
Elon Musk officially leaves the White House
Elon Musk's days working at the White House are over.
The billionaire Tesla CEO, enlisted by President Donald Trump to cut waste in the federal government, started offboarding from his role Wednesday night, a White House official told NBC News. Musk's move came a day after he criticized a Republican bill to fund much of Trump's agenda.
Musk commented on his exit Wednesday on X, his social media platform. He called for the 'DOGE mission' to become 'a way of life throughout the government,' referring to his Department of Government Efficiency initiative.
'As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending,' wrote Musk, the richest person in the world.
NBC News has reported that special government employees, a class of temporary worker that included Musk, can typically work up to 130 days in a calendar year, though the days can be split up. The White House first publicly acknowledged Musk's role on Feb. 3, so he was most likely nearing the end of that tenure.
Musk's official departure came at a charged moment in his relationship with Trump. On Tuesday, CBS News' 'Sunday Morning' shared a clip of him sharing his disappointment in the 'massive spending bill' that he said 'undermines' the work of his DOGE operation, which has aimed to reduce federal spending by slashing the size of the federal workforce, cutting government programs and eliminating grants deemed wasteful.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated the Republican funding package would add $2.3 trillion to the federal deficit over 10 years, largely due to the extensions of Trump's 2017 tax cuts and new expenditures that outweigh the savings.
Musk initially set out to cut upwards of $2 trillion dollars through the operation, though he later significantly walked back that goal.
Now he leaves the government with DOGE having thus far fallen well short of the trillions of dollars of savings that he had once touted on the campaign trail. As of Wednesday evening, the DOGE government website claimed $175 billion in savings, though its claims have been found to be questionable.
Trump responded to Musk's criticisms Wednesday afternoon in the Oval Office, defending the funding package. The president said the legislation would deliver on several of his key priorities, but he also noted the complexities of passing such a sprawling bill through a sharply divided House.
'My reaction's a lot of things. No. 1, we have to get a lot of votes. We can't be cutting a — you know — we need to get a lot of support, and we have a lot of support. We had to get it through the House,' Trump said.
Musk was among the most visible people in the early days of the second Trump administration, securing the president's favor after fueling his 2024 presidential campaign with upwards of $250 million dollars, according to campaign finance reports.
The tech mogul was frequently seen alongside Trump, often wearing a Trump hat while appearing with one of his young children. Musk appeared to relish his role as Trump's waste and fraud czar, taking the stage at the Conservative Political Action Conference in February with a sizable chainsaw to tout his cost-cutting initiative.
Musk also at one point threatened to use his wealth to fund challengers to any Republicans that dared to oppose Trump's agenda.
But behind the scenes, tensions mounted between Musk and other Trump administration members, with some of those making their way to the public through news reports about tense meetings and shouting matches. Musk also took some of his grievances public, including criticism of Trump's tariffs.
Meanwhile, Musk's public profile suffered — as did the perception of his most consumer-centric business, Tesla. Public poll numbers showed that he and DOGE were relatively unpopular, and Tesla vehicles and dealerships became the target of protests and vandalism. Tesla's stock is down 11% so far this year.
Trump continued to support Musk, at one point in March turning the South Lawn of the White House into an impromptu Tesla showroom and buying one of the vehicles.
Musk's power, both in terms of his cash contributions as well as his political clout, took a hit in late March when Republicans lost a high-profile judicial election in Wisconsin in which Musk spent heavily and became a target for Democrats.
Musk had maintained that his participation in the Trump administration and DOGE was temporary, but in recent weeks he has signaled that he may pull back from politics more broadly. Last week, he said he planned to scale down his sizable spending on politics, though said he would spend in the future if he saw a reason to do so. 'I don't currently see a reason,' he said.
