F1 travels to Canada! Here's how to watch the 2025 Canadian Grand Prix with Sling
F1 travels to Canada! Here's how to watch the 2025 Canadian Grand Prix with Sling
Montreal's famed Circuit Gilles-Villeneuve will soon be alive and loud as Formula 1 brings open-wheel racing back to the country of Canada.
The annual Canadian Grand Prix is this weekend as McLaren's fierce lineup of Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris continue to be the class of the field in Formula 1 this season.
Piastri's won four of the last six F1 races and has built a small 10-point advantage over Norris in the driver standings. A distant third is reigning champion Max Verstappen and Oracle Red Bull Racing, who despite two victories on the year has been playing catch up to McLaren.
Teams like Scuderia Ferrari and Mercedes continue to search for answers as they look for podium glory once again.
The Canadian Grand Prix airs on Sunday (Father's Day) at 2 p.m. EDT. Here's everything you need to know in order to watch the F1 action on Sling.
Watch the Canadian Grand Prix on Sling
How to Watch F1 on Sling
All Formula 1 races air live on ESPN during the season. Both Sling Orange and Sling Blue subscription plans carry ESPN, so Sling users have their choice of package.
How to watch live sports with Sling
Sling Orange and Sling Blue get you plenty of access to live sports, but for the true sports fans out there check out the Sports Extra package. When paired with Sling Blue, the total cost of your first month would be just $31 and includes NFL Red Zone, Big Ten Network, Golf Channel, NBA TV, NHL Network, MLB Network, Tennis Channel and many more sports channels.
What's the difference between Sling Blue and Sling Orange?
Sling Orange: The Sling Orange package has over 30 channels, including popular networks like ESPN, Disney Channel, CNN and HGTV. This is a popular pick for families and sports fans who want access to live game coverage and kid-friendly content. Sling Orange allows streaming on one device. Save 50% on your first month and pay just $23.
The Sling Orange package has over 30 channels, including popular networks like ESPN, Disney Channel, CNN and HGTV. This is a popular pick for families and sports fans who want access to live game coverage and kid-friendly content. Sling Orange allows streaming on one device. Save 50% on your first month and pay just $23. Sling Blue: With more than 45 channels, Sling Blue caters to a wider audience with major networks like FOX, NBC, Bravo and National Geographic. This package is perfect for those who enjoy a nice mix of news, reality television and lifestyle programming. Sling Blue allows streaming on up to three devices. Save 50% on your first month and pay just $23.
When is the F1 race?
The event goes live at 2 p.m. ET on Sunday as the field looks to dethrone the McLaren duo of Piastri and Norris.
Watch F1 with Sling
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
33 minutes ago
- Newsweek
BetMGM Bonus Code NW150: Claim New $150 Father's Day MLB, U.S. Open Promo
The BetMGM bonus code NW150 will give new players a $150 bonus for Father's Day betting on MLB and the U.S. Open. The BetMGM bonus code NW150 will give new players a $150 bonus for Father's Day betting on MLB and the U.S. Open. Sign up for a new sportsbook account with the BetMGM bonus code NW150 in time for Sunday's MLB action and the final round of the U.S. Open. Click here to start the sign-up process and get $150 in bonus bets or a $1,500 first bet offer, depending on your location. If you are in CO, MI, NJ, PA or WV, you will receive the $150 bonus, which requires you to place a winning $10 bet on any market to get the reward. If you are in another state, you will get the $1,500 first bet offer. With MLB games like Yankees-Red Sox, Giants-Dodgers and Cardinals-Brewers along with the final day of the U.S. Open, new users have plenty of opportunities to start their accounts fast with the BetMGM bonus code offer. BetMGM Bonus Code NW150 For MLB Sunday, U.S. Open BetMGM Bonus Code NW150 New User Offer Bet $10, Get $150 Bonus (CO, MI, NJ, PA, WV Only) $1,500 First-Bet Offer In-App Promos Second Chance Scorer, Daily Boost Tokens, MLB Daily Swing, etc. Terms and Conditions 21+ and Present in Participating States Bonus Last Verified On June 15, 2025 Information Confirmed By Newsweek Sports Betting Staff