Peru reinstates full protection of Nazca Lines reserve after controversial cutback
The country's culture ministry on Sunday nullified last week's resolution that had reinstated the boundary map set in 2004. The switch followed severe backlash after the government approved a 42% reduction in the zone — about 2,400 square kilometers (926 square miles) — and to allow miners to seek formal permits in previously restricted areas.
The original protected zone — spanning 5,600 square kilometers (2,162 square miles) — will remain in effect. The ministry also ordered an update of the site's management plan within 10 days and the formation of a technical panel, which will include government representatives, academics, UNESCO, and civil society figures to define future use and conservation strategies.
The area in question forms part of a UNESCO-recognized World Heritage Site , home to the Nazca Lines — massive geoglyphs etched into the desert over 1,500 years ago — and one of Peru's most fragile desert ecosystems.
'Thanks to the strong rejection by national and international public opinion, the government revoked the reduction of the area of the Nazca Archaeological Reserve,' Mariano Castro, Peru's former vice minister of the environment, told The Associated Press.
Castro said the government justified its decision by saying it had not previously discussed its decision publicly.
'In other words, it (the government) does not go so far as to admit the measure was wrong, despite evidence of the presence of illegal mining, which seriously endangers and threatens the integrity of the Nazca Lines and petroglyphs,' he said.
The ministry said a new government entity will be created to oversee the site's management, and technical studies will be published to ensure transparency and accountability.
Peruvian environmental lawyer, César Ipenza, who follows the issue closely, welcomes the technical panel, which will include local authorities, but he still has concerns.
'The truth is that the local authority is actually the one that has been calling for the reduction of the boundaries of the Nazca Lines,' Ipenza told the AP. 'There will also be strong pressure from miners for this to go ahead.'
Ipenza is concerned that informal mining has been steadily expanding in the area, even though all mining activity is officially banned.
'The government hasn't taken action to remove these miners and as a result, there has been pressure to officially open the area to allow informal and illegal miners to become formalized,' he said.
The AP contacted UNESCO for comment. The organization said it would aim to provide information on Tuesday, as Monday was a public holiday in France, where it is headquartered.
—-
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org .
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
2 hours ago
- Associated Press
Congo rejects Kenya's diplomatic appointment to conflict-hit Goma
LAGOS, Nigeria (AP) — The Congolese government on Saturday rejected Kenya's appointment of a consul general to its conflict-hit city of Goma, citing what it called a violation of international law and a lack of proper diplomatic process. Goma, located in eastern Congo, has been at the center of a conflict between the Congolese government and the Rwanda-backed M23 rebel group, which launched a lightning assault on the mineral-rich regional city in January. The city fell to the rebel group after days of fighting, and the Congolese army withdrew. The Congolese foreign ministry said in a statement Saturday that Kenya did not contact Congo's government in the capital, Kinshasa, before making the announcement, as required by international law and diplomatic practice. M23, which is one of about a hundred groups fighting in eastern Congo, has attempted to establish a parallel government in the region, saying it is freeing the region from what it alleges is misrule by Kinshasa. M23 has been accused of widespread abuses, and Congo's government argued that that the way Kenya nominated the diplomat to the occupied city of Goma without informing the Congolese government could appear to legitimize the rebel group's occupation. Kenya's announcement was made Friday as part of a raft of diplomatic appointments. Congo's foreign ministry called for 'caution and discernment in public communication to avoid any misunderstanding, speculation, or the appearance of legitimization of the ongoing illegal occupation.' Qatar has tried to mediate between the Congolese government and the rebel group, which led to the signing of a 'declaration of principles' to end the decades-long fighting, but talks have since faltered and fighting has resumed. The conflict has been a magnet for neighboring countries, including Rwanda, Burundi, Uganda and Kenya, all of which have had troops on the grounds, complicating regional efforts to end the fighting. Christian Moleka, a Congo-based political analyst, told The Associated Press that the appointment might have regional implications. He said it could reinforce Kinshasa's distrust of Kenya, which has been moving closer to Rwanda under President William Ruto, and weaken regional initiatives to establish peace. ___ Justin Kabumba in Goma, Congo, and Jean-Yves Kamale in Kinshasa, Congo, contributed to this report.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Trump Account' newborns could have $1.9M by 28, Treasury Dept. says — here's what's required to get that much
