‘Pretend kiss': Teacher denies abusing girl
Janelle Colville Fletcher, 40, is contesting the allegations that she groomed and sexually abused a teen girl some years ago and testified this week at the South Australian District Court before Judge Joanne Fuller.
The prosecution, led by Chris Allen, allege Ms Fletcher abused the girl in various locations and also that she communicated with her and another teenage girl to make them amenable to sexual activity.
Some of the alleged offending happened when the two girls and Ms Fletcher were alone together in a room, the prosecution said, with the teacher allegedly performing a lap dance on a chair.
She then allegedly 'dared' the two girls to kiss each other and asked if they would 'date' each other.
That same night, Mr Allen said, Ms Fletcher then spent time alone with one of the girls and touched her genital area.
The alleged grooming and abuse of the girl then went on for months at various locations, the prosecution said, including the home of Ms Fletcher and in Ms Fletcher's car.
This week, the prosecution presented emails and messages between the girl and Ms Fletcher and also various photographs that they allege demonstrate Ms Fletcher was in a sexual relationship with the child. Janelle Fletcher has pleaded not guilty to sexual abuse of a child and communicate to make a child amenable to sexual activity. NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia
A photo taken from a photo booth at a cinema shows the pair kissing, but Ms Fletcher, under questioning from defence lawyer Andrew Culshaw, said she was 'pulled in and the photo went off'.
'In the second photo from the bottom … we can see you and (the girl) appear to be kissing … can you explain to Her Honour what happened,' Mr Culshaw asked.
'It was meant to be a pretend kiss like we had done previously where our lips don't actually touch, and in that particular photo we got close and she did sort of pull me in and the photo went off, yeah,' Ms Fletcher said.
'When you say 'she pulled you in and the photo went off', what happened?' Mr Culshaw pressed.
'Just like around my neck sort of thing, just like, just so we would touch, yeah.
'Did you voluntarily engage in a kiss with her?' Mr Culshaw pressed
'No, I did not,' Ms Fletcher said.
Other photos, exhibited in court, show the girl at Ms Fletcher's house.
'You appear to be leaning against her (the girl),' Mr Allen said.
'Yes,' Ms Fletcher replied. Defence lawyer Craig Caldicott (right) is representing Ms Fletcher. NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia
'Is that a selfie taken by you?' Mr Allen asked.
'It does appear that way, yes,' Ms Fletcher said.
'Does it appear that it is taken in your house?' Mr Allen continued.
'Yes,' Ms Fletcher said.
In a series of emails read out in court, Ms Fletcher appears to express strong feelings for the girl.
In one, Ms Fletcher wrote: 'My feelings for you are not lust but love.'
'In your mind, what is the difference between the two?' Mr Culshaw asked.
'Lust is like with you are attracted to someone. You have the hots for them, so I guess similar,' Ms Fletcher replied.
'Love is not necessarily sexual or romantic, it is love.'
In other emails, Ms Fletcher told the girl: 'I am being selfish wanting you to myself when I need to let you live your life with someone your own age', and also 'right now, we can't be open. Right now we will have to continue as we are in secret ...'
But Ms Fletcher argued these messages were written to keep the girl happy and also to guide her away.
'Really, all the emails, the intention behind it was to try and make (the girl) feel that she is not abandoned, she is loved, she is wanted and that in another time or place, maybe she could entertain that she could be with me, but my sole intent of all of these was to slowly get her to think it was her idea to not be with me but to be with … someone her own age and I wanted her to think it was her idea,' Ms Fletcher said.
She told the court the girl had expressed romantic feelings for her and that she was struggling with her sexual identity.
Ms Fletcher said the girl started exhibiting 'concerning behaviour' and she sought to point her in the direction of a more age-appropriate relationship.
In one email, she told the girl she was 'completely in love' with her, but she told the court that was a lie.
'I did think she was a beautiful person,' Ms Fletcher said.
'It wasn't true that I was in love with her.'
'Why did you write it there,' Mr Culshaw asked.
'Because that's what I knew she wanted to hear,' Ms Fletcher said. The trial is being held at the South Australian District Court in Adelaide. NewsWire / Naomi Jellicoe Credit: News Corp Australia
Mr Allen, in his opening cross-examination of Ms Fletcher, reiterated the prosecution's allegations of extended sexual abuse at various locations and Ms Fletcher flatly denied each allegation.
When Mr Allen said Ms Fletcher was grinding on a chair inside a room with the girl and another girl present, Ms Fletcher appeared to giggle.
'Do you think that's funny?' Mr Allen said.
'Sorry, I don't mean to be rude. No, that's not,' Ms Fletcher replied.
Ms Fletcher holds a PhD in music education.
She told the court that she was heterosexual and believed in the Catholic faith.
She was still legally married to a man, though the pair had separated, she told the court.
Closing arguments in the judge-alone trial are expected on Monday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Adelaide mother who stabbed sons believing they were aliens sent to kill her ordered to spend 15 years under mental health supervision
A mother found not guilty of attempted murder of her two sons due to mental incompetence has been ordered by a court to remain under mental health supervision for more than a decade. Megan Somerville, 38, faced the South Australian Supreme Court on Tuesday to determine a period of supervision after she was in March found not guilty of attempted murder of her two sons due to mental incompetence caused by drug abuse. The court had heard in August 2022 Somerville, from Modbury Heights in Adelaide's north, stabbed her sons — then aged 3 and 8 — believing the boys were aliens out to kill her. The court was told she had pulled over her car while driving on the North-South Motorway at Wingfield to attack her children. She was detained by a member of the public before emergency services arrived. The court heard Somerville had been experiencing an 'episode of psychosis' and had used both methamphetamine and cannabis in the hours before the stabbing. One of the fathers of her children told the court he had found Somerville stashing 'knives in the bedroom, under the pillows, inside clothing cupboards, under the bed and other hidden spots' before the attack. The court on Tuesday ordered Somerville spend a limited term of 15 years under mental health supervision. She has been under supervision since her arrest, and so the term has been reduced now to 12 years. The court-ordered period under mental health supervision, in a secure facility or the community, is equal to the prison term a mentally competent person might receive for such a crime. Previously Somerville had requested to be allowed from James Nash House, where she is being supervised, for weekly shopping trips, however, has since changed her mind. On Tuesday she admitted to the court that she is not ready to be released into the community under any circumstances.