If you are in one of the states that receives the $150 bonus, you should look at markets available across BetMGM Sportsbook to find a wager you feel has a good chance of settling as a win. As an example, maybe you would like to bet on Max Fried to have a certain number of strikeouts against the Red Sox on Sunday night baseball. This type of market might be easier to predict than the outcome of the game itself. If you receive the $1,500 first bet safety net, you will have the opportunity to wager up to that amount on any market knowing that you will get your stake back if your bet loses. Let's say you want to put $900 on the outcome of the U.S. Open. If your bet wins, you will secure a large payout. If your bet settles as a loss, you will be able to get your $900 stake back in the form of a bonus. Sign Up With BetMGM Bonus Code NW150 Register for a new sportsbook account by clicking here or on any of our other links. Next, you will need to enter basic personal information, like your name, address, date of birth, etc. During this process, make sure to enter the bonus code NW150 to secure the welcome offer. Enable location settings on your device to ensure you receive the offer you are eligible for. The next step is to make an initial deposit that will cover your first wager with BetMGM Sportsbook. From there, you will be able to take advantage of the offer. If you get any bonuses with either offer, they will be valid to use for the next seven days before they expire. More Father's Day Opportunities At BetMGM Sunday is a good time to get up and running with your new account. In addition to the welcome offer that you receive and the wagers available with the MLB games and the U.S. Open, you will be able to prepare yourself for any NBA Finals and Stanley Cup Final bets you would like to place. The NBA Finals continues with Game 5 on Monday, and Game 6 of the Stanley Cup Final takes place on Tuesday. These games could be good opportunities to use bonus bets. Or you could claim in-app offers for all of these events. These promos often provide profit boosts. In other cases, you will get a chance to win your stake back, like with the second chance shot offer. Get up and running before Sunday's action to start up your BetMGM Sportsbook account the right way. Newsweek may earn an affiliate commission if you sign up through the links in this article. See the sportsbook operator's terms and conditions for important details. Sports betting operators have no influence over newsroom coverage.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Canadian Grand Prix 2025: How to watch today's F1 race, channel, time and more
If you buy something through a link in this article, we may earn commission. Pricing and availability are subject to change. The Canadian Grand Prix at Circuit Gilles Villeneuve is this weekend, here's how to tune in. (Eric Bolte-USA TODAY Sports) Formula One heads to Montreal, Canada, for the Canadian Grand Prix this Sunday afternoon. The Pirelli Canadian Grand Prix takes place at the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve and consists of 68 laps around the 4.36 km hybrid street circuit that occasionally features more groundhogs than cars on the track. You can catch this weekend's racing action on F1 TV Pro and ESPN+; here's everything you need to know about F1 this season, including how to watch this weekend's race, along with the full 2025 F1 grand prix schedule. How to watch the 2025 Canadian Grand Prix: Date: Sunday, June 15, 2025 Advertisement Time: Coverage begins at 12:30 p.m. ET, Race begins at 2 p.m. ET TV channel: ESPN Deportes Streaming: ESPN+, F1 TV Pro, Hulu + Live TV, DirecTV, or with a VPN When is the Canadian Grand Prix? Coverage of the 2025 Canadian Grand Prix on Sunday, June 15 begins at 12:30 p.m. ET, with the race itself starting at 2 p.m. You can also tune in to practices and qualifying races on Friday and Saturday. What channel is the Canadian Grand Prix on? You can tune into Sunday's race on ESPN+ and ESPN Deportes, which will broadcast the race live in Spanish. Practices and qualifying races will air across ESPN2, ESPN3, ESPNU and ESPN Deportes. Advertisement This season, ESPN+ will also offer alternate viewing options of the main event, including an Onboard Cameras Channel, which gives fans a look at the race from select drivers' perspectives, plus