Alphawave agrees £1.8bn takeover by America's Qualcomm
Qualcomm is offering to pay 183p per share in cash for London-listed Alphawave, which is a near-96% premium to its closing price before the takeover interest was revealed.
But Qualcomm has also put forward an alternative share offer to Alphawave investors, which would see them receive Qualcomm stock instead of cash.
The £1.8 billion price is less than half the £3.1 billion value at which Toronto-headquartered Alphawave floated when it listed just over four years ago.
It also sees the London market lose yet another listing after a recent flurry of firms defecting from the City for rival exchanges overseas and a number of firms being bought out.
Tony Pialis, president and chief executive of Alphawave, said: 'Qualcomm's acquisition of Alphawave represents a significant milestone for us and an opportunity for our business to join forces with a respected industry leader and drive value to our customers.
'Together, we will unlock new opportunities for growth, drive innovation, and create a leading player in artificial intelligence (AI) compute and connectivity solutions.'
For Qualcomm, the acquisition is seen boosting its capabilities in AI infrastructure by expanding its intellectual property portfolio in data centre and 5G networking.
As well as data centres, Alphawave technology is used in 5G infrastructure and autonomous vehicles.
Cristiano Amon, president and chief executive of Qualcomm, said: 'The combined teams share the goal of building advanced technology solutions and enabling next-level connected computing performance across a wide array of high-growth areas, including data centre infrastructure.'
The deal is expected to complete in the first three months of 2026.
Alphawave, which listed in London in May 2021, has around 830 employees across operations in Canada, the UK, Europe and Korea.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Defence at 5pc or learn to speak Russian? Spasibo, Mr Rutte
The secretary general of Nato, Mark Rutte, has come to London as the head of the most powerful military alliance on the planet to remind us Brits that unless we re-invest in our military capabilities we had better start learning Russian. Had we not achieved a similar feat after the 'awakening' of 1940, we would now be talking German. The development of Hitler's Nazi Germany in the 1930s is so frighteningly similar to Putin's actions in the 2010s and 2020s as to make you think the same playbook is being followed. Appearing to almost directly address Ms Reeves – ahead of her spending review on Wednesday – Rutte said: 'If you do not go to the 5 per cent, including the 3.5 per cent for defence spending, you could still have the NHS … the pension system, but you better learn to speak Russian. That's the consequence.' Rutte means 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence – as opposed to Keir Starmer's only concrete target of 2.5 per cent – plus another 1.5 per cent on security and infrastructure. In some respects Rutte is wrong. There will be no welfare state and no NHS if Putin takes over. Just look at the fate of ordinary people in Russia who can barely afford to eat, and both inflation and interest rates north of 20 per cent and rising. That shows what life might be like under a modern Warsaw Pact. Mr Rutte realises that we cannot appease tyrants like Putin and the only way to scare them off is to show strength. 'We are deadly serious that if anyone tries to attack us, the consequences of that attack would be devastating – be it Russia or anyone else,' he said. We must not repeat the mistakes of our forebears in the 1930s, who failed to rearm to the level of deterrence. If we had realised that only total domination of Europe would satisfy Hitler, we would have confronted pressing demands at home for more welfare spending and avoided war – not by letting the aggressor have his way, as was famously attempted by Neville Chamberlain, but by being strong enough that Hitler would have avoided a confrontation. As history recalls, when Chamberlain returned from Munich saying he had chosen 'peace in our time', Winston Churchill rebuked him: 'You were given a choice between war and dishonour. You chose dishonour, and you will have war.' If we look realistically at what Putin has been telling us for the last 20 years we will understand that only the re-establishment of the old Soviet Union will satisfy him. The fact that none of those countries want to be part of Putin's Russia, means only one thing, as we are sworn to defend them under Nato Article 5: war. If we abandon them, we will be dishonoured – and we will be next, facing an enlarged empire with even greater resources. The Germans, realising belatedly the threat of another tyrant who wants to subjugate them, have issued a stark warning this week. Herr Bruno Kahl, head of the Federal Intelligence Service, said his agency had clear intelligence indications that Russian officials believed the collective defence obligations enshrined in the Nato treaty no longer had practical force. 'We are quite certain, and we have intelligence showing it, that Ukraine is only a step on the journey westward,' says Kahl. Secretary General Rutte is spot on. This message from a former European liberal politician may get many backs up here, but we cannot ignore it. History tells us he's right. Sadly we do not appear to have a Churchill among our modern day politicians to lead us through the coming confrontation with Putin. I know from comments added to my previous pieces on this subject in this paper that there appear to be some who want us to capitulate and give up without a fight. Most of them are clearly Russian bots, part of the massive Russian propaganda machine who would want us to do exactly that. But if people think life in Britain is bad now, look east and see the misery most Russians live under. Let us heed Rutte's warning, and in the immortal words of Donald Trump 'build baby build' military capability. Quite frankly if we fail to defend ourselves now, everything else vexing people at the moment will become horrifically irrelevant.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
