March Madness is here: How to watch Selection Sunday, start times and more
The best time in college basketball is here: March Madness. 'Selection Sunday' is set for March 16, when the 68-team fields for the 2025 NCAA Division I men's and women's tournaments will finally be revealed.
Since November, hundreds of athletes have battled through the regular season and conference tournaments, all fighting for a spot on the bracket. The NCAA selection committee will decide their fate, setting the stage for a tournament full of upsets, buzzer beaters and championship dreams.
How to watch Selection Sunday
Selection for the men's tournament begins at 6 p.m. ET on CBS and streams on Paramount+. Selection for the women's tournament is at 8 p.m. ET on ESPN and streams on ESPN+.
The NCAA will also stream live coverage of the show on NCAA March Madness Live.
Who is hosting?
CBS' Adam Zucker will host the men's selection show and will be joined by analysts Clark Kellogg, Jay Wright and Seth Davis. Bubba Cunningham, chair of the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball committee, will also discuss the bracket in a live interview.
ESPN's Elle Duncan will host the women's selection show. Analysts Andraya Carter, Rebecca Lobo, Carolyn Peck, reporter Holly Rowe and 'bracketologist' Charlie Creme will be part of the coverage.
Men's tournament schedule
The First Four of the men's tournament kicks off on March 18 and 19 at the University of Dayton in Dayton, Ohio. The championship game is slated for April 7 at the Alamodome in San Antonio, Texas.
Here's the full timeline for the men's tournament:
First Four: March 18-19
First round: March 20-21
Second round: March 22-23
Sweet 16: March 27-28
Elite Eight: March 29-30
Final Four: April 5 at the Alamodome in San Antonio, Texas
NCAA championship game: April 7 at the Alamodome in San Antonio, Texas
Women's tournament schedule
The First Four of the women's tournament kicks off on March 19 and 20. The location is to be determined. The championship game is slated for April 6 at Amalie Arena in Tampa, Florida.
Here's the full timeline for the women's tournament:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Match of the Day pundit pinpoints CBS contrast – 'It'd never happen at the BBC'
Former England defender and Match of the Day star Micah Richards has shed light on a key cultural difference between the BBC and American network CBS, which he covers the Champions League for Match of the Day's Micah Richards has opened up about a 'mad' party thrown in his honour by network CBS the night before the Champions League final. The ex-England star admitted that the BBC would never plan such an event. Richards, who retired in 2019 and immediately transitioned into punditry, provides insight across various platforms. He has starred on Match of the Day and brought laughter to Sky Sports ' coverage of the Premier League. CBS began broadcasting European football five years ago, introducing him to an American audience. While working for stateside employers, Richards has made it clear that culturally, things differ from appearing for the BBC, which operates under a Royal Charter and is, therefore, a public corporation funded primarily by TV license fees. Operating for the public good means the historically revered Beeb holds itself to incredibly high standards, and coverage of the FA Cup and World Cup, for example, is no exception. The 36-year-old has now illuminated a huge difference between the British broadcaster and the US-based CBS, epitomised by a party thrown the night before last month's Champions League final. "We got there, the sun is shining. I was drinking until about four o'clock in the morning on the Thursday night. Friday night, CBS only threw me my own party!" a bewildered Richards told Gary Lineker and Match of the Day colleague Alan Shearer on The Rest Is Football podcast. "Bearing in mind we've got the Champions League final on the Saturday night and I've been hanging for weeks before that as well. Imagine us at the Beeb throwing a party the night before, say, the FA Cup final or the World Cup final. "It would never, ever happen. CBS just embrace it. I got there thinking it's just a CBS party. I get there, the big massive flyer says: 'Big Meeks' Party.' It was madness." While cultural differences would likely prevent the BBC from allowing its staff to indulge in such revelries and borderline unprofessionalism, CBS' Champions League final broadcast went off without a hitch. Richards appeared alongside presenter Kate Scott and fellow ex-pros Thierry Henry and Jamie Carragher. Actor Tom Cruise and David Beckham were also part of the build-up to the kick-off in Munich. Yet, Richards' path to the German capital was not without its tribulations, and he detailed that a fear of flying made for an awkward journey. "For those who don't know, I don't like flying. So, me, the absolute idiot, decides to look at a route from Harrogate all the way to Munich," he continued. "I thought, 'Ok, if I get to London, it's not gonna be too bad.' So I get to London, which is three hours door to door. "Then I went to get the train from London, and it was supposed to go to Brussels. It got cancelled, so now I'm sweating, thinking what I could possibly do! I'm scrambling on my apps. "I went from London to Paris, then I had to wait a couple of hours. Paris to Stuttgart. Had to wait a couple hours, then Stuttgart to Munich, and when I got there, I was absolutely exhausted."