a Driver Tracker that plots every driver's location on the course in real time. For super fans who don't want to miss a single race, all the action is streamable through an F1 TV Pro subscription. Schedule of events at the 2025 Canadian Prix: All times Eastern Friday, June 13 Free Practice 1, 1:30 p.m. (ESPN3, ESPN Deportes, ESPNU, F1 TV) Free Practice 2, 5 p.m. (ESPN3, ESPN Deportes, ESPNU, F1 TV) Saturday, June 14 Free Practice 3, 12:30 p.m. (ESPN2, ESPN3, ESPN Deportes, F1 TV) Advertisement Qualifying, 4 p.m. (ESPN2, ESPN3, F1 TV) Sunday, June 15 Canadian Grand Prix, 2 p.m. (ESPN Deportes, ESPN+, F1 TV) How to watch the 2025 F1 season: Stream F1 races and practices F1 TV Pro An F1 TV Pro subscription lets you stream every F1 race live, plus all the practices, qualifying races and pre-race shows. F1 TV is also home to F1's post-race live shows, analysis, Tech Talks, documentaries and the official F1 archive. You can subscribe to F1 TV Pro for $11.99/month or pay $85 for the entire season. $84.99/year at F1 TV Stream alternate action at the Canadian Grand Prix on ESPN+ ESPN+ This weekend you can catch alternate camera views of the Canadian Grand Prix on ESPN+, including the Onboard Cameras Channel, which gives fans a look at the race from select drivers' perspectives, plus a Driver Tracker that plots every driver's location on the course in real time. If you're a general sports lover and want to occasionally tune into F1 coverage, an ESPN+ subscription is a great option. ESPN+ grants you access to exclusive ESPN+ content including live events, fantasy sports tools and premium ESPN+ articles. You can stream ESPN+ through an app on your smart TV, phone, tablet, computer and on $11.99/month at ESPN Watch the Canadian Grand Prix with the help of a VPN Looking for a way to stream F1 coverage from anywhere in the world without ESPN? One way to catch this weekend's coverage of the Canadian Grand Prix is with the help of a VPN. With a VPN, you can change your location to one in Austria and watch free coverage of the race on ServusTV. A VPN (virtual private network) helps protect your data, can mask your IP address and is perhaps most popular for being especially useful in the age of streaming. Whether you're looking to watch Friends on Netflix (which left the U.S. version of the streamer back in 2019) or tune in to the F1 race this weekend without a cable package, a VPN can help you out. Stream F1 coverage from anywhere ExpressVPN ExpressVPN offers 'internet without borders,' meaning you can tune into a Belgian or Austrian livestream of the race for free as opposed to paying for ESPN or ESPN+ for US coverage of F1. All you'll need to do is sign up for ExpressVPN, change your server location to one in Belgium and then find the F1 livestream on RTBF, or change your location to Austria to watch free coverage on ServusTV. ExpressVPN's added protection, speed and range of location options make it an excellent choice for first-time VPN users looking to stretch their streaming abilities, plus, it's Engadget's top pick for the best streaming VPN. Plus, the service offers a 30-day money-back guarantee, in case you're nervous about trying a VPN. From $4.99/month at ExpressVPN F1 2025 grand prix schedule: Sunday, June 15: Canadian Grand Prix, Circuit Gilles Villeneuve (12:30 p.m. ET, ESPN+) Advertisement Sunday, June 29: Austrian Grand Prix, Red Bull Ring (9 a.m. ET, ESPN) Sunday, July 6: British Grand Prix, Silverstone Circuit (10 a.m. ET, ESPN) Sunday, July 27: Belgian Grand Prix, Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps (9 a.m. ET, ESPN) Sunday, August 3: Hungarian Grand Prix, Hangaroring (9 a.m. ET, ESPN) Sunday, August 31: Dutch Grand Prix, Circuit Zandvoort (9 a.m. ET, ESPN) Sunday, September 7: Italian Grand Prix, Monza Circuit (9 a.m. ET, ESPN) Sunday, September 21: Azerbaijan Grand Prix, Baku City Circuit (7 a.m. ET, ESPN) Sunday, October 5: Singapore Grand Prix, Marina Bay Street Circuit (8 a.m. ET, ESPN) Sunday, October 19: United States Grand Prix, Circuit of the Americas (3 p.m. ET, ESPN, ABC) Advertisement Sunday, October 26: Mexico City Grand Prix, Autodromo Hermanos Rodriguez (4 p.m. ET, ESPN) Sunday, November 9: Sau Paulo Grand Prix, Interlagos Circuit (12 p.m. ET, ESPN) Saturday, November 22: Las Vegas Grand Prix, Las Vegas Strip Circuit (11 p.m. ET, ESPN, ABC) Sunday, November 30: Qatar Grand Prix, Lusail International Circuit (11 a.m. ET, ESPN) Sunday, December 7: Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, Yas Marina Circuit (8 a.m. ET, ESPN) More ways to watch the 2025 F1 season:
