logo
EXCLUSIVE TRUTH of 'Maryland dad' Kilmar Abrego Garcia: Deported illegal migrant and alleged gangster loved by Dems... is now linked by new police video to a convicted human trafficker

EXCLUSIVE TRUTH of 'Maryland dad' Kilmar Abrego Garcia: Deported illegal migrant and alleged gangster loved by Dems... is now linked by new police video to a convicted human trafficker

Daily Mail​02-05-2025

Standing in front of the microphones on April 18, flanked by the friends and family of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, Democratic Senator Chris van Hollen declared that it is 'time to bring him home.'
Van Hollen had just returned from El Salvador where he overcame government opposition to meet with Abrego Garcia, 29, who was being held in the notorious Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (CECOT) prison, since his deportation from the United States in March.
The Maryland senator described how a tear ran down Abrego Garcia's cheek as the Salvadoran illegal immigrant – and resident of Maryland – lamented missing his wife and children.
Mainstream media reporting has described Abrego Garcia in similar terms, as a 'Maryland dad' and a 'father who had lived in Maryland for 13 years.' That's not how the Turmp administration tends to describe him.
Trump administration border czar Tom Homan has called Abrego Garcia, 'an MS-13 gang member, public safety threat, [and] terrorist.'
And, indeed, the new reporting and court documents seen by the Daily Mail closely linking Abrego Garcia to a convicted human trafficker paints a far dark portrait of the man than has been portrayed by others.
Suspected human trafficker
Staring nervously into a Tennessee police trooper's body camera in 2022, Abrego Garcia tried to explain exactly why he had eight other people crammed into his SUV and was driving with a suspended temporary license and no proof of insurance.
Bodycamera video of the stop was released by the Tennessee Highway Patrol on Friday.
'How many rows have you got in here? Four seats? Four rows of seats?' a state trooper can be heard asking Abrego Garcia.
'Did y'all put an extra one in? Huh? Did yall put another one in no? They come like this I've never seen one with that many seats in it,' the officer said.
Abrego Garcia said he had been driving construction workers between jobs for the last three days, starting in Houston, Texas with their final destination being Temple Hills, Maryland, 1,400 miles away.
But the Tennessee highway patrol officer became suspicious when Abrego Garcia allegedly tried to put him 'off track' by responding to questions with questions and pretending he couldn't speak English very well.
According to a police report, there was no luggage in the black Chevrolet Suburban and all of the men gave Abrego Garcia's home address as their address as well.
Abrego Garcia was also driving with an expired temporary license. And he told the state trooper that the SUV belonged to his boss, Jose Ramon Hernandez Reyes.
So concerned was the trooper that he suspected Abrego Garcia involved in human trafficking and arrested the nine men.
But – due to guidance form the Biden administration's FBI –Abrego Garcia was released with a warning for driving without a valid license.
Now, court and Homeland Security Department intelligence documents seen by Just The News are reportedly revealing more about that stop and Abrego Garcia's 'boss' - a fellow Salvadoran illegal immigrant and convicted human smuggler.
On December 2, 2019, a special agent of the Department of Homeland Security stopped a suspicious white Dodge Caravan minivan with New Mexico plates on a stretch of interstate I-10 in Gautier, Mississippi.
Inside the agent found nine illegal migrant men.
In the passenger seat was sat Jose Ramon Hernandez Reyes – the man that Abergo Garcia reportedly named as his 'boss.'
In August 2020, Hernandez Reyes plead guilty to four counts of 'aiding and abetting the illegal transportation of an alien within the United States' and sentenced to 18 months in federal prison.
He said he had been living in Maryland, where Abrego Garcia lives, before moving to Houston, Texas, a city Abrego Garcia had reportedly said he was thinking about relocating to.
A Daily Mail analysis of the publicly available evidence is raising even deeper questions about Abrego Garcia's past and the narrative that his defenders have spun.
Early life in San Salvador
Abrego Garcia's story starts in the Los Nogales neighborhood of San Salvador, El Salvador's capital where he lived with his mother, Cecilia, and the rest of his family.
Abrego Garcia would later testify that his job was to go to the grocery store and buy the supplies for the family's pupusa business, which they ran from their home.
Court documents reveal Abrego Garcia's claim that Barrio 18, a local gang, used him as a 'pawn' to extort his mother by demanding the money from the business or they would hurt him and his brother.
The family allegedly became so concerned that they sent Abrego Garcia's brother Cesar to the US, where he lives today, owning a home and construction business in rural Maryland.
