Elles Road Roundabout, Invercargill, Gets Its Fourth Leg
New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA) advises the new access off the Elles Road roundabout, across the recently upgraded KiwiRail level crossing, will be available from Monday 28 July. It will be the key route to the Invercargill City Council (ICC) Pound, ICC Wastewater Treatment Plant and Freight Haulage.
'The existing access via Lake Street, about 300 metres south of the Elles Road roundabout will be closed,' says Jason Forbes, Senior Project Manager for NZTA in Southland.
The additional access takes the Elles Road roundabout to four legs (as seen in the aerial map below).
Mr Forbes says there will be signs advising of the closure of Lake St ahead of 28 July and people should find the new, wider route preferable to Lake St.
'Lake St is attracting increasing numbers of large trucks and with further developments in this area now underway, this traffic growth means this intersection is no longer fit for purpose,' Mr Forbes says.
'The new access off the Elles Road roundabout will have new bells and barrier arms to protect road users at the rail line, there will also be a separated cycle path adjacent to the new road which will have automatic gates at the rail crossing to protect cyclists and pedestrians.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
8 hours ago
- Scoop
What Happens If My Partner Dies Without A Will?
, Money Correspondent Got questions? RNZ is launching a new podcast, No Stupid Questions with Susan Edmunds, next month. We'd love to hear more of your questions about money and the economy. You can send through written questions, like these ones, but - even better - you can drop us a voice memo to our email questions@ What is the situation with joint property and joint bank accounts, when someone dies without a will? I have been living with my partner since the late 1980s. Our house, main bank accounts and one car are in both names. Our latest car - bought last year from joint bank accounts - could only be registered in his name, due to changes in NZTA rules. I have a separate bank account in my name, which has a small amount of inherited money. He also has a separate bank account with some money from his family and a few shares in his name, which were acquired through his work. Many years ago, I was told that if either of us died, then any assets in joint names would go to the surviving partner. We have not made wills, have no children, my parents have both died and his father has died, but recently, I saw that if someone has a spouse or partner, and parents, but no children, the spouse received the personal effects, $155,000 and two-thirds of what is left. The deceased person's parents get the remaining third. That means, if I die first, all I have goes to him, which is what I want, but if my partner dies before me, does his remaining parent inherit a third of our house (meaning I will need to sell it, as I do not have funds to buy her out in my 60s), plus a third of our two cars, a third of our joint bank account money, and a third of his KiwiSaver, private superannuation, bank accounts, insurance payouts and shares in his name? His mother is in residential care with dementia and already has enough funds to cover her care for decades. I am worried I may become homeless. What is the situation with joint property and joint bank accounts, when someone dies? As a starting point, it might be re-assuring to note that assets that you hold in a joint name would pass to you, so if you own your house jointly, it would be yours, if your partner died. I went to Public Trust principal trustee Michelle Pope for more detail to answer the rest of your question. She said, when someone died, their estate would be distributed according to the Administration Act. "In the writer's case, if they die first without a will, their entire estate would pass to their partner, as they have no children or surviving parents," she said. "Assets held in joint names, listed by the writer as the house, main bank accounts and a car, will automatically pass to the surviving partner. However, it's important to confirm whether the property is legally owned jointly or in equal/unequal shares. "If it's jointly owned, it will pass by survivorship. If not, the deceased's share will need to be administered as part of their estate, which can add complexity. "If the writer's partner dies first without a will and has a surviving parent, Section 77(3) of the Administration Act 1969 applies. In this scenario, the writer would receive all personal chattels (including the car solely owned by the partner), a prescribed amount of $155,000 plus interest and two-thirds of the remaining estate. "The surviving parent would receive the remaining one-third of the estate. For clarity, the assets owned solely by the partner would appear to be a bank account, some shares, KiwiSaver, private superannuation and insurance. "Given the house is owned jointly, the writer can expect that the house will pass to them by what's called 'survivorship' in legal language and will not form part of their partner's estate. "It goes without saying that I'd encourage the writer and their partner to create wills. A will that clearly outlines their wishes can help remove any uncertainty when a person dies and can make the estate administration process a lot easier for loved ones." Having separated earlier this year, I chose to move out of the family home where my ex still resides. She is paying the mortgage, refuses to pay the house insurance or rates etc. the roof is leaking and she refuses to agree to making repairs, the ceiling is now ruined and mouldy. Though she has indicated she wishes to buy me out, she has not shared any form of offer or plan. She now refuses to engage in any form of correspondence at all. My questions - how do I go about necessary repairs to the house and how do I get her to move out, so that the house can be sold? Online research seems to point to tenancy/landlord situations which don't apply in this case. Is it actually just time for a lawyer to sort this out? Yes, I think the best - and really only - way to deal with this is to go to a lawyer as soon as possible. Can you please answer some questions about the way supermarkets operate. If I deliberately deceive customers, it's called deception. If I deliberately load, unload prices to make you think you are getting a better deal when you are not, this is manipulation to enhance your profit. Surely both of the above are profiteering and fraudulent. Supermarkets - and all retailers - have rules they have to comply with, when it comes to discounting, and it is illegal for businesses to mislead shoppers about prices. You can complain to the Commerce Commission, if you think someone has got it wrong. There is a lot of focus on supermarket pricing at the moment and Consumer NZ has been vocal about the current regime not being effective enough. It is calling for tougher penalties and infringement notice powers.