While Musk has said DOGE will continue to operate, it's unclear just how much pull it will have without him at the helm.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Jimmy Kimmel on Elon Musk's Doge tenure: ‘He came, he chainsawed, we bled, he left'
With most late-night hosts on vacation, Jimmy Kimmel celebrates the end of Elon Musk's term in Washington and riffs on the new Taco nickname for Donald Trump. Jimmy Kimmel celebrated a big announcement on Thursday evening: Elon Musk, Donald Trump's head of the so-called 'department of government efficiency' (Doge), posted on X that he would officially step down from his post and leave Washington DC. 'We're just happy that your time as a special government employee has come to an end,' Kimmel said. 'Elon had a remarkable 130-day stint in government,' he continued, speaking of Musk's highly controversial and much-loathed stint of firing civil service workers. 'He came, he chainsawed, we bled, he left. When he started, he promised to save us a trillion dollars, now he says Doge will probably only save about $160bn. Or as most everyone else says, he probably cost us hundreds of billions of dollars.' Officials from the Internal Revenue Service have said that cuts at the agency will result in a minimum of $500bn in uncollected taxes this year. 'But here's the thing: politics isn't about money,' said Kimmel. 'It isn't about success, it's not about failure. It's about the lives of the civil servants you destroy along the way. That's what is most important.' 'And Elon promised that Doge's work will go on,' he added. 'Similar to how the empire continued killing ewoks after the emperor died.' Now that he has left Washington, Musk can 'return to his primary job', Kimmel said, 'which is destroying companies and inseminating every woman in sight'. And it creates a problem for Trump, as he 'doesn't have anybody to take the blame for him anymore'. Trump is currently blaming the Court of International Trade, which ruled unanimously this week that he does not have the authority to enact his so-called 'reciprocal tariffs' on most countries. 'The DoJ claims that stopping these tariffs would take away Trump's leverage in trade negotiations and embolden other countries to take advantage of them,' Kimmel explained. 'Basically, the court pulled down his pants and showed China his little mushroom, and they're mad.' Since taking office in January, Trump has changed his tariffs policy more than 50 times, 'as any stable genius would', Kimmel quipped. The flip-flopping has led to a nickname making the rounds on Wall Street: Taco, an acronym for Trump Always Chickens Out. 'You're not going to believe it – he doesn't like the nickname at all,' Kimmel laughed. But it seems to be catching on, at least according to Kimmel's search of Taco-themed AI images on social media. 'How does it feel to be on the other end of the nickname game?' Kimmel wondered. 'Not great, does it? The only thing that would make it worse is if somebody changed the lyrics to a song by his beloved Village People to drive it home.' And with that, Kimmel introduced a Trump montage featuring 'Taco Man' to the tune of Macho Man.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
‘Looks like Munich 1938': Eastern bloc hits out at US sympathy for Putin's anti-Nato demands
The Trump administration's sympathy for Moscow's anti-Nato demands has been likened to Nazi appeasement as parts of the alliance's eastern bloc warn the US is priming non-members for invasion. Top officials from four Eastern European countries have hit out after Donald Trump's special envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, appeared to support Vladimir Putin's reported demand to have in writing that Nato will not accept any new members from the region. In an interview with US network ABC News, Mr Kellogg described Putin's latest position as a 'fair' one that was likely to include not just Ukraine but also Georgia and Moldova. His comments prompted the Kremlin on Friday to say they were 'glad' that Putin's opposition to Nato was finally 'being met with understanding' from Washington. A senior Lithuanian official, granted anonymity so they could speak freely, told The Independent that any cooperation between Trump and Putin to block nations who are fearful of Russia from joining Nato would be a dangerous repeat of history. 'It looks like Munich, when great powers decide the fate of small ones,' the official said, referencing the 1938 agreement between Adolf Hitler, the UK, France and Italy that ultimately led to Nazi Germany invading Czechoslovakia. The official added that blocking Moldova and Georgia's Nato membership was a signal to Putin that they would not be defended. It also casts doubt on the alliance's independence, the official said. 'Russia is trying to get what they were looking for in 2022, a buffer zone,' the official added. 'But this zone could soon become part of Russia if the Kremlin sees that nobody is defending them.' Russia invaded Georgia in 2008 and six years later began its attempted takeover of Ukraine, initially by illegally annexing Crimea. Moscow has also stationed more than a thousand troops in the Moldovan region of Transnistria, sparking fears that Moldova could be the next target for the Kremlin. Olga Rosca, foreign policy advisor to the Moldovan president, Maia Sandu, said Russia is already 'violating our neutrality'. When asked by The Independent if Chisinau was concerned about Kellogg's comments and their ability to join Nato being blocked, Rosca said: 'Moldova is a constitutionally neutral country. This is a position made clear both domestically and internationally. 