Suaram urges govt to clarify moratorium on Peaceful Assembly Act
PETALING JAYA : An NGO has called on the government to clarify the nature of its moratorium on legal proceedings under Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act (PAA) 2012, warning that ambiguity on the matter could undermine ongoing reform efforts.
Suara Rakyat Malaysia (Suaram) executive director Azura Nasron said home minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail's remarks yesterday on the moratorium requires clarification.
'It remains unclear whether this is a new policy shift or a misstatement of the Cabinet decision that focussed only on Section 11,' she said in a statement.
On Feb 13, Saifuddin said the government would place a moratorium on Section 11 of the PAA, which mandates that organisers seek the consent of venue owners or occupants before holding an assembly at a particular venue.
He said this was in view of the government's plan to amend the section.
'This means no action will be taken on the organisers of any assembly until the amendments are approved (by the Dewan Rakyat),' he said.
Saifuddin said yesterday an amendment to Section 11 would be tabled in the next Parliament meeting.
He said his ministry would also examine the Federal Court's ruling that Section 9(5), which criminalises failure to notify the police five days in advance of holding a peaceful assembly, was unconstitutional.
He said Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim had also enforced a moratorium on any legal proceedings under Section 9(5) of the PAA as part of his agenda to reform the law.
Azura said the moratorium must be explicitly announced and fully enforced on all ongoing investigations and prosecutions, until legislative repeal was completed.
'The government must not miss this critical opportunity to deliver the 'comprehensive reform of laws related to the right to assemble' it has pledged to implement,' she said.
She also called on the government to repeal Section 9(5), consult civil society on the amendment, and review other restrictive provisions such as the age limit under Section 4(d) prohibiting those below 21 years old from organising assemblies.
'While the move to amend Section 11 of the PAA is necessary, it must not distract from the urgent need to repeal Section 9(5) in full.
'Sections 9(5) and 11 have long operated in tandem to entrench an authorisation-centric culture, where peaceful assemblies are treated as privileges subject to approval rather than inalienable constitutional rights.
'Amending one without repealing the other leaves the underlying legal framework fundamentally flawed and impairs the development of a culture grounded in the presumption that peaceful assemblies are lawful,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
I no longer have to carry this burden, says Tengku Maimun
Former chief justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat reached the mandatory retirement age of 66 yesterday, with Tuesday being her last day in office. KUALA LUMPUR : Former chief justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat says it is now up to the government, and her successor, to carry on the duty of upholding judicial independence. Tengku Maimun – who became the first woman to helm the judiciary when she was appointed chief justice in 2019 – reached the mandatory retirement age of 66 yesterday, with Tuesday being her last day in office. Speaking at the launch of her book today, Tengku Maimun said she and her former colleagues had worked tirelessly to uplift the judiciary's image over the past six years. 'I no longer have to carry this burden,' she said. 'I still find it hard to fathom that I spent six years of my life as chief justice, and that I am now retired from a lifetime of service.' Her book, Beyond The Gavel, consists of some of her written judgments from the High Court until Federal Court, as well as some of her speeches. She also thanked her peers – consisting of lawyers and judges – who contributed to the book. Tengku Maimun's retirement was followed by that of Court of Appeal president Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim, whose judicial tenure ended yesterday. Both vacated their office on the eve of their 66th birthday. Chief Judge of Malaya Hasnah Hashim, currently the highest ranked judge in the judiciary, is now the acting chief justice. Hasnah, whose office ranks third in the judicial hierarchy, created history today by occupying the top three positions in the judiciary simultaneously. Hasnah herself reached the mandatory retirement age on May 13, but she secured a six-month extension which allowed her to remain in office until Nov 14.
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Military retirees seek Federal Court appeal on pension adjustments
A group of retired members of the armed forces had posed two questions for the Federal Court to determine. PETALING JAYA : A group of retired members of the armed forces (ATM) has applied for leave to appeal to the Federal Court against a Court of Appeal's decision which ruled that there was no discrimination or constitutional breach in the matter of pension adjustments. According to The Edge, the group's lawyer Haniff Khatri Abdulla confirmed filing the application today. The group posed two legal questions for the apex court to determine: Whether the Guidelines for Implementing Amendments to ATM Service Conditions dated Jan 17, 2013, and the Implementation Letter on Improvements to the Minimum-Maximum Salary Schedule prevented future pension adjustments for ATM members who retired prior to Jan 1, 2013. If the first question is answered in the affirmative, whether the respondents have breached Article 5, and/or Article 8, and/or Article 147 of the Federal Constitution. On June 4, a three-member panel, chaired by Justice Hashim Hamzah, had allowed the appeal by the government, armed forces council, and two other parties and reversed the High Court decision that ruled there was discrimination against armed forces veterans concerning pension adjustments. Also on the bench were Justices Wong Kian Kheong and Ismail Brahim. In the summary judgment, Wong said the government's actions were based on reasonable distinctions and did not violate Article 8(1) of the Federal Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law. He said the distinction between retirees before Jan 1, 2013, and those after that date was legally valid, as it stemmed from the implementation of the two key government documents. Wong also said the documents aimed to enhance and standardise the pay structure of serving members, not discriminate against retirees. The government, prime minister, defence minister, and armed forces council had appealed a High Court decision in favour of 50 ATM retirees who sued over the pension adjustments for those who retired before Jan 1, 2013. On Feb 5 last year, judicial commissioner Suzana Said ruled that ATM retirees who left service before Jan 1, 2013, were entitled to receive pension adjustments based on the rates and methods applied to those who retired after that date.
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Ramly Food to delay price hike, says Armizan
Domestic trade and cost of living minister Armizan Mohd Ali said they had summoned frozen food company Ramly Food for an explanation following public concern over the price hike. PETALING JAYA : Frozen food company Ramly Food has agreed to temporarily postpone a planned price hike for its products, says domestic trade and cost of living minister Armizan Mohd Ali. Armizan said his ministry summoned the company following public concern, and a meeting was held last Tuesday to clarify the situation, Astro Awani reported. 'The ministry has issued a 'Goods Information Confirmation Notice' under Section 21 of the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering Act to obtain justification for the planned price increase,' he was quoted as saying at a press conference today. The issue gained traction after a vendor notice dated April 14 from Ramly Food Marketing Sdn Bhd began circulating online, stating that product prices would go up starting next Monday. The notice attributed the increase to rising raw material costs. In a separate case, Armizan said Sim Yang Hok Industries Sdn Bhd, which recently went viral over claims it had increased the price of ice products from RM3.70 to RM6, has denied the allegation. He said the company clarified that no official notice was issued and that it had lodged a police report over the viral claims. 'So far, both companies have stated that any proposed price increase is due to operating costs and not the implementation of the sales and service tax (SST),' he said. He also advised companies to consult the ministry before implementing any price adjustments to ensure they do not violate anti-profiteering laws. The SST expansion, which took effect on Tuesday, maintains a zero rate for essential goods while imposing a 5% to 10% tax on non-essential items.