Soon, Kilmar followed his brother as the threats allegedly continued. And at 16-years-old, Abrego Garcia illegally crossed into the US and joined his brother in Maryland.
For the next eight years, he appears to have lived and worked in the US. By the time of his deportation, he was a first-year sheet metal apprentice and found other employment as an HVAC installer.
In 2016 he met his future wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, a US citizen who works in a dentist's office, and they had three children together, 10, nine and four, two of whom have been diagnosed with autism, while the third has seizures.
But the first to raise concerns about Abrego Garcia's alleged gang ties was Edwin Ramos, the father of two of her Vasquez's children, who told a court she was dating a 'gang member'
Alleged gang ties
Ramos filed for an emergency custody hearing and alleged that his children were in danger, but a judge disagreed it was an emergency and in early 2019 the case was dismissed for a lack of jurisdiction.
Then in March of that year, Abrego Garcia was arrested in an incident which would sow the seeds for his 2025 deportation by the Trump administration.
Abrego Garcia was standing around with three known MS-13 gang members outside a Home Depot in Hyattsville, Maryland.
His wife has claimed that he was looking for work, but he was arrested, nonetheless.
One of the MS-13 members was known as 'Bimbo' and had previous arrests for assault, burglary and concealing a dangerous weapon according to the document, called a 'Gang Field Interview Sheet'.
At the time Abrego Garcia was wearing a Chicago Bulls hat which the police said was 'indicative of Hispanic gang culture' and showed he was a member in 'good standing' with MS-13. The clothing allegedly represented 'see no evil, hear no evil', a gang motto.
According to the document, a detective spoke with a 'past and proven reliable source' who advised that Abrego Garcia was an 'active member of MS-13' with a clique known as the Westerns and had the rank of 'Chequeo' and the moniker 'Chele'.
The document suggested that Abrego Garcia and another man had previously been 'detained in connection with a murder investigation.' Abrego Garcia's lawyer has said he wasn't ever charged with murder.
In April 2019, a month later, a federal judge in Baltimore denied Abrego Garcia a bond and said that she found the claims about him being a gang member persuasive.
Judge Elizabeth Kesller wrote: 'The fact that a 'past, proven, and reliable source of information' verified the respondent's gang membership, rank, and gang name is sufficient to support that the respondent is a gang member, and the Respondent has failed to present evidence to rebut that assertion'.
While Abrego Garcia was still detained he married Vasquez. In court documents she later said that the wedding might be their 'only chance' to get married even though it was 'far from how we ever imagined it'.
Then Abrego Garcia's fortunes changed dramatically.
Deportation halted
In October 2019, a different judge, who heard two days of testimony including from Abrego Garcia and his wife freed him and allowed him to stay in the US indefinitely.
While Baltimore federal judge David M. Jones did not dismiss the alleged that he was an MS-13 member, he said that he was persuaded that Abrego Garcia would be persecuted if he returned to El Salvador.
He granted Abrego Garcia 'withholding of removal', a status which is at the discretion of a judge and has a higher burden of proof than asylum applications.
Judge Jones said Abrego Garcia provided 'credible' responses to the questions and his testimony was 'internally consistent…and appeared free of embellishment'.
Abrego Garcia also provided 'substantial documentation' for his claims including affidavits from family members, the judge concluded, adding that the Barrio 18 gang threatened Abrego Garcia's life more than once.
Todd Bensman, a Senior National Security Fellow for the Center for Immigration Studies, which is based in Washington, told the Daily Mail that the judge 'cut this guy a break'.
'To me it's sketchy he would agree to that,' said Bensman. 'Very often there's no evidence of these claims, they just take them at their word. It's one of the great weaknesses of our immigration system.
'I can't tell you how many immigration court proceedings where the government's lawyer offers nothing at all. Their caseloads are insane. Nobody is going to be able to go to El Savador and interview the witnesses, the mother, neighbors, local police, nobody is doing those investigations to be a proper adversary,' he continued. 'These things often fall to: does the judge get a good gut feeling about the claim or not?'
The ruling itself suggests that is what happened, and the judge noted that 'DHS (Homeland Security) has failed to carry their burden to show there are changes circumstances that would result in the respondent's life not being threatened'
Bensman also cast doubt on the idea that Abrego Garcia may still be facing threats back home eight years after he arrived in America. Abrego Garcia's mother Cecilia, who was supposedly being threatened by the Barrio 18 gang, is now living in Maryland.
