Top MAGA pollster warns Republicans will lose the majority for ‘the next decade' if Trump gets involved in Israel-Iran
A top MAGA pollster has warned that the Republicans may lose the majority in Congress 'for the next decade' if President Donald Trump gets the U.S. more closely embroiled in the Israel-Iran conflict.
Big Data Poll Director Rich Baris took to X on Monday to argue that 'Starting new foreign wars never helps a presidency. But it sure as Hell can end one, especially one predicated on not starting new wars overseas when we've been invaded and neglected at home.'
'The MAGA movement was never anti-war for the sake of being anti-war,' he added. 'It was a position stemming from the lies the ruling class used to get us involved in pointless wars. Israel needing to attack Iran 'preemptively' because nuclear capabilities are imminent, is a lie.'
'Kiss the Republican majority goodbye... For the next decade. If he pulls the trigger, it's all over for MAGA,' said Baris.
A poll conducted by the Ronald Reagan Institute before Israel began its bombardment of Iran's military and nuclear program on Friday found that a majority of Republicans back Israeli airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.
At the same time, polling also shows that Americans are concerned about the U.S. being pulled into a military conflict in the region. Last year, Quinnipiac University found that 86 percent of GOP voters were worried about the prospect, with 52 percent describing their views as 'very concerned.'
However, there is a divide among influential people supportive of the president, with some advocating for a strong response and others arguing that Trump voters supported him because he pledged not to get the U.S. involved in any more conflicts.
Trump demanded an 'unconditional surrender' from Iran on Tuesday as he issued a thinly veiled threat that he may take aim at Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
'We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers,' the president said on Truth Social. 'Our patience is wearing thin.'
On Monday night, speaking to reporters on Air Force One, Trump said he was looking for a 'real end' to the hostilities.
"Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, it's very simple," said the president. "They should have done the deal. I told them, do the deal. So I don't know. I'm not too much in the mood to negotiate."
"We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved," he told ABC News on Sunday.
On Monday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth indicated that the U.S. isn't set to strike Iran.
Northeastern University political science professor Costas Panagopoulos told Newsweek that Trump could 'take a colossal hit' in backing from his own base of support if the U.S. takes direct action in a Middle East conflict.
"Such action would represent the antithesis of how Trump has branded himself," said Panagopoulos. "It could be the straw that breaks MAGA's back."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
33 minutes ago
- CBS News
Members of Maryland synagogue stuck in Israel as airstrikes continue
A group from a Baltimore County synagogue traveled to Israel hours before Iran airstrikes began. They remain stuck there amid ongoing tension between the countries. Nearly 50 people from Beth Tfiloh in Pikesville arrived just hours before the Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv closed down due to "a special security situation" on Friday, June 13. Maryland rabbi in Israel during airstrikes "You're asleep at 3 o'clock in the morning, and you get an alarm. Just make sure you're near a shelter. Sometimes you hear the booms going on kind of around you," said Rabbi Chai Posner of Beth Tfiloh. "But then, like you get the all clear and you go, you go out. You go back to bed, or you go back to what you were doing. And today, outside, right in the courtyard of the hotel where we're staying, right outside our door, there was a wedding going on just really just beautiful and singing and dancing, and we've been doing our best to keep our group active and having fun." Tensions began to rise after Israel launched a wave of air strikes on Iran, targeting the country's military and nuclear infrastructure to try and rid it of weapons. Iran retaliated soon after, launching back-and-forth airstrikes that continued through the weekend. Officials confirmed Monday that 14 Israelis and 224 Iranians have died. Rabbi Posner said while it's scary and nerve-wracking, it's a trip he's thankful to be on. "We could do a tour of Israel anytime, and we'll do it again another time. But this was an opportunity to be a part of something historic, amazing," Rabbi Posner said. "They took care of some evil, evil people with some dangerous weapons. Nothing else was going to make it happen." President Trump would not comment on what it would take for the US to get involved in the conflict, but says he's hoping for a deal. However, he also said if any U.S. armed forces are hit by Iran, America will retaliate with "full strength and might."
