Opinion: there's hope yet for a fun motoring future
Opinion
Despite the doom and gloom in recent years for petrolheads, Jethro reckons the foreseeable future looks exciting Skip 1 photos in the image carousel and continue reading
As I write this, the sun is shining and the temperature has picked up. It's finally spring and my optimism is rising. It helps that there seems to be good news every single day at the moment. (Not in the wider world, which is a disaster, but in our little automotive enclave.) After several years of oppressive doom and gloom for car enthusiasts it appears the oft touted winter of our passion has been rolled back, the heavy frost is thawing and maybe, just maybe it's spring for us, too.
Do I feel bad that EV sales are failing to ignite as anticipated, causing manufacturers all sorts of problems? I do not. Am I happy to see the likes of Porsche reinvesting in ICE technology and trying to adapt new EV only architecture to accept engines? Oh yes. Does the news that Mercedes is developing a new V8 engine and will stick it back in the C63 model ASAP fill me with glee? I'm afraid it does.
Advertisement - Page continues below
Perhaps I should feel a tinge of guilt. We are all meant to want to save the world. But instead I find myself heartened by the power of the people. For years publicly pious and mostly disingenuous politicians have made decisions on our behalf that sound great on the election campaign trail but have no grounding in reality. For once, a large majority of people in all markets have just said, 'Well, we can make our own decisions". To put it politely.
This is not to say that I hate EVs. But boy, have they been shoved down our throats. Usually new technology takes over once it's better, cheaper and more convenient than the incumbent. Right now it's none of those things in all but a very few use cases. As many have said before, legislate the end goal and let the engineers do the rest. Legislating the path to said target from a position of limited knowledge and experience is a fool's errand. You might like
All that being said, my hopes for the future of fun motoring is even being bolstered in the EV segment, too. I couldn't care much for yet another 1,000bhp saloon or 2,000bhp supercar that weighs more than the moon and has an appeal half-life measured in seconds, but projects like the new Renault 5 Turbo 3E are genuinely intriguing. It references old heroes but isn't slavishly stuck in the past and the look, feel and promise of the technology within is lip smacking.
There's a film on TG's YouTube channel (that you can watch below) about the 3E but just think reimagined Group B look, RWD and 540bhp from two in-wheel motors that offer precise torque vectoring, plus a hydraulic handbrake. And just 1,450kg! It's an extreme concept and, sadly, a huge chunk of change at over £120,000, but at least it's provocative and recognises that a conventional sports car or supercar with a sonorous engine replaced by electric motors just won't cut it. For an EV to be truly fun requires a wholly different approach.
Advertisement - Page continues below
The real challenge is to bring this sort of thinking into the grasp of normal people who can't blow well over £100,000 on a car with a very narrow capability window. Luckily, while manufacturers work out the solution to that conundrum, we've all been granted a reprieve. The road ahead is long, exciting and paved, for the foreseeable future, with V8 engines.
25 minutes 19 seconds
Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox.
Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
18 minutes ago
- The Sun
Labour put Red Arrows' future at risk by failing to replace ageing Hawk jets, slams Shadow Defence Secretary
LABOUR were accused of putting the Red Arrows future at risk last night by failing to replace their ageing Hawk jets. Shadow Defence Secretary James Cartlidge slammed the government for 'dithering' after The Sun revealed the display team is running out of Hawk T1s. 6 6 6 He said: 'The Sun's revelations on Red Arrow availability show why Labour needs to stop dithering and actually get on with ordering a new RAF training jet. He added: 'They should commit to buying British so that renewal of the Red Arrows supports jobs and investment across the country.' Top Brass admitted the Red Arrows may be forced to cancel air shows to reduce the wear and tear on their surviving aircraft. The Hawk T1s entered service 50 years ago and the factory that made spare parts has closed. Ground crews have been forced to cannibalise parts from old planes to keep the best ones running. RAF sources denied industry claims the fleet could plummet to six working aircraft by 2028. They insisted the Red Arrows could keep 11 aircraft in service until 2030 by scrounging parts from older aircraft. But with a quarter of the fleet in maintenance at any one time, the display team would be unable to fly their trademark Diamond Nine formation. An industry source said the RAF's projections were 'wildly optimistic'. Labour's Strategic Defence Review demanded RAF replace its fleet of Hawk jets as soon as possible. A defence source close to John Healey said: 'We've been clear that we will deliver on all the SDR recommendations, a replacement jet worthy of our iconic Reds is no different.' Incredible moment Red Arrows jets soar over Buckingham Palace in stunning footage captured from inside the cockpit The only British contender is a concept jet known as the Aeralise Fast Jet Trainer. Critics claim Aeralis is Qatari owned and yet to make a prototype. An RAF spokesperson said: 'The Red Arrows will continue to use the Hawk to perform displays and flypasts until their out of service date and have sufficient aircraft in the fleet to do so. 'We continue to work closely with industry partners to ensure an appropriate number of aircraft will be available.' 6 6 6