Bensman said: 'Even if it was true when he was being threatened, the conditions would have very substantially changed almost a decade later.
'I call b******* on the story. I haven't seen anything made public that would constitute evidence that he was in danger of being sent back, especially now because the government of El Salvador has cleaned everything up'.
Regardless, Abrego Garcia was allowed to continue living in the US in 2019, but he wasn't done with the courts.
Domestic abuse claims
While Abrego Garcia's lawyers have insisted he has never been convicted of a crime and has no criminal record, in May 2021 his wife got a restraining order against him and claimed he repeatedly beat her.
Vasquez wrote in one document: 'At this point, I am afraid to be close to him. I have multiple photos/videos of how violent he can be and all the bruises he (has) left me'.
In a statement released after the allegations were made public, Vasquez said she had sought the restraining order 'out of caution' because of her previous experience with domestic violence.
She said: 'Things did not escalate, and I decided not to follow through with the civil court process. We were able to work through this situation privately as a family, including by going to counseling. Our marriage only grew stronger in the years that followed'.
But the most damning evidence against Abrego Garcia was yet to come.
Vasquez wrote in one document: 'At this point, I am afraid to be close to him. I have multiple photos/videos of how violent he can be and all the bruises he (has) left me'. (Pictured: A post from Vasquez's social media of her and Abrego Garcia).
Human trafficking
As first uncovered by the Tennessee Star, a conservative news and commentary website, Abrego Garcia was pulled over on the I-40 in Putnam County, Tennessee, for speeding and straying out of his lane.
The Combined Intelligence Unit report said that on December 1, 2022 an officer noticed eight other people were in the vehicle: Abrego Garcia claimed he had begun his journey eight days ago in Houston, Texas, and was going to Temple Hills, Maryland, via St Louis, Missouri.
The men in the car were construction workers and he was driving them around for his boss, Abrego Garcia said.
But red flags began appearing when the officer noticed there was no luggage in the vehicle and all the passengers gave the same home address matching Abrego Garcia's.
The report states: 'During the interview, subject (Abrego Garcia) pretended to speak less English than he was capable of and attempted to put the officer off-track by responding to questions with questions.'
Incredibly, Abrego Garcia was let off with a warning for driving without a valid license.
Michael Patrick Leahy, the editor of the Tennessee Star, said the fact Abrego Garcia was released was 'beyond weird'.
He revealed that the traffic stop went on for an hour and 45 minutes - an extraordinary amount of time - while Abrego Garcia's details were sent to federal law enforcement authorities who came back and asked the officer to take photos of the driver and all the vehicle occupants.
But after that information had been sent, the order came back to let them all go.
Leahy said: 'The Tennessee Highway Patrol told us that the Biden era FBI instructed them to let Garcia go. That was highly suspect to us.'
According to Leahy, Abrego Garcia's story didn't stack up because he claimed to have stopped in St Louis, Missouri, but to get to Maryland from there it would be a straight drive East.
Instead, he was stopped in Tennessee, which would have been a five-hour detour South.
Another inconsistency was that Abrego Garcia said he had been driving for three days yet it's only 900 miles, or a 12-hour drive. St Louis to Putnam County in Tennessee was another 400 miles, or five hours.
Houston, where Abrego Garcia claimed to have started his journey, is a known human trafficking hub.
Leahy said: 'When we talked to law enforcement officers - we talked to several - they all said the proper course of action would be to take the driver in and find some place for the eight individuals in the vehicle to be held and questioned by ICE. That didn't happen'.
Vasquez later claimed that her husband 'worked in construction and sometimes transported groups of workers between job sites'. She said it was 'entirely plausible he would have been pulled over while driving with others in the vehicle'.
But Todd Bensman told the Daily Mail that the report from Tennessee was 'game changing' and that, based on his years of experience in the immigration system, said it was likely a 'smuggling event'.
'That means he very likely was involved in the business of smuggling even after his immigration court hearing when he's claiming I'm not in MS-13,' Bensman said. 'You cannot do smuggling in this country unless you're dealing with criminal elements.'
Abrego Garcia's current deportation saga began when he was pulled over by immigration officers on March 12, 2025 and was told his immigration status had changed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California is losing the court of public opinion
California is losing the court of public opinion

