging interview with the BBC to mark the publication of his autobiography, Mettle, Sir David said he regretted his decisions and said sorry to fans and club staff.
"Of course I'd apologise," he said. "I'm not one of these people who run a company and hide.
"It was a terrible moment, and I apologise to all the staff, good people, and I know many of them to this day.
"I'd hope in hindsight, they look at the facts and think I was put in a very difficult position."
What were the facts?
The sale of Rangers and its resulting financial collapse had a huge effect on fans [SNS]
What was known as the 'big tax case' centred on the club's use of Employee Benefit Trusts (EBTs).
Advertisement
EBTs, which were also used by other clubs, enabled Rangers to pay £47m to players, managers and directors between 2001 and 2010 in tax-free loans.
HMRC argued the payments were earnings and should be taxable.
Two tribunals in 2012 and 2014 had previously found in Rangers' favour but the Supreme Court ruled in favour of HMRC after an appeal in 2015.
The case unfolded against a backdrop of financial meltdown for Rangers.
Years later, Mr Whyte was charged and cleared of taking over the club by fraud.
A court heard that his takeover of Rangers was sealed with a pound coin being tossed across a table in Sir David's office.
Advertisement
At the time, Mr Whyte had agreed to take on obligations which included paying an £18m bank debt and £5m for players.
Sir David denied failing to carry out due diligence on Mr Whyte, saying: "I went on the facts in front of me."
Craig Whyte bought the club and its debts for £1 in 2011 [PA Media]
Challenged on whether it was morally acceptable to deprive the NHS and other public services of funds so millionaire footballers could pay less tax, Sir David replied: "They didn't do anything illegal."
"Footballers are getting paid too much. Not just at Rangers, everywhere," he went on, adding: "It's avoidance. People do that."
Advertisement
Sir David denied that the trophies Rangers had won in this period were tainted by the tax arrangements and also denied that the scheme amounted to buying success, or financial doping.
"Not at all," he replied, adding: "It was proven in the end it wasn't an illegal tax scheme."
Sectarianism, steel and Sir Sean Connery
Sir David built his fortune in the metal industry before turning to football [PA Media]
Sir David made his name in the steel industry, forming the company Murray International Metals Limited by the age of 23.
In 1988, he purchased Rangers for £6m and went on to see the club win 15 league championships and 20 domestic Cups.
He and manager Graeme Souness signed the club's first high-profile Catholic player since World War Two - Mo Johnston, who previously played for Celtic - in 1989.
Advertisement
Reflecting on sectarian tensions in Glasgow, which he described in his book as "vitriol", Sir David said the continued singing of sectarian songs at Ibrox was not acceptable.
"There's no place for that in society," he said. "I don't think it's right and I've said that and I lost some of the support of the Rangers fans by saying that."
Sir David's early success as Rangers owner was achieved with manager Graeme Souness [SNS]
The businessman also called for an inquiry into the Scottish government's involvement in the sale of two steel processing plants in Lanarkshire to the tycoon Sanjeev Gupta.
The sale was backed by a £7m support package from the Scottish government.
Advertisement
Sir David claims ministers rejected his rival bid to purchase the business because it was potentially incompatible with state aid rules, and criticised Mr Gupta's management of Liberty Steel in the years since.
The Scottish government it had "acted quickly" to support the transaction, adding: "This intervention sustained over 100 jobs at Dalzell and retained steelmaking capacity in Scotland."
Sir David was also critical of the industrial policies of both the Scottish and UK governments saying: "It's ridiculous that Britain does not have the capacity to make a steel plate for its defence."
Sir David lost his legs after a car accident at the start of his business career [SNS]
Elsewhere in his book, Sir David describes in detail the car accident in 1976 that led to his legs being amputated at the age of 24, a year after founding his metals business.
Advertisement
On the way home from a game of rugby in his fibreglass Lotus, a tyre blowout sent him off the road and into a tree.
Sir David described how fellow rugby players stopped to help him, using their ties as tourniquets before he was taken to hospital for life-saving surgery.
"None of us know how tough we are until the time we find out how tough we are," he said.
"I had a young son of several months old and a boy of two. I'd a young wife. My father had just passed away. I could only go one way. I couldn't fail. I have a responsibility," he added.
Another chapter in the autobiography is dedicated to Sir Sean Connery, who was a close friend of Sir David's.
Advertisement
The book describes how the pair travelled to Dunblane in the aftermath of the murder of 16 children and their teacher in the Scottish town on 13 March 1996.
"It was after the terrible news up there that Sean wanted to visit it. And I took him up with some flowers, and quietly he stood for a minute and put some flowers at the school gates. A very difficult moment," said Sir David.