The Sun
18 minutes ago
- The Sun
Buy-now-pay-later Reeves is bribing voters with baubles as Labour's debt clock racks up and up
GOODBYE the Iron Chancellor, hello the Klarna Chancellor. Rachel Reeves' spending splurge yesterday may have some eye-catching purchases. But it's buy now, pay later as Labour racked up the debt even further. 3 You could hear Nigel Farage breathing down the neck of her Spending Review that saw the Treasury shovel billions out of the door on the never never. Clearly designed to see cranes in the sky and spades in the (electoral battle) ground, Reeves stuck another £113billion on the borrowing tab to try to see off the threat of Reform in the next crucial three years ahead of the election. There was £39billion for affordable homes and another £14billion for the first nuclear power station to be built in a generation. The £7billion prison-building project should be welcomed, as long as the judges actually fill them with violent thugs rather than online mums publishing stupid tweets. Bribe and cajole But voters will be wary of the £16billion in transport upgrades outside of the South East — what you might call levelling up — having heard these promises before, only to see them paused, scrapped and delayed again and again. And let's hope none of the above projects over-run on their budget — like pretty much every other major government infrastructure initiative has in the past 40 years. I couldn't help thinking Reeves' speech yesterday was the most she had ever sounded like Gordon Brown, torturing a dreary mantra that these were 'Labour choices' as she sought to bribe and cajole voters with baubles while the debt clock racked up and up. But we all know what happened to Brown when the music stopped . . . While the bond markets were steady last night after Donald Trump struck a trade deal with China, these things can go south very quickly, so it's far from clear if this spending gamble will pay off for Reeves. As former Cabinet Secretary Simon Case told The Sun this week: 'The nation's credit card is maxed out.' Top 5 takeaways from Spending review He warned: 'Just like when you're at home and you've got your credit card or your mortgage, you have to pay for that debt. 'So the debt interest that we're paying on the nation's credit card, if you actually put it out like it was a government department, it would be one of the biggest government departments by spending. 'It's taking up huge amounts of our money.' The Institute for Fiscal Studies put the extra borrowing Reeves has undertaken since taking over at No11 at £140billion, with more than £105billion of taxpayers' cash alone this year going on interest payments. To tackle this, Case directly urged Reeves this week to 'put the squeeze' on public spending or face a debt crisis and a lack of confidence in the UK's financial system with horrific effects. 3 So were there any cuts, or restraint of any real note yesterday? Of course there was the obligatory three per cent rise in NHS spending over the next three years as more pound notes poured into that seemingly indeterminable black hole. While NHS chiefs were crowing yesterday that they had 'done well' out of the settlement, they were already pumping out mood music that it might not be enough. Yet by 2029, the NHS annual budget will be just short of a quarter of a trillion pounds a year at £226billion. When will it ever be enough? And where are the promised reforms to the system that would rid us of this endless gimme, gimme, gimme cycle? Also, £9billon in efficiency savings for the NHS were proposed yesterday, with scarce details on the how, but already experts are pouring cold water on even that small sum being hit. Labour promised to get a grip on the NHS, and warned that more money would not be the answer. Another election promise that has turned to dust. As has Labour's pledge to end the use of migrant hotels within 12 months of taking power. That has now been downgraded to 'by the end of this Parliament' — at a cost of nearly £5billion until then. Smoke and mirrors Even by 2029, the Government will still be spending more than £2billion a year accommodating visitors, just not in hotels. So behind the smoke and mirrors of Reeves' speech to MPs, that isn't really a cut. And the continued costs of the heaving asylum bill dwarfs any of the departmental savings unveiled yesterday. Reeves was keen to stress no return to the days of austerity, and her tinkering on Whitehall budgets was about the only part of her speech yesterday that matched her rhetoric. The £1.5billion to be shaved off total departmental spending in the next three years pales in comparison to her extra spending elsewhere. Just over £14billion being spent this year, down to £12.6billion in three years' time. Hardly putting on the squeeze. GDP at 2.7trillion . . . Let's hope the Chancellor doesn't need a major rainy day fund anytime soon, or she really will be the new Gordon Brown.
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The six claims from Rachel Reeves that would never pass the test on a lie detector: ALEX BRUMMER
Rachel Reeves 's spending review was one of the most disingenuous statements I can remember in my long career as a financial journalist. In this deeply misleading review, the Chancellor used smoke and mirrors to disguise several key facts. A number of her claims would frankly fail a polygraph test. 1. She 'stabilised' the economy