Telegraph

time8 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

California is losing the court of public opinion

In the on-going Battle of Los Angeles, California governor Gavin Newsom may have the law on his side – but his adversary president Donald Trump has the most powerful imagery. The conflict began in Los Angeles on Friday, when mobs of protestors attacked agents of the US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE), who were trying to serve warrants on specific illegal immigrants at a Home Depot and also at a clothing store. On Saturday, during a protest in front of a nearby Department of Homeland Security (DHS) office, members of the crowd lit fires and threw rocks at federal officers, who defended themselves with tear gas and non-lethal ammunition. Later that day, president Trump authorised the deployment of 2000 members of the National Guard to protect the federal ICE agents; since then 700 American Marines have been added to the federal force. Governor Newsom and other leaders of the Democratic-dominated California have claimed that Trump's actions were not needed because local and state authorities had the situation under control. And yet on Sunday, following three days of violence and arrests, the Los Angeles Police Department declared downtown Los Angeles an 'unlawful assembly' area. And on Monday the state of California sued the Trump administration, claiming that Trump 'illegally acted to federalise the National Guard,' in the words of Newsom. Typically a governor requests a president to federalise and mobilise the National Guard to deal with riots or natural disasters. For example, consider the Los Angeles riots of 1992. It was sparked by the acquittal of four white police officers who beat a black motorist named Rodney King and it led to more than fifty deaths and a billion dollars of damage; in response a Republican California governor Pete Wilson asked a Republican president George HW Bush to federalise the National Guard. Not since 1965, when president Lyndon B. Johnson sent the National Guard to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators, has a president sent troops without a governor's request. While California officials might be able to make a legal case against the Trump administration, the state and the Democratic party risk losing in the court of public opinion. Viral photographs show masked rioters waving Mexican flags in front of burning cars and debris, supporting the Trump White House's inflammatory claims about an immigrant invasion. In a shrewd public relations move, the federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has released mug shots under the heading: 'ICE Captures Worst of the Worst Illegal Alien Criminals in Los Angeles Including Murderers, Sex Offenders, and Other Violent Criminals.' The rogues' gallery contains illegal immigrants from a number of countries including Vietnam, the Philippines, and Mexico, charged with offenses including attempted rape, assault with a deadly weapon, grand theft larceny, distribution of heroin and cocaine, wilful cruelty to a child and other serious crimes. Democrats recently succeeded in reversing the allegedly unlawful deportation to El Salvador of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an illegal immigrant from El Salvador who was granted the right to remain in the US by a federal immigration judge. But on his return he was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of being an MS-13 gang member who has smuggled thousands of illegal immigrants, drugs, and firearms in the US. Democratic strategists might ask whether someone like Abrego Garcia should be the face of the Democratic party. At least, unlike some of the rioters cavorting in front of burning wreckage in LA, he does not wear a mask.

Rachel Reeves spending review: What will be in the spending review and what does it mean for Scotland?
Rachel Reeves spending review: What will be in the spending review and what does it mean for Scotland?