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Raptors mailbag: Trade RJ Barrett or Immanuel Quickley? What are expectations for Toronto next season?
A bit miffed that the Knicks haven't called Mother Star for permission to talk to me about the coaching opening, but then again I don't know what the answer would be. I do know it's a big part of Ye Olde Mailbag this weekend, so enjoy. Oh, and be nice to be your dad today (you listening, Super Son?) and let him enjoy Father's Day in whichever manner he wants. I saw where Rogers had been approved by the five leagues that it is involved in as a part owner of MLSE to up its stake to 75 per cent, basically just a rubber-stamping process as no league is going to refuse them in upping their stake. My question, or rather confusion, lies in Larry Tanenbaum's 25 per cent stake. I have heard for a while now that his stake can be acquired by MLSE in 2026. This would make Rogers the sole owner of MLSE. Is this a done deal? Is it a given that Larry will sell his stake? Does he have a choice? Although I don't see why he wouldn't, as MLSE has morphed away from him being really the face of the corporation and he has his new venture in the WNBA. My question is: Is his stake definitely going to be sold in 2026, or what are the factors behind it in terms of MLSE acquiring it? Thanks and have a great day. —Doug B. In deep trouble at times Friday night, the Thunder reduced the Finals to a best-of-three heading back to Oklahoma City on Monday night. In deep trouble at times Friday night, the Thunder reduced the Finals to a best-of-three heading back to Oklahoma City on Monday night. Rogers has the rights to obtain Tanenbaum's 20 per cent — he had sold five per cent earlier — this year under the original terms of partnership. It's expected that it will be, but nothing in business at that level is done until it's done and it's not done, so this will be an interesting boardroom story to follow. Good afternoon, Doug. I have really enjoyed the playoffs this year. The basketball has been good, and the series have been reasonably competitive. Has there been a year that you felt the playoffs as a whole were below par? Which NBA Finals series did you enjoy the least? And to end on a positive note, which year's NBA Finals did you enjoy the most? —A.J. Falconer in Burlington In recent vintages, I seem to recall the overall tone of the 2013 playoffs were only saved by an epic Spurs-Heat final; the rest of the playoffs were pretty bad. So maybe that covers off both aspects? I don't listen to his podcast, but I seem to read an awful lot of what he said. Do you have an opinion of Bill Simmons? —Paul M. I really don't. He's not someone I pay any attention to. He's certainly a good success story, having become this giant from a humble start as a one-trick pony Boston Sports Guy, and he has created journalism jobs as a boss, but I don't put any weight on his opinions or his weight in the sports and entertainment culture world. Hi, Mr. Smith. Been a while since I asked a question here, but I am getting excited about the upcoming season and step forward that I hope the Raptors are healthy enough to take this year. That being said, it has been often discussed that they have many duplicate pieces. How many players do you feel could make up a team that can challenge in the playoffs? Is Immanuel Quickley a starting-calibre point guard or better suited as a two? With the glut of two-threes that they have, which or how many can be in a quality playoff team? —Niagara Nick The roster as constructed right now should be a playoff team. Once you get there, it's health, matchups, hot hands and good luck that determine mainly who advances. Yeah, I'd say he's a starting quality point guard, not an all-star but certainly good enough to start in a post-season series. As for how many two-threes? I think you need probably four guards, three wings — or let's say five smalls and three or four bigs — to comprise a good roster. And give my best to Niagara. I gotta get back there soon and see if any of the old haunts are still haunting the place. Or discover some new