Former US Rep. Madison Cawthorn broke campaign finance law, FEC says. How much he owes
For more than six months, the FEC has been trying to collect the money from Cawthorn to no avail.
McClatchy reached out to Cawthorn on Monday through his previous spokesman, but did not receive an immediate reply from the former congressman.
Cawthorn, 29, served one term in Congress beginning in 2021, and is one of the youngest members ever elected. But his time in office is remembered for a series of scandals that plagued him, from allegations of sexual misconduct, to bringing weapons to airports and school grounds, to calling Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelenskyy 'a thug,' to accusing his colleagues of having orgies and snorting cocaine. He lost a Republican primary election despite support from President Donald Trump, and later moved to Florida.
His run-in with regulators began in July 2022, when his campaign committee, Making a Difference in Service to Our Nation, or the MADISON PAC, failed to file a quarterly report by its due date, a violation of campaign finance laws.
Cawthorn, listing himself as the campaign's treasurer, would file it 30 days later, and by doing so would put himself on the hook for the money.
On July 17, 2024, the Federal Election Commission notified Cawthorn that a week earlier, the commission had taken a unanimous vote to issue a $17,458 civil penalty against Cawthorn for being late.
He was given 40 days to pay, but could appeal the decision if he could prove a factual error or miscalculation of the fine, or could demonstrate an unforeseen circumstance prevented him from filing the report on time.
Cawthorn neither paid nor filed an appeal.
On Feb. 4, 2025, Cawthorn received a final notice.
If he does not pay or appeal to the U.S. District Court within 30 days, the case will be turned over to the U.S. Treasury. At that point, the treasury adds a 30% fee to the fine.
If the treasury still does not receive the money from Cawthorn, it will be turned over to a private debt collector.
If the debt collector is unsuccessful, the treasury could refer the case to the Department of Justice.
The treasury is entitled to collect Cawthorn's wages or tax refunds and report the debt to the IRS as possible taxable income.
Cawthorn's PAC was cited in December for holding a negative balance. It's currently showing a balance of -$16,149.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
Democratic strategist says party lacks 'moral authority' on Texas redistricting fight
Democrats are fighting tooth and nail to stop Texas lawmakers' plan to redraw the state's congressional map, but critics, including one prominent member of their own party, say they don't exactly hold the moral high ground. Democrat legislators have fled the state to avoid votes on redistricting, which is expected to add more Republican seats to Congress for the Lone Star State. They're getting the rock-star treatment as they visit blue states, where several governors have vowed to gerrymander Republicans out of their own Congressional delegations in retaliation for the Texas effort. However, Democratic strategist Julian Epstein told "Fox News Live" on Saturday that his party is not immune from criticism, as many blue states have already gerrymandered in a way that limits Republican congressional representation. "No, I think they don't have the moral authority, and there's a lot of pearl-clutching going on," he said. Several blue states, including Massachusetts, Connecticut and New Mexico, have no Republicans in their House delegations. And many feature oddly-drawn districts, seemingly crafted to limit GOP representation. "The Democrats don't have clean hands here. You look at states like Massachusetts, New Jersey[…] Illinois, California, and Democrats have effectively gerrymandered Republicans out of existence," Epstein added. Epstein cautioned that the nationwide redistricting battle could create a "race to the bottom," and that leaving Republicans and Democrats in states led by the opposite parties could lead to people feeling left out of the democratic process. Epstein cited New Jersey, in which Trump garnered 46% of the vote in 2024, but Republicans only have three out of the 12 congressional seats. Meanwhile, Texas state Rep. Brian Harrison, a Republican, told Fox News Digital on Saturday that Democrats are guilty of "total hypocrisy and faux outrage." "The dirty little secret is Democrats have no problem whatsoever with states redrawing their congressional maps to maximize partisan political advantage. They're just furious that Republican states are starting to redraw their maps," Harrison said. "It's because Democrat state after Democrat state, for a decade, has been gerrymandering the hell out of their congressional maps," he said. "Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont, Rhode Island, Delaware, all of these states have zero. If you're a Republican in those Democrat states, you don't have any voice in Congress," he added. "And [there are] many, many more that have given you just one seat, Oregon, I think Maine and Maryland." In California, a special