Scotsman

time2 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Rachel Reeves spending review: What will be in the spending review and what does it mean for Scotland?

The Spending Review will be delivered by Chancellor Rachel Reeves on Wednesday. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Chancellor Rachel Reeves will deliver the Spending Review on Wednesday, in what is expected to lead to a significant amount of money for Scotland. While some areas with the greatest uptick in spending are devolved, the nature of the Barnett Formula means the Scottish Government will be allocated extra funds, in what The Scotsman understands will be a significant increase. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Reform UK has suggested the Barnett Formula and block funding grant from Westminster should go to be replaced with more tax powers for the Scottish Parliament The formula is used to work out the level of public spending for each of the devolved administrations. The Barnett Formula aims to be fair mechanism by giving each of the devolved administrations the same pounds-per-person change in funding. Here's what is expected to be in the spending review and what it means for Scotland. Winter fuel Scottish pensioners now face being worse off than those in England and Wales after the UK government confirmed its U-turn over the winter fuel payment. The Chancellor announced on Monday the payment, worth up to £300 for each recipient, will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners who previously received it because anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year will now get the payment automatically. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, Scotland has already created a devolved benefit of £100 for all pensioner households, which is less generous than the UK government version, potentially leaving hundreds of thousands of Scots worse off than their English and Welsh counterparts. With Holyrood being sent more money through the Barnett Formula, Scottish Labour has urged the Government at Holyrood to increase its payments. Energy UK energy secretary Ed Miliband endured a battle with the Treasury over funding, but is now expecting several big announcements. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (centre), Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar (right) and Ed Miliband, Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary (left), during a visit to St Fergus Gas Terminal, a clean power facility in AberdeenshirePicture: Jeff J Mitchell/PA Wire Most notably, the UK government has announced a £14.2 billion investment to build the Sizewell C nuclear plant in Suffolk - a project that could boost energy in Scotland, despite being based elsewhere. For Scotland, it is also understood the government is set to commit to a multi-decade, multi-billion redevelopment of HMNB Clyde, with funding in the hundreds of millions for the next few years. There are also hopes the Chancellor could finally sign off on the Acorn project. Based near Peterhead, it has been in the pipeline for years and would allow fossil fuels to continue to be burnt without, in theory, releasing harmful carbon emissions. The project is seen as key to scaling up the low-carbon hydrogen sector in Scotland and future plans for Grangemouth, but the technology has not yet been demonstrated at commercial scale. One way or the other, a decision is expected during the spending review. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Health Wes Streeting's department is expected to get one of the biggest funding boosts, which will in turn lead to more money for Scotland through the Barnett Formula. Shortly after the statement from Ms Reeves, the UK government will publish groundwork for its NHS ten-year plan. This will give an idea of the financial boost to Scotland and also what Labour might try to do to NHS Scotland if they win the Holyrood election next year.