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Washington waits on Trump's decision in Middle East conflict
Washington waited on edge Tuesday as President Donald Trump flew back to the White House and met with national security advisers to discuss the developing situation between Iran and Israel. Trump departed the G7 conference in Canada a day early as the conflict to rid Iran of its nuclear program intensified. Trump administration officials have insisted the U.S. is merely helping from a defensive standpoint at this time — even as evidence of a larger regional war, or potential U.S. involvement, continue. The president met with several top security officials in the Situation Room on Tuesday afternoon even as he continued to comment online about the conflict. His comments seemed to be making the case for more direct American involvement. On Monday evening, he criticized Iran for not signing a nuclear power deal, saying it was a shame and a 'waste of human life.' He declared Tehran should be evacuated 'immediately,' sparking panic in the Iranian city as millions tried to leave overnight. As of early Tuesday, he said he hasn't reached out to Iran to broker any 'Peace Talks,' and said that if Iran wanted to talk to him, they know how to reach him. The president later said that 'we' have 'complete and total control' of the skies over Iran. He said the country had good sky trackers and defense equipment, but it doesn't compare to American 'stuff.' He then said he knows where Iran's 'so-called 'Supreme Leader'' is hiding, calling him an 'easy target,' but said he won't be killed yet. 'Our patience is wearing thin,' Trump said with a warning about Iran targeting American soldiers. He later called for Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' The series of posts come as questions grow over the U.S. getting involved in the conflict, with support for the move coming from some quarters and opposition from others. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said he ordered the deployment of additional defensive capabilities to the region, but didn't provide specifics. The military also moved a large number of refueling aircraft to Europe and the United States' Nimitz aircraft carrier, which can hold 5,000 people and more than 60 aircraft, Reuters reported. Vice President JD Vance backed Trump in a lengthy post of his own online. He said the president has been consistent in his view that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and made it clear to the country that it could happen one of two ways: 'the easy way or the 'other' way.' He praised Trump for showing 'remarkable restraint' in keeping the military's focus on protecting U.S. troops and citizens. While Vance didn't explicitly say Trump would be taking the U.S. in a certain direction, his message signaled that he believes the president should be trusted. 'He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment. That decision ultimately belongs to the president. And of course, people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy,' Vance wrote. 'But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue. And having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish American people's goals.' 'Whatever he does, that is his focus.' Congress is divided over the possibility of the United States helping to target Iran's nuclear facilities, which Israel says can only be accessed using U.S. military equipment. Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., filed a War Powers Resolution on Monday that would restrict President Donald Trump's ability to unilaterally authorize military assistance to the area without the consent of lawmakers. The resolution was filed as a privileged measure, meaning it must wait at least 10 calendar days before it can be brought to the floor. Kaine said on Tuesday morning he has not yet announced any co-sponsors for the resolution but 'I definitely have interest.' That action has been matched by the House after Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Ro Khanna, D-Calif, filed a bipartisan resolution to block U.S. involvement unless explicitly approved by Congress. 'This is not our war,' Massie said in a post on X. 'Even if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution.' Meanwhile, the issue has divided Congress on whether the U.S. should get involved, with some lawmakers expressing support for Israel and for dismantling Iran's nuclear program while others are cautioning against any participation from the U.S. military. While many Democrats in the House — at least 14 have signed on to Massie and Khanna's resolution — support restricting Trump's war power, a handful are not so sure. Sen. John Fetterman, D-Penn., for example, who has positioned himself as a staunch ally of Israel, said the U.S. should engage in the conflict. 'Taking out Iran at this point, that's necessary if you ever have a chance to have any real peace in the Middle East,' he told Fox News on Tuesday. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., meanwhile, has maintained Israel's right to defend itself against attacks while arguing Iran cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. On Tuesday, Schumer told reporters that Senate Democrats 'will not hesitate to exercise our authority' when it comes to approving military action if necessary. That sentiment is shared among several Republicans, especially among those who have praised Trump's leadership on the issue. Some lawmakers such as Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., have rejected arguments that the president needs congressional approval to authorize U.S. military involvement. But some aren't supportive, no matter what Trump and Vance have said. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., normally a staunch ally of Trump's, appeared to break with some of her Republican colleagues over the issue. 'War has bad consequences. We voted for America First,' she wrote.

Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Utahns weigh in on Trump's job as president so far
President Donald Trump is nearing the five-month mark of his second term — a term marked so far by a frenetic pace of executive orders and action on issues related to culture as well as immigration and foreign policy. A major focus of the president more recently is pushing his 'big, beautiful bill' over the finish line in the Senate after it passed the House late last month. He also publicly enthusiastically embraced then fell out with his former close friend and adviser Elon Musk, who is opposed to the bill and left his position in the administration recently in a fiery spat. Trump is also trying to decide how much to involve the United States in Israel's effort to try to eliminate Iran's nuclear capabilities. Trump has insisted that his tariff agenda will work in Americans' favor and celebrated immigration enforcement that has ramped up across the country. Also in recent days, Trump has engaged in a battle with California Gov. Gavin Newsom, after he deployed several thousand National Guard troops to protect federal workers and property in response to ongoing protests of his immigration practices in Los Angeles. The deployment has escalated tensions between political parties, with Republicans largely backing Trump's use of military force and most Democrats criticizing him for overriding state power. Voters have responded to all of these changes and others, riding a bit of a roller coaster since Trump's inauguration in January. In the latest poll from the Deseret News/Hinckley Institute of Politics conducted by HarrisX, Utahns were asked whether they approve or disapprove of Trump's job performance. A reliably red state, Utah voters generally approve of Trump's job performance, while a sizable minority still disapproves of his action. Among those surveyed, a majority, 56%, approve of Trump's job as president, which is up from 54% in an April survey. In the latest Deseret News/Hinckley Institute of Politics poll, voters were also asked by HarrisX how well they think Trump is handling key issues. Trump still remains popular with Republicans in Utah. Nearly 80% of Utah Republicans approve of the job he's doing as commander in chief, with 47% of them who say they 'strongly approve' of his performance. The president performs best with white Utahns, males and with Utahns who are 35-49, the survey found. Jason Perry, the director of the University of Utah's Hinckley Institute of Politics, said Utah's Republican base is still 'firmly behind President Trump.' Among the 42% of Utahns who don't approve of Trump's presidency so far, the largest share are Democrats. Among Democratic voters, 84% disapprove of his job performance so far, while 58% of independent voters in Utah also disapprove of Trump's leadership. Perry noted that the share of independent voters in the state who disapprove of Trump's job as president is interesting. 'That is a group that will need to be watched, that is a group that can impact a race,' he told the Deseret News. Utahns largely approve of most of Trump's actions on various issues, but the issue they most supported was the president's immigration-related actions. According to the survey, 61% approve of Trump's handling of immigration, while 35% disapprove. Republicans in the state overwhelmingly support Trump on immigration, while just 21% of Democrats approve. Independents were fairly split down the middle on Trump's immigration policy. Utahns also strongly approved of Trump's efforts to reduce the cost of government, with 59% job approval compared to 34% who don't approve, and of his administration of the government, with 55% approval compared to 40% who don't approve. On foreign affairs, 54% of Utahns said they approve of the job Trump is doing compared to 40% who don't approve. While Trump also campaigned on economic issues, Utahns weren't overwhelming in their support of the president's economic moves. Just over half, 51%, of respondents approve of Trump's work on the economy so far, with 44% disapproving. He received similar levels of support on inflation. The issue of tariffs and international trade, a matter he campaigned on, is the only issue Utahns disapprove of more than approve. The survey found 48% of respondents disapprove of Trump's trade and tariff policy, while just 46% approve. Perry argued that Trump's lower performance on economic issues in the state will need to be watched when its time to head to the polls. 'When you talk to voters, when it comes time to vote, those are the things that are highest on their list,' he said. 'His approval on things like immigration and reducing the cost of government, which is important, but in the end, the economy itself, soon as we start looking to midterm elections and to the next election cycle, that issue is going to come up high again.' The survey was conducted online from May 16-21 among 805 registered voters in Utah by HarrisX. The margin of error is +/- 3.5 percentage points.