election is likely to occur in November to counteract the Texas redistricting plan. "We are talking about emergency measures to respond to what's happening in Texas, and we will nullify what happens in Texas," California Gov. Gavin Newsom said on Friday with some Texas state lawmakers. "We'll pick up five seats with the consent of the people. And that's the difference between the approach we're taking and the approach they're taking," Newsom added. "We're doing it on a temporary basis. We're doing it in a fully transparent way and we're doing it by asking the people of the state of California for their consent and support." Harrison explained that Texas's redistricting push has numerous reasons behind it, including the population growth in the Lone Star state since the last census.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Beto O'Rourke Defiant After Legal Blow in Texas Redistricting Standoff
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Beto O'Rourke was defiant after a judge temporarily barred him and his political group from helping fund Texas Democratic lawmakers who left their home state to block redrawn congressional maps, which President Donald Trump has backed. The ruling marks a victory for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who alleged O'Rourke's group Powered by People engaged in bribery and deceptive fundraising. Paxton "wants to silence me and stop me from leading this organization," O'Rourke, a former Texas congressman who ran unsuccessfully for governor and Senate, wrote on X after the ruling on Friday. "He wants to stop us from fighting Trump's attempt to steal the five congressional seats he needs to hang on to power. But I'm not going anywhere." Newsweek has contacted Paxton's office and O'Rourke through Powered by People for comment via emails sent outside regular business hours. Former U.S. Rep. Beto O'Rourke speaks to attendees during a "Our Fight, Our Future" rally at The Millennium bowling alley on October 02, 2024 in Austin, Texas. Former U.S. Rep. Beto O'Rourke speaks to attendees during a "Our Fight, Our Future" rally at The Millennium bowling alley on October 02, 2024 in Austin, It Matters The Democratic lawmakers who left Texas have denied their Republican colleagues the quorum needed for a vote on the redrawn maps that could net the GOP five additional seats in the 2026 midterm elections. They face thousands of dollars in out-of-state lodging and dining costs. They also face fines of $500 for each day they are absent and these cannot be paid from their office budgets or political contributions under Texas House rules. Those who left have declined to say how long they'll hold out. What To Know Powered by People gave money to the Texas House Democratic Caucus to help cover their up-front costs, a spokesperson for the group told The Associated Press earlier this week. Tarrant County District Judge Megan Fahey, a Republican who was appointed by Texas Governor Greg Abbott in 2019 and has since won reelection, granted Paxton's request for a temporary injunction. "Defendants have and will continue to engage in unlawful fundraising practices and utilization of political funds in a manner that either directly violates or causes Texas Democratic Legislators to violate" state law and House procedures, she wrote in her ruling. Her order bars Powered by People from using political funds to pay for travel, hotel or dining costs for the Texas Democrats who left the state or fundraising on their behalf. Powered by People filed a responding lawsuit against Paxton on Friday, alleging his investigation violates the group's right to association, free speech and equal protection, the Houston Chronicle reported. "The true motivation behind defendant's action thus appears to be an unlawful desire to retaliate against Mr. O'Rourke," it said. What People Are Saying Paxton celebrated the judge's ruling, saying in a statement on Friday: "Today, I stopped his deceptive financial influence scheme that attempted to deceive donors and subvert our constitutional process. They told me to 'come and take it,' so I did.'" O'Rourke responded to Paxton on X, saying: "Actually, you didn't. Still here, still raising and rallying to stop the steal of 5 congressional seats in Texas. Ironic that you'd accuse someone of bribery when you were impeached in Texas for taking bribes from Nate Paul." (Paxton was acquitted of bribery and corruption charges by the Republican-led Texas Senate in 2023 after the GOP-controlled House voted to impeach him). In another post, he wrote: "They want to make examples out of those who fight so that others won't. Paxton is trying to shut down Powered by People, one of the largest voter registration organizations in the country, because our volunteers fight for voting rights and free elections... the kind of work that threatens the hold that Paxton, Trump and Abbott have on power in Texas." What's Next O'Rourke is set to speak at a rally—dubbed "The People vs. The Power Grab"— in Fort Worth on Saturday afternoon. Fahey's order is to remain in effect for two weeks. She has scheduled a hearing for August 19.
Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
A Trump-Putin Summit Is Set. Here's What You Need to Know
President Donald Trump will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday to discuss a potential ceasefire in Ukraine, marking the first time the leaders of the two countries have held talks since 2021. Trump claimed the conflict 'could be solved very soon' as he announced the summit at the White House on Friday, on the deadline Trump had imposed on Putin to finalize a peace deal or face potential financial penalties. But the prospect of the negotiations succeeding was quickly thrown into doubt after Trump suggested that Ukraine would have to cede territory to Russia as part of any peace deal. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky quickly and pointedly rejected any potential deal that would involve handing over Ukrainian territory. 'The answer to Ukraine's territorial question is already in the constitution of Ukraine,' he said in a Saturday video statement on Telegram. 'Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier.' Trump vowed to broker a peace deal to end the war in Ukraine within the first 24 hours of his second presidential term, and has previously expressed disappointment at Russia's lack of movement towards peace as he continuously moves the ceasefire deadline forward. Friday's meeting will be the first time two sitting U.S. and Russian presidents have met since 2021—when then-President Joe Biden met the Russian leader in Geneva—and the first time Putin and Trump have met since 2019. It is also the first time in a decade that Putin has set foot in the U.S. Yury Ushakov, a Kremlin presidential aide, told CNN that Trump has already been invited to a follow-up meeting in Russia. Here's what to know about the upcoming meeting in Alaska. Both Trump and Putin want Ukraine to give up land The success of a ceasefire deal hinges on Trump's ability to convince Ukraine to agree to Putin's list of demands, which involves Kyiv giving up large parts of its territory. 'We're going to get some back, and we're going to get some switched,' the President said Friday at the White House. 'There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both.' The Trump Administration has long argued that Ukraine would have to give up land in exchange for peace. Speaking in March this year, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said it would be 'very difficult for Ukraine in any reasonable time period to sort of force the Russians back all the way to where they were in 2014,' and called for Kyiv to make 'concessions' to achieve peace. Russian officials have reportedly presented U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff with a list of ceasefire demands that include Ukraine giving up the eastern Donbas region, most of which is already occupied by Russia, as well as Crimea, according to CNN. (The latter was transferred from Russia to Ukraine in 1954, but was later illegally annexed by Russia in 2014.) Trump has not publicly confirmed the details of the potential deal, but Zelensky has outright rejected the notion that the country would allow Russia to take over any of its territory and spoken out against the idea of facilitating peace talks without the presence of Ukraine. 'Any decisions made against us, any decisions made without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace. They will bring nothing,' Zelensky said in his video address. Foreign Minister David Lammy and Vice President J.D. Vance are due to meet Ukrainian and European leaders in the U.K. on Saturday to discuss the peace negotiations, a British spokesperson told Reuters. Thus far, Trump has not publicly remarked on Zelensky's stance on the upcoming Alaska meeting. But the President previously criticized Zelensky for being stubborn in his position for a ceasefire deal and claimed he is 'not ready for peace.' Ukraine appears to have the backing of the European Union. French President Emmanuel Macron, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal, and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer all spoke with Zelensky on Saturday to share their support for Ukrainian sovereignty and the end of the war. 'The Russians still refuse to stop the killings, still invest in the war, and still push the idea of 'exchanging' Ukrainian territory for Ukrainian territory, with consequences that guarantee nothing except more favorable positions for Russia to resume the war,' Zelensky said on X. 'All our steps must bring us closer to a real end to the war, not its reconfiguration.' But Putin wants more than land The Kremlin's demands extend beyond a desire for land. As part of any agreement, Putin has reportedly called for Ukraine to give up its quest to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), a European and North American alliance of which the United States is a founding member. A similar demand was made by Russia in June last year during that round of peace negotiations. NATO has been a strong supporter of Ukraine, supplying the smaller country with billions in military aid, weapons, and ammunition. Ukraine has been approved for NATO membership and is currently a 'partner country.' Other former Soviet republics, including Georgia and Moldova, would also be affected by the peace deal pledge. The Kremlin also asked for the lifting of Western sanctions, protection for Russian speakers in Ukraine, and a resolution to unfreeze the $300 billion in Russian sovereign assets that are currently being held in Europe, Reuters reports. The funds were frozen after the U.S. and other countries banned transactions with Russia's central bank after the country invaded Ukraine in 2022. Alaska is significant The decision to hold a summit in Alaska has been criticized in part by some officials who are wary of welcoming Putin to the U.S. Former Trump national security advisor John Bolton denounced the meeting. 'This is not quite as bad as Trump inviting the Taliban to Camp David to talk about the peace negotiations in Afghanistan, but it certainly reminds one of that, Bolton told CNN. 'The only better place for Putin than Alaska would be if the summit were being held in Moscow. So, the initial setup, I think, is a great victory for Putin,' he added. Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said that while she saw the summit as a chance to 'forge meaningful agreements.' She was also 'wary of Putin and his regime. 'I hope these discussions lead to genuine progress and help end the war on equitable terms,' she said in a post on X. The 'Last Frontier' state is also of historic significance to Russia, which sold the territory to the United States in 1867 for $7.2 million, despite its interest in the region's wealth of natural resources. The deal marked an end to Russian presence in North America. Some Russian nationalists have reportedly called for the return of Alaska to Russia, experts say. 'Trump has chosen to host Putin in a part of the former Russian Empire. Wonder if he knows that Russian nationalists claim that losing Alaska, like Ukraine, was a raw deal for Moscow that needs to be corrected,' wrote Stanford University political science professor Michael McFaul on X. In 2022, a billboard stating 'Alaska is Ours,' was seen in the Russian town of Krasnoyarsk. Local officials then told the press that the billboard was part of a 'private initiative.' Meanwhile, Russia has remained firm in its military campaign against Ukraine despite such international pressure. Over the weekend, Russian drones continued their attacks on Ukraine, launching more than 45 drone strikes across Ukraine. At least two people died and another six were injured after a strike hit a minibus.