Reform needs Zia Yusuf
Reform needs Zia Yusuf

New Statesman​

time2 hours ago

  • New Statesman​

Reform needs Zia Yusuf

After the turmoil created by the resignation of Zia Yusuf as chairman of Reform UK, and then his return 48 hours later in a new role, the risibly titled 'leader of the DOGE unit', Nigel Farage's anti-system party started the week determined to regain control. While Yusuf was interviewed in the coveted 8.10am slot on the BBC's Today programme on 9 June, Farage was in Wales. There he delivered a speech, fusing right and left populism, aimed at disaffected Labour voters. He took credit for Labour's U-turn on restoring the winter fuel allowance to most pensioners, accused Keir Starmer of being in a 'blind panic' about Reform (he had previously boasted that he was living rent free in the prime minister's head), said he would like to see the return of coal mines to Wales and pledged to reopen the Port Talbot steel blast furnaces. All in a morning's work. As the so-called Conservative and Unionist party withers in Scotland and Wales, Reform, dismissed as an English nationalist party, is supplanting it; without any significant infrastructure or organisation in Scotland, Reform improbably won 26 per cent of the vote in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election last week, which Labour took from the SNP. John Swinney, the SNP leader, had declared before the vote that Labour could not win. Don't follow his racing tips. Support for Labour has collapsed in Wales, and, according to the latest YouGov poll, Reform is second behind Plaid Cymru in the contest for next year's Senedd elections. The mood in the old industrial heartlands of Wales is no different from the red wall areas of England: one of mass disaffection. Starmer's advisers believe the next general election will be a straight contest between Labour and Reform and it's one they think they can win, not least because they expect progressives, as well as crypto Liberal Democrats, to fall into line when confronted by the prospect of a Farage premiership. That might turn out to be another progressive delusion. The greater challenge for Farage, as framed by Dominic Cummings, who caricatures Reform as being little more than 'Nigel Farage and an iPhone', is this: can the party attract elite talent? They were once antagonists, but Cummings is now one of the most astute analysts of Farageism. 'Does he want to find people to be chancellor etc who are better than the old parties?' Cummings wrote in a long Substack post, prefaced by the obligatory blizzard of quotations from Bismarck, Churchill, Nietzsche, Mao, Thucydides and James Marriott. 'Can he exploit the surging energy for new politics among the young, can he hoist a sail and let that force blow him along to greater victories over his enemies? Or does he blow the chance and let that energy be captured by others?' When I spent a day with Farage on the Essex coast last summer as he campaigned in the general election, he told me, as I wrote at the time, that he believed he had done more than any other politician to defeat the far right in Britain. 'If you think I'm bad enough, imagine what might come after me,' he said. 'But while I'm here that person will not emerge.' Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Farge is adept at simultaneously deflecting and attracting the nativist right, which is why his party is split. Rupert Lowe, a boorish Monday Club-style reactionary now sitting as an independent in the Commons having been banished from Reform, represented a hardline faction that is obsessed with Islam. That faction is closer, in spirit and intent, than Farage can tolerate to European far-right parties such as the Sweden Democrats and the Afd in Germany. I was reporting from a Reform rally in Quendon, near Saffron Walden, in Essex, in February, when Lowe demanded the deportation of rape gangs 'and members of their families'. He later posted on Facebook that he had been 'instructed by Farage's team, sanctioned by him, to remove a call to deport all complicit foreign national family members'. He claimed he was being censored. Shortly afterwards, he was out, having also clashed with Yusuf. Farage wants to position Reform as a mainstream centre-right alternative to the Conservatives, but he also wants 'to move the needle' on what counts as acceptable political discourse. Angela Jenkyns, the new Reform mayor of Greater Lincolnshire, said something similar when I asked her about her recent comments about putting asylum seekers in tents. 'I was talking about illegal migrants, not asylum seekers,' she told me while conceding that some of her statements were deliberately outrageous. 'You've misquoted me there. But it should be like in France, a contained area [of tents] – look at the stats, look at the people coming through. The majority are males, economic migrants.… It's about fairness for the British people. I'd never say that about asylum seekers. The tent thing was intended to be provocative to make the public realise that people have had enough. People should not be put up in hotels when British people are struggling to pay their taxes. I know I'm a glutton for my own punishment, but the thing is, I always know what I'm saying.' Sarah Pochin also knew what she was saying when she asked her question in the Commons about banning the burqa. Yusuf, who has endured repugnant racial abuse online, was correct to call the question 'dumb', on multiple levels. Why prioritise such an issue with your first question as an MP when it was not even party policy? The answer is that Pochin, who won the Runcorn and Helsby by-election, was cynically, opportunistically (choose the most appropriate adverb) 'laying down a marker' as one her allies put it to me. This is who she is and what she wants. In his BBC interview with Yusuf, who is a British Muslim of Sri Lankan heritage, Nick Robinson suggested that he provided 'cover' for Farage. The implication was that he was a useful idiot. That is one view. Another is that as a Goldman Sachs alumnus who earned as much as £30 million from the sale of a business, and has since demonstrated his competence by professionalising the party, Zia Yusuf has the kind of experience Reform must attract if is to become anything more than an anti-system protest movement. That was the real reason Farage was desperate not to lose him. [See more: Will Labour's winter fuel U-turn work?] Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store