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
‘Radical': Neo-Nazi's next court move
A notorious Australian neo-Nazi who has openly praised Adolf Hitler has indicated he will fight a charge of using a Nazi symbol on constitutional grounds. Joel Davis, a leader in the fascist National Socialist Network, appeared for a pre-trial conference at Adelaide Magistrates Court on Tuesday. He is confronting the allegation that he displayed a Nazi symbol on a belt buckle following an Australia Day protest in the Adelaide CBD this year. His defence lawyer, Matthew Hopkins, appeared via telephone and told the court that he would serve a notice on the Solicitor-General to argue the charge may have breached his client's constitutional rights. 'Mr Hopkins has just advised he has filed with the court a notice pursuant to the Judicature Act with the intention of obtaining a sealed copy, which he will then serve upon the Solicitor-General, as he wishes to argue a constitutional point in relation to the matter,' chief magistrate Mary-Louise Hribal said. Mr Hopkins filed the notice on Tuesday morning. Neo-Nazi Joel Davis has flagged a 'constitutional' fight over the allegation he used a Nazi symbol. NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia South Australian police arrested and charged 16 people with loitering and displaying Nazi symbols after some 40 men dressed in black stormed the CBD on January 26, chanting 'white man fight back' and singing 'Waltzing Matilda'. Charges against some of the men, including NSN leader Thomas Sewell, have since been withdrawn. A charge against Mr Davis from that day was also withdrawn in May. The neo-Nazis have since claimed they are the victims of political persecution. After a court hearing in April, Mr Hopkins said the alleged offences had impinged on Mr Sewell and Mr Davis's implied constitutional rights to political expression. 'They do intend to form a political party and it would be a radical departure in Australian constitutional jurisprudence for an ideology to be outlawed,' he said at the time. 'And that's really where we are going with this.' Mr Hopkins said the NSN had been 'targeted' by the police and suggested the NSN march was a form of political expression comparable to Survival Day rallies. 'There were numerous demonstrations happening in Adelaide,' he said. 'And it seems to be the case where it is this particular organisation that has been targeted as a special group. 'They were carrying the Australian flag, they were at no stage anywhere near those protests. 'One of them was called anti-Australia Day, one was called Invasion Day. 'You have polarising ideologies here that are in conflict and as part of our constitutional representative government we allow for that, and that is part of the reason why the right to political communication is there, so that there is an outlet for legitimate displays of an ideology.' Mr Davis, speaking outside court in May, also said he would go 'all the way' to the High Court to fight the charge. Ms Hribal said a representative from the Solicitor-General would likely attend Mr Davis's next appearance and indicate their response to the notice. She listed September 23 for the next hearing. Mr Davis and Thomas Sewell are leaders of the fascist NSN group. NewsWire / Luis Enrique Ascui Credit: News Corp Australia Mr Davis is an avowed fascist and has expressed admiration for Hitler. Hitler led the Nazi war machine in the 1930s and 1940s and orchestrated the extermination of some six millions Jews across Europe. At an earlier court appearance, police alleged the NSN was preparing for a 'race war' and hoped to usher in a white supremacist ethnostate. The court was told the men said they wore black outfits to 'represent the ideal of national socialism' and eliminate their individual identities. South Australia's parliament outlawed the display of Nazi symbols or salutes following a sharp and sudden increase in anti-Semitic expression across the country after the terror attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. The law came into effect in December 2024.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Man jailed for decade-long $1.7 million extortion of former lover
A North Queensland court has been told a man who blackmailed his former lover made his victim's life a living hell. The man, aged in his 40s, pleaded guilty in the District Court in Townsville on Tuesday to one count of extortion. He admitted to coercing a woman into paying him about $1.7 million over more than a decade by threatening to tell her husband about their past affair. Judge Gregory Lynham sentenced the man, who cannot be be named to protect his victim, to 10 years in jail. In his sentencing remarks Judge Lynham said the man had forced the woman to pay $1.7 million in more than 1,000 transactions from 2013 until his arrest in 2023. The woman's victim impact statement showed how much she had suffered, he said. "Prior to your incarceration her life had been controlled by your phone calls and constant demands," he said. "Things started to take a turn for the worse, and from that time on her life became a living hell. Judge Lynham said the offending escalated from 2013, despite the woman's desperate attempts to break off contact. "He commenced to blackmail the complainant by threatening if he did not meet his demands he would tell her husband she had engaged in several affairs, including their own," he said. The woman blocked the man's number and disconnected her landline, but the harassment continued. "If the complainant missed your calls and did not respond within a certain time frame the amount demanded would increase," Judge Lynham said. The woman had initially asked solicitors to send cease-and-desist letters but eventually felt her only recourse was to go to police, who charged him in late 2023. He was taken into custody in April 2024 after breaching bail by continuing to contact her. Judge Lynham described the offending as unsophisticated but serious, and evidently motivated by an alcohol and gambling addiction. "You were turning over tens of thousands of dollars each week in a SportsBet account," he said. "There's no suggestion you used the money to fund an extravagant lifestyle." The man will be eligible for parole in May 2027.