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Distracted Yankees star makes throwing error mic'd up on ESPN after vowing to bring 'smoke' vs Red Sox
Jazz Chisholm Jr. was not focusing on just baseball while playing third base for the New York Yankees on Sunday night, as he made a critical throwing error during a mid-game interview. During one of ESPN's mic'd up segments during the third inning of a national broadcast against the rival Red Sox, the ball was hit to the 27-year-old. On what would have been a tough play even if Chisholm was not giving an interview answer, the speedy infielder had to deliver a spinning throwing across the diamond, which ended up way off line for an error. His horrible throw came after Chisholm promised to bring 'smoke' against Boson after Red Sox rookie pitcher Hunter Dobbins said he'd rather retire than suit up in pinstripes. 'I think there should be more trash talk in baseball!!! Anyone agrees!? Anyway free smoke at 7,' Chisholm posted to X hours before the error. Fans took the opportunity to dunk on Chisholm for a bit of karma, or think that ESPN should have been charged with the error, not the Yankees star. "DAMMIT" — Talkin' Yanks (@TalkinYanks) June 8, 2025 He made a throwing error during a mid-game interview on Sunday night during an interview 'Now i know why (Juan) soto didin't want to wear the mic during the subway series,' one MLB fan said on social media. 'Stop the interviews. It's so distracting and selfish by mlb and espn in my opinion,' a second person added. 'This franchise used to win championships,' a third continued. 'If you wanted attention you could just be good at baseball,' a fourth stated. A collection of social-media messages about Jazz Chisholm's throwing error on ESPN The throwing error did not lead to any scoring from the Red Sox, although Boston came on strong later in the game to win 11-7. Dobbins got the win, allowing only three runs in five innings of work, absorbing any excess smoke from the Bronx. Chisholm did not have a hit in three at bats, but did draw a walk and drive in a run. The teams meet again later this week, with plenty chances for smoke from Chisholm should he choose to dish it out.
The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
Female athletes worry for future after $2.8 billion NCAA settlement
As news of the $2.8 billion NCAA settlement broke at AthleteCon, college athletes Sydney Moore and Sabrina Ootsburg found themselves in a unique position. Surrounded by hundreds of their peers, they felt like the only ones who truly grasped the situation's gravity. Moore recounted a conversation with a Division I football player, who exclaimed, "I'm about to get paid!" Her response was pointed: "Yes, you are about to get paid, and a lot of your women athlete friends are about to get cut." While Moore admitted her response might be a projection, the House settlement, which allows college athletes to directly receive revenue from their schools and offers financial stability to some, also raises concerns for others. Starting July 1, schools can share up to $20.5 million with their athletes annually. However, projections estimate that 75 per cent of these funds will go to football, leaving non-revenue-generating sports, which include almost everything outside football and basketball, in a precarious position. It's a query that is top of mind for Ootsburg as she enters her senior year at Belmont, where she competes on the track and field team. 'My initial thought was, 'is this good or bad? What does this mean for me? How does this affect me? But more importantly, in the bigger picture, how does it affect athletes as a whole?'' Ootsburg said. 'You look at the numbers where it says most of the revenue, up to 75 per cent to 85 per cent, will go toward football players. You understand it's coming from the TV deals, but then it's like, how does that affect you on the back end?' Ootsburg asked. 'Let's say $800,000 goes toward other athletes. Will they be able to afford other things like care, facilities, resources or even just snacks?' Moore has similar concerns. She says most female athletes aren't worried about how much – if any – money they'll receive. They fear how changes could impact the student athlete experience. 'A lot of us would much rather know that our resources and our experience as a student athlete is going to stay the same, or possibly get better, rather than be given $3,000, but now I have to cover my meals, I have to pay for my insurance, I have to buy ankle braces because we don't have any, and the athletic training room isn't stocked,' Moore said over the weekend as news of Friday night's settlement approval spread. One of the biggest problems, Ootsburg and Moore said, is that athletes aren't familiar with the changes. At AthleteCon in Charlotte, North Carolina, they said, perhaps the biggest change in college sports history was a push notification generally shrugged off by those directly impacted. 'Athletes do not know what's happening,' Ootsburg said. 'Talking to my teammates, it's so new, and they see the headlines and they're like, 'Ok, cool, but is someone going to explain this?' because they can read it, but then there's so many underlying factors that go into this. This is a complex problem that you have to understand the nuances behind, and not every athlete truly does.' Some coaches, too, are still trying to understand what's coming. Mike White, coach of the national champion Texas softball team, called it 'the great unknown right now.' 'My athletic director, Chris Del Conte, said it's like sailing out on a flat world and coming off the edge; we just don't know what's going to be out there yet, especially the way the landscape is changing,' he said at the Women's College World Series in Oklahoma City. 'Who knows what it's going to be?' What about the walk-ons? Jake Rimmel got a crash course on the settlement in the fall of 2024, when he said he was cut from the Virginia Tech cross-country team alongside several other walk-ons. The topic held up the House case for weeks as the judge basically forced schools to give athletes cut in anticipation of approval a chance to play – they have to earn the spot, no guarantees – without counting against roster limits. Rimmel packed up and moved back to his parents' house in Purcellville, Virginia. For the past six months, he's held on to a glimmer of hope that maybe he could return. 'The past six months have been very tough," he said. "I've felt so alone through this, even though I wasn't. I just felt like the whole world was out there – I would see teammates of mine and other people I knew just doing all of these things and still being part of a team. I felt like I was sidelined and on pause, while they're continuing to do all these things.' News that the settlement had been approved sent Rimmel looking for details. 'I didn't see much about roster limits," he said. 'Everyone wants to talk about NIL and the revenue-sharing and I mean, that's definitely a big piece of it, but I just didn't see anything about the roster limits, and that's obviously my biggest concern.' The answer only presents more questions for Rimmel. 'We were hoping for more of a forced decision with the grandfathering, which now it's only voluntary, so I'm a little skeptical of things because I have zero clue how schools are going to react to that," Rimmel told The Associated Press. Rimmel is still deciding what's best for him, but echoed Moore and Ootsburg in saying that answers are not obvious: 'I'm just hoping the schools can make the right decisions with things and have the best interest of the people who were cut.'