NZ Herald
21 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Napier-Wairoa road: Tenders set to open for Waikare Gorge highway project
A computerised Waka Kotahi flyover of the Waikare Deviation planned for State Highway 2 between Napier and Wairoa. Video / Waka Kotahi NZTA Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. A tender for building a 3.4km State Highway 2 deviation between Napier and Wairoa should be let early next year, paving the way for a project likely to cost over $400 million. NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA) senior project manager Chris Mahoney said a tender process for the Waikare Gorge realignment, bypassing Putorino and the gorge, will open this month and close in December. With land use and resource consents granted last year and property acquisition to be finalised, it will enable a start in 2026. Confirmation comes as work starts on a second temporary replacement bridge just north of Putorino at the site of the Waikare River bridge, which was destroyed in Cyclone Gabrielle in February 2023. NZTA says funding for the Bailey bridge replacement by New Zealand's first Acrow bridge, amid the phasing out of the Bailey bridge stock first used in New Zealand in the 1940s, is separate from that of the realignment.
The Spinoff
2 days ago
- The Spinoff
Ōtaki to Levin cost blowout shines a spotlight on NZ's infrastructure woes
With a budget that has more than doubled, the road has little hope of recouping costs through tolls, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. One very expensive road The cost of the Ōtaki to north of Levin (O2NL) highway has ballooned to $2.1 billion, more than double the original 2020 estimate of $817 million, despite the fact that construction has yet to begin in earnest. Infrastructure minister Chris Bishop has laid the blame squarely on the previous government, claiming 'it was basically costed on the back of an envelope very quickly so Grant Robertson could announce projects at the start of election year'. In a bid to contain spiralling costs, NZTA proposed a series of pared-back design changes earlier this year, including replacing an interchange with a roundabout. But those proposals were strongly opposed by Horowhenua residents and, as 1News reported in June, ultimately scrapped. NZTA told BusinessDesk's Oliver Lewis (paywalled) that reconsenting the changes would have added more delays and costs than simply sticking to the original plan. Tolls won't bridge the funding gap To help recoup some of the cost, the government will impose tolls on the O2NL once it opens in 2029. But they're unlikely to make much of a dent in the final bill. The Infrastructure Commission recently told a select committee that for a toll road to pay for itself, it must cost no more than $32 million per kilometre, carry 40,000 vehicles a day, and cut travel time by 15 minutes. As Thomas Coughlan writes in the Herald (paywalled), O2NL fails on at least two counts: it will cost about $85m per km and is expected to carry more than 20,000 vehicles a day by the late 2030s. Currently, just three toll roads exist in New Zealand, all in the upper North Island. More are planned, including Penlink north of Auckland and Tauranga's Takitimu North Link, with O2NL joining that list. On Wednesday, the government announced a new digital road user charge system that should also enable the digital payment of tolls – but easier toll payments won't solve the core problem of projects that cost far more than they can return. Consensus under construction The O2NL cost blowout coincided with this week's Building Nations infrastructure conference, where politicians from both major parties repeated the familiar call for bipartisan planning on major builds. Infrastructure minister Chris Bishop says he wants 80 to 90% agreement on the long-term project pipeline. But as The Spinoff's Joel MacManus points out, high-minded talk of consensus tends to mask the cynical partisan reality. Bishop insists his concerns are about 'project selection and management', but, Joel notes, his definition of the 'right' projects tends to track closely with his party's own preferences. Labour has hardly done better: its handling of the cancelled iRex ferry project kept National in the dark about the extent of the cost blowout until after the election. 'The problem is that it is easy to say your opponents should be bipartisan in supporting your ideas,' Joel writes. 'It's harder to agree to support your opponents' ideas.' The Green roadblock The problem with the bipartisan-infrastructure dream isn't just opposing priorities, but also a deeper ideological divergence. As Richard Harman argues in the Herald (paywalled), any future Labour-led government is almost certain to include the Greens, a party that remains staunchly opposed to National's Roads of National Significance, including O2NL. The Greens believe that funding should be redirected toward rail and existing road upgrades, not carbon-intensive new highways. A recent Labour-Greens minority report on another expressway project argued that 'there is an urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and New Zealand has a limited financial budget and a limited carbon budget'. According to Harman, this kind of objection 'transcends the purely practical and economic and veers off into ideological considerations', making lasting political consensus difficult to achieve. As long as infrastructure remains a proxy for deeper debates over climate, growth and spending priorities, bipartisan agreement may remain more aspiration than reality.