When the One Big Beautiful Bill was signed into law on July 4, it created a new account for children. The so-called 'Trump account' provides a one-time $1,000 deposit from the government at birth and gives parents and relatives the chance to make additional contributions each year. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it The Treasury Department has now claimed that the accounts could grow to $1.9 million over 28 years — although to reach that goal, parents would need to invest quite a bit of additional money, beyond that initial $1,000 seed contribution. Here's what you need to know about these accounts, how they work, how much they could grow and how they compare to other popular investment options parents can leverage for their children. How the new Trump accounts work The One Big Beautiful Bill allows parents to open Trump accounts at any bank of their choosing for children born after December 31, 2024 and before January 1, 2029 and the government will provide the initial $1,000 investment. However, the child must be a U.S. citizen with a Social Security number. Of course, parents can still open Trump accounts for children born at other times, but anyone born outside this period won't qualify for the $1,000 seed money. The money can then be put into an eligible investment such as a mutual fund or ETF that tracks a financial index like the S&P 500. The investment can't have fees or expenses above 0.1% and it must include equity investments primarily consisting of U.S. companies. Read more: Nervous about the stock market? Gain potential quarterly income through this $1B private real estate fund — even if you're not a millionaire. Parents are allowed to contribute up to $5,000 per year to these accounts, while their employers are allowed to invest up to $2,500 (just note that the $2,500 employer contribution counts towards the $5,000 annual limit). This amount is adjusted for inflation. While employer contributions are not taxed, parent contributions aren't tax-deductible. The invested funds will grow tax-free until the money is withdrawn, with children having the option to take out the money once they reach the age of 18. At that time, a withdrawal triggers a tax event and is treated like an IRA for tax purposes. As the Tax Foundation and AEI explain, this means: Withdrawals will be taxed at ordinary income tax rates Withdrawals are subject to a 10% penalty unless made after 59½ or used for a qualifying purpose, such as covering college costs or going towards a home The goal is for children to benefit from compound growth and, as the Treasury Department explains, the accounts could potentially be worth as much as $1.9 million by age 28. However, that would require parents to max out the accounts, or invest the maximum every year until the child's 17th birthday (which starts at $5,000 per year and which will be adjusted up for inflation). If there are no additional contributions, however, even the initial $1,000 could turn into between $3,000 and $13,800 over 18 years, according to the Treasury, with the amount dependent on how the account ultimately performs. Are these accounts a good value? The Trump account is just one of several tax-advantaged accounts parents can set up for their children and many financial experts don't believe it is the best one. A Roth IRA can be a better option if the child has ordinary income to contribute to it, because Roth IRAs allow tax-free withdrawals after 59 ½ as well as withdrawals of contributions any time — penalty-free. A 529 account could also be a better choice, because money can be withdrawn tax-free if it is used for qualifying educational expenses. And even a Uniform Transfers to Minors Account (UTMA) could be preferable because it allows for penalty-free withdrawals for any reason or transferred to other accounts; plus, investment gains can be taxed at the more favorable capital gains tax rate. "Trump accounts provide a more limited and restricted tax benefit than existing saving incentives, such as 529 accounts," the Tax Foundation reports. Most parents are not maxing out these existing accounts, which provide more advantages, so it is unlikely that they'll be setting aside a full $5,000 into the Trump account either. Still, the $1,000 is there for babies born during the eligible years. So, if nothing else, parents should open the account to claim those funds and leave them to grow — extra cash from Uncle Sam is still extra cash. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
What is Team Trump thinking when it comes to future of Fannie, Freddie?
-- Team Trump is exploring ways to monetize the U.S. government's stakes in mortgage giants Fannie Mae (OTC:FNMA) and Freddie Mac (OTC:FMCC), with an initial sale of up to $30 billion possible 'as soon as this winter,' according to TD Cowen. The White House's focus is on 'the government realizing a return rather than on the GSEs raising new capital,' the analysts said, adding that under the plan, 'GSEs stay in conservatorship' with 'an implicit government backstop.' TD Cowen cautioned that 'having the government monetize its investments in Fannie and Freddie is more complex than it may appear.' Key hurdles include 'shareholder rights,' 'control of the boards of directors,' 'valuation,' 'commitment fee,' and 'limits on what the GSEs may do,' as well as the 'potential to merge the GSEs prior to any sales.' The bank said there is 'a path' for President Donald Trump to move forward, but it would require 'political risks that could impact both his popular support and GOP prospects in the midterm election.' Despite those challenges, TD Cowen sees 'reason for optimism' that the administration could begin sales, even if not by winter. One possibility is that 'Trump could just do it regardless of political and market risk,' a tactic the firm calls 'the tariff approach,' akin to his trade policy decisions. Another option could be selling a stake to 'a foreign sovereign wealth fund' or transferring control of the holdings to 'a newly created domestic sovereign wealth fund,' both of which TD Cowen said 'could involve less market and political risk.' Related articles What is Team Trump thinking when it comes to future of Fannie, Freddie? Clients buying into summer rally, bracing for later pullback, says BofA's Hartnett If Powell goes, does Fed trust go with him? Sign in to access your portfolio