"He was such a patriot, Sean. He took an interest in Scotland every day and he just wanted to be there."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tissue Regenix Group Full Year 2024 Earnings: US$0.012 loss per share (vs US$0.024 loss in FY 2023)
Revenue: US$28.6m (down 2.9% from FY 2023). Net loss: US$885.0k (loss narrowed by 48% from FY 2023). US$0.012 loss per share (improved from US$0.024 loss in FY 2023). We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 7.1% p.a. on average during the next 2 years, compared to a 9.1% growth forecast for the Biotechs industry in the United Kingdom. Performance of the British Biotechs industry. The company's shares are down 3.3% from a week ago. Before we wrap up, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Tissue Regenix Group that you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error al recuperar los datos Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The taxes Reeves could raise to pay for Labour's about-turns
Rachel Reeves faces another black hole in the public finances. This time she can blame her own MPs: the revolt by more than 120 Labour backbenchers has forced the Prime Minister to back down on his proposal to slow the growth in the benefits bill. Sir Keir Starmer's reforms were supposed to save £5bn per year. But now that he has performed another about-turn, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) estimates the scheme will only save £2bn, thus blowing a fresh £3bn hole in the Chancellor's numbers. 'These changes more than halve the saving of the package of reforms as a whole, making the Chancellor's already difficult budget-balancing act that much harder,' says Tom Waters, at the think tank. It comes weeks after the policy reversal on winter fuel payments for pensioners, which will cost more than £1bn. To make matters worse, the economy is slowing – in part because of Labour's record-breaking tax raids – which will undermine the tax revenues on which Reeves's plans relied. Ruth Gregory, at Capital Economics, estimates the combination of higher benefits spending and lower growth will cost the Chancellor £22bn compared to the Office for Budget Responsibility's forecasts at the Spring Statement. If MPs will not allow the Government even the most modest restraint on spending, and if the Chancellor will not again rewrite her own 'iron-clad' borrowing rules, that means more tax rises are on the way in the autumn. Here are the options Reeves will be looking at. The Government's biggest revenue-raiser, income tax, raked in £310bn last year – almost precisely matching the £313bn spent on benefits. Adding a penny to the basic and higher rates of income tax would bring in just over £10bn extra per year, according to HMRC estimates. That means at least 2p would need to be added to come close to repairing Reeves's Budget. If it were not for Labour's manifesto pledge not to raise the tax, this would be an obvious place for the Chancellor to turn. But the manifesto is hardly a meaningful constraint. The vaunted document also promised not to raise National Insurance contributions (NICs), but the Chancellor did just that in her first Budget. The Government argued that the manifesto promise only applied to the NICs paid directly by workers, not the much larger share paid by their employers. Income tax does not lend itself quite so easily to such a ruse, but the Chancellor could extend the Conservatives' long freeze on thresholds. A classic stealth tax, this method means that as workers receive pay rises they are pulled more quickly into higher tax brackets – even if inflation means the spending power of their pay packets is not actually growing. The freeze on thresholds, which is currently set to last until 2028, is already expected to bag the Chancellor nearly £50bn per year by the end of the decade. Extending it by another two years would bring in an extra £10bn per year, the IFS estimates. Given the sums involved and the fact that stealth raids do not affect workers in an obvious way, this is seen as a likely option. The Chancellor is unlikely to whack businesses with another raid. She has promised hostile bosses that she will not pull the same stunt on National Insurance contributions again. Andrew Bailey, the Governor of the Bank of England, has also warned that last year's tax raid is now weighing on the economy, meaning increasing the rate again could be counterproductive. But that does not mean the tax, which is set to bring in £200bn this year, has to go untouched. One option is to raise the rate paid by workers. This would breach even the revised version of the manifesto pledge, but could be framed as reversing reckless Tory tax cuts – under Jeremy Hunt, Reeves's predecessor in No 11, the rate was chopped from 12pc to 10pc and then down to 8pc. Each of those two percentage point moves cost more than £10bn, so reversing the cuts could help Reeves considerably. Increasing the rate of capital gains tax (CGT) is popular in Left-wing circles. Unfortunately, jacking up the tax paid on profits made from the sale of assets comes with a range of downsides, which can result in a higher tax rate in fact costing the Treasury revenue. A large share of CGT is paid by a very small number of people. If the higher rate means they simply decide not to sell their assets, then the tax take will plunge in short order. HMRC estimates that a one percentage point increase in the top rate ends up costing the Treasury £30m per year. A 5p increase costs £870m per year. A 10p jump loses a staggering £3.6bn per year for the public purse. As a result, increasing the rate of CGT seems unlikely. Another option ruled out in the manifesto, this levy on a large share of the things people buy is on track to bring in £200bn per year by the end of the decade. Currently charged at a rate of 20pc, increasing VAT might not be the most popular measure when households are already reeling from a cost of living crisis. None the less, it could be a tempting