ones. Hi, Doug. Can't complain about the playoffs being boring! Both NBA and NHL finals are competitive to say the least. Oh, the late nights and early-morning work hours mean pre-game naps for me! Some questions: 1) Many articles suggest that if the Raptors are involved in any trades, RJ Barrett is a target. No offence, but why not Immanuel Quickley? Similar age and contract, or is there less of a market for guards (mentioned Jakob Poeltl a lot, too). I automatically disregard any multiple-team trade rumour where the Raptors are the only team that benefits and someone demands a third of our roster and/or every draft pick for the next four to six years! 2) Tyrese Haliburton and SGA were both acquired by their respective teams in the first couple of years in the league by trading an all-star player. Should this be the model for team building? Or was this just two examples of savvy GMs pulling off a heist? 3) How likely is Dr. Alex McKechnie to manage another Kawhi Leonard-like recovery in the case of Brandon Ingram ? Getting back to potential trades, wouldn't it be wiser to see how well the healthy roster works together before making any moves (assuming no crazy offers too good to pass up are made!)? In this week's mailbag, Doug Smith takes questions on potential Raptors trades, the NBA Finals, Bobby Webster, the G League and much more. In this week's mailbag, Doug Smith takes questions on potential Raptors trades, the NBA Finals, Bobby Webster, the G League and much more. 4) Another draft question. Yes, the draft is largely a crapshoot, but as interest in Khaman Malauch grows, the odds of him being around for the Raptors may fall. Would it be so terrible to pick a player maybe an inch shorter with a similar wingspan? Also, based on last year, it looks like management prefers fourth- or fifth-year players rather than freshmen. Thoughts? It's sad that the team losing the championship will wonder what they need to fix when the truth is, with luck, they are essentially good enough! Thanks for keeping us going until next season! —Bernie M. The general theory I'm hearing about RJ being bandied about is that his contract, while a bit more expensive per year, has two fewer seasons left than Quickley's and that makes him a more interesting asset to discuss. And the larger value might make it easier for money to fit in a big deal. Doesn't mean it's why they want to deal him, it's that the fit is better. Big trades, like the ones that got Haliburton to Indy and SGA to OKC, are always just parts of the team-building process. And as much as we think now the Pacers and Thunder fleeced the Kings and Clippers, both Sacramento and Los Angeles firmly believed they were making deals to improve at the time. It just didn't work out. I don't know if Alex and the team's medical staff will make magic with Ingram, but their history suggests they will and it's part of the reason the Raptors pulled the trigger. They have faith in their staff. And yes, all things considered you'd want to see if things work before pulling off a big deal, but you have to strike when the opportunity arrives, if it does, and what's possible today is unlikely to be available in, say, next February. Yes, the draft is a crapshoot, no question. But it's not inches as much as it is overall skill set that will determine who gets taken. The four-year college 'vets' have generally come later in the draft and it's a conscious decision by management at that point. I don't think it should come into play with a top-10 selection. Hey, Doug. Hope you are enjoying the longer days and transition into the summer months. The warmth and sunshine just seem to change about everything for me. The firing of the head coaches for the New York Knicks (NBA) and Dallas Stars (NHL) after reaching conference finals has me scratching my head. Highly successful seasons, or in the Stars example multiple seasons. But clearly my definition of success and those organizations' definition are different. It seems the standard is now: win it all or you will be gone. Tom Thibodeau took the Knicks to a place they haven't been in a long while. One might think that's a good thing. Apparently not. What are your thoughts on this? Was the assumption that the Knicks advanced despite the coach, rather than because of him? Is there a lack of accountability by the GMs of these organizations