‘Dragon Man' DNA revelation puts a face to a mysterious group of ancient humans
An enigmatic skull recovered from the bottom of a well in northeastern China in 2018 sparked intrigue when it didn't match any previously known species of prehistoric human. Now, scientists say they have found evidence of where the fossil fits, and it could be a key piece in another cryptic evolutionary puzzle.
After several failed attempts, the researchers managed to extract genetic material from the fossilized cranium — nicknamed Dragon Man — linking it to an enigmatic group of early humans known as Denisovans. A dozen or so Denisovan fossilized bone fragments had previously been found and identified using ancient DNA. But the specimens' small size offered little idea of what this shadowy population of ancient hominins looked like, and the group has never been assigned an official scientific name.
Scientists typically consider skulls, with telltale bumps and ridges, the best type of fossilized remains to understand the form or appearance of an extinct hominin species. The new findings, if confirmed, could effectively put a face to the Denisovan name.
'I really feel that we have cleared up some of the mystery surrounding this population,' said Qiaomei Fu, a professor at the Institute of Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, part of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, and lead author of the new research. 'After 15 years, we know the first Denisovan skull.'
Denisovans were first discovered in 2010 by a team that included Fu — who was then a young researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany — from ancient DNA contained in a pinkie fossil found in Denisova Cave in the Altai Mountains of Russia. Additional remains unearthed in the cave, from which the group gets its name, and elsewhere in Asia continue to add to the still-incomplete picture.
The new research, described in two scientific papers published Wednesday, is 'definitely going to be among, if not the, biggest paleoanthropology papers of the year,' and will spur debate in the field 'for quite some time,' said Ryan McRae, a paleoanthropologist at the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History in Washington, DC, who was not involved in the studies.
The findings could help fill in gaps about a time when Homo sapiens weren't the only humans roaming the planet — and teach scientists more about modern humans. Our species once coexisted for tens of thousands of years and interbred with both Denisovans and Neanderthals before the two went extinct. Most humans today carry a genetic legacy of those ancient encounters. Neanderthal fossils have been the subject of study for than a century, but scant details are known about our mysterious Denisovan cousins, and a skull fossil can reveal a great deal.
A laborer in the city of Harbin in northeastern China discovered the Dragon Man skull in 1933. The man, who was constructing a bridge over the Songhua River when that part of the country was under Japanese occupation, took home the specimen and stored it at the bottom of a well for safekeeping.
The man never retrieved his treasure, and the cranium, with one tooth still attached in the upper jaw, remained unknown to science for decades until his relatives learned about it before his death. His family donated the fossil to Hebei GEO University, and researchers first described it in a set of studies published in 2021 that found the skull to be at least 146,000 years old.
The researchers argued that the fossil merited a new species name given the unique nature of the skull, naming it Homo longi — which is derived from Heilongjiang, or Black Dragon River, the province where the cranium was found. Some experts at the time hypothesized that the skull might be Denisovan, while others have lumped the cranium in with a cache of difficult-to-classify fossils found in China, resulting in intense debate and making molecular data from the fossil particularly valuable.
Given the skull's age and backstory, Fu said she knew it would be challenging to extract ancient DNA from the fossil to better understand where it fit in the human family tree. 'There are only bones from 4 sites over 100,000 (years old) in the world that have ancient DNA,' she noted via email.
Fu and her colleagues attempted to retrieve ancient DNA from six samples taken from Dragon Man's surviving tooth and the cranium's petrous bone, a dense piece at the base of the skull that's often a rich source of DNA in fossils, without success.
The team also tried to retrieve genetic material from the skull's dental calculus — the gunk left on teeth that can over time form a hard layer and preserve DNA from the mouth. From this process, the researchers managed to recover mitochondrial DNA, which is less detailed than nuclear DNA but revealed a link between the sample and the known Denisovan genome, according to one new paper published in the journal Cell.
'Mitochondrial DNA is only a small portion of the total genome but can tell us a lot. The limitations lie in its relatively small size compared to nuclear DNA and in the fact that it is only inherited from the matrilineal side, not both biological parents,' McRae said.
'Therefore, without nuclear DNA a case could be made that this individual is a hybrid with a Denisovan mother, but I think that scenario is rather less likely than this fossil belonging to a full Denisovan,' he added.
The team additionally recovered protein fragments from the petrous bone samples, the analysis of which also suggested the Dragon Man skull belonged to a Denisovan population, according to a separate paper published Wednesday in the journal Science.
