MPS school resource officer deadline; will city be in compliance?
The deadline for school resource officers to return to MPS was Saturday, March 15.
The city could pay $1,000 each day until it is in compliance with state law.
Mayor Johnson said he's confident the city is on track to comply with a court order.
MILWAUKEE - The court-ordered deadline for resource officers to return to Milwaukee Public Schools was Saturday, March 15. Whether the city is in compliance when students return on Monday remains to be seen.
The backstory
The city failed to comply with Judge David Borowski's previous deadline, which required school resource officers – or SROs – to return by Feb. 27.
FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android
"I expect my orders to be followed. You don't have to like them, but they need to be followed," he said last month.
Borowski ordered the city to deploy school resource officers, or show proof of progress, by March 15. If the city fails to do so, it must pay $1,000 each day until it is in compliance with the law.
What they're saying
Mayor Cavalier Johnson said he's confident the city is on track to comply with a judge's order, and everything will be in place by the time students return on Monday.
"It's what's in the bill, so given that it's what's in the bill, I wanted to get it accomplished," he said. "That's exactly where we are now."
SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News
"What I know is SROs and some of our security staff are in training, and we are excited to see this moving forward," said Michael Harris, MPS interim chief school administration officer.
The National Association of School Resource Officers told FOX6 News it has trained 38 officers, each of whom has completed 40 hours of SRO training as of Friday.
What's next
The case is back in court on Monday for a hearing.
Big picture view
A state law, passed in 2023, helped municipalities with their budgets. For Milwaukee, it required at least 25 school resource officers to return to MPS by Jan. 1, 2024. When that didn't happen, a parent sued.
In a statement to FOX6, the attorney for the MPS parent show sued said "they are waiting for MPS and the city to comply with the law."
The Source
Information in this report is from the City of Milwaukee, Milwaukee Public Schools and prior FOX6 News coverage of the order for school resource officers to return to MPS.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
4 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Students face new cellphone restrictions in 17 states as school year begins
Both Democrats and Republicans have taken up the cause, reflecting a growing consensus that phones are bad for kids' mental health and take their focus away from learning, even as some researchers say the issue is less clear-cut. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'Anytime you have a bill that's passed in California and Florida, you know you're probably onto something that's pretty popular,' Georgia state Rep. Scott Hilton, a Republican, told a forum on cellphone use last week in Atlanta. Advertisement Phones are banned throughout the school day in 18 of the states and the District of Columbia, although Georgia and Florida impose such 'bell-to-bell' bans only from kindergarten through eighth grade. Another seven states ban them during class time, but not between classes or during lunch. Still others, particularly those with traditions of local school control, mandate only a cellphone policy, believing districts will take the hint and sharply restrict phone access. Advertisement Students see pros and cons For students, the rules add new school-day rituals, like putting phones in magnetic pouches or special lockers. Students have been locking up their phones during class at McNair High School in suburban Atlanta since last year. Audreanna Johnson, a junior, said 'most of them did not want to turn in their phones' at first, because students would use them to gossip, texting 'their other friends in other classes to see what's the tea and what's going on around the building.' That resentment is 'starting to ease down' now, she said. 'More students are willing to give up their phones and not get distracted.' But there are drawbacks — like not being able to listen to music when working independently in class. 'I'm kind of 50-50 on the situation because me, I use headphones to do my schoolwork. I listen to music to help focus,' she said. Some parents want constant contact In a survey of 125 Georgia school districts by Emory University researchers, parental resistance was cited as the top obstacle to regulating student use of social and digital media. Johnson's mother, Audrena Johnson, said she worries most about knowing her children are safe from violence at school. School messages about threats can be delayed and incomplete, she said, like when someone who wasn't a McNair student got into a fight on school property, which she learned about when her daughter texted her during the school day. 'My child having her phone is very important to me, because if something were to happen, I know instantly,' Johnson said. Many parents echo this — generally supporting restrictions but wanting a say in the policymaking and better communication, particularly about safety — and they have a real need to coordinate schedules with their children and to know about any problems their children may encounter, said Jason Allen, the national director of partnerships for the National Parents Union. Advertisement 'We just changed the cellphone policy, but aren't meeting the parents' needs in regards to safety and really training teachers to work with students on social emotional development,' Allen said. Research remains in an early stage Some researchers say it's not yet clear what types of social media may cause harm, and whether restrictions have benefits, but teachers 'love the policy,' according to Julie Gazmararian, a professor of public health at Emory University who does surveys and focus groups to research the effects of a phone ban in middle school grades in the Marietta school district near Atlanta. 'They could focus more on teaching,' Gazmararian said. 'There were just not the disruptions.' Another benefit: More positive interactions among students. 'They were saying that kids are talking to each other in the hallways and in the cafeteria,' she said. 'And in the classroom, there is a noticeably lower amount of discipline referrals.' Gazmararian is still compiling numbers on grades and discipline, and cautioned that her work may not be able to answer whether bullying has been reduced or mental health improved. Social media use clearly correlates with poor mental health, but research can't yet prove it causes it, according to Munmun De Choudhury, a Georgia Tech professor who studies this issue. 'We need to be able to quantify what types of social media use are causing harm, what types of social media use can be beneficial,' De Choudhury said. A few states reject rules Some state legislatures are bucking the momentum. Wyoming's Senate in January rejected requiring districts to create some kind of a cellphone policy after opponents argued that teachers and parents need to be responsible. Advertisement And in the Michigan House in July, a Republican-sponsored bill directing schools to ban phones bell-to-bell in grades K-8 and during high school instruction time was defeated in July after Democrats insisted on upholding local control. Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, among multiple governors who made restricting phones in schools a priority this year, is still calling for a bill to come to her desk. Associated Press writers Isabella Volmert in Lansing, Michigan, and Dylan Lovan in Louisville, Kentucky, contributed.