HMRC slammed for ‘unacceptable' delay in reporting £49m phishing scam
A committee of MPs has criticised HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) for failing to promptly report a data breach affecting approximately 100,000 taxpayers. The Treasury Committee said it only learned of the incident through a notification published on the HMRC website, coinciding with a live session on June 4. The breach, a phishing scam, resulted in the loss of £47 million, a figure recently revised to £49 million. HMRC officials informed the Treasury Committee that they have contacted, or are in the process of contacting, 100,000 individuals whose accounts were locked down following what they described as an "organised crime" incident that began last year. Adding to the controversy, the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) stated in a letter published by the committee on Tuesday that it had not discussed the phishing incident with HMRC and was unaware of it before the June 4 hearing. The committee also published a letter sent via email from its chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier to John-Paul Marks, chief executive, HMRC. The letter said: 'I am alarmed that it was never deemed necessary to inform Parliament about an issue which affected such a vast number of taxpayers and led to the loss of £47 million of public money. 'To discover this information during a session from press reports and without adequate time for the committee to review the information in detail is unacceptable.' The letter said the committee is seeking responses from HMRC as to 'why was Parliament not notified earlier about the loss of £47 million of taxpayers' money, whether through a written ministerial statement and/or public or confidential letters to the Treasury Committee and the Public Accounts Committee?' The committee is also seeking responses on why the update was published on the day of the committee hearing on the work of HMRC and who else in Government was told about the incident and when. It also wants to receive a timeline of how the incident unfolded and find out what measures HMRC has put in place to ensure that such incidents do not happen in future. The letter asked for a reply by June 24, 2025. Meanwhile, the letter from Glenn Collins, head of technical and strategic engagement, ACCA, to Dame Meg, dated June 5, said: 'While we regularly engage with HMRC, including earlier in the year about issues relating to agent account access, we have not received any communication from HMRC on the issue of taxpayer account breaches until yesterday. 'We have highlighted to HMRC our frustration that HMRC has not been transparent or timely in its communication over this important issue.'
Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
FCA appoints deputy chief executive
Sarah Pritchard has been appointed deputy chief executive of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). 0 The new role has been created to reflect the FCA's expanding remit, with the integration of the Payment Systems Regulator, regulation of stablecoin and crypto firms as well as buy now pay later activities. As deputy chief executive, Sarah will also support the FCA's increasingly international focus, given its role supporting UK growth and competitiveness. Sarah joined the FCA in June 2021 to jointly lead the supervision, policy and competition division. Sarah has most recently been responsible for consumers and competition, having previously led the FCA's markets function. Sarah also has executive responsibility for the FCA's international work and personally spearheaded recent G20/Financial Stability Board work on leverage in non-bank financial institutions. Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the FCA, said: 'Since joining us, Sarah helped bring together our supervision, policy and competition functions and has led some of our most high-profile work, for example the once-in-a-generation overhaul of the listing rules and landmark work on financial advice and guidance. 'Delivering our ambitious new strategy - to deepen trust, rebalance risk, support growth and improve lives - is a collective endeavour and relies on continued reform. Sarah's breadth of experience, in both public and private sectors, makes her ideally placed to help me drive this.' Ashley Alder, chair of the FCA, said: 'The international environment is complex, our remit is growing and expectations of us continue to evolve. The board fully support Sarah taking on the role of deputy chief executive to help Nikhil lead the FCA day-to-day and cultivate our key relationships. Sarah has proven her ability to drive reform and deliver bold proposals at pace.' Sarah Pritchard, deputy chief executive of the FCA, said: 'The last 4 years has been marked by significant reform. I am looking forward to working even more closely with Nikhil so there is no let up in the pace of change, and to ensure we have the right relationships, domestically and internationally, to deliver our ambitious strategy.' Sarah has already taken up the deputy chief executive role. There will be no immediate change to her areas of responsibility. Sarah joined the FCA in June 2021. In addition to the responsibilities detailed above, Sarah is the executive director sponsor for the FCA's Edinburgh office. Since she joined, the number of FCA colleagues based in its Edinburgh office has nearly tripled. Prior to joining the FCA, Sarah was the director of the National Economic Crime Centre (NECC), a multi-agency partnership housed in the National Crime Agency (NCA), created in late 2018 to deliver UK system leadership on economic crime. Before then, she was general counsel/legal director for the NCA as well as leading the NCA's transformational people programme. Her career has involved investigative, operational and legal roles in a range of government departments and in the private sector. Within the private sector, she led global financial crime compliance and reputational risk teams at HSBC and qualified as a commercial litigator with Dechert LLP.