Together, 'these papers increase the impact of establishing the Harbin cranium as a Denisovan,' Fu said.
The molecular data provided by the two papers is potentially very important, said anthropologist Chris Stringer, research leader in human origins at London's Natural History Museum.
'I have been collaborating with Chinese scientists on new morphological analyses of human fossils, including Harbin,' he said. 'Combined with our studies, this work makes it increasingly likely that Harbin is the most complete fossil of a Denisovan found so far.'
However, Xijun Ni, a professor at the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology in Beijing who, along with Stringer, worked on the initial Dragon Man research but not the latest studies, said that he is cautious about the outcome of the two papers because some of the DNA extraction methods used were 'experimental.' Ni also said he finds it strange that DNA was obtained from surface dental calculus but not inside the tooth and petrous bone, given that the calculus appeared to be more exposed to potential contamination.
Nonetheless, he added that he thinks it is likely the skull and other fossils identified as Denisovan are from the same human species.
The goal in using a new extraction approach was to recover as much genetic material as possible, Fu explained, adding that the dense crystalline structure of dental calculus may help prevent the host DNA from being lost.
The protein signatures Fu and her team recovered indicated 'a Denisovan attribution, with other attributions very unlikely,' said Frido Welker, an associate professor of biomolecular paleoanthropology at the University of Copenhagen's Globe Institute in Denmark. Welker has recovered Denisovan proteins from other candidate fossils but was not involved in this research.
'With the Harbin cranium now linked to Denisovans based on molecular evidence, a larger portion of the hominin fossil record can be compared reliably to a known Denisovan specimen based on morphology,' he said.
With the Dragon Man skull now linked to Denisovans based on molecular evidence, it will be easier for paleoanthropologists to classify other potential Denisovan remains from China and elsewhere. McRae, Ni and Stringer all said they thought it was likely that Homo longi would become the official species name for Denisovans, although other names have been proposed.
'Renaming the entire suite of Denisovan evidence as Homo longi is a bit of a step, but one that has good standing since the scientific name Homo longi was technically the first to be, now, tied to Denisovan fossils,' McRae said. However, he added that he doubts the informal name of Denisovan is going anywhere anytime soon, suggesting it might become shorthand for the species, as Neanderthal is to Homo neanderthalensis.
The findings also make it possible to say a little more about what Denisovans might have looked like, assuming the Dragon Man skull belonged to a typical individual. According to McRae, the ancient human would have had very strong brow ridges, brains 'on par in size to Neanderthals and modern humans' but larger teeth than both cousins. Overall, Denisovans would have had a blocky and robust-looking appearance.
'As with the famous image of a Neanderthal dressed in modern attire, they would most likely still be recognizable as 'human,'' McRae said.
'They are still our more mysterious cousin, just slightly less so than before,' he added. 'There is still a lot of work to be done to figure out exactly who the Denisovans were and how they are related to us and other hominins.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
There's a Surprisingly Easy Way to Remove Microplastics in Your Drinking Water
Tiny fragments of plastics are making their way deep inside our bodies in concerning quantities, particularly through our food and drink. In 2024, scientists in China found a simple and effective means of removing them from water. The team ran tests on both soft water and hard tap water (which is richer in minerals). They added in nanoplastics and microplastics before boiling the liquid and then filtering out any precipitates. Related: "Tap water nano/microplastics (NMPs) escaping from centralized water treatment systems are of increasing global concern, because they pose potential health risks to humans via water consumption," the researchers from Guangzhou Medical University and Jinan University write in their published paper. In some cases, up to 90 percent of the NMPs were removed by the boiling and filtering process, though the effectiveness varied based on the type of water. Of course the big benefit is that most people can do it with what they already have in their kitchen. "This simple boiling water strategy can 'decontaminate' NMPs from household tap water and has the potential for harmlessly alleviating human intake of NMPs through water consumption," write biomedical engineer Zimin Yu from Guangzhou Medical University and colleagues. A greater concentration of NMPs was removed from samples of hard tap water, which naturally forms a buildup of limescale (or calcium carbonate) as it is heated. Commonly seen inside kitchen kettles, the chalky substance forms on the plastic's surface as changes in temperature force the calcium carbonate out of solution, effectively trapping the plastic fragments in a crust. "Our results showed that nanoplastic precipitation efficiency increased with increasing water hardness upon boiling," the team