option when a 1p increase brings in £9.6bn per year. Alternatively, the Chancellor could slap the tax on items that are currently exempt – as she did with private school fees this year – or those that attract the reduced rate of 5pc, such as energy bills. Reeves has maintained the accounting wheeze employed by successive Conservative chancellors: freeze fuel duty year after year but pencilling in extra revenues from future increases. About half of her headroom comes from the official assumption that the tax on petrol and diesel will rise in future – yet few expect she will actually jack up the cost of driving. The fuel duty escalator has been frozen for a decade and a half, making it politically difficult to unfreeze. Most economists believe it will be kept frozen. It would be a shock to voters, but Reeves may find it an attractive revenue-raiser: reintroducing inflation-linked increases in fuel duty would raise an estimated £5bn a year. It is not just the big taxes that are on the table. Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, wrote to Reeves with a raft of proposed tax increases ahead of the Spring Statement. Suggestions included: a higher bank surcharge, raising up to £700m from lenders; scrapping inheritance tax relief on Aim-listed shares, for anywhere between £100m and £1bn; removing the dividend allowance to bag £325m, as well as raising the tax rate on dividends; and further freezing the threshold at which high earners pay the additional rate of income tax. Raising the tax on enveloped properties, which are largely owned by companies, could raise another £200m, while closing a commercial property stamp duty loophole could net £1bn. Reinstating a lifetime allowance on pensions contributions might gain close to £800m per year. Rayner also suggested clawing back more child benefit from higher-earning households, for £600m, and tightening migrants' access to benefits. Together those measures could increase the Treasury's haul by £4.6bn or more. That would be useful, but is barely enough to cover the cost of Starmer's latest about-turns, let alone cover the other costs. The scale of spending commitments mounting up means Reeves is facing unpalatable choices when it comes to the Budget. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Irn-Bru owner in advanced talks with potential buyer for drinks brand facing closure
THE owners of Irn-Bru are reportedly in advanced talks with a potential buyer for its bottled water brand, which it announced is set to close. In March, Scottish drinks giant AG Barr, which is best known for producing Irn-Bru and Rubicon, announced that its Strathmore Water brand was to be axed, claiming it was no longer 'sustainable'. The news put 23 jobs at its production site in Forfar at risk of redundancy, the firm said in a statement at the time. Following the shock announcement, a brief stock exchange filing showed that AG Barr had said that discussions with an unnamed third party had begun. READ MORE: Scottish city's council warns of parking scam messages amid ongoing cyber incident But the soft drinks firm said there could be 'no certainty a transaction will ultimately occur', The Courier reported. However, according to the newspaper, talks have since advanced, and AG Barr is hoping to strike a deal which could bring fresh investment in the brand. An AG Barr spokesperson told The Courier: 'We are pleased to have found a prospective buyer for Strathmore Water that is committed to protecting jobs and intends to invest in the site to secure its future. 'Both parties are engaged, the deal is progressing.' The company added: 'TUPE consultations are underway and we will continue to support our Strathmore employees through this period of transition.' The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) regulations are designed to protect employees' rights in a business transfer. TUPE ensures that jobs, terms and conditions, and continuity of employment are safeguarded. Earlier this year AG Barr recorded a 15.8% rise in adjusted pre-tax profit, reaching £58.5 million for the year ending January 25, 2025. The firm said it had seen growth of 4.6% in soft drinks volume, with strong performances from Rubicon and Irn-Bru helping boost revenues to £420.4m – up from £400m last year. At the time of the announcement, Euan Sutherland, AG Barr chief executive (below), said: '2024/25 was a successful year for the company. I would like to take the opportunity to thank my colleagues across the business who delivered these excellent financial results. (Image: AG Barr) 'Looking forward, we have a refreshed strategy centred on growth and are committed to our long-term financial targets. 'I am confident that successful execution of our plans will see another year of positive progress towards our long-term goals.' AG Barr said Strathmore had 'struggled to compete' in the bottled water market in recent years. The Scottish firm acquired the former Strathmore Spring Water business from US owners for £15.5m in 2006. Following the news of AG Barr planning to close the Strathmore Water site, Mairi Gougeon, the Rural Affairs Secretary and MSP for Angus North and Mearns, said she had written to the firm raising concerns about the planned closures, considering the firm's otherwise strong performance. She said: 'This news is incredibly disappointing for Forfar and the wider Angus area. 'To hear that such a highly regarded employer as Strathmore Water is potentially facing closure, especially when the parent company is reporting strong financial performance, is difficult to understand. 'I have already taken action and written to AG Barr, Angus Council, and the Minister for Employment and Investment, Tom Arthur MSP, to understand the full implications of this announcement and to ensure that all available support is offered to the affected workforce.' Gougeon added: 'We need to explore all possibilities to minimise the impact of this potential closure on the local economy and the community.'