for the roster? In other words, I gave you a championship roster, so you should have won a championship! It's not me, it's you. The Knicks and the Stars were right there. So close to getting to the finals. A play here, a bounce there and they're through. Now, a new coach, new system, etc., one could argue there is a higher likelihood you are worse next year rather than better, given how difficult it is to get to the conference finals. I don't get it. I know winning a lot of games for years on end, without getting to the ultimate goal, will cause reflection and perhaps change and rightly so (hello, Leafs ). I've just always felt that coaches get too much credit and too much blame, and the players on the court/ice ultimately will decide who's better. Maybe my thinking is flawed. —Chris I've always felt that coaches get too much blame and too much credit, but it's a hard argument to win given the focus on them and their position often as the only constant face of a franchise. But I don't think it's personal accountability as much as it is a stark lack of patience, and not to ever be forgotten is the impatience is often shown by ownership, far more often than by general managers. The owners are often the true culprit, and I think that's what was in play in New York. Kuhn has seen it all in his role as the Toronto Raptors' public address announcer since the inaugural season. Kuhn has seen it all in his role as the Toronto Raptors' public address announcer since the inaugural season. And while I can't speak to the Dallas hockey situation, I will make this point: At some juncture, some coaches have taken teams as far as they can go and there needs to be a change to take that final step, and maybe after three straight failures to take the final step a new approach is necessary. That was certainly not the case in the New York basketball scenario. The Knicks had showed constant growth and had not stagnated. Hi, Doug. Long time no submission (but doing so now to help keep you employed)! Having watched many of the playoff teams this post-season and their varying levels of skill, I'm impressed with many of those teams' future prospects — and concerned about how far Raps still have to go (in my opinion) to catch up to the better teams never mind climb over them in standings. How do you see the competitive landscape? —BBall Barry in North Bay/Sarasota I think the East is a bit of a mess and wide open right now, and I expect this Raptors roster to be quite competitive in it next season. Probably not to the level of winning the conference, but they can certainly take the next big step toward that. The distance to go isn't as great as you seem to think, I would say. Hey, Doug. Happy Super Dad Day! Wondering what you make of the latest soap opera from the New York Knicks? They fired Thibodeau and now appear to be asking the other 29 teams for permission to interview their head coach. (Maybe they should reach out to Red Auerbach. I understand he hasn't been under contract by the Celtics for a few years now.) Who should they hire? Is Dwane Casey no longer interested in coaching? If offered the position, should he accept it? I can't help to see certain similarities between the Knicks and Maple Leafs. What is it about these franchises that they appear close to returning to the finals of their respective leagues, and then everything collapses around them? Maybe Harold Ballard could be compared to James Dolan, but the Leafs have had solid — rational? — ownership for many years now. What should they do, or not do? Appreciated as always. —Phil I would never in a second recommend to a friend like Dwane that he consider working for Dolan and the Knicks. It's been a cesspool of ownership for about two decades and while Leon Rose may have cleaned it up a bit, it's still a mess. Who should they hire? Well, I'm sure there's an assistant out there who is eager for one of only 30 jobs like it on Earth who thinks he or she can somewhat survive, but I can't think of anyone in particular. Trouble is, it seems the Knicks are more interested in winning the press conference than anything, and that seldom works out. Leafs-Knicks? Maybe the common thread over the last 20 years is hubristic because neither team — until New York this spring — has been truly relevant in their sport, despite the fans' belief that they're good.