writes. "For example, from 34 percent at 80 mg L−1 to 84 percent and 90 percent at 180 and 300 mg L−1 of calcium carbonate, respectively." Even in soft water, where less calcium carbonate is dissolved, roughly a quarter of the NMPs were snagged from the water. Any bits of lime-encrusted plastic could then be removed through a simple filter like the stainless steel mesh used to strain tea, the researchers say. Past studies have measured fragments of polystyrene, polyethylene, polypropylene, and polyethylene terephthalate in potable tap water, which we're consuming daily in varying quantities. To put the strategy to the ultimate test, the researchers added even more nanoplastic particles, which were effectively reduced in number. "Drinking boiled water apparently is a viable long-term strategy for reducing global exposure to NMPs," write the researchers. "Drinking boiled water, however, is often regarded as a local tradition and prevails only in a few regions." The research team hopes that drinking boiled water might become a more widespread practice as plastics continue to take over the world. While it's still not certain exactly how damaging this plastic is to our bodies, it's clearly not the healthiest of snacks. Plastics have already been linked to changes in the gut microbiome and the body's antibiotic resistance. The team behind this latest study wants to see more research into how boiled water could keep artificial materials out of our bodies – and perhaps counter some of the alarming effects of microplastics that are emerging. "Our results have ratified a highly feasible strategy to reduce human NMP exposure and established the foundation for further investigations with a much larger number of samples," write the authors. The research has been published in Environmental Science & Technology Letters. An earlier version of this article was published in March 2024. Related News World First: Scientists Film The Exact Moment a Human Embryo Implants Chlorophyll & Collagen: Does Science Back TikTok's Favorite Supplements? Aging Can Spread Through Your Body Via a Single Protein, Study Finds Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
'It makes no sense to say there was only one origin of Homo sapiens': How the evolutionary record of Asia is complicating what we know about our species
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The story of our ancient ancestors began in Africa millions of years ago. But there are considerable gaps between the first and current chapters of that tale, and some anthropologists are looking to Asia to fill in missing information about how humans evolved. "The genus Homo evolved in Africa," Sheela Athreya, a biological anthropologist at Texas A&M University, told Live Science. But as soon as Homo left the continent, "all bets are off because evolution is going to treat every population differently." One bet Athreya is investigating is the notion that there wasn't a single origin of our species, Homo sapiens. Rather, the ancestors of today's humans living in different geographic regions took different evolutionary paths, before eventually coalescing into the human tribe we know today. Once humans left Africa, "you have so much complexity that it makes no sense to say there was only one origin of Homo sapiens," Athreya said. Key to this story is a different understanding of human evolution in Asia — and the possibility that Denisovans, a group of little-understood extinct human ancestors known from just a handful of fossils, were actually the same as a much earlier member of our family tree: Homo erectus, Athreya argues. Related: Strange, 300,000-year-old jawbone unearthed in China may come from vanished human lineage Early humans in ancient Asia There's a big gap in human evolutionary history. We know Homo evolved in Africa and that a human ancestor, Homo erectus, was already in Asia and parts of Europe by about 1.8 million years ago. But what happened in Asia between that point and the time when Homo sapiens arrived around 50,000 years ago? That picture is much less clear. To help fill it in, Athreya has considered the emergence of our species, Homo sapiens, during the Middle and Late Pleistocene epoch (780,000 to 11,700 years ago). Her "deep-dive" into the human fossil record of Asia has convinced her that there are evolutionary pathways in places like Java, Indonesia, that differ from the Pleistocene patterns seen in Africa and Europe. H. erectus reached Java at least 1.5 million years ago, and the species likely lasted there until 108,000 years ago. But the lack of more recent H. erectus bones doesn't necessarily mean they went extinct, Athreya wrote in a 2024 study with co-author Yousuke Kaifu, an anthropologist at the University of Tokyo. Instead, these Javanese H. erectus could have persisted until H. sapiens appeared in Sumatra as early as 73,000 years ago and interbred with them. The fossil record in China is similarly complicated. Around 300,000 years ago, there was a shift in what H. erectus fossils looked like, Athreya said. Skeletons in the Middle Pleistocene in China became more variable in form, and traits that were common in Western Eurasian groups like H. sapiens and Neanderthals, such as smoother bicuspid teeth, began to appear in these fossils. This means that — instead of completely dying out — H. erectus in China may have made a genetic contribution to populations living today, Athreya said, just as Neanderthals left genetic traces