'The only country violating our neutrality is the Russian Federation, which continues to station troops illegally on our sovereign territory, against our will and in defiance of international law.' Estonian president Alar Karis said the country's position on Nato expansion was clear: 'Every country has the right to choose its own security arrangements. Ukraine's future is in Nato.' Jan Lipavsky, foreign minister for the Czech Republic, also hit back at Mr Kellogg's comments late last night. 'Nato expansion is in the interest of Russian security,' he wrote on X. 'There is no war where Russia borders Nato countries. There is war elsewhere.' Their commentary comes ahead of the next round of direct peace talks between Moscow and Kyiv, which the former has proposed takes place in Istanbul next week. However, Ukraine has accused its invader of failing to present a promised draft peace plan ahead of further talks. Mr Kellogg said that the national security advisors of the UK, Germany and France would all attend the talks, however the Starmer government has not yet confirmed this. Russian foreign minister said this week Moscow's key demands included Ukrainian neutrality. European officials have long cautioned that the Russian suggestion that Nato is expanding aggressively eastward is propaganda aimed at justifying its imperialistic ambitions. Putin's attacks on Georgia and Ukraine in 2008 and 2014 came well before either country had serious chances of joining Nato, and the Russian leader's pre-invasion speech in February 2022 made little mention of Kyiv's Nato membership hopes. In March, Ukrainian foreign minister Andrii Sybiha rejected restrictions on joining international alliances and organisations as part of a potential peace deal. Ukraine applied for Nato membership in September 2022, months after Putin ordered the full-scale invasion. The country has not received a formal invitation, as the 32 members have struggled to reach a consensus. While Nato membership looks unlikely in the short term, Kyiv has been clear that if it is left without any security guarantees against Russia, they are at a serious risk of future Kremlin aggression. Moldova does not currently support Nato membership but has been working closely with the alliance for several decades. Last year, a declaration issued at the Nato summit in Washington called on Russia to withdraw all its forces from Moldova.


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Supreme Court allows Trump to revoke legal status of 500,000 immigrants
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Trump administration to revoke temporary legal status granted to more than 500,000 immigrants by the Biden administration. The court granted an emergency application filed by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem that ends the Biden program that gave 532,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela permission to temporarily live and work in the United States. The brief order noted that liberal justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor dissented. Jackson wrote that the court had failed to take into account "the devastating consequences of allowing the government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are pending." The administration was contesting a ruling by Massachusetts-based U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, who ruled the administration could not sweep away each person's status without an individualized determination. Starting in 2022, then-Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas granted what is called parole for two years to people from the affected countries in part to alleviate the surge of immigrants arriving in the U.S.-Mexico border. The policy, known as the CHNV parole programs, allowed immigrants who passed a security check and who had a sponsor in the United States who could provide housing, to enter the country and stay. Solicitor General D. John Sauer said in court papers that Talwani did not have authority to rule on the issue, with Noem given authority to make her decision under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act. The same law gave Mayorkas the discretion to allow the affected immigrants to enter and stay in the country. The Department of Homeland Security said in October 2024 that each person's parole would not be extended once their two-year approval period expired. Noem's move to unwind the Biden action was challenged in court by individuals who would be affected as well as the Haitian Bridge Alliance, an immigrant rights group. Their lawyers wrote in court papers that if the Trump administration action is upheld, all the parolees will immediately "become undocumented, legally employable, and subject to mass expulsion." They noted that Talwani's decision did not prevent Noem from ending the program, only that the government could not immediately rescind the status of the people already enrolled via a single sweeping order. The dispute is one of dozens of cases in which the Trump administration has complained about lower court judges blocking its policies even as President Donald Trump has sought to aggressively expand the power of the presidency without the authorization of Congress.