Chicago Tribune
10 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Forrest Claypool: Chicago leaders show no signs of changing their fiscal behavior
For years, city and state officials have marched Chicago toward a cliff. This budget season will determine if they have the will to finally pull back from the abyss. Leaders of three prominent Chicago civic organizations recently outlined principles in the Tribune that they hope will guide those officials as they tackle billions in budget deficits at the city, public schools and the CTA. Although sound, their admonitions seem almost quaint, reflecting a bygone era when elected officials exercised a modicum of responsibility for their constituents' futures. Some history, juxtaposed with paraphrasing of the civic leaders' recommendations, is illustrative:For decades, city mayors have used one-time revenues to present the illusion of balanced budgets. Both Mayor Richard M. Daley and his successor Rahm Emanuel used 'scoop and toss,' refinancing bonds with new 30-year debt and spending it to close annual deficits. A Tribune investigation called this practice, along with Daley's use of bonds to cover legal settlements, back pay and sundry expenses, 'equivalent to taking out a 30-year mortgage to buy a car and making your children — or grandchildren — pay it off, with interest.' Mayors Lori Lightfoot and Brandon Johnson used one-time COVID-19 relief dollars, among other short-term revenues, to balance budgets. Stealthy deficit spending has been the choice of mayors and city councils since at least the late decades of economic growth under Daley and Emanuel, financed in part by tax increment financing districts, Lightfoot and Johnson have raided these funds to balance budgets, shrinking job creation and future revenues. Further dampening growth, Lightfoot instituted automatic annual property tax increases and raised the gas tax. Johnson pushed through new taxes falling largely on businesses, making the city less competitive. He is seeking a new tax on each private sector job in the late! With Johnson's passive acquiescence, Gov. JB Pritzker imposed new pension sweeteners on the city Aug. 1, adding $60 million to 2027's pension tab and a whopping $750 million a year by 2055. It increases pension debt in the police and firefighters' funds by $11 billion, reducing funding levels to pay retirees from 25% to 18%, the worst ratio in the nation. As Yogi Berra would say, the governor's action was deja vu all over again. Pritzker signed similar pension sweeteners in 2021 and 2023, contributing to Chicago budget deficits. In contrast to Johnson, Lightfoot fought hard to block the unfunded mandate, but Pritzker and legislators beholden to powerful government unions ignored receives ideas for government cost efficiencies in the same way a vampire reacts to a gift of garlic. His only answer to budget challenges is a supplicating plea for more money from Chicago and Illinois taxpayers. Unlike the crushing pension debts imposed on Chicago by Springfield, this civic recommendation is within the control of local leaders. The CTA, for example, can match its bus and rail service to actual rider demand rather than running pre-pandemic schedules, pretending that despite the rise of remote work, 2019 ridership will return any minute. Chicago Public Schools, hemorrhaging students for years, can right-size its system by closing near-empty schools, giving students better opportunities and sending more dollars to classrooms. When combined with strategic neighborhood investments, guided by community leaders, these changes can both improve educational outcomes and help spur local renewal. Improving services also means putting customer needs first. The Chicago Park District, for example, should reconsider its obtuse plan to close 57 swimming pools by mid-August, the peak of the heat season amid a near-record heat wave. Chicago's civic leaders are right, but state and local officials show no signs of turning over a new leaf. Unless and until they do, expect more of the same — high unemployment, sky-high taxes, endemic violent crime and a declining quality of life. As the Tribune wrote nearly a half century ago, at a time of a similar existential crisis in 1981 Chicago, 'cities stricken in this way become irrelevant. Business moves away. So do the best young people. The population ages. The city becomes a backwater.' Chicago rose like a phoenix from that historic nadir because strong and effective leaders made difficult decisions. It's long past time for today's leaders to start doing the same. Forrest Claypool is author of 'The Daley Show: Inside the Transformative Reign of Chicago's Richard M. Daley.' He served twice as Daley's chief of staff and was CEO of Chicago Public Schools from 2015 to 2017.
New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson says flood relief applicants don't have to disclose their immigration status
During a news conference on Tuesday, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said it is not 'necessary to disclose' if you are an illegal immigrant when applying for aid from flood damage. 'We want to ensure that the residents of the communities that have been hit the hardest know that the full force of government will remain constant until families get full restoration,' Johnson said during a news conference about recent flooding. At least five inches of heavy rain fell on parts of Chicago and northwest Indiana, causing flooding and delays. Johnson said that illegal immigrants need not worry about disclosing their status when applying for aid. 'We also want to make sure that when you are filling out the survey, your documentation status is not necessary to disclose,' Johnson said. 'So this is for individuals who are residents or citizens, as well as undocumented individuals. That information will not be disclosed, so your status will be protected as the Welcoming City Ordinance permits.' Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, at a news conference this week, said that applicants for flood relief do not have ' to disclose' if they are living in the U.S. illegally. Jeffrey Greenberg/Universal Images Group via Getty Images Chicago is a sanctuary city for illegal immigrants. In July, Johnson said his city 'will not ever cooperate with ICE.' During the press conference, Johnson also said the city will have to plant more trees to combat climate change. Parts of Chicago, Illinois, and northwestern Indiana suffered at least five inches of rain, which has led to major flooding. Kyle Mazza / SOPA Images/Sipa USA 'We will continue to see damaging flood incidents until there are some real structural changes and improvements to our infrastructure as a whole,' Johnson said. 'Second reason is climate change,' Johnson added. 'It means that Chicago's working-class communities are experiencing more and more frequent 100-year storms and extreme weather. We need to build more climate-resilient infrastructure, plant more trees to absorb water, and modernize our infrastructure to account for this new reality.'