in people with European ancestry and Denisovans contributed DNA to people with Oceania ancestry. The idea isn't impossible, one expert told Live Science. Groups of ancient human relatives could have mated anywhere they met up, Adam Van Arsdale, a biological anthropologist at Wellesley College in Massachusetts, told Live Science. No matter where they lived, "I just think humans aren't that different" during the Pleistocene. What's more, anthropologists are starting to realize that many of these groups that looked very different could still have interbred. Twenty years ago, scientists would have said "there's no possible way" they could have interbred, Van Arsdale said. "And I just don't think we can assume that anymore." So far, no DNA has been recovered from H. erectus fossils, largely because most of their fossils are too old, so there's no genetic support for this idea. But emerging methods for extracting ancient proteins from fossils may soon make it feasible to identify some H. erectus genes. Another route to understanding the fate of H. erectus in Asia may be to look more closely at the enigmatic Denisovans. RELATED STORIES —Oldest wooden tools unearthed in East Asia show that ancient humans made planned trips to dig up edible plants —Ancient jawbone dredged off Taiwan seafloor belongs to mysterious Denisovan, study finds —140,000 year old bones of our ancient ancestors found on sea floor, revealing secrets of extinct human species Since the only known skull of a Denisovan looks similar, in many ways, to that of H. erectus, those two groups may actually be one and the same. "I don't think that genetics is going to find that Homo erectus was a separate dead-end lineage," Athreya said. "I would expect Denisovans to be Homo erectus." But until more work is done that combines DNA, artifacts and fossil bones in Southeast Asia, the full picture of human evolution cannot yet come into focus the way it has in places like Europe, Athreya said. Human evolution quiz: What do you know about Homo sapiens?
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
DNA has an expiration date. But proteins are revealing secrets about our ancient ancestors we never thought possible.
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The moment a creature dies, its DNA begins to break down. Half of it degrades every 521 years on average. By about 6.8 million years, even under ideal preservation conditions in cold, stable environments, every meaningful trace is gone. That's a huge challenge when trying to understand our evolutionary history more deeply: Two-legged primates emerged 7 million years ago in Africa, and our genus showed up around 2.6 million years ago. But DNA breaks down fast in the places our distant ancestors roamed. As a result, many of the key adaptations that make us uniquely human date to a period in which ancient DNA is indecipherable. But a novel technique is allowing us to peer back further than DNA's expiration date in Africa, to answer long-standing questions about our ancestors. Called paleoproteomics, it's the study of ancient proteins, which last longer than DNA. "Proteins are long-lived biomolecules capable of surviving over millions of years," Christina Warinner, a biomolecular archaeologist at Harvard University, and colleagues wrote in a 2022 paper. DNA encodes the instructions to make amino acids, which combine in long strings to make proteins. Because proteins fall apart more slowly than DNA does, they are becoming an extremely valuable resource for understanding human evolution. Archaeologists and the DNA revolution Archaeologists' interest in ancient DNA has skyrocketed since 2010, when researchers published a draft of the Neanderthal genome, confirming that Neanderthals mated with the ancestors of many modern humans. Since then, the technique has been used to answer a number of archaeological questions, such as when the Americas and Australia were settled, when agriculture was invented, and how languages and cultures might have spread. But there are major drawbacks to relying solely on ancient DNA. Even though techniques for extracting DNA from very old bones have advanced significantly over the years, DNA breaks down into smaller fragments over millennia due to the effects of sunlight, heat and humidity. As a result, DNA analysis of our ancient relatives' bones and teeth has a time limit that prevents us from learning about our more distant evolution through this technique. Related: Oldest human DNA reveals mysterious branch of humanity That's an even bigger problem in Africa, where most human evolution took place. "Africa is the center of our evolutionary past, and we don't have ancient DNA in Africa beyond a scale of maybe 20,000 years at this point," Adam Van Arsdale, a biological anthropologist at Wellesley College, told Live Science. Knowing what was happening biologically with our distant ancestors millions of years ago in the core of Africa would transform our understanding of human evolution, Van Arsdale said. An explosion in protein analysis Proteins are an exciting target for anthropologists because they can outlast even the oldest DNA. They have fewer atoms, fewer chemical bonds, and a more compact structure, which means they are less fragile than DNA, according to Warriner and colleagues. The first ancient proteome — a group of proteins expressed in a cell, tissue or organism — was extracted from a 43,000-year-old woolly mammoth bone in a study published in 2012. In 2019, researchers announced the oldest mammalian proteome for the time: that of a 1.9 million-year-old tooth from the extinct ape relative Gigantopithecus. And in 2025, researchers successfully extracted the oldest proteins yet, from Epiaceratherium, an extinct rhinoceros-like creature that lived in the Canadian Arctic more than 21 million years ago. As we improve the methods for identifying proteins, anthropologists are starting to use these methods to answer questions about human evolution. In a 2020 study published in the journal Nature, researchers analyzed the proteins in the tooth enamel of Homo antecessor, an extinct human relative that lived in Europe 800,000 years ago. They discovered that H. antecessor's proteins were different from those of H. sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans, making them a separate branch of our evolutionary tree rather than our direct ancestor. In a study published in April in the journal Science, proteomic analysis was also used to figure out that a mysterious jawbone first found in the early 2000s off the coast of Taiwan was related to the Denisovans, a group of extinct human relatives. Before this, paleoanthropologists did not know whether the Denisovans had lived in that part of the world. The analysis also demonstrated that it's possible to identify the proteins found in fossils from warm, humid regions. Our African roots Paleoproteomics may be even more transformative for deciphering our more distant evolution. Two recent studies of fossil bones and teeth from Africa, where DNA studies are nearly impossible, highlight the method's potential. Related: Oldest and most complete ancient Egyptian human genome ever sequenced reveals ties to Mesopotamia In the first, published in May in the journal Science, archaeologists recovered ancient proteins from the teeth of four members of the species Paranthropus robustus, a human relative that lived between 1.8 million and 1.2 million years ago. They showed that two of the individuals were male and two were female. Surprisingly, though, the researchers discovered that one of the P. robustus individuals who was thought to be male was actually female. This suggests that some skulls previously classified as one sex of a known species may have in fact belonged to unidentified groups or newfound species. In the second study, published in February in the South African Journal of Science, researchers recovered the proteome from the tooth enamel of Australopithecus africanus, a human relative that lived in South Africa 3.5 million years ago. Although they were only able to identify the biological sex of the australopithecines, the researchers wrote that "these are all incredibly exciting breakthroughs that are poised to revolutionise our understanding of human evolution." One question this analysis could help answer is whether males and females of our ancestors and relatives differed dramatically in size or features, Rebecca Ackermann, a biological anthropologist at the University of Cape Town, told Live Science. For instance, protein and sex analysis could reveal that some bones previously interpreted as males and females of the same species were actually individuals of the same sex, but from different lineages. So far, though, scientists have successfully analyzed proteins from just a small number of ancient human ancestors . But while modern humans have more than 100,000 proteins in their body, the enamel "proteome" is tiny; it's composed of just five major proteins related to enamel formation. Still, the variation in the protein sequences can be enough to differentiate between related organisms. Future frontiers Analysis of the differences in those proteins likely does not provide enough resolution to answer key questions, such as how ancient human ancestors and relatives were related, Ackermann said. For instance, millions of years ago in East Africa, several two-legged primate species overlapped in time, but whether they could interbreed and create fertile hybrids is not clear from their bones alone. Related: World's oldest DNA reveals secrets of lost Arctic ecosystem from 2 million years ago Could ancient proteins eventually help answer that question? Ackermann is cautiously optimistic that technology will advance enough for paleoproteomics to clarify evolutionary relationships among closely related groups. "Whether or not we can say more about hybridization is a good question," she said. RELATED STORIES —130,000-year-old mammoth calf smells like 'fermented earth and flesh,' necropsy reveals —Royal tomb in Benin has traces of human blood on its walls, hinting at human sacrifice, study finds —Scientists discover 1 million-year-old DNA sample lurking beneath Antarctic seafloor Even so, bone and enamel proteomes may never be detailed enough to distinguish closely related individuals in the same way genomes can, Ackermann added. But there's a chance techniques will improve enough for scientists to extract proteins from millions-of-years-old tissues, Ackermann added. Most proteins made by humans, including those that are part of the "dark proteome," have not been analyzed, which means we have little idea what they do, Warriner and colleagues wrote. "The next 20 years will surely hold many surprises as we begin to apply this analytical power to answer long-standing questions about the past and innovate new solutions to old problems," they wrote. Human evolution quiz: What do you know about Homo sapiens?
